Award Abstract # 1417757
Learning Labs: Using Videos, Exemplary STEM Instruction and Online Teacher Collaboration to Enhance K-2 Mathematics and Science Practice and Classroom Discourse

NSF Org: DRL
Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings (DRL)
Recipient:
Initial Amendment Date: April 8, 2015
Latest Amendment Date: July 10, 2017
Award Number: 1417757
Award Instrument: Continuing Grant
Program Manager: Michael Ford
miford@nsf.gov
 (703)292-5153
DRL
 Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings (DRL)
EDU
 Directorate for STEM Education
Start Date: April 15, 2015
End Date: December 31, 2018 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $2,998,840.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $2,998,840.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2015 = $1,460,881.00
FY 2016 = $811,953.00

FY 2017 = $726,006.00
History of Investigator:
  • Paul Teske (Principal Investigator)
    pteske@teachingchannel.org
  • Bruce Sherin (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Elham Kazemi (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Miriam Sherin (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Jessica Thompson (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Pat Wasley (Former Principal Investigator)
  • Erika Nielsen Andrew (Former Principal Investigator)
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: Teaching Channel
Two Embarcadero Center
SAN FRANCISCO
CA  US  94111-3833
(415)553-0038
Sponsor Congressional District: 11
Primary Place of Performance: Teaching Channel
930 Montgomery Street
San Francisco
CA  US  94133-4657
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
11
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): EL7UKH6U1MW3
Parent UEI:
NSF Program(s): Discovery Research K-12
Primary Program Source: 04001516DB NSF Education & Human Resource
04001617DB NSF Education & Human Resource

04001718DB NSF Education & Human Resource
Program Reference Code(s):
Program Element Code(s): 764500
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.076

ABSTRACT

The Discovery Research K-12 program (DRK-12) seeks to significantly enhance the learning and teaching of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) by preK-12 students and teachers, through research and development of innovative resources, models and tools (RMTs). Projects in the DRK-12 program build on fundamental research in STEM education and prior research and development efforts that provide theoretical and empirical justification for proposed projects. The investigators of this study propose to develop and study two sets of instructional materials for K-2 teacher professional development in mathematics and science that are aligned with the Common Core State Standards in Mathematics (CCSS) and the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). They will develop two modules in each subject area and an introductory module that prefaces and integrates the science and mathematics materials. Teachers will be able to review the materials online, watch video of exemplary teaching practice, and then upload their own examples and students' work to be critiqued by other teachers enrolled in professional learning communities as well as expert coaches. New instructional materials aligned with the standards are needed to assist teachers in meeting the challenging instructional practices recommended. To date, scant few resources of this type exist and, given many school districts have limited resources, more cost-effective forms of development such as this must be found. A particular strength of this project is that teachers will be able to engage in the courses online, on an ongoing basis and integrate what they have learned into their daily teaching practice.

The investigators propose a program of design research to develop and improve the modules. The central hypothesis is a test of the Teaching Channel model--that the modules and professional learning communities result in significant changes in the quality of instructional practice. Text analytics will be performed on the online discussion to detect changes in group discourse over time. Changes in instructional quality and vision will be measured by observing the videos posted by teachers. Pre-post tests of student work will be performed. The findings of the research will be disseminated through conference presentations, publications, and the Teaching Channel website.

PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH

Note:  When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

Lomax, K., Alfonzo, K., Dietz, S., Kleyman, E., & Kazemi, E. "?A new take on problem solving: Trying three-act tasks with primary students.?" Teaching Children Mathematics , v.23 , 2017
Richards, J., & Thompson, J. "Choose your own adventure?: Responsive curricular choices in elementary science" Rethinking Learning in the Digital Age: Making the Learning Sciences Count, 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2018, Volume 2 , v.2 , 2018 , p.1017
Richards, J., & Thompson, J. "Responsive curricular choices in elementary science." The International Conference of the LearningSciences , 2018
Sherin, M. G. & Dyer, E. A. "Mathematics teacher self-captured video andopportunities for learning" Journal ofMathematics Teacher Education , , v.20 , 2017 , p.477
Sherin, M. G. & Dyer, E. A. "Teacher self-captured video: Learning to see ." Kappan , v.98 , 2017 , p.49
Shim, S., Thompson, J., Richards, J., &Vaa, K. "Supporting young students in scientific argumentation and modeling through Agree/DisagreeT-charts." Science and Children. , 2018

PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT

Disclaimer

This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.

Our goals for this project were threefold: creating scalable online professional development courses in K-2 mathematics and science; creating a video series showcasing exemplary teaching practices in those areas; and creating a tool for measurement of teacher vision in order to determine the effectiveness of our courses and videos.  

We have met our objectives by building four online courses, two each in modeling and argumentation for both mathematics and science (example of a course in Figure 1).  We plan to continue with this material by making it available for use in academic courses by our partners at the University of Washington and Northwestern University. We are also planning to have courseware available for small group collaboration through Teaching Channel’s online professional learning platform. This material has been tested and in over 20 pilot sections with more than 300 teacher participants, with pilot test feedback carefully collected and analyzed by WestEd, with further help from our project advisory board consisting of education research professionals from throughout the United States.  The feedback has then been used to refine the online courses in subsequent versions.

We also created twelve videos showcasing exemplary teaching practices, which are currently available on the Teaching Channel website (Figures 2 and 3).  These videos consist of students and teachers in the classroom exploring concepts that are central to our vision of effective teaching of K-2 mathematics and science.  The videos are housed on the Teaching Channel website (www.teachingchannel.org/videos) and have collectively been viewed over 100,000 times.  These videos have further been used in blog posts and Teaching Channel Deep Dives, to provide mini-lessons to the Tch community.

Finally, we have worked towards creating effective measurement of teacher vision.  These accomplishments are outlined in conference papers and presentations as well as journal submissions from the project team.  Through analysis of participant data, student work, surveys, and exit interviews we have determined various criteria for observing success, and have incorporated these discoveries into the materials we have created.

 


Last Modified: 04/23/2019
Modified by: Paul Teske

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page