
NSF Org: |
EAR Division Of Earth Sciences |
Recipient: |
|
Initial Amendment Date: | July 5, 2017 |
Latest Amendment Date: | July 5, 2017 |
Award Number: | 1725338 |
Award Instrument: | Standard Grant |
Program Manager: |
Jennifer Wade
jwade@nsf.gov (703)292-4739 EAR Division Of Earth Sciences GEO Directorate for Geosciences |
Start Date: | September 1, 2017 |
End Date: | August 31, 2020 (Estimated) |
Total Intended Award Amount: | $98,482.00 |
Total Awarded Amount to Date: | $98,482.00 |
Funds Obligated to Date: |
|
History of Investigator: |
|
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: |
845 N PARK AVE RM 538 TUCSON AZ US 85721 (520)626-6000 |
Sponsor Congressional District: |
|
Primary Place of Performance: |
1040 E. 4th St. Tucson AZ US 85721-0001 |
Primary Place of
Performance Congressional District: |
|
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): |
|
Parent UEI: |
|
NSF Program(s): | XC-Crosscutting Activities Pro |
Primary Program Source: |
|
Program Reference Code(s): |
|
Program Element Code(s): |
|
Award Agency Code: | 4900 |
Fund Agency Code: | 4900 |
Assistance Listing Number(s): | 47.050 |
ABSTRACT
The Paradox basin and other sedimentary basins of the Colorado Plateau host many significant mineral and hydrocarbon resources, including iron, copper, cobalt, manganese, silver, and oil and gas, and are best known for hosting one of the world's great uranium-producing provinces. New reconnaissance geological studies in the Paradox basin revealed unexpected spatial and stratigraphic connections between uranium mineralization, hydrocarbon migration, and mobility of iron and other elements. These connections suggest that a new model for uranium deposition is required: one where oil, and possibly natural gas, leads to localized trapping of uranium perhaps in mixing zones, in contrast to the prevailing model where uranium is trapped by organic matter that is indigenous to the host rock. This new hypothesis does not preclude the alternatives, but it predicts that the larger deposits may have higher grades and have a distinct and more localized distribution. Evidence for concurrent redistribution of iron and other elements suggests that the same fluids move many elements; such element redistribution gives clues to fluid geochemistry and movement. This project will advance the fundamental geochemical understanding of metal movement and mass transport in the Paradox and other sedimentary basins and it may provide novel approaches to mineral discovery in a region with world-class mineral resources.
Five focus sites along the 100+ km-long Lisbon Valley salt wall in the Paradox Basin have been selected for field mapping, core logging, petrographic, fluid inclusion, and elemental and isotopic analyses. The focus sites represent diverse stratigraphic and structural settings and range from the deep central part of the basin to the fringes, but all show uranium mineralization, iron mobility, and bleaching or other evidence of hydrocarbons. The mapping of alteration minerals, petrography, and whole-rock analyses will be used to document the distribution and paragenesis of iron, alkali, and base metal enrichment and depletion at scales from the single deposit to the sub-region. The investigators will correlate these observations with the distribution, evolution, and temporal sequence of uranium and related (vanadium, copper) mineralization and the loci of hydrocarbon reservoirs and migration paths. Coupled with fluid inclusion and isotopic analyses of alteration minerals and geochemical modeling to evaluate fluid characteristics and sources, these data will enable a systematic test of the interplay between metal-bearing basinal brines, hydrocarbons, and local structures and rock types - e.g. whether the movement and deposition of U, Fe, and hydrocarbons represent different facets of a single short-lived system, represent the evolution of a single system over a long time, or were produced by multiple unrelated superimposed events. This is a first step toward an integrated approach to studying linkages among mass transport phenomena in the Paradox Basin, which can be applied on the Colorado Plateau and worldwide both to understanding the geological and geochemical evolution of important resource provinces and to exploring and managing resource development therein.
PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH
Note:
When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external
site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a
charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from
this site.
PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT
Disclaimer
This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.
The goal of this project was to analyze previously unrecognized connections between the movement of hydrocarbons and the movement of uranium and iron on the Colorado Plateau. Most approaches to research conventionally separate the metals from hydrocarbons, considering one or the other but not both. However, field evidence suggested that the movement and precipitation of metals – uranium and iron in particular – could both be linked to the geochemical changes caused by the movement of hydrocarbons through the rock. This pointed to an unrecognized connection between petroleum, iron, and uranium movement on the Colorado Plateau.
To test this idea, we collected and analyzed rock samples, visited mines, and mapped rock outcrops at five key field sites across the Colorado Plateau. At each of them, we documented geological relationships, mineralogical changes, and differences in rock chemistry that suggest that hydrocarbon, U, and Fe movements are strongly coupled. Mapping shows that deposits of uranium occur where the normally red rocks have been bleached white, partly by the reduction of iron from hematite to pyrite and partly by the removal of Fe from the rock (as indicated by whole-rock analyses of red and bleached sandstones). In rocks from various U deposits, we found chemical and mineralogical evidence that this bleaching of redbeds occurred relatively early in the paragenesis and was shortly followed by U mineralization (hematite, pyrite, and pitchblende inclusions under authigenic quartz overgrowths). We also found U-rich asphalt and blue-fluorescing fluid inclusions in rocks from the ore deposits, indicating hydrocarbon involvement in ore precipitation.
This evidence supports the interpretation that mineralization was a multi-step process involving first hydrocarbons and then more conventional metal-bearing fluids. Hydrocarbons bleached the rock relatively early in its history, reducing or removing iron and redepositing it in situ as pyrite or on the fringes of the bleached area as pyrite, hematite, or ferroan carbonate concretions. While individual deposit parageneses vary, in general the evidence indicates that U mineralization occurred around the same time as the hydrocarbon-induced bleaching or shortly thereafter. This is consistent with the known geochemistry of the Colorado Plateau rocks and of hydrocarbon reservoirs and U deposits in general. Reduction and removal of iron is a common side effect of hydrocarbon passage, which has been known for some years to cause bleaching in red rocks. Hydrocarbons, or rocks bleached by hydrocarbons, also have the right chemistry to trap uranium from solution by reducing it from its soluble U6+ to its insoluble U4+ state.
This new work indicates uranium movement and ore mineralization much earlier than previously thought, and indicates that the development of U deposits is closely related to the mobilization or reduction of Fe. While further interpretation is underway, this represents a significant revision to the previous metallogenetic model for the formation of uranium deposits in sandstone. It also helps to constrain the potential sources of uranium and timing of mineralization, two long-standing and unresolved questions in Colorado Plateau geological research, and provides insights that will aid future efforts to understand the geological and mineralization history of the region.
Last Modified: 11/03/2020
Modified by: Isabel F Barton
Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.