Award Abstract # 1552351
Collaborative Research: Multimodel Bayesian Data-Worth Analysis for Groundwater Remediation Design

NSF Org: EAR
Division Of Earth Sciences
Recipient: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO
Initial Amendment Date: April 5, 2016
Latest Amendment Date: April 5, 2016
Award Number: 1552351
Award Instrument: Standard Grant
Program Manager: Laura Lautz
llautz@nsf.gov
 (703)292-7775
EAR
 Division Of Earth Sciences
GEO
 Directorate for Geosciences
Start Date: August 1, 2016
End Date: July 31, 2021 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $183,760.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $183,760.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2016 = $183,760.00
History of Investigator:
  • Roseanna Neupauer (Principal Investigator)
    roseanna.neupauer@colorado.edu
  • Joseph Kasprzyk (Co-Principal Investigator)
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: University of Colorado at Boulder
3100 MARINE ST
Boulder
CO  US  80309-0001
(303)492-6221
Sponsor Congressional District: 02
Primary Place of Performance: University of Colorado Boulder
3100 Marine St Rm 481 572 UCB
Boulder
CO  US  80309-0572
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
02
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): SPVKK1RC2MZ3
Parent UEI:
NSF Program(s): Hydrologic Sciences
Primary Program Source: 01001617DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT
Program Reference Code(s):
Program Element Code(s): 157900
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.050

ABSTRACT

Groundwater contaminant remediation involves removing subsurface contaminants so that they do not pose unacceptable future risks to humans and the environment. While various remediation methods have been developed, they all face a common challenge that the groundwater environment is complex and cannot be fully understood and characterized with limited amount of time and resources. Hence, given the uncertainty in the characterization of the groundwater environment, the challenge is to design a remediation strategy that has the maximum probability of success or equivalently the minimum probability of failure. A common reason for remediation failure is ignoring model uncertainty. Using a single model for remediation design may lead to overconfidence in the predictive capability of the model and thus to increased probability of failure. The proposed research will reexamine the problem of remediation design under model uncertainty by using a multimodel-based data-worth analysis. In other words, multiple models are used to identify and guide the collection of the most valuable data for model evaluation, improvement, and reconstruction. Because of the synthesis between models, remediation designs, and data, the proposed multimodel data-worth analysis for remediation design will provide a transformative platform for scientists, engineers, and decision-makers to systematically investigate all components involved in groundwater remediation. This project will also provide an opportunity for interdisciplinary training of undergraduate and graduate students in the areas of hydrology, computational science, and civil engineering. In addition, the project will engage high school teachers and students in summer schools to gain laboratory and computational experience for understanding the concepts of groundwater contaminant transport and remediation.

The proposed research has two objectives: to reformulate data-worth analysis for groundwater remediation with consideration of model uncertainty, and to break computational barriers between models and model analysis needed for remediation design. To achieve the first objective, a data-worth analysis will be integrated into a framework of multimodel analysis (also known as model averaging), which will be developed into a new procedure for remediation design that will be compatible with the multimodel data-worth analysis. To achieve the second objective, an accurate but cheap-to-evaluate surrogate of the models will be developed and then used for the data-worth analysis and remediation design under uncertainty. The Bayesian approaches (theoretical and computational) will be used for achieving both the objectives. While the proposed method of multimodel Bayesian data-worth analysis is general and can be applied to any remediation method, it will be integrated with the recently developed engineered injection and extraction method, a promising technique for in-situ remediation. The proposed methods will be evaluated in a two-prong strategy using synthetic and real-world modeling problems. The real-world problem involves uranium contamination at the Naturita Site, Colorado, and nitrogen contamination at the Indian River County, Florida. The synthetic study will mimic the real-world problem to the extent possible so that insights gained from the synthetic study can be used directly for the real-world modeling. This project will provide scientific support for on-going environmental remediation and monitoring at the two field sites as well as other contaminated sites.

PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH

Note:  When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

J.A. Greene, R.M. Neupauer, M. Ye, J.R. Kasprzyk, D.C. Mays, and G. Curtis "Engineered injection and extraction for remediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater" Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress , 2017
Neupauer, R. M. and Mays, D. C. and Ye, M. and Greene, J. A. "Comparison of Effective Active Spreading Designs for In Situ Groundwater Remediation" 2022 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress , 2022 https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484258.013 Citation Details

PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT

Disclaimer

This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.

Engineered Injection and Extraction (EIE) is a method for cleaning up contaminated groundwater in place.  In this method, a chemical amendment in injected into the contaminant plume, and groundwater in the vicinity of the plume is injected and extracted from wells at pre-defined rates to create flow patterns that allow the contaminant and amendment to come together to react.  In this project, we investigated the application of this method to remediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater.  Uranium is present as a dissolved chemical in the groundwater that can travel with the groundwater toward uncontaminated areas.  Uranium can also attach to the soil surfaces and remain immobilized.  The amount of uranium that is in each phase (dissolved or attached to soild surfaces) depends on the chemistry of the groundwater and the soil.  This work demonstrated that EIE can create flow patterns that create conditions that are favorable for driving the uranium to be attached to the solid surfaces.  By implementing this approach, a portion of the uranium is removed from the groundwater, reducing the likelihood of contaminating previously uncontaminated regions.  These results demonstrate that EIE can be applied to the remediation of many different groundwater contaminants.  The results also demonstrate that the design of the EIE system, including the location of wells and the injection and extraction sequence, must take into account the chemical behavior of the contaminant and the groundwater.  


Last Modified: 01/10/2022
Modified by: Roseanna M Neupauer

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page