
NSF Org: |
EEC Division of Engineering Education and Centers |
Recipient: |
|
Initial Amendment Date: | June 9, 2015 |
Latest Amendment Date: | April 14, 2021 |
Award Number: | 1519412 |
Award Instrument: | Standard Grant |
Program Manager: |
Kemi Ladeji-Osias
jladejio@nsf.gov (703)292-7708 EEC Division of Engineering Education and Centers ENG Directorate for Engineering |
Start Date: | July 1, 2015 |
End Date: | September 30, 2021 (Estimated) |
Total Intended Award Amount: | $1,993,490.00 |
Total Awarded Amount to Date: | $1,993,490.00 |
Funds Obligated to Date: |
|
History of Investigator: |
|
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: |
2550 NORTHWESTERN AVE # 1100 WEST LAFAYETTE IN US 47906-1332 (765)494-1055 |
Sponsor Congressional District: |
|
Primary Place of Performance: |
701 West Stadium Avenue West Lafayette IN US 47907-2045 |
Primary Place of
Performance Congressional District: |
|
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): |
|
Parent UEI: |
|
NSF Program(s): |
PFE\RED - Professional Formati, IUSE |
Primary Program Source: |
04001516DB NSF Education & Human Resource |
Program Reference Code(s): |
|
Program Element Code(s): |
|
Award Agency Code: | 4900 |
Fund Agency Code: | 4900 |
Assistance Listing Number(s): | 47.041 |
ABSTRACT
Higher education institutions strive to improve the opportunities and preparation they give to students, especially in crucial professional skills like communication, creativity, and entrepreneurship. Very often, today's engineering graduates possess exemplary technical skills for analysis and design, but need further development of professional skills. American competitiveness, national security, and leadership in innovation are at stake. This project identifies the academic department as an organization whose alignment with these goals needs to be improved. The modern imperative to add value to a mechanical engineering (ME) education -- by focusing more closely on professional skills -- stimulates critical self-examination of the ME department. This project connects organizational dynamics to student outcomes, inspiring changes in curriculum, the student experience, and most importantly the ways that students, staff, and faculty interact with each other. This is significant, because it is not currently known how an organizational model promotes or inhibits development of these professional skills in students. By remaking the organization to one based upon creativity and trust, using modern approaches to manage this change, this project orchestrates revolutionary change in student preparation for engineering careers.
This project engages the tools of engineering education research, ethnography, social network and content analysis, change management, and a new, experimental organization to manifest revolutionary change in how students are prepared for engineering careers. Revolutionary change simply cannot occur until two crucial facets of an academic organization are addressed: emotion and culture. Faculty, students, and staff hold deeply personal, emotionally driven beliefs about what higher education is - and should be. In turn, these beliefs shape the local culture within ME in both positive and negative ways. This project takes a systematic approach to revolutionize the ME department at Purdue by focusing on both engineering education research and culture/change research questions. The effort will answer critical research questions about engineering education and appropriate approaches to achieve professional outcomes at large scale. The vision emphasizes relationships, culture, and communication, along with undeniable technical prowess, as cornerstones of professional skills. The Engineering Dean has provided a strong institutional commitment to the project and its investigating team, which is a unique coalition of experts in engineering education research, change management, and cultural anthropology of technical organizations.
The faculty development plan engages Strategic Doing, a modern approach appropriate for the highly networked (not hierarchical) ME department organization. The connection to professional practice leverages several successful, on-going programs in ME for both domestic and international experiences. Scalability and adaptation are central elements of the faculty development plan, with special emphasis on assessing professional outcomes - at scale. Project reliance on research in engineering education is robust, with one of the members of the PI team holding a joint appointment between the ME department and Purdue's School of Engineering Education. The project engages a diverse group of experts in executing the work, and involves a scaling and adaptation plan that allows the revolution blueprint to be adopted and adapted by other interested institutions.
PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH
Note:
When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external
site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a
charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from
this site.
PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT
Disclaimer
This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.
This award supported both research and programmatic activities within a mechanical engineering department, with the outcomes providing benefits to faculty, staff, and students, as well as the research and academic communities at large. The project achieved intellectual merit by advancing the scholarship and research base in several areas. First, our interdisciplinary team of engineers and anthropologists introduced new methods into engineering education research for cultural characterization within academic organizations. These new approaches include both observation protocols and survey-based methods. Engineering departments now have new tools available to them to pursue this kind of research and cultural characterization. Second, our team advanced knowledge about how change happens in academic organizations by focusing on grassroots teams, the change processes they employed, and the outcomes they achieved. Our team elevated the important role of staff in achieving positive outcomes for students.
Our team achieved broader impacts in several ways as well. First, the undergraduate academic program has a somewhat stronger emphasis on student professional formation than it did prior to this project. This includes more formal integration of structured teaming experiences that align with best practices, as well as the use of scalable assessment approaches to provide students with faster and higher-quality feedback about their work. As such, hundreds of undergraduate students in our institution have experienced benefits as a result of this project. Faculty and staff in the program also appear to more routinely engage in discussion of education at scale, and in particular questions about how to provide students quality and rapid feedback on their work. These conversations were much less frequent before this project, and our team can cite changes in both practice (the mechanisms by which feedback is given) and course-level policies that support improved feedback to students, which in turn supports their professional development as engineers. This project enabled the training and workforce development of a large number of team members, including faculty, staff, undergraduate students, graduate students, and post-doctoral researchers, all of whom engaged in interdisciplinary topics and training through collaborations across our engineering and anthropology teams.
This project resulted in several durable changes in the student experience, including enhanced flexibility on co-op assignments (an improvement that has propagated widely in our institution) and a general elevation of conversations and practices around undergraduate teaching and learning. Our team has advanced research, scholarship, and practice around student professional formation throughout this project, with positive impacts on the academic program as a whole in addition to the many people (faculty, staff, students) who are members of this academic community.
Last Modified: 11/05/2021
Modified by: Edward J Berger
Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.