
NSF Org: |
EAR Division Of Earth Sciences |
Recipient: |
|
Initial Amendment Date: | April 5, 2016 |
Latest Amendment Date: | April 5, 2016 |
Award Number: | 1552351 |
Award Instrument: | Standard Grant |
Program Manager: |
Laura Lautz
llautz@nsf.gov (703)292-7775 EAR Division Of Earth Sciences GEO Directorate for Geosciences |
Start Date: | August 1, 2016 |
End Date: | July 31, 2021 (Estimated) |
Total Intended Award Amount: | $183,760.00 |
Total Awarded Amount to Date: | $183,760.00 |
Funds Obligated to Date: |
|
History of Investigator: |
|
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: |
3100 MARINE ST Boulder CO US 80309-0001 (303)492-6221 |
Sponsor Congressional District: |
|
Primary Place of Performance: |
3100 Marine St Rm 481 572 UCB Boulder CO US 80309-0572 |
Primary Place of
Performance Congressional District: |
|
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): |
|
Parent UEI: |
|
NSF Program(s): | Hydrologic Sciences |
Primary Program Source: |
|
Program Reference Code(s): | |
Program Element Code(s): |
|
Award Agency Code: | 4900 |
Fund Agency Code: | 4900 |
Assistance Listing Number(s): | 47.050 |
ABSTRACT
Groundwater contaminant remediation involves removing subsurface contaminants so that they do not pose unacceptable future risks to humans and the environment. While various remediation methods have been developed, they all face a common challenge that the groundwater environment is complex and cannot be fully understood and characterized with limited amount of time and resources. Hence, given the uncertainty in the characterization of the groundwater environment, the challenge is to design a remediation strategy that has the maximum probability of success or equivalently the minimum probability of failure. A common reason for remediation failure is ignoring model uncertainty. Using a single model for remediation design may lead to overconfidence in the predictive capability of the model and thus to increased probability of failure. The proposed research will reexamine the problem of remediation design under model uncertainty by using a multimodel-based data-worth analysis. In other words, multiple models are used to identify and guide the collection of the most valuable data for model evaluation, improvement, and reconstruction. Because of the synthesis between models, remediation designs, and data, the proposed multimodel data-worth analysis for remediation design will provide a transformative platform for scientists, engineers, and decision-makers to systematically investigate all components involved in groundwater remediation. This project will also provide an opportunity for interdisciplinary training of undergraduate and graduate students in the areas of hydrology, computational science, and civil engineering. In addition, the project will engage high school teachers and students in summer schools to gain laboratory and computational experience for understanding the concepts of groundwater contaminant transport and remediation.
The proposed research has two objectives: to reformulate data-worth analysis for groundwater remediation with consideration of model uncertainty, and to break computational barriers between models and model analysis needed for remediation design. To achieve the first objective, a data-worth analysis will be integrated into a framework of multimodel analysis (also known as model averaging), which will be developed into a new procedure for remediation design that will be compatible with the multimodel data-worth analysis. To achieve the second objective, an accurate but cheap-to-evaluate surrogate of the models will be developed and then used for the data-worth analysis and remediation design under uncertainty. The Bayesian approaches (theoretical and computational) will be used for achieving both the objectives. While the proposed method of multimodel Bayesian data-worth analysis is general and can be applied to any remediation method, it will be integrated with the recently developed engineered injection and extraction method, a promising technique for in-situ remediation. The proposed methods will be evaluated in a two-prong strategy using synthetic and real-world modeling problems. The real-world problem involves uranium contamination at the Naturita Site, Colorado, and nitrogen contamination at the Indian River County, Florida. The synthetic study will mimic the real-world problem to the extent possible so that insights gained from the synthetic study can be used directly for the real-world modeling. This project will provide scientific support for on-going environmental remediation and monitoring at the two field sites as well as other contaminated sites.
PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH
Note:
When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external
site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a
charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from
this site.
PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT
Disclaimer
This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.
Engineered Injection and Extraction (EIE) is a method for cleaning up contaminated groundwater in place. In this method, a chemical amendment in injected into the contaminant plume, and groundwater in the vicinity of the plume is injected and extracted from wells at pre-defined rates to create flow patterns that allow the contaminant and amendment to come together to react. In this project, we investigated the application of this method to remediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater. Uranium is present as a dissolved chemical in the groundwater that can travel with the groundwater toward uncontaminated areas. Uranium can also attach to the soil surfaces and remain immobilized. The amount of uranium that is in each phase (dissolved or attached to soild surfaces) depends on the chemistry of the groundwater and the soil. This work demonstrated that EIE can create flow patterns that create conditions that are favorable for driving the uranium to be attached to the solid surfaces. By implementing this approach, a portion of the uranium is removed from the groundwater, reducing the likelihood of contaminating previously uncontaminated regions. These results demonstrate that EIE can be applied to the remediation of many different groundwater contaminants. The results also demonstrate that the design of the EIE system, including the location of wells and the injection and extraction sequence, must take into account the chemical behavior of the contaminant and the groundwater.
Last Modified: 01/10/2022
Modified by: Roseanna M Neupauer
Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.