Skip to feedback

Award Abstract # 1645072
DCL: HSI Transfer and the Undergraduate STEM Pipeline at Two-year Hispanic Serving Institutions

NSF Org: EES
Div. of Equity for Excellence in STEM
Recipient: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
Initial Amendment Date: September 15, 2016
Latest Amendment Date: July 19, 2018
Award Number: 1645072
Award Instrument: Standard Grant
Program Manager: Martha James
mjames@nsf.gov
 (703)292-7772
EES
 Div. of Equity for Excellence in STEM
EDU
 Directorate for STEM Education
Start Date: January 15, 2017
End Date: December 31, 2020 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $295,835.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $352,784.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2016 = $295,835.00
FY 2018 = $56,949.00
History of Investigator:
  • Eboni Zamani-Gallaher (Principal Investigator)
    ezamanig@illinois.edu
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
506 S WRIGHT ST
URBANA
IL  US  61801-3620
(217)333-2187
Sponsor Congressional District: 13
Primary Place of Performance: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
1901 S. First Street, Suite A
Champaign
IL  US  61820-7473
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
13
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): Y8CWNJRCNN91
Parent UEI: V2PHZ2CSCH63
NSF Program(s): Alliances-Minority Participat.
Primary Program Source: 04001617DB NSF Education & Human Resource
04001819DB NSF Education & Human Resource
Program Reference Code(s): 7916, 9178
Program Element Code(s): 913300
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.076

ABSTRACT

The National Science Foundation uses the EArly-concept Grants for Exploratory Research (EAGER) funding mechanism to support exploratory work in its early stages on untested, but potentially transformative, research ideas or approaches. In response to the Dear Colleague Letter NSF 15-078, "Stimulating Research on Effective Strategies in Undergraduate STEM Education at Two-Year Hispanic Serving Institutions", the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign will conduct an exploratory research study on the impact of two-year Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) on the persistence and success of Latino(a) students in STEM.

The study will be conducted in two phases using a dominant-less dominant mixed methods research design. In Phase 1, the quantitative phase of the study, two national data sets will be coupled and then mined to determine the STEM transfer pathways for Hispanic students at two-year HSIs. Based on the results of Phase 1, Phase 2, the qualitative phase of the study, will involve case studies of five HSIs to enable a deeper dive to probe in detail the practices of Hispanic-serving community colleges that facilitate the successful matriculation, graduation, and transfer of Latino(a) students in STEM programs. The results of the research study will contribute to the knowledge base by increasing understanding about which STEM majors and which two-year HSIs have the greatest production of Hispanic student transfers and completers of four-year STEM degrees. The methodology employed is novel and may yield new methods for using data mining techniques to explore data for other types of institutions. The outcomes could inform two-year HSIs (and other community colleges) about those strategies they could implement to facilitate successful STEM pathways for Latino(a) students.

PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT

Disclaimer

This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.

This project has expanded what is known about institutional identity of Hispanic-serving community colleges (HSCCs), particularly in terms of cultural congruence and dissonance regarding person-environment fit and its impact on Hispanic students' satisfaction, matriculation, and success in STEM pathways. An intriguing finding emerged about the relationship between institutional identity, student demographics, and completion rates within distinct STEM programs of study. The results highlighted gaps and nuances, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between institutional labeling and the actual culture, policies, and practices that promote URM (Underrepresented Minority) STEM persistence.

 

The case study data revealed a gap between the language used by faculty and their actual practices. It revealed contradictions in race-conscious work based on equity and culturally sustaining practices that recognize the historical legacies of oppression. These approaches include offering students diverse, tailored wraparound services and supports designed to address their unique success needs. The project raised broader implications for developing DEI training opportunities for community college faculty, as such professional development could significantly enhance the ability of many faculty and staff to gain the necessary cultural competencies, expertise, and skills to better support students of color, particularly Latinx adult learners. We found anti-Black attitudes emerged among some faculty. More research is needed to understand how anti-Blackness affects campus climate and student success, important for Hispanic serving community colleges, which unwittingly may not mitigate racial disparities. While Latinx faculty supported the HSI designation, white and Black faculty were less enthusiastic due to fairness concerns between groups, showing a misunderstanding about HSI designated funding.

 

Our study's data mining of IPEDS and ELS datasets revealed that HSCCs are underexplored as pathways for STEM and their role in credentialing pathways. Since 2005, the number of HSCCs has increased; Overall, institutions serving large numbers of Hispanic students have grown significantly. In particular, analysis of IPEDS data highlighted state-specific differences in STEM fields and outcomes (e.g., HSCCs in Texas showed slightly higher biology degrees among women of color, while Illinois saw more interdisciplinary studies degrees awarded). This raises additional questions about the impact of these programs on STEM pathways and workforce. Additionally, we noted significant disparities in STEM degree attainment by race and gender, particularly for women of color relative to how private for-profit institutions compare to public ones in supporting racially minoritized students.

Key outcomes or other achievements: Completion of 10 research briefs with quantitative data: Based on the master institutional data accomplished in Phase 1, the research team has published research briefs -- eight states (Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, New Mexico, New York, and Texas), and Puerto Rico. The vast majority of HSCCs are in these regions, all of which have significant Latinx populations. For instance, California, Texas, and Florida together accounted for 65.7% of HSCCs in the data. Each research brief included comprehensive descriptive analyses to identify patterns or trends regarding issues or contexts of STEM degree attainment at HSCCs. This environmental scan highlighted the critical role of HSCCs in awarding STEM degrees to Latinx students, other students of color, and women of color. The top contributing STEM fields identified were interdisciplinary studies (20,292; 37.84%), computer and information sciences (10,745; 20.04%), and engineering technologies (9,187; 17.13%) among 11 STEM fields designated by the NSF Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation. There are evident race and gender gaps in STEM fields nationwide. Among 427,081 degrees conferred at community colleges, STEM degrees account for 12.56% (52,929). Whites earned 44.13% of STEM degrees, followed by Latinxs at 28%, Asians at 10.27% and Blacks at 8.10%. In terms of gender, there is a substantial gap. Although women earned most of the total degrees (60.64%), they lag behind men in earning STEM credentials (38.74%). These disparities in STEM degree attainment across race and gender were observed in all eight states and Puerto Rico. These research briefs help to define the institutional identity of HSCCs, analyze STEM degree attainment by institutional type, and highlight race and gender inequities in STEM fields. 

 

Takeaways and insights from this EAGER grant about HSCCs and STEM degrees pathways reiterate Hispanic students remain underrepresented in STEM fields. Community colleges are an important pipeline for students who later transfer to four-year institutions and earn STEM degrees. Additional investing in HSCCs to increase transfer pathways from community colleges to four-year universities, and creating targeted STEM initiatives, the number of Hispanic students completing STEM degrees is critical. In sum, Hispanic-serving community colleges are pivotal in supporting Hispanic students and racially minoritized students in STEM fields, offering access and support necessary for students to succeed. With continued investment and targeted programs, HSCCs are poised to increase the number of STEM degrees awarded to Hispanic students in the coming years. 


Last Modified: 09/19/2024
Modified by: Eboni Zamani-Gallaher

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page