Award Abstract # 1301732
Partial Support of the Arctic Human Development Report II (AHDR-II)

NSF Org: OPP
Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
Recipient: UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS
Initial Amendment Date: April 5, 2013
Latest Amendment Date: February 16, 2017
Award Number: 1301732
Award Instrument: Standard Grant
Program Manager: Anna Kerttula de Echave
OPP
 Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
GEO
 Directorate for Geosciences
Start Date: April 1, 2013
End Date: March 31, 2018 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $99,999.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $99,999.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2013 = $99,999.00
History of Investigator:
  • Peter Schweitzer (Principal Investigator)
    ppschweitzer@alaska.edu
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: University of Alaska Fairbanks Campus
2145 N TANANA LOOP
FAIRBANKS
AK  US  99775-0001
(907)474-7301
Sponsor Congressional District: 00
Primary Place of Performance: University of Alaska Fairbanks Campus
AK  US  99775-7420
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
00
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): FDLEQSJ8FF63
Parent UEI:
NSF Program(s): ARCTIC RES & POLICY SUPPORT PR
Primary Program Source: 0100XXXXDB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT
Program Reference Code(s): 9150, 5221, 1079
Program Element Code(s): 520200
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.078

ABSTRACT

The goal of the Arctic Human Development Report II (AHDR-II) is to provide a second assessment and synthesis report on the state of human
development in the Arctic, ten years after the initial report. This project will enable that the seven U.S. lead authors of AHDR-II can
participate in critical project meetings, which are typically held in Denmark. In addition, the project will partially fund several
"town-hall meetings" in various arctic locations (e.g., Alaska, Canada, Russia, Sweden). These meetings are being held in non-academic
settings and are intended to stimulate feedback to draft chapters of the report by arctic residents. Finally, the project will support the
dissemination of results of AHDR-II by contributions to a printed report and through assistance for establishing and maintaining an
AHDR-II website, where updates and other products relevant for the user-community will be posted in regular intervals.

PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH

Note:  When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

Joan Nymand Larsen, and Gail Fondahl "Arctic Human Development, Shared Voices" The UArctic Magazine, Special Issue , 2016 , p.38

PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT

Disclaimer

This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.

The second volume of the “Arctic Human Development Report: Regional Processes and Global Linkages” (AHDR-II) provided an update to the first AHDR (2004) and appeared at its tenth anniversary. This most current assessment of human development in the Arctic has shown that the region continues to face significant challenges, e.g., outmigration from local communities, emerging health challenges, emerging threats related to climate change, persistent disparities between Indigenous and non-Indigenous standards of living, continued gaps in education between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people and between males and females, growing human and fiscal capacity challenges, violence and discrimination, and threats to traditional livelihoods. At the same time, Arctic success stories are many – and should be underscored. While the region is facing rapid change and complex challenges, we can distinguish adaptation, innovation and resilience as characterizing many northern communities. This assessment has noted the many contrasts between and within regions across the Arctic, between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples, between males and females. As emphasized in our focus on Arctic community viability and adaptation, many factors come into play in determining the success and ability of communities to adapt to change. Examples include the increasing use of Indigenous knowledge; the increase in Indigenous participation, control and ownership; the continued growth of innovative governance arrangements; and that the emergence of Arctic identities and a sense of Indigenous identity have become an asset rather than a hinderance.

Each of the ten topical chapters of the AHDR-II provide an overview over the state of the art, and offer policy-relevant conclusions. For example, the chapter on “cultures and identities” concluded that “interest in and awareness of the Arctic is growing, and Indigenous culture is increasingly seen as a resource in the North. Great cultural variation and complexity characterize the Arctic. For Arctic Indigenous peoples the challenge is not of choosing between ‘modernity’ and ‘tradition,’ but to find a fulfilling combination of the two.” (p. 478). The chapter on “economic systems,” on the other hand, concluded that “the Arctic will remain a high cost region. The effects of environmental changes in the Arctic may in some cases benefit economic development, but in others will make resource development more costly. Natural resource production will continue as a driving force of the Arctic economy, although expectations of higher prices and lower costs for Arctic resources may be overly optimistic.” (p. 480). Crosscutting trends across all domains and topics include urbanization, a dramatic increase of interest in the Arctic from beyond the region, as well as continued disparities in formal educational achievement in the northern regions of the Arctic states, compared to national averages. Likewise, trends toward the increase in legitimate participation in Arctic decision-making and continued innovation in governance, as well as growing expectations for resource extractive industries, coupled with an increased interest in economic diversification, can be seen as crosscutting trends.

At the same time, gaps in knowledge have been identified. These include understanding the needs of Arctic youth and the elderly; the gendered dimensions of Arctic change; “soft securities,” such as food, water, and energy; as well as the role of Arctic settlements and communities. The identification of these gaps led to a number of suggestions for follow-up activities. These included dissemination activities, such as a series of well-targeted “townhall” meetings in Northern settlements. On the other hand, an Arctic youth focused AHDR, that is a report targeting the next generation of Arctic residents, was suggested. The majority of funds of funds of this grant have been spent to provide travel support for lead authors and early career scholars, enabling their participation in completing and disseminating the AHDR-II, as well as in laying the groundwork for a future Arctic Youth report.

 


Last Modified: 07/29/2018
Modified by: Peter P Schweitzer

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page