
NSF Org: |
DEB Division Of Environmental Biology |
Recipient: |
|
Initial Amendment Date: | August 16, 2019 |
Latest Amendment Date: | August 16, 2019 |
Award Number: | 1924288 |
Award Instrument: | Standard Grant |
Program Manager: |
Barbara Ransom
bransom@nsf.gov (703)292-7792 DEB Division Of Environmental Biology BIO Directorate for Biological Sciences |
Start Date: | October 1, 2019 |
End Date: | September 30, 2022 (Estimated) |
Total Intended Award Amount: | $436,224.00 |
Total Awarded Amount to Date: | $436,224.00 |
Funds Obligated to Date: |
|
History of Investigator: |
|
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: |
200 UNIVERSTY OFC BUILDING RIVERSIDE CA US 92521-0001 (951)827-5535 |
Sponsor Congressional District: |
|
Primary Place of Performance: |
3203 BATCHELOR HALL KEEN HALL Riverside CA US 92521-0001 |
Primary Place of
Performance Congressional District: |
|
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): |
|
Parent UEI: |
|
NSF Program(s): | DYN COUPLED NATURAL-HUMAN |
Primary Program Source: |
|
Program Reference Code(s): |
|
Program Element Code(s): |
|
Award Agency Code: | 4900 |
Fund Agency Code: | 4900 |
Assistance Listing Number(s): | 47.074 |
ABSTRACT
Trees are now ubiquitous components of urban landscapes in the United States. Increasingly urban trees are called upon as a form of living (i.e., green) infrastructure that is used to meet a variety of municipal goals to provide ecosystem services and combat the effects of climate change that, for many cities in the US and abroad, is causing an increase in the urban heat island effect. However, using trees as a form of infrastructure raises new challenges compared to traditional gray infrastructure typically managed by cities. This research addresses major knowledge gaps in our understanding of the effectiveness and capacity of urban trees to provide the services expected within the structure of municipal tree planting, stewardship and decision making and community interaction. Living infrastructure is a socio-environmental-technological system of feedbacks between organisms, the environment, societal desires, and governance capacity. In the case of urban trees, their capacity to meet municipal goals is uncertain and likely varies among cities. Part of this uncertainty exists because the ability to adequately model the effect of urban trees on their local environment suffers from a lack of quantitative information and scientific study. At the same time, the capacity of institutional managers to successfully steward urban trees is also unclear. Taken together, cities may have goals for tree-derived functions that are disconnected from both the biophysical realities of what trees can do and realities and limitations of community management practices. Broader impacts of the work include student and postdoc training in convergent research, providing data and findings to inform municipal decision making, and informing the public and other stakeholders of the role of living infrastructure in cities via social media and other outreach mechanisms.
This is a pilot project with an overarching goal to understand the intellectual and institutional factors that have driven the movement to use urban trees as living infrastructure to produce ecosystem services. Project activities will evaluate the capacity of municipal institutions to implement and manage urban trees as living urban infrastructure to achieve climate goals. The project addresses key uncertainties in the socio-environmental system that considers urban trees as living infrastructure. It will examine how existing municipal forestry goals and plans vary throughout the United States, and how municipalities currently frame the role of living infrastructure in climate mitigation and adaptation. It also examines how current scientific understanding aligns with these goals and what information is needed for monitoring, modeling, and validation of these processes. the project includes the evaluation of existing municipal urban forestry plans from 20 cities throughout the United States. Data will be evaluated from the different disciplinary perspectives: i.e., ecosystem science, community ecology, ecohydrology, cultural geography, engineering, and landscape architecture. These data will be complemented with additional data collection and stakeholder interviews at three focal research cities: Los Angeles, California; Phoenix, Arizona; and Baltimore, Maryland. Work packages include a whole-team 1- to 2-day synthesis meeting in each of the three focal cities where existing data will be examined and discussed by the group. This will be followed by a half day workshop that engages local stakeholders. Meetings will focus on addressing research questions and further elaborating the coupled socio-environmental theory of living infrastructure. A Technical Advisory Committee will be constituted and their input on stakeholder decision making will be incorporated into the work plan. This effort will substantially contribute to a more comprehensive theory of living infrastructure as an interface between social, environmental, and technological systems and as a key component of novel urban ecosystems that can vary dramatically at national scales. Societal benefits of the project include the direct dissemination of our research findings to urban land management and forestry professionals, and new interdisciplinary training opportunities for postdoctoral and undergraduate trainees. Project results will directly address the needs of municipalities and their tree planting programs, which often seek to expand urban cover and diversity at great expense, but with a paucity of available scientific information.
This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.
PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH
Note:
When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external
site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a
charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from
this site.
PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT
Disclaimer
This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.
Our project made contributions to improved scientific understanding and provided novel training pathways for evaluating urban trees as a feedback among societal, environmental, technological and biological processes. Using the cities Los Angeles, CA, Phoenix, AZ, and Baltimore MD as foci for multiple city comparisons we evaluated perspectives of key government and private stakeholders in the context of existing and desired tree distributions, and associated climate adaptation and mitigation contributions. Stakeholders throughout the United States were broadly interested in urban trees as a near universally valuable benefit to their communities. They were concerned with achieving maximum benefits and recognized the importance of scientific input but were challenged by accessing definitive guidelines. Stakeholders further realized the importance an equity dimension, including its racial aspects, to how urban trees are distributed throughout their communities and considered equity an important goal in tree distributions. Consistent with stakeholder views, we identified consistent urban cooling, a climate adaptation, associated with urban trees. The vegetation cooling capacity increased in warmer and drier conditions, suggesting a potential local negative feedback where vegetation is more effective at cooling when most needed. In retro-fitting cities to enhance heat resilience we completed an assessment of canopy and land cover change effects on active mobility heat exposure. The distribution of urban tree cooling suggested a negative climate feedback, as conditions become hotter urban trees provide more cooling. The local negative feedback of urban trees to climate changes was further supported by our results showing the urban tree water and carbon traits are increasingly decoupled when the trees are planted in hotter environments, most urban trees can increase their water use. In applying these insights, we assessed how changes to neighborhood form, from high heat exposure configurations to low heat exposure configurations, effects total exposure for walkers, bikers, and transit users. The results showed that modest neighborhood form changes have much more significant beneficial outcomes than travel behavior (i.e., rerouting) changes. In contrast, as a carbon sequestration or climate mitigation tool, our analyses of the current state of the science suggested that the methods for assessing carbon sequestration contain unknown uncertainties but nonetheless have limited capacity to affect global atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. These findings have led to the development of a new framework for urban trees as a nexus of people?s desires and actions, environmental constraints, technological interactions, and biological capacities. Through these science activities we have created new training opportunities for students and the public. Our project provided new experiential and classroom opportunities to enhance the capacity of trainees to address complex problems at the interface between human decision making and biophysical dynamics. As a key component of our training program, we developed a summer training in environmental-societal coupling that emphasizes urban climate mitigation and adaptation components of urban trees. Trainees gained tools to assess the theoretical underpinnings of such coupled systems, qualitative and quantitative approaches for studying coupled systems, and project management skills for an interdisciplinary and geographically distributed team. For the public we developed a new community science engagement program that provides training in urban-atmosphere-vegetation relationships and approaches for thinking scientifically about uncertainties as they affect the livability of their neighborhoods. These scientific and broader impact outcomes are enhancing theoretical frameworks describing the systems within which urban trees are embedded while improving public understanding of how these systems shape people?s lived experiences.
Last Modified: 02/17/2023
Modified by: George D Jenerette
Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.