
NSF Org: |
DRL Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings (DRL) |
Recipient: |
|
Initial Amendment Date: | January 16, 2018 |
Latest Amendment Date: | June 21, 2021 |
Award Number: | 1759360 |
Award Instrument: | Standard Grant |
Program Manager: |
Jennifer Noll
DRL Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings (DRL) EDU Directorate for STEM Education |
Start Date: | January 15, 2018 |
End Date: | December 31, 2023 (Estimated) |
Total Intended Award Amount: | $772,521.00 |
Total Awarded Amount to Date: | $772,521.00 |
Funds Obligated to Date: |
|
History of Investigator: |
|
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: |
633 CLARK ST EVANSTON IL US 60208-0001 (312)503-7955 |
Sponsor Congressional District: |
|
Primary Place of Performance: |
2120 Campus Drive Evanston IL US 60208-2610 |
Primary Place of
Performance Congressional District: |
|
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): |
|
Parent UEI: |
|
NSF Program(s): | ITEST-Inov Tech Exp Stu & Teac |
Primary Program Source: |
|
Program Reference Code(s): | |
Program Element Code(s): |
|
Award Agency Code: | 4900 |
Fund Agency Code: | 4900 |
Assistance Listing Number(s): | 47.076 |
ABSTRACT
This is a collaborative project submitted to the Successful Project Expansion and Dissemination (SPrEaD) strand of the Innovative Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers (ITEST) program (Program Solicitation NSF 17-565) to advance efforts to better understand and promote practices that increase student motivations and capacities to pursue careers in fields of science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM). The goal is to expand and disseminate strategies to support spatial thinking at the high school level by adapting and implementing the previously developed Geospatial Semester (GSS) one-year, dual-credit course focused on developing geospatial problem-solving skills and applying those skills to student-selected problems. GSS consists of introductory exercises to develop students' basic skills in using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for analyzing spatial problems, supporting students in framing a meaningful problem from a spatial perspective, identifying and organizing relevant spatial datasets, analyzing their spatial data as evidence for proposing solutions for their problem, and making a public presentation of their results. GSS is currently taught in high schools in Virginia in partnership with James Madison University. At the core of GSS is the development of spatial thinking skills, which are strongly predictive of achievement, persistence, and attainment in STEM fields, even after accounting for other relevant variables, such as mathematical and verbal aptitude. Thus, the central purpose of the study is to adapt and implement the GSS high school course in six Career and Technical Education (CTE) clusters in the Chicago Public Schools (CPS). The project will select participants from identified groups currently underrepresented in STEM occupations. Through the GSS course, students will engage with relevant STEM, social science, and CTE topics that cut across multiple disciplines, and engage in relevant practices, including scientific data collection, analysis, modeling, and interpretation.
The project will adopt and adapt the core elements of the GSS for the context of Chicago CTE programs using a design-based implementation research (DBIR) approach. The study will use a framework of spread and scale to investigate the strategies for expanding and disseminating the course and the ways in which contextual factors influence the likelihood of success. It will address two research questions regarding whether, and how, the GSS can be adapted to the needs of a large, urban district teaching a variety of CTE-related skills: (1) How can large urban school districts develop the necessary infrastructure to implement GSS without the direct support of the developers?; and (2) Can we develop classroom-based assessments of spatial reasoning that have convergent validity with the research-based measures used in past research? To address the former, the project will partner with the City Colleges of Chicago to provide the dual enrollment credit, and engage in co-design with teachers to develop an implementation model that is tailored to CPS's CTE curriculum and supported by continuing professional development practices. To answer the latter, the project will engage in co-design with teachers to develop classroom assessments of spatial thinking and validate the extent to which they correlate with research-based measures. The project will use these assessments to investigate whether the adaptation of GSS in Chicago provides outcomes that are comparable to those of the established GSS implementations in Virginia. Data sources will include classroom observations, ratings of student work products, teacher interviews, student demographics, and growth in student performance on pretest and posttest assessments. A debriefing routine will be used to interpret what has happened and plan prospective events for the next implementation phase. A mixed-method approach will be employed to incorporate quantitative analysis of student learning. As DBIR research, the project will (a) form partnerships between researchers and practitioners focused on persistent problems of practice from multiple stakeholders' perspectives; (b) focus on the importance of spatial reasoning as foundational for STEM practice through a multi-stakeholder partnership of GIS educators, psychologists, implementation researchers, a large urban district and community college; and (c) develop capacity for sustaining change in systems through GSS teacher leaders and new courses in GIS at City Colleges of Chicago. The project will develop new co-designed curriculum materials through (a) pilot testing of materials (years 1-2); (b) field testing of materials (year 3) with emphasis on professional development, implementation research (to examine the extent to which the program is successfully implemented across a variety of school contexts), and analysis of field-test results; and (c) testing the integration of the professional development and course implementation into the CTE operations, including analysis of the validity and quality of spatial-thinking classroom assessments. The main outcome of this effort will be a high school GIS-focused CTE curriculum prototype developed through co-design processes, as well as DBIR focused on geospatial problem-solving. An external advisory board will provide ongoing, independent, and critical reviews of the implementation of the program to evaluate progress, both formative and summative.
PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH
Note:
When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external
site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a
charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from
this site.
PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT
Disclaimer
This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.
Geographic information systems (GIS) are used to generate maps and analyze how spatial location affects issues like business, government, environmental science, and social science. Learning GIS can improve students’ academic and career prospects. But GIS also helps students develop spatial thinking skills, which are foundational for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) achievement. Geospatial Semester, a yearlong GIS course offered to high school students in Virginia, has been linked to improved spatial problem-solving. This project adapted the Geospatial Semester for implementation in Chicago Public Schools. From 2018-2023, we worked with Chicago Public Schools to (1) offer teacher professional development opportunities, (2) co-design GIS lessons, (3) observe effective lesson implementation strategies, and (4) assess students’ learning.
At the start of the grant, we offered multi-day professional development (PD) workshops that provided teachers with a foundational understanding of GIS. However, this was a major time commitment for teachers, and teachers were unsure of how to develop and implement GIS lessons. We pivoted to offering one-day PD workshops that taught the specific GIS skills necessary for teachers to implement GIS lessons. We found it helpful to share example GIS lessons and give teachers opportunities to practice teaching GIS lessons and get feedback. In our final year, teachers requested short “refresher” PD sessions, and we created GIS tutorial videos that teachers could access at their convenience.
Regarding the development of GIS lessons, we first invited teachers create their own GIS lessons after the multi-day PD workshops. We thought that this approach would encourage teachers to design lessons that aligned with their curriculum and their students’ needs. However, this was laborious for teachers, and some felt that they lacked the GIS expertise to create their own lessons. We moved to a “work circle” model, in which multiple teachers from the same discipline co-designed GIS lessons. Near the end of the project, we found success in pairing teachers with GIS “teacher experts.” In this model, teachers developed the GIS lessons they wanted, but they appreciated having support from knowledgeable GIS experts. We also co-designed a GIS-focused unit for the Exploring Computer Science course. Teachers had access to a ready-made unit, complete with a teacher implementation guide and student materials (e.g., worksheets, assignments). After the first year of the grant, we identified effective lesson design principles that were integrated into all subsequent lessons: student-driven inquiry, culturally responsive instruction, foregrounding of spatial reasoning, and connections to disciplinary content.
We observed multiple teachers as they implemented the GIS lessons and noted important strategies for teaching GIS to high school students. First, compared to grading students only on class participation, it is valuable for students to be graded on the quality of their GIS maps and get regular feedback. Second, it is essential that students can devote plenty of time to working in GIS software and creating their maps. This is most easily done by having students create GIS software accounts so that they can save their mapping progress across multiple days. Finally, we developed a GIS Careers Guide that highlighted the careers of eight GIS experts in Chicago. We found that showcasing GIS careers helped students see the value of learning GIS.
Finally, we assessed students’ GIS problem-solving and STEM attitudes throughout the project. Students’ GIS problem-solving consistently increased from pre-test to post-test. Students performed better when their teachers had more GIS experience and offered graded feedback on the quality of their GIS maps. Regarding students’ attitudes, students are more likely to feel that they can succeed in STEM, that STEM is valuable, and that STEM is not too costly when their classrooms feel equitable, when they have access to GIS software accounts to save their maps, and when they are provided with a GIS Careers Guide.
Across the grant, we offered 23 PD sessions, which were attended by 151 CPS teachers. With teachers, we co-designed 90 GIS lessons and one GIS-focused unit for Exploring Computer Science. These lessons are being reviewed, and strong lessons will be added to an online lesson repository accessible by teachers in CPS and beyond. CPS has expressed interest in adopting our GIS-focused unit for all their Exploring Computer Science classes. To date, 12 teachers administered the GIS assessments in their classrooms, and we collected data on 500 students. Among students who reported demographic information, 50% identified as male, 47% as female, and 3% as transgender or non-binary. 49% identified as Hispanic/Latine. 43% reported their ethnicity as white, 39% black/African American, 9% Native American/Indigenous, 7% Asian, and 2% Pacific Islander. We believe that many teachers who worked with us will continue to utilize GIS in their classrooms, and we hope that the diverse students who learned GIS will continue to experience benefits for their spatial thinking and STEM achievement, and that they may pursue GIS-related opportunities in the future.
Last Modified: 04/30/2024
Modified by: David H Uttal
Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.