
NSF Org: |
SES Division of Social and Economic Sciences |
Recipient: |
|
Initial Amendment Date: | July 18, 2019 |
Latest Amendment Date: | November 29, 2022 |
Award Number: | 1921187 |
Award Instrument: | Continuing Grant |
Program Manager: |
reginald sheehan
SES Division of Social and Economic Sciences SBE Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences |
Start Date: | August 1, 2019 |
End Date: | January 31, 2024 (Estimated) |
Total Intended Award Amount: | $305,000.00 |
Total Awarded Amount to Date: | $305,000.00 |
Funds Obligated to Date: |
FY 2020 = $127,919.00 FY 2021 = $54,196.00 |
History of Investigator: |
|
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: |
160 ALDRICH HALL IRVINE CA US 92697-0001 (949)824-7295 |
Sponsor Congressional District: |
|
Primary Place of Performance: |
4201 SBSG Irvine CA US 92697-7085 |
Primary Place of
Performance Congressional District: |
|
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): |
|
Parent UEI: |
|
NSF Program(s): | LSS-Law And Social Sciences |
Primary Program Source: |
01002021DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT 01002122DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT |
Program Reference Code(s): |
|
Program Element Code(s): |
|
Award Agency Code: | 4900 |
Fund Agency Code: | 4900 |
Assistance Listing Number(s): | 47.075 |
ABSTRACT
In contrast to the expansive and highly influential body of research on children's memory and suggestibility, which has led to clear guidelines about how to elicit accurate testimony from child victims of sexual abuse, little is known about how to question adolescent victims, even though they represent a large proportion of victims who have suffered a range of sexual abuse experiences and are questioned by law enforcement and legal authorities. The lack of guidelines is even more striking for sexually trafficked adolescents, who are often identified as criminal suspects and questioned by police, not trained forensic specialists. How to approach and interview adolescent victims, particularly those who have been trafficked, has never been comprehensively examined. Yet professionals, including interviewers and police, must question these adolescents in a way that elicits clear disclosures from the victims about their experiences in order to intervene, ensure their protection, and prosecute those who commit these heinous crimes. This study will systematically evaluate actual interviews by law enforcement and legal professionals with suspected adolescent victims, including those who have been trafficked. It will determine what types of questioning approaches are used, what approaches are more or less effective at eliciting abuse and trafficking details, and how the questions and victims' responses relate to the outcomes of criminal cases against traffickers. The results of the research will inform scientific models of disclosure patterns in highly vulnerable populations of victims. The results will also impact policy and practice by providing crucial insight into effective questioning approaches with adolescent sexual abuse victims, especially those who have been trafficked, thereby laying the foundation for training protocols on these approaches and long-lasting improvements in practice and policy.
This research will specifically involve reviewing and coding 340 interview transcripts of adolescent victims, half trafficking victims and half adolescents who have experienced other forms of sexual abuse. For cases that went to trial, transcripts of the victims' testimony, case details and case outcome data will also be collected and coded. Statistical analyses will focus on the types of questions asked and the tone of the questions (for instance, whether the tone is supportive or interrogation-like), as well as characteristics of the victims' responses, such as whether they disclose abuse, the amount of detail they provide, the content of what they report, and their levels of evasiveness. With this extensive coding system, linkages between the question and response categories will be evaluated to determine what kinds of questions are more versus less effective at eliciting specific types of responses from victims and how the questions and responses, directly and interactively, relate to case outcomes.
This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.
PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH
Note:
When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external
site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a
charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from
this site.
PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT
Disclaimer
This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.
During the past several decades, a highly influential body of research has emerged concerning children’s memory, suggestibility, and disclosures of abuse. Results have led to best-practice protocols now used by by trained forensic interviewers across the globe in order to elicit the most complete and accurate accounts possible from child victims. In contrast, surprisingly little research has focused on best practice approaches to questioning adolescent victims, even though these older youth represent a large proportion of victims who have suffered a range of abuse experiences and been questioned by law enforcement and legal authorities. The lack of research is especially striking considering that characteristics of trafficking victims, combined with their encounters with the authorities as suspects of crime, can make them especially difficult to interview and uniquely resistant to disclosing their victimization. We carried out this multi-study project to comprehensively document for the first time the precise ways that adolescent victims of trafficking are questioned by law enforcement and legal professionals. We evaluated whether law enforcement and legal professionals use strategies considered best practices with child victims, such as rapport building and support, and what types of responses trafficked adolescents provided in response to best-practice but also other questioning approaches. We also examined how criminal cases unfold when they involve charges of trafficking of a minor, and compared this to how criminal cases unfold when they involve charges of sexual abuse with victims of similar ages. The comparisons enabled us to identify unique but also overlapping features of both types of cases involving adolescents. Our results are incredibly important in laying the foundation for developing recommendations regarding how best to question adolescent victims, collect evidence for criminal cases, and how to modify both of these to accommodate the needs of adolescent victims of trafficking.
Our findings reveal numerous important trends regarding how criminal cases unfold, how victims are questioned, and how victims respond. First, trafficked adolescents are described in far more negative ways in criminal trials than are sexually abused adolescents, with the former being referred to as delinquent or troubled youth, prostitutes, or problematic teens. Trafficked adolescents’ negative history is mentioned more frequently, even when cases result in guilty verdicts, as is their potential uncooperativeness with authorities. What is not mentioned, though, are reasons why trafficked adolescents might behave in these ways, which include their history of maltreatment and other adversities, repeated negative encounters with social services and law enforcement that has led to high levels of mistrust, and their potential reliance on a trafficker for basic needs. Law enforcement, especially local police, tend to ask high numbers of closed-ended and potentially leading questions when interviewing trafficking victims, with minimal levels of support provided once the victims respond. Interviewers with prior training in child forensic interviewing tend to use a greater amount of rapport building and slightly more open-ended questions, although even these interviewers fall back on closed-ended questions somewhat frequently. Adolescent victims, as might be expected, often respond in evasive, reluctant, and even sassy ways, especially to local police, and at times provide minimal useful information regardless of what type of questioning tactic is employed. The way in which rapport is built with trafficked adolescents appears to be crucial for establishing a positive relationship and eliciting clear and complete disclosures. Law enforcement needs to be better trained on rapport, but also on hallmark characteristics of trafficked adolescents that make them reluctant, so that law enforcement understand why adolescent victims might behave the way they do and how best to respond to that behavior.
Last Modified: 07/09/2024
Modified by: Jodi A Quas
Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.