Award Abstract # 0620699
Dissertation Research Awards: The Science of Defining Populations: Disease, Diagnostics, and the Administration of the Social Body in the United States

NSF Org: SES
Division of Social and Economic Sciences
Recipient: THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
Initial Amendment Date: July 20, 2006
Latest Amendment Date: July 20, 2006
Award Number: 0620699
Award Instrument: Standard Grant
Program Manager: stephen zehr
SES
 Division of Social and Economic Sciences
SBE
 Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences
Start Date: July 1, 2006
End Date: June 30, 2007 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $2,250.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $2,250.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2006 = $2,250.00
History of Investigator:
  • Veena Das (Principal Investigator)
    veenadas@jhu.edu
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: Johns Hopkins University
3400 N CHARLES ST
BALTIMORE
MD  US  21218-2608
(443)997-1898
Sponsor Congressional District: 07
Primary Place of Performance: Johns Hopkins University
3400 N CHARLES ST
BALTIMORE
MD  US  21218-2608
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
07
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): FTMTDMBR29C7
Parent UEI: GS4PNKTRNKL3
NSF Program(s): SOC STUDIES OF SCI, ENG & TECH
Primary Program Source: app-0106 
Program Reference Code(s): 9179, SMET
Program Element Code(s): 756700
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.075

ABSTRACT

The principal objective of this Science and Society Dissertation Improvement Grant is to support research examining how the scientific management of disease produced ideas about populations, more specifically the poor, during the twentieth century. The focus is upon diagnostic and therapeutic changes in the management of venereal disease (sexually transmitted diseases, as the category would later become). In the case of venereal
disease, scientific knowledge and existing social and moral attitudes towards contagion and poverty came together through novel uses of quantification, defining scientifically discrete populations. The research strategy is to trace the production of knowledge (both social and scientific) about such populations between laboratory science, clinical medicine, and public administration within the context of Baltimore, Maryland. By following these transformations in one locale, the research will provide a nuanced picture of how forms of treatment and surveillance in turn become incorporated into public life. The project considers how such notions entered medical and scientific discourse around venereal and other types of infectious diseases, most notably those characterized by poverty, race, and sexuality, after the rise of more effective diagnostics and therapeutics. The major product of this research will be a dissertation manuscript combining historical and ethnographic approaches, contributing to an understanding of the role of medical science in the shaping social difference and instrumentalizing moral dimensions of disease and illness. The research will draw from science studies, medical and social anthropology, and the history of science and medicine. The objective of the proposed research is to offer a historically informed look at how knowledge about populations, particularly the poor and disadvantaged, is produced at the intersection of science, medicine, and public life. Despite the close connection to the fields of medicine and public health, this project is uniquely suited for support from the Science and Society Program because of its critical attention to the way scientific objects and methods are
bounded by social and societal norms. This research will contribute substantially to knowledge at the intersection of science and society by documenting how ideas about populations are produced in relation to scientific progress. The broader impacts of this project will include: demonstrating new forms of appraisal of medical and public health practices; opening a dialogue between clinicians, administrators, and researchers concerning established notions about populations characterized by disadvantage and risk; and incorporating historically informed analyses into research practice and policy decisions.

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page