Award Abstract # 1811118
Building Capacity for Co-Created Public Engagement with Science

NSF Org: DRL
Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings (DRL)
Recipient: MUSEUM OF SCIENCE
Initial Amendment Date: June 14, 2018
Latest Amendment Date: September 21, 2020
Award Number: 1811118
Award Instrument: Continuing Grant
Program Manager: Toni Dancstep
tdancste@nsf.gov
 (703)292-7922
DRL
 Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings (DRL)
EDU
 Directorate for STEM Education
Start Date: July 1, 2018
End Date: June 30, 2024 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $1,919,470.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $1,919,470.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2018 = $1,047,271.00
FY 2020 = $872,199.00
History of Investigator:
  • David Sittenfeld (Principal Investigator)
    dsittenfeld@mos.org
  • Lawrence Bell (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Elizabeth Kunz Kollmann (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Amanda Fisher (Former Co-Principal Investigator)
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: Museum of Science
1 SCIENCE PARK
BOSTON
MA  US  02114-1099
(617)589-0118
Sponsor Congressional District: 08
Primary Place of Performance: Museum of Science
1 Science Park
Boston
MA  US  02114-1099
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
08
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): KKW4W2TPS5N8
Parent UEI: KKW4W2TPS5N8
NSF Program(s): AISL
Primary Program Source: 04001819DB NSF Education & Human Resource
04002021DB NSF Education & Human Resource

04002122DB NSF Education & Human Resource
Program Reference Code(s):
Program Element Code(s): 725900
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.076

ABSTRACT

As part of its overall strategy to enhance learning in informal environments, the Advancing Informal STEM Learning (AISL) program seeks to advance new approaches to, and evidence-based understanding of, the design and development of STEM learning in informal environments. This includes providing multiple pathways for broadening access to and engagement in STEM learning experiences, advancing innovative research on and assessment of STEM learning in informal environments, and developing understandings of deeper learning by participants. This project will build and test a new model for co-created public engagement with science activities in partnership with civic, community, and scientist partners. The innovation to be tested is deliberative dialogues in science museums that help reduce the polarization about socio-scientific issues, giving people a greater voice in science, and addressing barriers that disconnect scientists from the public. The project will engage four target audiences (informal science education/ISE professionals, civic, community and scientist partners). Science museum partners include Museum of Science (MOS) Boston, Oregon Museum of Science, the Michigan Science Center, and the North Carolina Museum of Life and Science. The project is designed to have a strategic impact on how ISE institutions choose topics of STEM engagement and build public Forum programs.

There will be two evaluation teams for the project. MOS Research and Evaluation will act as formative evaluation mentors for the four partner sites as they co-create their forums. They will provide evaluation capacity building for the sites using team-based inquiry as they create and understand the potential impacts and outcomes of the model. Data collection will include panel surveys and focus groups. The evaluation will explore how the forums can decrease 1) public polarization around STEM topics and (2) the disconnect between scientists, civic organization, and the public. The external summative evaluation will be conducted by Rockman et al (REA). They will conduct a study of the project's process to help the team identify challenges and strategies for overcoming them as they work through the phases of public engagement. The summative study will focus on the project goals taking a qualitative approach. Early interviews with partner participants will explore their strengths and weaknesses in taking on this type of public engagement model including the extent of their previous work with civic partners. Later interviews will investigate what factors have enabled or hindered this project. Summative evaluation questions will also address changes in attitudes toward public engagement with science. REA will collect feedback from summit attendees through intercept interviews and post-surveys administered within a week at the event's conclusion to explore the any changes in knowledge or confidence in undertaking this type of model. REA will present findings from the external evaluation during the annual meeting of the Association of Science-Technology Centers and publish reports to Informalscience.org. Once the model has been developed and tested it will be disseminated to an initial group of 25-30 science museums and eventually to the entire ISE museum field.

This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT

Disclaimer

This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.

The Co-Created Public Engagement with Science (CC-PES) project, an Innovations in Development project, supported by NSF’s Advancing Informal Science Learning Program, built capacity among informal science education (ISE) institutions with respect to developing, evaluating, and implementing co-created public engagement with science (CC-PES) activities in partnership with civic, community, and scientist partners. The project was led by the Museum of Science, Boston (MOS). Public Engagement with Science (PES) is defined in this context as ISE activities that facilitate multi-directional learning among community, research, and civic partners. The primary focus for this project was the co-created nature of the development of dialogue-based programs to address socio-scientific issues: participation of public and civic representatives along with scientists and informal educators in each stage of the CC-PES process, including topic selection, decision-making, and taking action. The project developed, tested, refined, and disseminated a model for CC-PES that was based upon three fundamental elements of public participation drawn from the public engagement literature: agenda-setting, decision-making, and policy-forming/taking action.

Intellectual Merit:

The project was designed to have a strategic impact on the way that ISE institutions choose topics for engagement and implement PES programming. In the first two phases of the project, the CC-PES model, materials, and methods were piloted in three US communities (Boston, MA, Portland, OR, and Durham, NC) with civic, community and research partners. the local ISE institutions. Community representatives, civic officials and scientists worked with ISE partners at each site to first select issues for engagement and then worked to identify socio-scientific questions for deliberation. The co-creation teams in Boston (comprised of partners from the City of Boston, the Museum of Science, and Urban College of Boston) and Durham (comprised of the Museum of Life and Science, Families Moving Forward, and the city of Durham) chose to address equitable housing as their PES topic. The co-creation team in Portland, OR, which was collaboratively developed by youth at the Oregon Museum of Science and Industry, the Metro Regional Government, and Momentum Alliance, selected the issue of corporate responsibility for addressing climate change.

Evaluation mentors from the Museum of Science worked with each of the co-creation teams, supporting the ISE educators and their community, civic, and scientist partners as they collected data to improve the materials and adapted and refine the CC-PES model in ways that met their team’s objectives. Each of the project teams each had to pivot from their original plans for PES formats in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, but all of the teams hosted multiple in-person and virtual events that comprised the agenda-setting, decision-making, and action phases of the CC-PES framework.

The third phase of the project supported a cohort of nine previously unengaged institutions from around the United States who each adapted the CC-PES model with partners in their own communities. The co-created topics included food security, gun violence, air quality, local economic development, screening for colon cancer, climate resilience, equitable STEM education access, and community land use. Each team designed unique PES activities for the topic selection, decision-making, and action steps, refining their activities based upon formative evaluation findings. A Co-Created PES Summit event in June 2023 brought together the members of this national cohort model to share their learning points with one another and to inform products to inform future co-creation work in the field.

Summative evaluation assessed changes in knowledge, awareness, skills, and capacity among ISE partners and awareness, interest, and impacts on civic, and scientist partners with regard to participation in these co-created PES activities. These findings were used to inform dissemination efforts for the ISE field.

Broader Impacts:

The culminating project year disseminated learning from these project activities to the broader ISE field, and subsequently applied the CC-PES framework to its yearlong institutional spotlight for 2024, the Year of the Earthshot, including a forum co-created with the US Department of Energy. The project team members are now applying the learning from these efforts to MOS’s Public Science Common initiative, a strategic direction that focuses future current science programming around community-generated priorities and works to amplify the content from co-created PES across MOS’s educational channels to engage millions.

The outcomes from the CC-PES project have been shared through national-scale PES organizations including the Association of Science and Technology Centers, the National Informal STEM Education Network, and the American Advancement for the Advancement of Science. The project has advanced knowledge in the ISE field by creating, testing and refining a model for co-creation that has be applied in varied ISE settings to respond to priorities of community concern. This has worked to position ISE institutions as community hubs that can be instrumental in civic problem-solving. Broader implementation of CC-PES, and future innovations in this realm, will help members of the public discover ways to engage with scientists and civic partners and thereby enrich socio-scientific decision-making.

 

 


Last Modified: 12/09/2024
Modified by: David Sittenfeld

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page