Skip to feedback

Award Abstract # 1940119
CoPe EAGER: Collaborative Research: Evaluating Coastal Community Resilience Bonds to Facilitate Community Recovery

NSF Org: RISE
Integrative and Collaborative Education and Research (ICER)
Recipient: COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
Initial Amendment Date: August 29, 2019
Latest Amendment Date: August 29, 2019
Award Number: 1940119
Award Instrument: Standard Grant
Program Manager: Manda S. Adams
amadams@nsf.gov
 (703)292-4708
RISE
 Integrative and Collaborative Education and Research (ICER)
GEO
 Directorate for Geosciences
Start Date: October 1, 2019
End Date: September 30, 2022 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $100,000.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $100,000.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2019 = $100,000.00
History of Investigator:
  • John van de Lindt (Principal Investigator)
    john.van_de_lindt@colostate.edu
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: Colorado State University
601 S HOWES ST
FORT COLLINS
CO  US  80521-2807
(970)491-6355
Sponsor Congressional District: 02
Primary Place of Performance: Colorado State University
200 West Lake Street
Fort Collins
CO  US  80521-4593
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
02
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): LT9CXX8L19G1
Parent UEI:
NSF Program(s): CoPe-Coastlines and People
Primary Program Source: 01001920DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT
Program Reference Code(s): 4444, 7916
Program Element Code(s): 097Y00
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.050

ABSTRACT

This project evaluates the use of a new type of bond, a coastal community resilience bond (CCRB), that has the potential to assist coastal communities to recover more quickly and become more resilient following a disaster. If effective, this new bond mechanism can be extended to other communities. This new type of bond integrates social assets and physical infrastructure in its development to enable investment in community resilience. The two goals of this resilience bond are to: (1) achieve equitable recovery of both physical and social systems and institutions; and (2) reduce the resilience gap between different types of communities. The resilience bond development includes not only the repair of the physical systems in a community, but also valuation and investment that enable timely recovery of social institutions, bridging a gap in current disaster resilience bonds. As part of this research graduate students will receive cross-disciplinary training where the fields of urban planning, engineering, and finance overlap.

To test this new type of bond, the research team considers two case study communities in Mississippi and South Carolina each having different resilience planning capacities, but both identifying needs in resilience investment. Community level modeling with a portfolio of options to achieve these goals and objectives will consider metrics identified as part of the engagement process combined with what is achievable. A resilience bond pricing methodology will be developed through a series of interviews and consultation with insurance and finance industry experts. Pricing will be discussed with community stakeholders to determine if it is within the acceptable range. The primary outcomes of this research are: (1) the development of a coastal community resilience bond which not only includes the repair of the physical systems in a community, but also provides valuation and investment to enable timely recovery of social institutions, bridging a gap in current disaster resilience bonds; (2) a high-fidelity loss model integrated with a community-level model to enable decision-making based on community needs; and (3) development of a coastal community resilience bond development methodology that is adaptive to varying capacities for resilience investment and planning in a variety of communities.

This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH

Note:  When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

Honerkamp, Ryan and Yan, Guirong Grace and van de Lindt, John "Revealing Bluff-Body Aerodynamics on Low-Rise Buildings under Tornadic Winds Using Numerical Laboratory Tornado Simulator" Journal of Structural Engineering , v.148 , 2022 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003283 Citation Details
Nofal, Omar M. and van de Lindt, John W. and Do, Trung Q. and Yan, Guirong and Hamideh, Sara and Cox, Daniel T. and Dietrich, J. Casey "Methodology for Regional Multihazard Hurricane Damage and Risk Assessment" Journal of Structural Engineering , v.147 , 2021 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003144 Citation Details

PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT

Disclaimer

This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.

Disasters start and end locally – at the community level. The resilience of a community is a dynamic process resulting from complex interaction that is best studied at the nexus of social sciences, economics, engineering, and technology. While disaster resilience bonds are discussed in the literature as a mechanism for communities to protect themselves against catastrophe and enable a more rapid recovery for the overall community, the concept is often focused solely on physical infrastructure with the assumption that the recovery of people will follow.   In essence this is the difference between a classical catastrophe bond and a new type of mitigation tool known as a communioty resilience bond.  Specifically, disparities in resilience investment and insurance and consequently recovery are rarely considered in the development of catastrophe bonds. This gap not only limits the opportunity for achieving equitable recovery of both physical and social systems and institutions through pre-disaster investments, it also widens the resilience gap between smaller low capacity communities and more affluent larger communities.  In this project a large group of stakeholders were individually interviewed which included two groups, namely insurers and finance specalists, to qualitatively determine how the catastrophe bond market may be able to shift to community resilience bonds.  Then, a novel mechanism to estimate damage to nearcoast buildings was developed that can be used as the first major part of the analysis of a community for bond pricing throuhg risk calculations.  The former will be documented as a key paper to serve as a resource for investors or others looking to create community resilience bonds, and the latter is being released within opensource software to assist analysts predicting risk and resilience of communities.


Last Modified: 01/03/2023
Modified by: John W Van De Lindt

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page