
NSF Org: |
OPP Office of Polar Programs (OPP) |
Recipient: |
|
Initial Amendment Date: | August 9, 2011 |
Latest Amendment Date: | August 29, 2013 |
Award Number: | 1103428 |
Award Instrument: | Continuing Grant |
Program Manager: |
Douglas Kowalewski
dkowalew@nsf.gov (703)292-2181 OPP Office of Polar Programs (OPP) GEO Directorate for Geosciences |
Start Date: | August 15, 2011 |
End Date: | July 31, 2015 (Estimated) |
Total Intended Award Amount: | $208,800.00 |
Total Awarded Amount to Date: | $208,800.00 |
Funds Obligated to Date: |
FY 2013 = $69,600.00 |
History of Investigator: |
|
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: |
La Jolla CA US 92093-0208 |
Sponsor Congressional District: |
|
Primary Place of Performance: |
La Jolla CA US 92093-0208 |
Primary Place of
Performance Congressional District: |
|
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): |
|
Parent UEI: |
|
NSF Program(s): | POST DOC/TRAVEL |
Primary Program Source: |
|
Program Reference Code(s): | |
Program Element Code(s): |
|
Award Agency Code: | 4900 |
Fund Agency Code: | 4900 |
Assistance Listing Number(s): | 47.078 |
ABSTRACT
The biota of the world's seafloor is fueled by bursts of seasonal primary production. For food-limited sediment communities to persist, a balance must exist between metazoan consumption of and competition with bacteria, a balance which likely changes through the seasons. Polar marine ecosystems are ideal places to study such complex interactions due to stark seasonal shifts between heterotrophic and autotrophic communities, and temperatures that may limit microbial processing of organic matter. The research will test the following hypotheses: 1) heterotrophic bacteria compete with macrofauna for food; 2) as phytoplankton populations decline macrofauna increasingly consume microbial biomass to sustain their populations; and 3) in the absence of seasonal photosynthetic inputs, macrofaunal biodiversity will decrease unless supplied with microbially derived nutrition. Observational and empirical studies will test these hypotheses at McMurdo Station, Antarctica, where a high-abundance macro-infaunal community is adapted to this boom-and-bust cycle of productivity. The investigator will mentor undergraduates from a predominantly minority-serving institution, in the fields of invertebrate taxonomy and biogeochemistry. The general public and young scientists will be engaged through lectures at local K-12 venues and launch of an interactive website. The results will better inform scientists and managers about the effects of climate change on polar ecosystems and the mechanisms of changing productivity patterns on global biodiversity.
PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH
Note:
When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external
site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a
charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from
this site.
PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT
Disclaimer
This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.
This research project identified how an animal community is able to survive the food-poor winters in the High Antarctic by using an unexpected food source: bacteria. As a result we advanced both our understanding of marine ecology and the factors that control the fate of carbon on the planet.
Intellectual Merit: The scientific advances of this project fall into three categories: methodological, ecological, and global carbon-cycle implications.
Methodological advances: In many systems the importance of top-down forcing (grazing, predation) can determine the community composition and metabolic rate of prey with important implications to the functioning of an ecosystem. We also know that bacterial metabolisms are critical to the overall functioning of the globe. However, we do not know how grazing of bacteria by animals impacts the rate and type of bacterial mediated processes that occur. Part of this understanding is limited by methodology, we do not know whether currently used approaches to quantify an animal’s diet work when dealing with bacteria or Archaea. Two potential, and employed techniques are stable isotopic and fatty acid analyses. As part of this research, we showed that many of the basic assumptions for these techniques are either violated or are inherently more variable when dealing with bacterial and archaeal food sources than the paradigms constructed around plant and animal diets would suggest. These results will improve the accuracy and applicability of future studies that aim to constrain the role of microbial food sources in animal diets.
Ecological understanding of polar systems: Polar habitats experience short term periods of high food availability and long periods of no food during winter; however one potential food resource that is active throughout the winter are bacteria. Bacteria can degrade resources that animals cannot digest. Through this research we showed that when food becomes scarce, bacteria that are active become the food source by the animals that live in the mud. Further, we demonstrated that if microbial activity is inhibited when food is scarce the entire food web starts to fail. This identified a mechanism by which this community is able to survive and a previously hypothesized but never demonstrated role of bacteria as critical food resource for animals.
Advances in Carbon Cycling – The vast majority of the world’s seafloor occurs at depths that get only episodic inputs of food, making the intensely seasonal High Antarctic a perfect model system to understand global processes. This food is formed in the surface water by phytoplankton and as the plankton sinks it brings down with it carbon from the atmosphere, minimizing the impact of human CO2 release on our climate. A portion of this food that falls to the seafloor is consumed by bacteria or animals meaning that the carbon is released back into the water. This released carbon will resurface within approximately 1000 years. However, the portion of the carbon that is not consumed by biology is buried for geologic time periods (>10,000s of years), making it one of the few long term sinks of carbon on the planet. While most of the carbon that makes it this deep is not digestible by the animals, bacteria can consume it and through their own growth facilitate the transfer of this carbon into the animal food web. Thus, through identifying the routing of carbon through bacteria into animal food webs in this research, we have identified a mechanism that alters the total amount of carbon that is buried within the seafloor. As part of this research we have synthesized these concepts within an Ecosystem Service review article to facilitate their use by resource managers.
Broader impac...
Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.