Award Abstract # 1734834
Community Cultures: Broadening Participation By Understanding How Rural Communities Support Engineering as College Major Choice

NSF Org: EEC
Division of Engineering Education and Centers
Recipient: VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY
Initial Amendment Date: May 4, 2017
Latest Amendment Date: May 4, 2017
Award Number: 1734834
Award Instrument: Standard Grant
Program Manager: Christine Grant
EEC
 Division of Engineering Education and Centers
ENG
 Directorate for Engineering
Start Date: August 1, 2017
End Date: April 30, 2021 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $257,205.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $257,205.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2017 = $257,205.00
History of Investigator:
  • Liesl Baum (Principal Investigator)
    lmbaum@vt.edu
  • Marie Paretti (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Jacob Grohs (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Phyllis Newbill (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Julee Farley (Co-Principal Investigator)
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
300 TURNER ST NW
BLACKSBURG
VA  US  24060-3359
(540)231-5281
Sponsor Congressional District: 09
Primary Place of Performance: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
VA  US  24061-0001
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
09
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): QDE5UHE5XD16
Parent UEI: X6KEFGLHSJX7
NSF Program(s): EDA-Eng Diversity Activities
Primary Program Source: 01001718DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT
Program Reference Code(s): 110E, 7680
Program Element Code(s): 768000
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.041

ABSTRACT

A robust and diverse engineering workforce is essential to national security and economic competitiveness, and current rates of higher education enrollment in engineering are not sufficient to support the need. Thus, broadening participation in engineering from underrepresented groups is a critical priority. To meet this need, this project focuses on economically disadvantaged rural students, particularly women and other underrepresented groups. Traditional models of career choice stressing interest as a primary career choice driver break down in rural contexts, where instead community values, local economic drivers, and strong family networks often play a critical role. As a result, this project shifts the focus from individual students to the communities themselves to understand how key stakeholders and organizations support the career choices of rural youth. With this knowledge, the investigators will engage target rural communities in participatory design workshops so that they might leverage their unique community assets to support more of their youth, particularly underrepresented groups, to pursue engineering careers.

The project begins with focus group and individual interviews with undergraduate engineering students from selected rural high schools that are known for producing high numbers of engineering majors. These data lay the foundation for interviews with key members of students' home communities and observations of salient programs or events to provide a rich understanding of the beliefs, experiences, and values of each community. Data analysis includes both within-case and cross case analysis. Further, the results of the multi-case study will be used to guide participatory design workshops with rural schools and communities in the region that do not typically produce engineering majors. These workshops will foster dialogue that explores factors that support or hinder transfer of practices to low-producing schools and identifies policies and strategies that would enhance each community's ability to better support engineering as a potential career choice. The study uses the southwestern region of Virginia, in the Appalachian Mountains, as its primary focus, but research on career choice among rural students generally points to the potential transferability of the findings and methods. This project advances knowledge about engineering career choice and rural education by capturing the perspectives of community members who often play key roles in students' career and academic decisions, particularly in rural communities.

PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH

Note:  When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

Paretti, Marie C. and Grohs, Jacob R. and Anderson, William Michael and Lester, Marlena McGlothlin and Baum, Liesl M. and Newbill, Phyllis Leary and Kelly, Stacey Leigh "Community Cultures: Broadening Participation By Understanding How Rural Communities Support Engineering as a College Major Choice" 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , 2018 Citation Details
Vaziri, S.L. and Grohs, J.R. and Paretti, M.C. and Baum, L.M. and Lester, M.M. and Newbill, P.L. "Broadening the Participation of Rural Students in Engineering: Preliminary Findings on the Perspectives of Key Community Members" ASEE annual conference & exposition , 2019 Citation Details
Vaziri, S.L. and Paretti, M.C. and Grohs, J.R. and Baum, L.M. and Lester, M.M. and Newbill, P.L. "Broadening the Participation of Rural Students in Engineering: Exploring Community Perspectives" Zone 1 Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education , 2020 Citation Details
Vaziri, S.L. and Paretti, M.C. and Grohs, J.R. and Baum, L.M. and Lester, M.M. and Newbill, P.L. "Communities Support Engineering as a College Major Choice" Zone 1 Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education , 2020 https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34307 Citation Details

PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT

Disclaimer

This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.

Rural students continue to face barriers to pursuing engineering majors and engineering careers. Our findings align with previous work that points to the importance of key individuals able to help students access information about engineering and envision engineering careers - friends or family members with engineering degrees, math or science teachers who encourage students toward engineering degrees, outreach programs that engage students in engineering tasks. In addition, our work also points to the central role played by community colleges as critical pathways into engineering; community colleges help make engineering affordable, locally available, and accessible. A core study within our overall project used qualitative methods to analyze interviews from 36 undergraduate engineering students from rural backgrounds with a coding system rooted in Perna's model of student college choice. Consistent with the literature, finances, cultural capital, and academic achievements were key influences on students' decisions to attend college and major in engineering.  Our study further highlighted the ways in which engineering careers lack broad visibility in many rural communities, and pathways into engineering careers are less accessible. Significant opportunities exist to establish meaningful partnerships with community organizations such as 4H and scouting, as well as with community colleges, to help students in rural communities make informed decisions about possible engineering careers. At the same time, structural inequities around available courses and resources remain a problem; the persistent underesourcing of rural schools remains a barrier that must be addressed to expand students' opportunities.


Last Modified: 08/27/2021
Modified by: Liesl Baum

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page