Skip to feedback

Award Abstract # 1646810
Collaborative Research: AGEP Transformation Alliance: CIRTL AGEP - Improved Academic Climate for STEM Dissertators and Postdocs to Increase Interest in Faculty Careers

NSF Org: EES
Div. of Equity for Excellence in STEM
Recipient: TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
Initial Amendment Date: September 14, 2016
Latest Amendment Date: October 15, 2020
Award Number: 1646810
Award Instrument: Continuing Grant
Program Manager: Mark Leddy
EES
 Div. of Equity for Excellence in STEM
EDU
 Directorate for STEM Education
Start Date: October 1, 2016
End Date: September 30, 2022 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $169,762.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $178,337.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2016 = $104,914.00
FY 2017 = $8,575.00

FY 2018 = $41,618.00

FY 2020 = $23,230.00
History of Investigator:
  • Sarah Hokanson (Principal Investigator)
    sch1@bu.edu
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: Trustees of Boston University
1 SILBER WAY
BOSTON
MA  US  02215-1703
(617)353-4365
Sponsor Congressional District: 07
Primary Place of Performance: Trustees of Boston University
881 Commonwealth Ave.
Boston
MA  US  02215-1300
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
07
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): THL6A6JLE1S7
Parent UEI:
NSF Program(s): AGEP
Primary Program Source: 04001617DB NSF Education & Human Resource
04001718DB NSF Education & Human Resource

04001819DB NSF Education & Human Resource

04002021DB NSF Education & Human Resource
Program Reference Code(s): 1515, 8212
Program Element Code(s): 151500
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.076

ABSTRACT

Iowa State University, Boston University, Cornell University, Howard University, Michigan State University, Northwestern University, University of Buffalo, University of Georgia, University of Maryland College Park, and University of Texas at Arlington will collaborate to develop, build and test the impact of a model of a "networked improvement community" focused on improving dissertator experiences at a variety of institutions with the goal of reducing the effect of negative climate on interest in faculty careers. The project was submitted in response to the NSF's Alliances for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) program solicitation (NSF 16-552). The AGEP program seeks to advance knowledge about models to improve pathways to the professoriate and success of historically underrepresented minority (URM) students, postdoctoral fellows and faculty in specific STEM disciplines and/or STEM education research fields. AGEP Transformation Alliances develop or replicate/reproduce, implement and study, via integrated educational/social science research, models to transform the dissertator phase of doctoral education, postdoctoral training and/or faculty advancement, and the transitions within and across the pathway levels, of URMs in STEM and/or STEM education research careers.

The project includes activities to address faculty and postdoc behavior and knowledge about mentoring, advising, and mitigating implicit bias and micro-aggressions as well as activities to support dissertators through workshops similar to faculty workshops, building cohorts and peer mentoring. A super-structure of the ten alliance members will work together to produce and share information and disseminate change more broadly. Evaluation will be done by a team from Michigan State University led by Dr. Marilyn Amey. Integrated research is built into the collaborative process as the community will go through four plan-do-study-act cycles to share information about interventions, plan improvements, coordinate evaluation, and spread effective interventions through first the collaboration and then disseminate them to the 46 institution CIRTL network. Research questions will address 1) student descriptions of engagement with their departments and disciplines, 2) which experiences and relationships are most influential in strengthening students' interest in faculty careers, and 3) how peers and external supports influence sense of community for dissertators. Along with testing the impact of a variety of interventions at nine institutions on the transition from dissertators to faculty and on the climate experienced by dissertators, the project will evaluate the impact of the network itself through a social network analysis, semi-structured interviews, and qualitative analysis of local and community meeting records.

PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH

Note:  When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

Garza, Norma E. and Rodriguez, Sarah L. and Espino, Maria L. "Nepantla aquí, Nepantla allá: The Borderlands of Identity from Mexican-Origin Women in STEM" Journal of Hispanic Higher Education , 2022 https://doi.org/10.1177/15381927221130174 Citation Details
Noble, Chelsea E. and Amey, Marilyn J. and Colón, Luis A. and Conroy, Jacqueline and De Cheke Qualls, Anna and Deonauth, Kamla and Franke, Jeffrey and Gardner, Alex and Goldberg, Bennett and Harding, Thelma and Harris, Gary and Hernández, Sara Xayarath an "Building a Networked Improvement Community: Lessons in Organizing to Promote Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics" Frontiers in Psychology , v.12 , 2021 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.732347 Citation Details
Perez, Rosemary J. and Motshubi, Rudisang and Rodriguez, Sarah L. "We are a huge source of labor: Exploring STEM Graduate Students Roles in Changing Departmental Climate" The Review of Higher Education , v.46 , 2022 https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2022.0012 Citation Details
Rodriguez, Sarah L. and Perez, Rosemary J. and Schulz, Jessica M. "How STEM lab settings influence graduate school socialization and climate for students of color." Journal of Diversity in Higher Education , v.15 , 2022 https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000361 Citation Details

PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT

Disclaimer

This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.

Our grant work has supported the interest and preparation of graduate students from historically marginalized backgrounds in becoming faculty members, primarily by improving campus climate. We adopted a systems change approach known as a networked improvement community (NIC). NICs can accelerate progress because they focus on systems and the partnerships needed to create change. Ten universities formed a NIC and we modified its traditional structure to be more relevant for higher education partnerships.

Traditional NIC (Carnegie NIC)

CIRTL AGEP NIC

Well-specified aim

Well-specified aim

Understanding the problem and how to address it

Understanding the systems in which the problem is located, including the variety of contexts and different organizations

Improvement science methods, such as Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycles

Incorporating data that reflect different campus contexts and varied analytical approaches while providing utility to the collective

Leadership models are not specified

Culture and practice of shared leadership in determining questions to be addressed and actions to take centered around inclusivity in our practices

Accelerate interventions

Accelerate local partnerships, infrastructure, and interventions

Universities in the NIC have implemented projects that support the interest and preparation of graduate students from historically marginalized backgrounds in becoming faculty members, including: strengthening faculty’s understanding of DEI; improving admissions, advising, and mentoring processes; increasing peer support and professional development; and developing partnerships with other DEI offices on campus. Our campuses have institutionalized workshops and programming that are attended by ~10,000 faculty, staff, and graduate students during the 5th year of the grant. In addition, the CIRTL AGEP toolkit is a resource that other universities can use and adapt to support their diversity, equity and inclusion goals. The toolkit has five categories of tools: Establishing & Maintaining a Network Improvement Community, Organizational Change Processes, Faculty Mindsets and Practices, Future Faculty Development, and Community Building.

 


Last Modified: 01/27/2023
Modified by: Sarah C Hokanson

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page