
NSF Org: |
BCS Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences |
Recipient: |
|
Initial Amendment Date: | July 16, 2021 |
Latest Amendment Date: | July 16, 2021 |
Award Number: | 2129710 |
Award Instrument: | Standard Grant |
Program Manager: |
John Yellen
jyellen@nsf.gov (703)292-8759 BCS Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences SBE Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences |
Start Date: | September 1, 2021 |
End Date: | August 31, 2024 (Estimated) |
Total Intended Award Amount: | $30,296.00 |
Total Awarded Amount to Date: | $30,296.00 |
Funds Obligated to Date: |
|
History of Investigator: |
|
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: |
845 N PARK AVE RM 538 TUCSON AZ US 85721 (520)626-6000 |
Sponsor Congressional District: |
|
Primary Place of Performance: |
1009 E South Campus Dr Tucson AZ US 85721-0030 |
Primary Place of
Performance Congressional District: |
|
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): |
|
Parent UEI: |
|
NSF Program(s): | Archaeology DDRI |
Primary Program Source: |
|
Program Reference Code(s): |
|
Program Element Code(s): |
|
Award Agency Code: | 4900 |
Fund Agency Code: | 4900 |
Assistance Listing Number(s): | 47.075 |
ABSTRACT
This award is funded in whole or in part under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (Public Law 117-2).
This project investigates the role of specialized knowledge in constituting sociopolitical power in non-Western contexts. Understanding sociopolitical organization is a cornerstone of the social sciences, but this scholarship is often based upon categorical types derived from Western contexts. Are such categories universally applicable in understanding sociopolitical development in other social and historical contexts? Some researchers advocate for more culturally-situated models of sociopolitical development to understand the global diversity of political strategies. While the accumulation of material wealth is often treated as a proxy for social inequality, Indigenous scholars argue that this overshadows a far more salient foundation of power and social inequality: knowledge. Drawing from core concepts of Indigenous philosophy, this study asks: In what ways does specialized knowledge circulate in emergent power structures? Is the control of knowledge employed to create and legitimize new social inequalities? The deep-time perspective of archaeology offers important ways of examining changes in sociopolitical organization from the ground up, without prioritizing pre-determined typological schemas. This study contextualizes multiple sources of archaeological and ethnographic data to produce new culturally-situated models for interpreting sociological change. By relying on the non-destructive reanalysis of existing museum collections for primary data collection, this study will add value to existing collections while minimizing the impact on the in situ archaeological record. This research promotes collaboration between archaeologists, conservation scientists, museum professionals, and descendant communities to produce innovative interpretations of sociopolitical change.
This project utilizes an archaeological example to examine paint technology to understand the development and eventual dissolution of a traditional large scale social complex. In this instance, paint is a specialized technology produced following strict adherence to protocol governed by ritual sodalities, making it an ideal material to study relationships between knowledge and power. The project employs social network analysis to evaluate the homogeneity or heterogeneity of knowledge networks based on shared recipes in paint and painted material culture. Paint recipes are defined based on both technological similarities identified through polarized light microscopy, X-ray fluorescence, and Raman and Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy. The researchers employ these data to examine how the transformation of political power corresponded with changes in the centralization and dispersal of knowledge through time. This study represents the first standardized treatment of paint as such a technology and works to produce a robust database for future research.
This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.
PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH
Note:
When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external
site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a
charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from
this site.
PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT
Disclaimer
This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.
The advent of the Chaco World transformed the Greater Southwest, but despite centuries of study, most models of Chaco sociopolitical organization rely upon categorical types rooted in neo-evolutionary schema. Many Indigenous scholars question the universal applicability of such models, arguing that knowledge and relationships serve as a more salient foundation of power in Indigenous societies. In the Pueblo World of the U.S. Southwest, this is expressed mostly clearly in performances in which cultural knowledge is shared through song, dance, and chromatic metaphor. Paint produced for performance embeds many layers of symbolism and knowledge and is produced following strict adherence to sodality-maintained protocol, making it an ideal material to explore diachronic relationships between knowledge and power. Paint is one of the oldest human technologies, yet it remains poorly understood and largely unproblematized in archaeological discourse.
In this project, archaeological collections of paint, paint production tools, and painted media are treated as a material archive of relationships. Although a wide range of colors was used and rendered in paint, the technology of blue-green paint was of primary concern for this project. Blue-green is one of the most significant colors in the Pueblo World, with important symbolic ties to all-important rain and vegetation, and is also one of the most challenging to render in paint.
In this project, similarities in archaeological paint compositions were interpreted as reflections of shared production environments and used to reconstruct the social groups responsible for their production. Archaeological paint recipes were reconstructed using a novel approach to the analysis of archaeological paint that relies upon the non-destructive analysis of micro-samples of material that is often routinely discarded during routine museum handling. Once collected, compositional analysis was carried out using a combination of non-destructive techniques including polarized light microscopy, X-ray fluorescence, and Raman spectroscopy.
The analysis of blue-green paint recipes from Pueblo Bonito, Chetro Ketl, Pueblo del Arroyo, Aztec West, and Kin Kletso has resulted in several key findings. First, despite archaeologists' long-held assumption that blue-green paint was made with copper carbonate minerals, such as azurite and malachite, copper sulfate minerals served as the primary colorants and is made with the closely related minerals of antlerite and brochantite. This single recipe for blue-green was circulated among great houses in Downtown Chaco, Aztec West in the Middle San Juan, and at the McElmo phase great house of Kin Kletso. Rooms with evidence for the preparation and storage of blue-green paint and painted media are strongly associated with rooms associated with Pueblo Bonito's founding families in the northern room block, or in rooms that articulate with plaza space in symbolic spaces that show that the display of blue-green painted media was a key component of plaza-based performances.
The widespread circulation of a single recipe for blue-green suggests that communities of practice involved in the production of performances cross-cut great house affiliations. Ultimately, this suggests that participation in performances offered a way for members of founding families to continually legitimize their power by managing the dissemination of knowledge, but also offered a way to integrate newcomers into Chaco society through cross-cutting institutions such as sodalities. Performance in the Chaco World created a dynamic arena for the circulation of knowledge, and for the continual creation and recreation of relationships. By focusing on the role of paint as a means of reconstructing relationships of knowledge, this project calls attention to the importance of knowledge sharing and the integration of diverse people as fundamental drivers of Chaco society.
In sum, this project resulted in the following key results and outcomes: (1) The development of a novel approach to the study of archaeological materials, encouraging the use of micro-samples for non-destructive analysis in future research; (2) The identification of a single, widespread recipe for blue-green paint made using a previously undocumented copper sulfate pigments that was circulated widely among Chaco great house sites through time and space; (3) A new understanding of blue-green paint as a tool for interpreting the socio-political landscape of Chaco, emphasizing the circulation of knowledge in maintaining power and social cohesion in Chaco society.
Last Modified: 11/25/2024
Modified by: Kelsey E Hanson
Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.