Award Abstract # 1045606
Collaborative Research: Analysis of Seismicity Associated with tThe Mw=8.8 2010 Maule Earthquake and Implications for Subduction Processes

NSF Org: EAR
Division Of Earth Sciences
Recipient: LEHIGH UNIVERSITY
Initial Amendment Date: February 15, 2011
Latest Amendment Date: December 19, 2011
Award Number: 1045606
Award Instrument: Continuing Grant
Program Manager: Eva Zanzerkia
EAR
 Division Of Earth Sciences
GEO
 Directorate for Geosciences
Start Date: February 15, 2011
End Date: January 31, 2014 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $166,209.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $166,209.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2011 = $78,413.00
FY 2012 = $87,796.00
History of Investigator:
  • Anne Meltzer (Principal Investigator)
    ameltzer@lehigh.edu
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: Lehigh University
526 BRODHEAD AVE
BETHLEHEM
PA  US  18015-3008
(610)758-3021
Sponsor Congressional District: 07
Primary Place of Performance: Lehigh University
526 BRODHEAD AVE
BETHLEHEM
PA  US  18015-3008
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
07
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): E13MDBKHLDB5
Parent UEI:
NSF Program(s): Geophysics
Primary Program Source: 01001112DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT
01001213DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT
Program Reference Code(s): 1576
Program Element Code(s): 157400
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.050

ABSTRACT

The Mw=8.8 Maule earthquake off the coast of Chile on
February 27, 2010 is the 5th largest megathrust earthquake ever to be recorded and the 2nd
largest to be recorded by modern digital seismic networks. Immediately following the
Maule earthquake, teams of seismologists from Germany, France, the UK, and the US,
working with seismologists in Chile, coordinated resources to deploy both broadband and
short period seismometers and accelerometers above the rupture zone to capture
aftershocks associated with this significant earthquake. Data recorded from these stations
will be combined to produce an open international community data volume providing an
unprecedented opportunity to investigate processes associated with great earthquakes and
to image the anatomy of a subduction zone. A defining characteristic of the Maule aftershock investigations
has been collaboration, at both national and international levels. The original involvement
in the data collection by US teams grew voluntarily out of the IRIS community, and the
rationale of greater efficiencies through cooperation was readily adapted by the five
international groups working in the region.

In this project the researchers will carry out a broad but
interrelated spectrum of seismic analyses to the Maule international seismic data set,
along with a reanalysis of a selection of data collected in the rupture zone prior to the
earthquake, to address some of the fundamental scientific objectives that motivated the
initial data collection. These objectives fall into two general categories: (1) rupture
processes of megathrusts, and (2) active tectonics and dynamics of an oceanic-continental
(Andean) margin. They intend to produce an internally consistent set of data products across a range of
analytical techniques. The PIs will share graduate students and scheduling extended visits to each others labs, thereby exposing students to a significantly broader range of experience than most students typically enjoy. Finally, they plan to engage our international colleagues by sharing some analysis tasks of mutual
interest. Data products generated by this study will be made available to the broader
international community via a dedicated web site.

PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH

Note:  When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

Gavin P. Hayes, Eric Bergman, Kendra L. Johnson, Harley M. Benz, Lucy Brown and Anne S. Meltzer "Seismotectonic framework of the 2010 February 27 Mw 8.8 Maule, Chile earthquake sequence" Geophys. J. Int. , v.195 , 2013 , p.1034 doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt238
S. Beck, A. Rietbrock, F. Tilmann, S. Barrientos, A. Meltzer, O. Oncken, K. Bataille, S. Roecker, Jean-Pierre Vilotte. R. M. Russo "Advancing Subduction Zone Science with International Collaboration and Open Data" EOS , v.95 , 2014 , p.193 10.1002/2014EO230001

PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT

Disclaimer

This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.

Subduction zones are sites of the world’s largest earthquakes. The nature of the interface between the down going oceanic lithosphere and the overriding plate allow for earthquake ruptures to extend for hundreds of kilometers generating large magnitude megathrust events like those offshore Chile and Alaska in the 1960’s, Sumatra in 2004, and Japan in 2011. Earthquakes along subduction zones are the most damaging and costliest in terms of loss of life and economic impact. The Mw=8.8 Maule earthquake offshore Chile in February 2010 ruptured a 500 km segment of the Nazca-South American plate boundary. This event is the 6th largest megathrust earthquake ever to be recorded and the 2nd largest to be recorded by modern digital seismic networks. In the immediate wake of the earthquake, an international effort coordinated resources to deploy both broadband and short period seismometers and accelerometers above the rupture zone to capture aftershocks associated with this significant earthquake. The combined data recorded by these stations produced an open international community data volume, IMAD (International Maule Aftershock Deployment). The IMAD dataset provides an exceptional opportunity to investigate processes associated with great earthquakes and to image the anatomy of a subduction zone.

A primary outcome from this project is a uniform catalog of aftershock seismicity of the complete IMAD dataset. Extremely high seismicity following the mainshock (over 100,000 earthquakes during the recording period) requires automated procedures. The spatial and temporal patterns of seismicity combined with the frequency-magnitude distribution of earthquakes after a large magnitude megathrust make implementation of standard automatic earthquake detection and location methodologies difficult. Improvements in routine high quality earthquake detection and location from earthquake aftershock sequences have the potential to improve seismic hazard analysis and earthquake real-time warning systems. Our work combines local tuning of detection and location algorithms for automated processing and quality control calibrated by analyst review to produce a uniform catalog of events. The uniform catalog provides a basis for research into the spatial and temporal patterns of deformation in the subduction zone following the large magnitude mainshock. It also serves as a basis for additional studies aimed at imaging the structure of the subduction zone and a variety of geologic process associated with subduction.

Analysis of the aftershock catalog indicates complex spatial and temporal patterns of seismicity and earthquake focal mechanisms, and earthquake clustering. The majority of larger magnitude aftershocks occur adjacent to areas that ruptured during the mainshock as the surrounding volume of material adjusts to slip associated with the main event. Locations of smaller magnitude events are more diffuse suggesting broader volumetric accommodation of deformation. Larger magnitude aftershocks show evidence of triggering smaller magnitude events (cascading events). While the majority of aftershocks occur along the interface between the subducting and overlying plate, a significant number of events are located within the overlying plate and well into the volcanic arc. Pre-existing structures within the forarc region act to concentrate and in some cases impede aftershock seismicity. 


Last Modified: 07/03/2014
Modified by: Anne S Meltzer

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page