Award Abstract # 1924288
CNH2-L: Toward a Theory of Urban Trees as Living Infrastructure

NSF Org: DEB
Division Of Environmental Biology
Recipient: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT RIVERSIDE
Initial Amendment Date: August 16, 2019
Latest Amendment Date: August 16, 2019
Award Number: 1924288
Award Instrument: Standard Grant
Program Manager: Barbara Ransom
bransom@nsf.gov
 (703)292-7792
DEB
 Division Of Environmental Biology
BIO
 Directorate for Biological Sciences
Start Date: October 1, 2019
End Date: September 30, 2022 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $436,224.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $436,224.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2019 = $436,224.00
History of Investigator:
  • George Jenerette (Principal Investigator)
    darrel.jenerette@ucr.edu
  • Stephanie Pincetl (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Mikhail Chester (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Meghan Avolio (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Theodore Eisenman (Co-Principal Investigator)
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: University of California-Riverside
200 UNIVERSTY OFC BUILDING
RIVERSIDE
CA  US  92521-0001
(951)827-5535
Sponsor Congressional District: 39
Primary Place of Performance: University of California-Riverside
3203 BATCHELOR HALL KEEN HALL
Riverside
CA  US  92521-0001
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
39
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): MR5QC5FCAVH5
Parent UEI:
NSF Program(s): DYN COUPLED NATURAL-HUMAN
Primary Program Source: 01001920DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT
Program Reference Code(s): 9169, 1691, 9278
Program Element Code(s): 169100
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.074

ABSTRACT

Trees are now ubiquitous components of urban landscapes in the United States. Increasingly urban trees are called upon as a form of living (i.e., green) infrastructure that is used to meet a variety of municipal goals to provide ecosystem services and combat the effects of climate change that, for many cities in the US and abroad, is causing an increase in the urban heat island effect. However, using trees as a form of infrastructure raises new challenges compared to traditional gray infrastructure typically managed by cities. This research addresses major knowledge gaps in our understanding of the effectiveness and capacity of urban trees to provide the services expected within the structure of municipal tree planting, stewardship and decision making and community interaction. Living infrastructure is a socio-environmental-technological system of feedbacks between organisms, the environment, societal desires, and governance capacity. In the case of urban trees, their capacity to meet municipal goals is uncertain and likely varies among cities. Part of this uncertainty exists because the ability to adequately model the effect of urban trees on their local environment suffers from a lack of quantitative information and scientific study. At the same time, the capacity of institutional managers to successfully steward urban trees is also unclear. Taken together, cities may have goals for tree-derived functions that are disconnected from both the biophysical realities of what trees can do and realities and limitations of community management practices. Broader impacts of the work include student and postdoc training in convergent research, providing data and findings to inform municipal decision making, and informing the public and other stakeholders of the role of living infrastructure in cities via social media and other outreach mechanisms.

This is a pilot project with an overarching goal to understand the intellectual and institutional factors that have driven the movement to use urban trees as living infrastructure to produce ecosystem services. Project activities will evaluate the capacity of municipal institutions to implement and manage urban trees as living urban infrastructure to achieve climate goals. The project addresses key uncertainties in the socio-environmental system that considers urban trees as living infrastructure. It will examine how existing municipal forestry goals and plans vary throughout the United States, and how municipalities currently frame the role of living infrastructure in climate mitigation and adaptation. It also examines how current scientific understanding aligns with these goals and what information is needed for monitoring, modeling, and validation of these processes. the project includes the evaluation of existing municipal urban forestry plans from 20 cities throughout the United States. Data will be evaluated from the different disciplinary perspectives: i.e., ecosystem science, community ecology, ecohydrology, cultural geography, engineering, and landscape architecture. These data will be complemented with additional data collection and stakeholder interviews at three focal research cities: Los Angeles, California; Phoenix, Arizona; and Baltimore, Maryland. Work packages include a whole-team 1- to 2-day synthesis meeting in each of the three focal cities where existing data will be examined and discussed by the group. This will be followed by a half day workshop that engages local stakeholders. Meetings will focus on addressing research questions and further elaborating the coupled socio-environmental theory of living infrastructure. A Technical Advisory Committee will be constituted and their input on stakeholder decision making will be incorporated into the work plan. This effort will substantially contribute to a more comprehensive theory of living infrastructure as an interface between social, environmental, and technological systems and as a key component of novel urban ecosystems that can vary dramatically at national scales. Societal benefits of the project include the direct dissemination of our research findings to urban land management and forestry professionals, and new interdisciplinary training opportunities for postdoctoral and undergraduate trainees. Project results will directly address the needs of municipalities and their tree planting programs, which often seek to expand urban cover and diversity at great expense, but with a paucity of available scientific information.

This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH

Note:  When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

Avolio, Meghan L. and Swan, Christopher and Pataki, Diane E. and Jenerette, G. Darrel "Incorporating human behaviors into theories of urban community assembly and species coexistence" Oikos , 2021 https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.08400 Citation Details
Eisenman, Theodore S. and Flanders, Tamsin and Harper, Richard W. and Hauer, Richard J. and Lieberknecht, Katherine "Traits of a bloom: a nationwide survey of U.S. urban tree planting initiatives (TPIs)" Urban Forestry & Urban Greening , v.61 , 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127006 Citation Details
Ibsen, Peter C. and Borowy, Dorothy and Dell, Tyler and Greydanus, Hattie and Gupta, Neha and Hondula, David M. and Meixner, Thomas and Santelmann, Mary V. and Shiflett, Sheri A. and Sukop, Michael C. and Swan, Christopher M. and Talal, Michelle L. and Va "Greater aridity increases the magnitude of urban nighttime vegetation-derived air cooling" Environmental Research Letters , v.16 , 2021 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abdf8a Citation Details
Ibsen, Peter C. and Borowy, Dorothy and Rochford, Mia and Swan, Christopher M. and Jenerette, G. Darrel "Influence of Climate and Management on Patterns of Taxonomic and Functional Diversity of Recreational Park Vegetation" Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution , v.8 , 2020 https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.501502 Citation Details
Ibsen, Peter C. and Santiago, Louis S. and Shiflett, Sheri A. and Chandler, Mark and Jenerette, G. Darrel "Irrigated urban trees exhibit greater functional trait plasticity compared to natural stands" Biology Letters , v.19 , 2023 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0448 Citation Details
Jenerette, G Darrel and Anderson, Kurt E and Cadenasso, Mary L and Fenn, Mark and Franklin, Janet and Goulden, Michael L and Larios, Loralee and Pincetl, Stephanie and Regan, Helen M and Rey, Sergio J and Santiago, Louis S and Syphard, Alexandra D "An expanded framework for wildlandurban interfaces and their management" Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment , v.20 , 2022 https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2533 Citation Details
Ossola, Alessandro and Jenerette, G. Darrel and McGrath, Andrew and Chow, Winston and Hughes, Lesley and Leishman, Michelle R. "Small vegetated patches greatly reduce urban surface temperature during a summer heatwave in Adelaide, Australia" Landscape and Urban Planning , v.209 , 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104046 Citation Details
Pataki, Diane E. and Alberti, Marina and Cadenasso, Mary L. and Felson, Alexander J. and McDonnell, Mark J. and Pincetl, Stephanie and Pouyat, Richard V. and Setälä, Heikki and Whitlow, Thomas H. "The Benefits and Limits of Urban Tree Planting for Environmental and Human Health" Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution , v.9 , 2021 https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.603757 Citation Details
Roman, Lara A. and Conway, Tenley M. and Eisenman, Theodore S. and Koeser, Andrew K. and Ordóñez Barona, Camilo and Locke, Dexter H. and Jenerette, G. Darrel and Östberg, Johan and Vogt, Jess "Beyond trees are good: Disservices, management costs, and tradeoffs in urban forestry" Ambio , v.50 , 2021 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01396-8 Citation Details
Wang, Jun and CastroGarcia, Lorena and Jenerette, G. Darrel and Chandler, Mark and Ge, Cui and Kucera, Dion and Koutzoukis, Sofia and Zeng, Jing "Resolving and Predicting Neighborhood Vulnerability to Urban Heat and Air Pollution: Insights From a Pilot Project of Community Science" GeoHealth , v.6 , 2022 https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GH000575 Citation Details

PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT

Disclaimer

This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.

Our project made contributions to improved scientific understanding and provided novel training pathways for evaluating urban trees as a feedback among societal, environmental, technological and biological processes. Using the cities Los Angeles, CA, Phoenix, AZ, and Baltimore MD as foci for multiple city comparisons we evaluated perspectives of key government and private stakeholders in the context of existing and desired tree distributions, and associated climate adaptation and mitigation contributions. Stakeholders throughout the United States were broadly interested in urban trees as a near universally valuable benefit to their communities. They were concerned with achieving maximum benefits and recognized the importance of scientific input but were challenged by accessing definitive guidelines. Stakeholders further realized the importance an equity dimension, including its racial aspects, to how urban trees are distributed throughout their communities and considered equity an important goal in tree distributions. Consistent with stakeholder views, we identified consistent urban cooling, a climate adaptation, associated with urban trees. The vegetation cooling capacity increased in warmer and drier conditions, suggesting a potential local negative feedback where vegetation is more effective at cooling when most needed. In retro-fitting cities to enhance heat resilience we completed an assessment of canopy and land cover change effects on active mobility heat exposure. The distribution of urban tree cooling suggested a negative climate feedback, as conditions become hotter urban trees provide more cooling. The local negative feedback of urban trees to climate changes was further supported by our results showing the urban tree water and carbon traits are increasingly decoupled when the trees are planted in hotter environments, most urban trees can increase their water use. In applying these insights, we assessed how changes to neighborhood form, from high heat exposure configurations to low heat exposure configurations, effects total exposure for walkers, bikers, and transit users. The results showed that modest neighborhood form changes have much more significant beneficial outcomes than travel behavior (i.e., rerouting) changes. In contrast, as a carbon sequestration or climate mitigation tool, our analyses of the current state of the science suggested that the methods for assessing carbon sequestration contain unknown uncertainties but nonetheless have limited capacity to affect global atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. These findings have led to the development of a new framework for urban trees as a nexus of people?s desires and actions, environmental constraints, technological interactions, and biological capacities. Through these science activities we have created new training opportunities for students and the public. Our project provided new experiential and classroom opportunities to enhance the capacity of trainees to address complex problems at the interface between human decision making and biophysical dynamics. As a key component of our training program, we developed a summer training in environmental-societal coupling that emphasizes urban climate mitigation and adaptation components of urban trees. Trainees gained tools to assess the theoretical underpinnings of such coupled systems, qualitative and quantitative approaches for studying coupled systems, and project management skills for an interdisciplinary and geographically distributed team. For the public we developed a new community science engagement program that provides training in urban-atmosphere-vegetation relationships and approaches for thinking scientifically about uncertainties as they affect the livability of their neighborhoods. These scientific and broader impact outcomes are enhancing theoretical frameworks describing the systems within which urban trees are embedded while improving public understanding of how these systems shape people?s lived experiences.

 


Last Modified: 02/17/2023
Modified by: George D Jenerette

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page