
NSF Org: |
SES Division of Social and Economic Sciences |
Recipient: |
|
Initial Amendment Date: | May 23, 2017 |
Latest Amendment Date: | May 23, 2017 |
Award Number: | 1738399 |
Award Instrument: | Standard Grant |
Program Manager: |
Joseph Whitmeyer
jwhitmey@nsf.gov (703)292-7808 SES Division of Social and Economic Sciences SBE Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences |
Start Date: | June 1, 2017 |
End Date: | November 30, 2018 (Estimated) |
Total Intended Award Amount: | $11,938.00 |
Total Awarded Amount to Date: | $11,938.00 |
Funds Obligated to Date: |
|
History of Investigator: |
|
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: |
160 ALDRICH HALL IRVINE CA US 92697-0001 (949)824-7295 |
Sponsor Congressional District: |
|
Primary Place of Performance: |
4265 Social Science Plaza B Irvine CA US 92697-5100 |
Primary Place of
Performance Congressional District: |
|
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): |
|
Parent UEI: |
|
NSF Program(s): | Sociology |
Primary Program Source: |
|
Program Reference Code(s): |
|
Program Element Code(s): |
|
Award Agency Code: | 4900 |
Fund Agency Code: | 4900 |
Assistance Listing Number(s): | 47.075 |
ABSTRACT
For students from low-income and working-class backgrounds, the process of upward mobility involves adopting perspectives or developing practices that contrast with the perspectives and practices of their communities of origin. The objective of this study is to understand how college, family and community cultures interact to shape the experience of students as they transition to college. What role do students' racial/ethnic and community cultures play as they assimilate into the college and university culture and the middle-class? The methodology includes interviews with approximately 60 college students and observations of eight students, all of whom grew up in the same Mexican-American, working-class community. The interviews and observations will compare students who attend a moderately selective school with students who attend a less selective school. This study advances research surrounding the role that the university plays in reducing inequality. Given the rapid expansion of higher education and its greater accessibility to students from working-class backgrounds, this project examines whether what it means to belong to the middle-class differs across university contexts and the extent to which existing social class hierarchies are reproduced. Moreover, whether student engagement with their communities of origin varies across university selectivity also carries important implications as it relates to policies surrounding academic and student life on college campuses.
Previous research finds that unlike their middle-class peers, working-class college students struggle to reconcile forms of speech, habits and practices associated with both their middle-class and working-class cultures. Previous research, however, has concentrated on the upwardly mobile college experiences of students attending elite or selective universities and, with few exceptions, has not generally assessed how culture rooted in students? racial-ethnic identity contributes to their assimilation into the middle class. This study draws on Bourdieu and colleagues? concept of habitus to understand how university, family and community culture influence Mexican-origin students' class habitus. Using semi-structured interviews and participant observation, this study takes a comparative assessment of the experiences of students from one working-class community who attended a moderately selective, flagship institution and students from the same community who attended a less competitive, local university. The lead researcher examines the role that race plays in mediating the way in which the university influences students? development of a middle-class habitus as well as whether university culture varies based on school selectivity and/or community contexts. The project pushes theoretical debates to move beyond assumptions that the middle-class culture of the university remains static across school selectivity and community contexts and to consider that understandings of what it means to belong to the middle-class likely vary across social contexts as well. Because this study also examines how university cultures help students build or break ties with their home communities, it carries important policy implications as it relates to how colleges structure academic curriculums and important aspects of campus and student life.
PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT
Disclaimer
This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.
This study investigated how the upwardly mobile trajectories of working class, Mexican-origin students differed based on the selectivity of the school they attended as well as the community in which that school was located. Although working-class students often view a four-year college degree as a vehicle towards upward mobility, existing studies gravitate towards studying the upwardly mobile experiences of students enrolled in elite or highly selective universities where working class and racial-ethnic minority students are commonly underrepresented. Moreover, with few exceptions, previous studies overlook the role that racial-ethnic background plays in shaping students’ social class experiences.
Using semi-structured interviews and participant observation, this study generated three forms of data: 60 interviews with Mexican-origin, working-class students, 25 interviews with faculty and staff across two universities and field notes collected during a 6-month observation period. Thirty student study respondents attended a selective institution located in an urban, middle-class metropolis. Their co-ethnic counterparts, however (comprising the remaining half of the study sample), attended a less competitive university situated in the local community. All 60 student respondents grew up in the same working class geographical region. The Co-PI also performed extensive observations as she shadowed eight of the original student interview participants. These students were each observed for a two-week period when they attended class, student organization meetings and/or other academic appointments on campus.
Intellectual Merit: Findings reveal that key institutional processes, such as course instruction, leadership development opportunities and organizational cultural offerings challenged students to alter discourse techniques and lifestyle patterns to a greater extent in the selective institution than in the less competitive, regional institution. In this way, the selective university valorized class-based skill sets that are common among mainstream, middle-class cultures. The selective university, however, sidelined cultural characteristics associated with study respondents’ working class, racial-ethnic cultures. Students attending the regional university on the other hand, experienced their working class, racial-ethnic culture as more dominant in the university but experienced elements of mainstream, middle-class cultures in sidelined ways. I argue that an increasingly stratified system of higher education plays a crucial role in not simply shaping but also fragmenting middle-class cultures. Even though students may view their college degree as a ticket for higher occupational earnings, whether they develop the skills to be competitive for middle-class occupations largely varies based on the type of institution they attend. Moreover, because class-based processes reflected the cultural characteristics of specific racial-ethnic groups, this study challenges mainstream interpretations of a dominant, middle-class culture.
Broader Impacts: In an effort to assist universities as they accommodate a rising number of low-income and racial-ethnic minority students, study findings have been shared in a range of public settings. Study analyses were presented at the 2018 American Sociological Association annual meeting as well as in campus gatherings and workshops in one university. The Co-PI intends to further share study findings with both of the institutions profiled in the study, with other interested higher education institutions, as well as with officials in the community where all study respondents spent their formative adolescent years. Moreover, the Co-PI will also publish select components of the study in scholarly journals and feature a more comprehensive study assessment in a book. Finally, published reports will also be made available to study participants who express an interest in the study’s conclusions.
Last Modified: 03/27/2019
Modified by: Alma Nidia Garza
Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.