CHAPTER II
INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROPOSAL PREPARATION
Organizations applying for the first time or which have not received an NSF award within the preceding two years, should refer to GPM Section 501, for instructions on specific information that may be requested by NSF.
A. CONFORMANCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROPOSAL PREPARATION
It is important that all proposals conform to the
instructions
provided in the GPG and in the Proposal Forms Kit. Conformance
is required and will be strictly enforced unless a deviation has
been approved. Proposals that are not consistent with these
instructions may not be considered by NSF. Particular attention
is given to proposal length, content and formatting, including
the page limit on the Project Description and other proposal
sections, the use of Appendices
and required format for
Biographical Sketches.
Any deviations from these instructions must be authorized in
advance by NSF. Deviations may be authorized in one of two ways:
1. through specification of different requirements in an NSF
Announcement/Solicitation;
or
2. by the written approval of the cognizant NSF Assistant Director
(AD) or designee. Such deviations may be a "blanket
deviation" for a particular program or programs, or in rare
instances, an "individual" deviation for a particular
proposal.
Proposers may deviate from these instructions only to the extent
authorized. Proposals must identify the deviation in one of the
following ways as appropriate: (a) by identifying the program
announcement/solicitation number in the appropriate block on the
NSF Form 1207; or (b) by
identifying the date of the deviation
authorization in the program announcement/solicitation block on
the NSF Form 1207,
and including one copy of the written deviation
authorization with the single-copy documents identified in
paragraph
B. below.
B. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR SINGLE-COPY DOCUMENTS
The following single-copy documents, if applicable, should be
attached to the front of the proposal in the order identified
below.
1. List of Suggested Reviewers or Reviewers Not To Include
(optional)
Proposers may include, in a cover letter or separate sheet, a
list of suggested reviewers that the proposers believe are
especially well qualified to review the proposal. Proposers may
also designate persons they would prefer not review the proposal,
indicating why. These suggestions are optional. The NSF Program
Officer handling the proposal considers the suggestions and may
contact the proposer for further information.
2. Information About Principal Investigators/Project
Directors
(NSF Form 1225)
NSF is committed to providing equal opportunities for participation
in its programs and promoting the full use of the Nation's research
resources. To aid in meeting these objectives, NSF requests information
on the gender, race, ethnicity and disability status of individuals
named as PIs or Co-PIs on proposals and awards. Except for the
required information about current or previous Federal research
support, submission of the information on the form is voluntary,
and individuals who do not wish to provide the personal information
should check the box provided for that purpose. The forms and
the information they contain are accessible by NSF personnel only.
3. Certification Page
(Page 2 of the Cover Sheet for Proposal to the National
Science Foundation),
NSF Form 1207
By signing Page 2 of the NSF Form 1207, PIs and authorized organizational
representatives are providing certain required certifications.
(See Section II.D.1
for further information regarding certifications.)
4. Deviation Authorization (If Applicable)
See paragraph A. above.
C. FORMAT OF THE PROPOSAL
Proposals must be stapled in the upper left-hand corner, but
otherwise unbound, and have 2.5-cm margins at the top, bottom
and on each side. The type size must be clear and readily legible,
in standard size which is 10 to 12 points. (No smaller than 10
point font size will be accepted.) If constant spacing is used,
there should be no more than 12 characters per 2.5 cm, whereas
proportional spacing should provide no more than an average of
15 characters per 2.5 cm. Line spacing (single-spaced, double-
spaced, etc.) is at the discretion of the proposer; however,
established
page limits must be followed. (Individual program announcements/solicitations
may eliminate this proposer option.) The original signed copy
should be printed only on one side of each sheet, except for the
NSF Form 1207
(which is a double-sided form). Additional copies
of the proposal may be printed on both sides.
Appendix A indicates
the required number of copies of proposals, including the original
signed copy.
Pages submitted must be of standard size. Metric A4 (210
mm x 297 mm) is preferred, however 8 1/2" x 11" (216
mm x 279 mm) may be used. Pages must conform to the formatting
instructions (in particular, 2.5-cm margins and type size limitations)
described above.
D. SECTIONS OF THE PROPOSAL
Proposers may select any numbering mechanism for the proposal
(e.g., sections may be separately paginated and include both the
section and page number on the bottom center of each page or the
entire proposal may be numbered consecutively). The proposal
must be assembled in the following sequence:
Section in
Proposal
Codes:
1 = Use of format required
2 = Use of model format optional
· Cover Sheet for Proposal to the National Science
Foundation (NSF Form 1207)K
(page 1 - all copies;
page 2 - original signature copy only - see Section II.B.3)1
A Project Summary (NSF Form 1358)1
B Table of Contents (NSF Form 1359)1
C Project Description (including Results from Prior NSF Support)
(NSF Form 1360)2
D References Cited
(NSF Form 1361)2
E Biographical Sketch (NSF Form 1362)1
F Budget (NSF Form 1030)(cumulative
and annual budgets, including subawards budgets, if any, and up
to three pages of Budget Justification/Explanation)1
G Current and Pending Support
(NSF Form 1239)2
H Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources
(NSF Form 1363)2
I Special Information and Supplementary Documentation
J Appendices
(Include only if approved in advance of proposal
submission by NSF AD, or designee, or program announcement/solicitation)
1. Cover Sheet for Proposal to the National Science Foundation
(NSF Form 1207)
The required format for the NSF Form 1207 is shown in Chapter IX,
Proposal Forms Kit. Using
Appendix A as a guide, proposers
should enter the NSF Program(s) to which the proposal should be
directed in the block entitled, "For Consideration by NSF
Organizational Unit." Proposers must identify the
applicable program announcement/solicitation number and closing
date in the block, "Program Announcement/Solicitation No./Closing
Date." If the proposal is not submitted in response to a
specific program announcement/solicitation, proposers must enter
"Grant Proposal Guide, NSF 95-27". Compliance
with this requirement is critical to determining the relevant
proposal processing guidelines. Failure to submit this information
may delay processing.
Should the project be performed at a place other than where the
award is to be made, that should be identified in the block entitled,
"Name of Performing Organization." Examples are as
follows:
Grantee Organization Performing Organization
Northern Virginia University Northern Virginia University Health
Center
Southern Virginia University Southern Virginia University
Research Foundation
The title of the project should be brief, scientifically or technically
valid, intelligible to a scientifically or technically literate
reader and suitable for use in the public press. NSF may edit
the title of a project before making an award.
The proposed duration for which support is requested should be
consistent with the nature and complexity of the proposed activity.
Grants are normally awarded for up to three years but may be
awarded for periods up to five years. The Foundation encourages
PIs to request awards for durations of three to five years when
such durations are necessary for completion of the proposed work
and when such durations are technically and managerially advantageous.
Specification of a desired starting date for the project is important
and helpful to NSF staff; however, requests for specific effective
dates may not be met. Except in special situations, requested
effective dates should allow at least six months for NSF review,
processing and decision. Should unusual situations, (e.g., a
long lead time for procurement) create problems regarding the
proposed effective date, the PI(s) should consult his/her sponsored
program office.
Should any of the listed items apply to a proposal, the appropriate
box(es) should be checked.
One copy of the proposal must be signed by the PI(s) and an official
authorized to commit the organization in business and financial
affairs. Other copies may include page 1 of the
NSF Form 1207
only.
The proposer must use page 2 of the
NSF Form 1207 to submit the
following required certifications:
Certification for Principal Investigators and Co-Principal
Investigators: The PIs and Co-PIs are required to complete
certifications regarding statements contained in the proposal,
authorship and reporting of the research and scientific conduct
of the project.
Drug-Free Workplace: The proposer is providing the Drug-Free
Workplace Certification by signing page 2.
Certification for Authorized Organizational Representative
or Individual Applicant: The Authorized Organizational Representative
or individual proposer is required to certify that the statements
contained in the proposal are true and complete to the best of
his/her knowledge, and that the Organization (or Individual) agrees
to accept the obligation to comply with award terms and conditions.
A new certification has been added that requires an institutional
representative to certify that the institution has implemented
and is enforcing a written policy on conflicts of interest consistent
with the provisions of Grant Policy Manual,
Section 510;
that, to the best of his/her knowledge, all financial disclosures
required by the conflict of interest policy were made; and that
conflicts of interests, if any, were, or prior to the institution's
expenditure of any funds under the award, will be satisfactorily
managed, reduced or eliminated in accordance with the institution's
conflict of interest policy or disclosed to NSF. This certification
is required for all proposals submitted on or after October 1,
1995.
Debt/Debarment and Suspension: Proposers are required
to complete the Debt and Debarment or Suspension questions by
checking the appropriate boxes.
Certification Regarding Lobbying: The certification on
Lobbying Restrictions entitled Certification for Contracts,
Grants, Loans and Cooperative Agreements, is included in full
text on page 2 of the Cover Sheet. This certification is required
when the proposal exceeds $100,000. Only if, pursuant to paragraph
2 of the certification, submission of the "Disclosure
of Lobbying Activities," SF LLL, is required, should
the box for "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities" be checked
on the Cover Sheet. The signed SF LLL, when applicable, should
be included behind the single-copy documents identified in
Section
II.B. A copy of this form may be obtained from the Policy
Office by phoning (703) 306-1243 or by e-mail at: policy@nsf.gov.
Profit-making organizations must certify their status by completing
each of the appropriate submitting organization boxes on the Cover
Sheet, using the following guidelines:
a. A small business must be organized for profit, independently
owned and operated (not a subsidiary of or controlled by another
firm), have no more than 500 employees, and not be dominant in
its field. The appropriate box should also be checked when the
proposal involves a cooperative effort between an academic institution
and a small business.
b. A minority business must be: (i) at least 51 percent owned
by one or more minority or disadvantaged individuals or, in the
case of a publicly owned business, have at least 51 percent of
the voting stock owned by one or more minority or disadvantaged
individuals; and (ii) one whose management and daily business
operations are controlled by one or more such individuals.
c. A woman-owned business must be at least 51 percent owned by
a woman or women, who also control and operate it. "Control"
in this context means exercising the power to make policy decisions.
"Operate" in this context means being actively involved
in the day-to-day management.
2. Project Summary -- Proposal Section A
The required Project Summary,
NSF Form 1358, is included
in Chapter IX,
Proposal Forms Kit. The proposal must
contain
a summary of the proposed activity suitable for publication, not
more than one page in length. It should not be an abstract of
the proposal, but rather a self-contained description of the activity
that would result if the proposal were funded. The summary should
be written in the third person and include a statement of objectives,
methods to be employed and the significance of the proposed activity
to the advancement of knowledge. It should be informative to
other persons working in the same or related fields and, insofar
as possible, understandable to a scientifically or technically
literate lay reader.
3. Table of Contents -- Proposal Section B
The required Table of Contents,
NSF Form 1359, is included
in Chapter IX, Proposal Forms Kit.
4. Project Description -- Proposal Section C (Including Results
from Prior NSF Support)
The Project Description,
NSF Form 1360, is included in
Chapter IX, Proposal Forms Kit. This specific format is not
required.
The Metric Conversion Act of 1975, as amended, and Executive
Order 12770 of 1991 encourage Federal agencies to use the Metric
System (SI) in procurement, grants and other business-related
activities. Proposers are encouraged to use the Metric System
of weights and measures in proposals submitted to the Foundation.
Grantees are also encouraged to use metric units in reports,
publications and correspondence relating to proposals and awards.
The main body of the proposal should be a clear statement of
the work to be undertaken and should include: objectives for the
period of the proposed work and expected significance; relation
to longer-term goals of the PI's project; and relation to the
present state of knowledge in the field, to work in progress by
the PI under other support and to work in progress elsewhere.
The statement should outline the general plan of work, including
the broad design of activities to be undertaken, an adequate description
of experimental methods and procedures and, if appropriate, plans
for preservation, documentation, and sharing of data, samples,
physical collections and other related research products. Any
substantial collaboration with individuals not included in the
budget should be described and documented with a letter from each
collaborator, which should be provided as supplementary documentation
and included in Proposal Section I.
Brevity will assist reviewers and Foundation staff in dealing
effectively with proposals. Therefore, the Project Description
(including Results from Prior NSF Support, which is limited to
five pages) may not exceed 15 pages. Visual materials, including
charts, graphs, maps, photographs and other pictorial presentations
ARE INCLUDED in the 15-page limit. Conformance to the
15-page limit will be strictly enforced and may not be exceeded
unless the deviation has been specifically authorized.
Section
II. A. contains information on deviations. Group
Proposals
(see Section II.D.12) are subject
to different page limits.
In preparation of proposals for renewed support, proposers may
submit under the "traditional" approach in which the
proposed work is documented and described as fully as though the
proposer were applying for the first time; or, an "Accomplishment-Based
Renewal" (ABR) proposal, in which the project description
is replaced by copies of no more than six reprints of publications
resulting from the research supported by NSF during the preceding
three- to five-year period, plus a brief summary of plans for
the proposed support period. (See Section VI.B.2
for additional information on preparation of Renewal Proposals.)
Results from Prior NSF Support
If the PI(s) has received NSF funding in the past five years,
information on the prior award is required. If the proposer has
received more than one prior award (amendments to an award
are not considered separate awards), the proposer should provide
the information requested for the award most closely related to
the proposal. The following information should be provided:
a. the NSF award number, amount and period of support;
b. the title of the project;
c. summary of the results of the completed work, including, for
a research project, any contribution to the development of human
resources in science and engineering;
d. publications resulting from the NSF award;
e. brief description of available data, samples, physical
collections and other related research products not described
elsewhere; and
f. if the proposal is for renewed support, a description of the
relation of the completed work to the proposed work.
Reviewers will be asked to comment on the quality of the prior
work described in this section of the proposal. Please note that
a PI with prior support may use up to five pages to describe
the results. Results may be summarized in fewer than five
pages, which would give the proposer the balance of the 15 pages
for the Project Description.
Proposals for renewed support of research projects, for academic
institutions only, must include information on human-resources
development at the postdoctoral, graduate and undergraduate levels.
This may involve, but is not limited to, the role of research
in student training, course preparation and seminars (particularly
for undergraduates). Special accomplishments in the development
of professional scientists and engineers from underrepresented
groups should be described. Graduate students who participated
in the research should be identified by name. This requirement
does not apply to commercial or other non-profit organizations.
5. References Cited -- Proposal Section D
The References Cited,
NSF Form 1361, is shown in
Chapter IX, Proposal Forms Kit. Use
of this specific form is optional,
but reference information is required. Citations must be complete
(including full name of authors, title and location in the literature).
There is no page limit for this section of the proposal.
6. Biographical Sketches -- Proposal Section E
The required Biographical Sketch,
NSF Form 1362, is shown
in Chapter IX, Proposal Forms Kit.
Biographical sketches are
limited to two pages and are required for all senior personnel.
(See Appendix C for definition
of Senior Personnel.) The instructions
provided on the form must be followed.
For the personnel categories listed below, the proposal may also
include information on exceptional qualifications that merit
consideration in the evaluation of the proposal.
a. Postdoctoral associates
b. Other professionals
c. Students (research assistants)
For equipment proposals, the following should be provided
for each auxiliary user:
a. Short biographical sketch;
b. List of up to five publications most closely related to
proposed acquisition.
7. Budget -- Proposal Section F
The required Summary Proposal Budget,
NSF Form 1030, is
shown in Chapter IX, Proposal Forms Kit.
Unless a particular
program announcement/solicitation stipulates otherwise, each proposal
must contain a budget for each year of support requested and a
cumulative budget for the full term of requested NSF support.
Locally produced versions of the form may be used, but changes
or substitutions should not be made in prescribed budget categories.
The proposal may request funds under any of the categories listed
so long as the item and amount are considered necessary to perform
the proposed work and are not precluded by specific program guidelines
or applicable cost principles. In addition to the forms, the
proposal should include up to three pages of budget justification/explanation.
a. Salaries and Wages (Lines A and B on the
NSF Form 1030)
(i) Policies
As a general policy, NSF recognizes that salaries of faculty
members and other personnel associated directly with the project
constitute appropriate direct costs and may be requested in proportion
to the effort devoted to the project.
NSF regards research as one of the normal functions of faculty
members at institutions of higher education. Compensation for
time normally spent on research within the term of appointment
is deemed to be included within the faculty member's regular organizational
salary. Grant funds may not be used to augment the total salary
or rate of salary of faculty members during the period covered
by the term of faculty appointment or to reimburse faculty members
for consulting or other time in addition to a regular full-time
organizational salary covering the same general period of employment.
Exceptions may be considered under certain NSF science and engineering
education program announcements/solicitations for weekend and
evening classes or for administrative work done as overload.
(See GPM Section 611.)
Summer salary for faculty members on academic-year appointments
is limited to no more than two-ninths of their regular academic-
year salary. This limit includes summer salary received from all
NSF-funded grants.
These same principles apply to other types of organizations,
such as research institutes. Since their employment periods are
usually annual, salary should be shown under "calendar months."
For such persons, "summer salary" is normally inappropriate
under an NSF grant.
Sometimes an independent institute or laboratory proposes to
employ college or university faculty members on a part-time basis.
In such cases, the general intent of the policies above apply,
so that an individual's total income will not be augmented in
ways that would not be possible under a grant to an academic institution.
In most circumstances, particularly for institutions of higher
education, salaries of administrative or clerical staff are included
as part of indirect costs. However, salaries of administrative
or clerical staff may be requested as direct costs for a project
requiring an extensive amount of administrative or clerical support
and where these costs can be readily and specifically identified
with the project with a high degree of accuracy. The circumstances
for requiring direct charging of these services should be clearly
described in the budget justification/explanation.
(ii) Procedures
The names of the PI(s), faculty, and other senior personnel and
the estimated number of academic-year, summer, or calendar-year
person-months for which NSF funding is requested should be listed.
For postdoctoral associates and other professionals, each position
must be listed, with the number of full-time-equivalent person-months
and rate of pay (hourly, monthly or annual). For graduate and
undergraduate students, secretarial, clerical, technical, etc.,
whose time will be charged directly to the project, only the total
number of persons and total amount of salaries per year in each
category is required. Salaries requested must be consistent with
the organization's regular practices.
The budget may request funds for support of graduate or undergraduate
research assistants to help carry out the proposed research.
Compensation classified as salary payments should be requested
in the salaries and wages category. Any direct costs requested
for tuition remission should normally be listed under "Other
Direct Costs" except for organizations that have negotiated
treatment of these costs as "Fringe Benefits" with their
cognizant Federal negotiating agency.
(iii) Confidential Information
The proposing organization may request that salary data on senior
personnel not be released to persons outside the Government during
the review process. In this case, the item for senior personnel
salaries in the proposal may appear as a single figure and the
person-months represented by that amount omitted. If this option
is exercised, however, senior personnel salaries and person-months
must be itemized in a separate statement, two copies of which
should accompany the proposal. This statement must include all
of the information requested on the
NSF Form 1030 for each person
involved. NSF will not forward the detailed information to reviewers
and will hold it privileged to the extent permitted by law. The
information on senior personnel salaries will be used as the basis
for determining the salary amounts shown in the grant budget.
Proposals may also contain patentable information or data, trade
secrets, privileged or confidential commercial or financial information,
disclosure of which may harm the proposer. Such information should
be clearly marked in the proposal or included as a separate statement
accompanying the proposal and should be appropriately labeled
with a legend such as,
"The following is (proprietary or confidential) information
that (name of proposing organization) requests not be released
to persons outside the Government, except for purposes of review
and evaluation."
The box for "Proprietary and Privileged Information"
should be checked on the
NSF Form 1207 when the proposal
contains
such information. (See also
Section VII.J. "Release of
Grantee Proposal Information.")
b. Fringe Benefits (Line C on the
NSF Form 1030)
If the grantee's usual accounting practices provide that its
contributions to employee benefits (social security, retirement,
etc.) be treated as direct costs, NSF grant funds may be requested
to defray such expenses as a direct cost, but only in proportion
to salaries and wages requested in the budget.
c. Equipment (Line D on the NSF Form 1030)
Equipment is defined as an item of property that has an acquisition
cost of $5,000 or more (unless the organization has established
lower levels) and an expected service life of more than one year.
Items of needed equipment should be listed individually by description
and estimated cost, including tax, and adequately justified.
Allowable items will ordinarily be limited to research equipment
and apparatus not already available for the conduct of the work.
General-purpose equipment, such as a personal computer, is not
eligible for support unless primarily or exclusively used in the
actual conduct of scientific research.
(See Section II.D.7.f.(iv))
d. Travel (Line E on the NSF Form 1030)
(i) General
Allowance for air travel normally will not exceed
the cost of round-trip, economy air accommodations. (See also
GPM Section 614)
(ii) Domestic Travel
For budget purposes, domestic travel includes travel in the U.S.,
its possessions, Puerto Rico, and travel to Canada and Mexico.
Travel and its relation to the proposed activities should be
specified. Funds may be requested for field work, attendance
at meetings and conferences, other travel associated with the
proposed work and subsistence. In order to qualify for support,
however, attendance at meetings or conferences must enhance the
PI's ability to perform the work, plan extensions of it or
disseminate its results. Consultants' travel costs may also be
requested.
(iii) Foreign Travel
For budget purposes, travel outside the areas specified above
is considered foreign. The proposal should include relevant information,
including countries to be visited (also enter names of countries
on the
NSF Form 1030) dates of visit,
if known, and justification
for any foreign travel planned in connection with the project.
Persons traveling under NSF grants must travel by U.S.-flag carriers,
if available.
Travel support for dependents of key project personnel may be
requested only when all of the following conditions apply:
a. the individual is a key person who is essential to the research
on a full-time basis;
b. the individual's residence away from home and in a foreign
country is for a continuous period of six months or more and is
essential to the effective performance of the project; and
c. the dependent's travel allowance is consistent with the policies
of the organization administering the grant.
e. Participant Support (Line F on the
NSF Form 1030)
This budget category refers to costs of transportation, per diem,
stipends and other related costs for participants or trainees
(but not employees) in connection with NSF-sponsored conferences,
meetings, symposia, training activities and workshops. (See
Section
V.B.) Generally, indirect costs are not allowed on participant
support costs. The number of participants to be supported should
be entered in the parentheses on the
NSF Form 1030. These costs
should also be justified in the budget justification/explanation
section of the proposal.
f. Other Direct Costs (Lines G1 through 6 on the
NSF Form 1030)
Any costs charged to an NSF grant must be reasonable and directly
allocable to the supported activity. The budget should identify
and itemize other anticipated direct costs not included under
the headings above, including materials and supplies, publication
costs, computer services and consultant services. Other examples
are: aircraft rental; space rental at research establishments
away from the grantee organization; minor building alterations;
payments to human subjects; service charges; and construction
of equipment or systems not available off the shelf. Reference
books and periodicals may be charged to the grant only if they
specifically relate to the project.
(i) Materials and Supplies (Line G1 on the
NSF Form 1030)
The budget should indicate in general terms the type of expendable
materials and supplies required, with their estimated costs.
The breakdown should be more detailed when the cost is substantial.
(ii) Publication / Documentation / Dissemination (Line G2
on the NSF Form 1030)
The budget may request funds for the costs of documenting, preparing,
publishing or otherwise making available to others the findings
and products of the work conducted under the grant. This generally
includes the following types of activities: reports, reprints,
page charges or other journal costs (except costs for prior or
early publication); necessary illustrations; cleanup, documentation,
storage and indexing of data and data bases; development, documentation
and debugging of software; and storage, preservation, documentation,
indexing, etc., of physical specimens, collections or fabricated
items.
(iii) Consultant Services (Line G3 on the
NSF Form 1030)
Anticipated consultant services should be justified and information
furnished on each individual's expertise, primary organizational
affiliation, normal daily compensation rate and number of days
of expected service. Consultants' travel costs and per diem allowances
(or meals provided in lieu of per diem) should be listed separately
under travel in the budget. Payment for a consultant's services,
exclusive of expenses, may not exceed the consultant's normal
rate or the daily maximum rate established annually by NSF, whichever
is less.
(iv) Computer Services (Line G4 on the
NSF Form 1030)
The cost of computer services, including computer-based retrieval
of scientific, technical and educational information, may be requested.
A justification/explanation based on the established computer
service rates at the proposing organization should be included.
(See also Supercomputer Facilities Support and Access in
Section V.J.)
The budget also may request costs, which must be shown
to be reasonable, for leasing of automated data processing equipment.
Special purpose computers or associated hardware and software,
other than general purpose PCs, should be requested as items of
equipment and justified in terms of their necessity for the activity
proposed.
(v) Subawards (Line G5 on the
NSF Form 1030)
Excluding the procurement of items such as commercially available
supplies, materials, equipment or general support services allowable
under the grant, no significant part of the research or substantive
effort under an NSF grant may be contracted or otherwise transferred
to another organization without prior NSF authorization. The
intent to enter into such arrangements should be disclosed in
the proposal submission. At a minimum, the disclosure shall include
a clear description of the work to be performed, the basis for
selection of the subawardee (except for collaborative/joint arrangements)
and a separate budget in the prescribed NSF format for each subaward.
Collaborative/joint arrangements may include closely related
and coordinated activities at another organization; a joint activity
by several organizations or a consortia; group proposals from
multiple organizations, etc. The total amount for proposed subawards,
not included elsewhere, should be entered on Line G5 in the Summary
Proposal Budget for the project.
g. Total Direct Costs (Line H on the
NSF Form 1030)
The total amount of direct costs requested by the proposer,
to include Lines A through G, should be entered on Line H.
h. Indirect Costs (Line I on the
NSF Form 1030)
The appropriate, applicable indirect cost rate(s) negotiated
by the organization with the cognizant Federal negotiating agency
must be used in computing indirect costs for a proposal. If an
organization has no established indirect cost rate, it should
contact the Cost Analysis/Audit Resolution Branch of NSF's Division
of Contracts, Policy and Oversight. An organization may obtain
guidelines for submitting rate proposals from that Branch, telephone
(703) 306-1244.
Within Government guidelines, unless otherwise indicated in a
specific program announcement/solicitation, it is NSF policy that
grantees are entitled to reimbursement from grant funds for indirect
costs allocable to the NSF share of allowable direct costs of
a project, except grants:
· solely for the support of travel, equipment, construction of facilities
or doctoral dissertations;
· for participant support costs;
· to foreign grantees; and
· to individuals (i.e., Fellowship awards.)
i. Total Direct and Indirect Costs (Line J on the
NSF Form 1030)
The total amount of direct and indirect costs (addition of Lines
H and I) should be entered on Line J.
j. Residual Funds (Line K on the
NSF Form 1030)
This line is used only for budgets for incremental funding
requests on continuing grants. Grantees
should provide a rationale for residual funds in excess of 20% as
part of the progress report. (See NSF Form 1328.)
k. Amount of This Request (Line L on the
NSF Form 1030)
The total amount of funds requested by the proposer will be the
same as the
amount entered on Line J unless the Foundation disapproves the
carry over of residual funds. If disapproved, Line L will be
equal to Line J minus Line K.
l. Cost-Sharing (Line M on the
NSF Form 1030)
In accordance with Congressional requirements
(see GPM 330), NSF requires that each grantee share in the
cost of research projects resulting from unsolicited proposals.
The grantee may meet the statutory cost-sharing requirement by
choosing either of two alternatives:
1. by cost-sharing a minimum of one-percent on the project; or
2. by cost-sharing a minimum of one-percent on the aggregate
costs of all NSF-supported projects requiring cost-sharing.
The statutory cost-sharing referenced above is not required for
grants that provide funds solely for
the following purposes (not considered to be support of "
research"), although such awards may be subject to other
cost-sharing requirements identified in a specific announcement/solicitation:
1. international travel;
2. construction, improvement or operation of facilities;
3. acquisition of research equipment;
4. ship operations;
5. education and training;
6. publication, distribution and translation of scientific
data and information;
7. symposia, conferences and workshops; and
8. special studies authorized or required by
Subsections 3a(5) through 3a(7) of the NSF Act, as amended.
The minimum one-percent statutory cost-sharing requirement
discussed above need NOT be entered on Line M of the
NSF Form 1030.
If the program announcement/solicitation requires specific
cost-sharing or if the proposer promises to cost-share in an
amount in excess of the one-percent minimum indicated above, the
total amount must be entered on Line M of the
NSF Form 1030. The
estimated value
of any in-kind contributions should be included and an explanation
of the source, nature, amount and availability of any proposed
cost-sharing should also be provided. It should be noted that
contributions counted as cost-sharing toward projects of
another Federal agency may not be counted towards meeting the
specific cost-sharing requirements of the NSF grant.
Line M of the NSF approved grant budget will reflect any
required specific cost-sharing for the NSF grant if above the
minimum one-percent. All cost-sharing amounts are subject to
audit. A failure to provide such cost-sharing may result in grant
costs being questioned and required to be refunded to NSF and may
constitute a violation of the terms of the grant so serious as
to provide grounds for debarment or suspension.
m. Unallowable Costs
Proposers should be familiar with the complete list of
unallowable costs which is contained in the applicable cost
principles. Because of their sensitivity, the following
categories of unallowable costs are highlighted:
(i) Entertainment
Costs of entertainment, amusement, diversion and social
activities and any costs directly associated with such activities
(such as tickets to shows or sports events, meals, lodging,
rentals, transportation and gratuities) are unallowable. Expenses
of grantee employees who are not on travel status are unallowable.
This includes cases where they serve as hosts or otherwise
participate at meals that are primarily social occasions
involving speakers or consultants. Costs of employees on travel
status are limited to those allowed under the governing cost
principles for travel expenses.
(See GPM Section 614.)
(ii) Meals and Coffee Breaks
No NSF funds may be spent on meals or coffee breaks
for intramural meetings of an organization or any of its
components, including, but not limited to, laboratories,
departments and centers.
(iii) Alcoholic Beverages
No NSF funds may be spent on alcoholic beverages.
8. Current and Pending Support -- Proposal Section G
Current and Pending Support,
NSF Form 1239, is shown in
Chapter IX, Proposal Forms Kit. The
NSF Form 1239 calls for
required information on all current and pending support for
ongoing projects and proposals, including subsequent
funding in the case of continuing grants. All current project
support from whatever source (e.g., Federal, State or local
government agencies, private foundations, industrial or other
commercial organizations) must be listed. The proposed project
and all other projects or activities requiring a portion of time
of the PI and other senior personnel should be included, even if
they receive no salary support from the project(s). The number of
person-months per year to be devoted to the projects must be
stated, regardless of source of support. Similar information must
be provided for all proposals already submitted or submitted
concurrently to other possible sponsors, including NSF.
If the project now being submitted has been funded previously
by a source other than NSF, the information requested in the
paragraph above should be furnished for the last period of funding.
If the proposal is also being submitted to other possible
sponsors, all of them must be listed. Concurrent submission of a
proposal to other organizations will not prejudice its review
by NSF. Note the Biological Sciences Directorate exception to
this policy identified on page 1.
9. Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources -- Proposal
Section H
Facilities, Equipment and
Other Resources, NSF Form 1363,
is included in Chapter IX, Proposal Forms Kit.
Use of this format is not required. Information on
NSF Form 1363 is used to
assess the adequacy of the organizational resources available to
perform the effort proposed.
Proposers should describe only those resources that are directly
applicable.
10. Special Information and Supplementary Documentation --
Proposal Section I
Except as specified below, special information and
supplementary documentation should be part of
the 15-page project description (or part of the budget
justification/explanation) where it is relevant to determining
the quality of the proposed work. Information in the following
areas should be included in Section I and not counted as part of
the 15-page project description limit. This Special Information
and Supplementary Documentation Section is not considered an
appendix. Specific guidance on the need for additional
documentation may be obtained from the organization's sponsored
research administration office or in the references cited below.
·Rationale for performance of all or part of the project
off-campus or away from organizational headquarters.
(GPM Section 633),
· Documentation of collaborative arrangements of significance
to the proposal through letters of commitment.
(GPG II.D.4)
· Environmental impact statement for activities that have an
actual or potential impact on the environment.
(GPM Section 830) Where applicable, the box for "National
Environmental Policy Act" should be checked on the
NSF Form 1207.
· Work in foreign countries. Some governments require
nonresidents to obtain official approval to carry out
investigations within their borders and coastal waters under their
jurisdiction. Investigators are responsible for obtaining the
required authorizations and for advising NSF that they have been
obtained or requested. Advance coordination should minimize
disruption of the research.
(GPM Section 763)
· Research in the Antarctic and Greenland.
(Contact the NSF Office of Polar Programs (OPP) for additional
information, see
Appendix A for phone numbers.)
· Research in a location designated, or eligible to be
designated, a registered historical place.
(GPM Section 840) Where applicable, the box
for "Historical Places" should be checked on the
NSF Form 1207.
· Research involving field experiments with genetically
engineered organisms.
(GPM Section 712)
· Research involving the use of human subjects, hazardous
materials, vertebrate animals, or endangered species.
(
GPM Section 710,
GPG II.D.12.e and f)
· Projects that involve technology utilization/transfer
activities, that require a management plan, or that involve
special reports or final products.
· Projects containing a special component, such as Facilitation
Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities or Research
Opportunity Awards.
(GPG V.G. and H.)
· Research in Undergraduate Institutions. (See program
announcement/solicitation for information.)
· In addition, Section I should alert NSF officials to unusual
circumstances that require special handling, including, for
example, proprietary or other privileged information in the
proposal, matters affecting individual privacy, required
intergovernmental review under E.O. 12372, Intergovernmental
Review of Federal Programs, for activities that directly affect
State or local governments or possible national security
implications.
11. Appendices -- Proposal Section J
All information necessary for the review of a
proposal should be contained in Sections A through I of the
proposal. Appendices may not be included unless a deviation has
been authorized.
Section II.A. contains information on
deviations.
12. Special Guidelines
a. Small Grants for Exploratory Research (SGER)
Proposals (one copy only) for small-scale, exploratory,
high-risk research in the fields of science, engineering and
education normally supported by NSF may be submitted to individual
programs. Such research is characterized as:
· preliminary work on untested and novel ideas;
· ventures into emerging research areas;
· application of new expertise and new approaches to "
established" research topics;
· research having a severe urgency with regard to availability
of or access to
data, facilities or specialized equipment, including quick-response
research on natural disasters and similar unanticipated events; or
· efforts of similar character likely to catalyze rapid and
innovative advances.
The project description should be brief
(two to five pages) and include clear statements as to why the
proposed research should be considered particularly exploratory
and high risk, the nature and significance of its potential impact
on the field and why an SGER grant would be a suitable
means of supporting the work.
Brief biographical information is required for the PI and
Co-PI(s) only, and should include no more than five significant
publications or other research products.
These proposals will not be subject to external merit review
and the award amount will be substantially less than a given
program's average award amount. In any event, the amount will
not exceed $50,000. The project's duration will normally be
one year, but may be up to two years. Renewed funding may be
requested only through submission of a non-SGER proposal, which
will be subject to full merit review. The box for "Small
Grant for Exploratory Research" should be checked on the
NSF Form 1207.
Investigators are strongly encouraged to contact the NSF
program(s) most germane to the proposal topic before submitting an
SGER proposal. This will facilitate determining whether the
proposed work meets the guidelines described above and SGER
funding is likely to be available or whether the work is
more appropriate for submission as a fully reviewed proposal.
(See Appendix A for programs.)
b. Group Proposals
A group proposal is a proposal that is submitted by three or
more investigators and combines into one administrative mechanism
several projects that ordinarily would be funded separately. A
single individual bears primary responsibility for the
administration of the grant and discussions with NSF, although
several investigators may be designated as Co-PI(s). These grants
support groups of scientists or engineers who themselves judge
that the effectiveness of their work would be enhanced by group
funding.
In submission of a group proposal, the organization has
determined that the proposed activity is administratively
manageable. However, NSF may request a revised proposal if it
considers that the project is so complex that it will be too
difficult to review or administer. The box for "Group Proposal"
should be checked on the
NSF Form 1207. In addition,
group proposals should be indicated as such in a cover letter
accompanying the proposal and in the project description.
Where multiple organizations are involved in collaborative or
joint arrangements, the proposal may be submitted by only one of
them. It should clearly describe both the role to be played by
the other organizations, specify the managerial arrangements and
explain the advantages of the multi-organizational effort. In
some instances, simultaneous submission of related proposals from
each organization might be appropriate, in which case parallel
awards would be made.
PIs wishing to submit group proposals that might exceed the
15-page limit on the project description should discuss that
possibility with the appropriate Program Officer prior to
submission. In general, group proposals that contain up to ten
pages of overall project description (including overall progress
under the appropriate prior award) plus up to five pages per
person of individual project descriptions (including description
of progress under prior awards) will be acceptable.
c. Equipment Proposals
Proposals for specialized equipment may be submitted by an
organization for:
(1) individual investigators; (2) groups of investigators
within the same department; (3) several departments; (4) organization(s)
participating in a collaborative or joint arrangement; (5) any
components of an organization; or (6) a region. One individual
should be designated as PI. Investigators may be working in
closely related areas or their research may be multidisciplinary.
Note: Many organizations within NSF have formal
instrumentation programs with special guidelines. It is important
to use the applicable guidelines in these competitions. Consult
with the appropriate program.
Instrumentation and equipment proposals should follow the
format of research proposals. Each potential major user should
describe the project(s) for which the equipment will be used. These
descriptions should be succinct, not necessarily as detailed as
in an individual research proposal and should emphasize the
intrinsic merit of the activity and the importance of the
equipment to it. A brief summary will suffice for auxiliary users.
Equipment to be purchased, modified or constructed should be
described in sufficient detail to allow comparison of its
capabilities with the needs of the proposed activities.
Equipment proposals should also describe comparable equipment
already at the proposing organization(s) and explain why it cannot
be used.
This includes comparable government-owned equipment that is
on-site. Equipment proposals should discuss arrangements for
acquisition, maintenance and operation, including:
· overall acquisition plan;
· biographical sketch of the person(s) who will have
overall responsibility for maintenance and operation and a brief
statement of qualifications, if not obvious;
· description of the physical facility, including floor plans
or other appropriate information, where the equipment will be
located;
· statement of why the equipment is severable or non-severable
from the physical facility;
· annual budget for operation and maintenance of the proposed
equipment, indicating source of funds; and
· brief description of other support services available,
particularly related equipment, and the annual budget for their
operation, maintenance and administration.
The terms of a grant require that special-purpose equipment
purchased or leased with grant funds be subject to reasonable
inventory controls, maintenance procedures and organizational
policies that enhance its multiple or shared use on other
projects, if such use does not interfere with the work for which
the equipment was acquired. If the government retains title,
those items must be included in the
annual inventory submitted to the NSF Property Administrator.
Equipment proposals should include the information described
above within the 15-page project description.
These proposals normally compete with proposals for research
or education projects.
Some instrumentation programs have special guidelines for support
of equipment that may include special cost-sharing or other
requirements. See individual program announcement/solicitation
for specific requirements.
For additional information on other
NSF opportunities in this area, see
Section V.A. on the Academic
Research Infrastructure Program.
d. Proposals to the Directorate for Engineering
Proposals for consideration by the Directorate for Engineering
should, within the 15-page project
description, include a separate section that describes the impact
of the proposed research. This section should discuss potential
new discoveries or advances that are expected as a result of the
research and the specific contributions the proposed work
will make toward expanding or developing the knowledge and
technology base. The likelihood that the proposed research will
lead to new discoveries or fundamental advances in the knowledge
or technology base will be an important criterion on which
Engineering program staff will base their recommendation on
whether or not to support a particular proposal.
e. Proposals Involving Vertebrate Animals
For proposals involving the use of vertebrate animals,
sufficient information should be provided within
the 15-page project description to allow for evaluation of the
choice of species, number of animals to be used and any necessary
exposure of animals to discomfort, pain or injury. All projects
involving vertebrate animals must have approval from the
organization's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)
before issuance of an NSF award. NSF recommends inclusion of the
approval form (in Section I of the proposal) with the proposal
submission. The box for "Vertebrate Animals"
should be checked on the
NSF Form 1207 with the IACUC
approval date (if available) identified in the space provided.
f. Proposals Involving Human Subjects
Projects involving research with human subjects must ensure
that subjects are protected from
research risks in conformance with the Common Rule (Federal Policy
for the Protection of Human Subjects, 45 CFR §690). All
projects involving human subjects must either: (1) have approval
from the organization's Institutional Review Board (IRB)
before issuance of an NSF award; or (2) identify the applicable
subsection exempting the proposal from IRB review, as established
in section 101(b) of the Common Rule. The box for "Human
Subjects" should be checked on the
NSF Form 1207 with
the IRB approval date (if available) or exemption subsection
from the Common Rule identified in the space provided. NSF
encourages inclusion of the IRB approval form (in Section I of the
proposal) with the proposal submission.