Skip to feedback

Award Abstract # 2138463
ERI: Towards Data-Capable Engineers with a Variability-Capable Mindset

NSF Org: EEC
Division of Engineering Education and Centers
Recipient: FRANKLIN W. OLIN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, INC.
Initial Amendment Date: December 6, 2021
Latest Amendment Date: December 6, 2021
Award Number: 2138463
Award Instrument: Standard Grant
Program Manager: Alice Pawley
apawley@nsf.gov
 (703)292-7286
EEC
 Division of Engineering Education and Centers
ENG
 Directorate for Engineering
Start Date: June 1, 2022
End Date: May 31, 2026 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $186,861.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $186,861.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2022 = $186,861.00
History of Investigator:
  • Zachary del Rosario (Principal Investigator)
    zdelrosario@olin.edu
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering
1000 OLIN WAY
NEEDHAM
MA  US  02492-1200
(781)292-2426
Sponsor Congressional District: 04
Primary Place of Performance: Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering
1000 Olin Way
Needham
MA  US  02492-1200
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
04
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): DN8YL963MRP5
Parent UEI:
NSF Program(s): ERI-Eng. Research Initiation
Primary Program Source: 010V2122DB R&RA ARP Act DEFC V
Program Reference Code(s): 110E, 1340
Program Element Code(s): 180Y00
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.041

ABSTRACT

This award is funded in whole or in part under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (Public Law 117-2)

Engineers are responsible for delivering safe, efficient solutions. For instance, automobile manufacturers need to design cars that are light enough to be gas-efficient, but still sturdy enough to protect the passenger. A complication in this design process is variability: No engineer can predict with 100% confidence what a driver will do with their car or what conditions it will encounter. Traditionally, engineers handle variability by "overdesign"---making things heavier than they need to be. However, scientists from other disciplines (such as statisticians) have more efficient ways to handle variability. A better understanding of variability---and how engineers themselves react to it---will lead to safer, more efficient engineering designs. Achieving these efficiency gains is critical for American economic competitiveness and for addressing anthropogenic climate change. Funded by the NSF's Research in the Formation of Engineers initiative, this project will study how real engineers react to variability and will train them to handle it more efficiently.

Variability is a key challenge in data analysis: In order to realize the NSF?s Big Idea of Harnessing the Data Revolution, engineers will need to have a variability-capable mindset. However, present engineering education results in professionals who struggle to recognize and manage variability in engineering applications. This lack of engineering workforce capability leads to inefficient designs, and in some cases, dangerously unreliable systems. The aim of this research is to study and improve the formation of engineers? variability-capability. The challenges of variability are well-documented: People generally have difficulty reasoning about variability in climate science, election forecasting, and matters of human judgment. This lack of variability-capability leads to climate inaction, political disengagement, and an unacceptably capricious application of justice. Focused on engineering, the primary investigator?s previous work identified decades-standing safety issues in aircraft design, stemming from a misidentification of a source of deviation (design-relevant variability) as noise (induced measurement variability). This project will be a mixed-methods study of practicing engineers: to investigate their ability to identify and treat different sources of variability, to develop a quantitative instrument to characterize present engineering workforce capabilities, and to design and deploy teaching interventions to improve engineers? variability-capability. Data collection will be paired with professional development workshops, which will synergistically create broader impacts via direct training. The project will advance our collective understanding and treatment of statistical variation, grounded in engineering practice. The mixed-methods study will fill gaps in the literature on how practicing engineers reason about variability. Working closely with engineers in professional development workshops will surface a library of real-world examples of noise and deviation, strengthening the novel theoretical framework with a diversity of practical examples. Sampling practitioners from across disciplines will also provide novel understanding of the differences across engineering fields, comparing current statistical practices in engineering and attributing them to differences in training and paradigm. The proposed work will develop and deploy teaching interventions to train data- and variability-capable engineers through professional development workshops. Thus broader impact will be realized both directly (through the professional development workshops) and indirectly (through dissemination of the teaching interventions to other institutions).

This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH

Note:  When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

del_Rosario, Zachary "Board 198: A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Engineers Targeting the Consequences of Variability" , 2023 https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--42595 Citation Details
del_Rosario, Zachary "Neglected, Acknowledged, or Targeted: A Conceptual Framing of Variability, Data Analysis, and Domain Consequences" Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education , 2024 https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2024.2308119 Citation Details
Vo, Katelyn and Evans, AJ and Madan, Shreenithi and del_Rosario, Zachary "A Scoping Review of Engineering Textbooks to Quantify the Teaching of Uncertainty" , 2023 https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--42497 Citation Details

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page