Dr. Rita Colwell
Mr. Chairman, Senator Kennedy, members of the Committee, thank you for this opportunity to testify in anticipation of NSF's reauthorization. I want to begin by thanking you and the subcommittee for your consistent, bipartisan support for NSF's science and engineering activities.
The Foundation's priorities for the coming year are very clearly delineated in our budget request for Fiscal Year 2001. If enacted, this budget would provide the largest dollar increase the Foundation has ever received. I believe that this investment is the first step in setting the stage for a new century of progress through learning and discovery.
Let me highlight a few trends at the frontiers of science and engineering that shape our priorities for the NSF in the coming fiscal year. Then, I'll focus on how NSF is responding to these trends and working to improve learning and teaching at all levels.
The headliners in NSF's 2001 request are four focused, multidisciplinary initiatives. In fact, they are really national priorities: Information Technology Research, Biocomplexity, 21st Century Workforce and the emergent National Nanoscale Science and Engineering Initiative.
Each initiative integrates research across the disciplines of science, engineering and mathematics and fosters strong connections to education at all levels. Solving many of the challenges facing our society will require more than individual discoveries. It will require the integration of knowledge from all disciplines.
In addition to our initiatives, nearly half our requested increase will support what we call the core activities. It will help us with the biggest challenge: to strengthen the core disciplines of science and engineering while moving forward in interdisciplinary areas.
It was just fifty years ago - May 10th, 1950 to be exact - that President Truman signed S. 247, the act that established the NSF.
Our nation's commitment to science, engineering and education did not begin in 1950. This commitment can be seen from the very beginning of the nation. The motto on America's first coin for example - minted in 1792 - read: Liberty: Parent of Science and Industry.
That motto has just as much meaning today - in the 21st century - as it did in 1792, in an era before the advent of the steam engine. Individual scientists and engineers - supported by NSF and other federal agencies - are using their talent and their freedom to create, discover, and innovate.
Increasingly these scientists and engineers, and perhaps even more important their students - are also making the jump to the private sector.
This transfer to the private sector of people - first supported by NSF at universities - should be viewed as the ultimate success of technology transfer. These talented scientists and engineers are part of the new wave of entrepreneurs creating remarkable wealth in areas like information technology, biotechnology, and now in nanotechnology.
Nanotechnology - Mr. Chairman - is a new, emerging field where scientists and engineers are beginning to manipulate matter at the atomic level. Taking a cue from biology, researchers across disciplines are beginning to create nanostructures smaller than human cells.
This "Lilliputian" technology has the potential to revolutionize nearly every facet of our economy and our lives. For example:
- Researchers envision building electronic circuits
from the bottom-up, starting at the molecular
level. In the future researchers may be building
molecular computers the size of a tear drop with
the power of today's fastest supercomputers.
- Combining microelectronics and neural research
holds great promise for developing prosthetic
devices for artificial limbs. Researchers are
creating nanochips where nerve axons can regrow
through the tiny grate in the center of a silicon
membrane. These chips then modify and distribute
the nerve impulses, simulating the electrical
activity of a normal nerve synapse.
- Researchers are already developing micromachined needles with sharp tips of less than a micrometer across. Such tiny needle tips can pierce the skin easily and without pain-a novel new method of drug delivery.
There are many more innovations - most occurring in the past year or so. We are also already seeing a substantial amount of industry-university partnerships in nanoscale science and engineering. Industry, as well as other federal agencies like NASA, DoE and DoD will be looking to our universities for the scientists and engineers skilled in nanotechnology. That is why I cannot overstate the importance of NSF's investment.
The transfer of scientists and engineers to the private sector can probably best be seen in the Information Technology sector. Everyday we read a news story touting the latest Internet whiz kid or biotechnology IPO. David Ignatius - in a recent column in the Washington Post - wrote about a 27-year old Stanford graduate student with a smart business plan and a hot Internet search engine with the strange name of Google.
The offbeat name is actually a reference to the complex math - actually a series of mathematical algorithms - that makes the search engine work. It involves over half a billion variables in its complex calculations. The mathematical term googol represents 10 to the 100th power.
Google the company is an excellent example of knowledge transfer from NSF investments in people. The company's two founders were computer science grad students at Stanford who studied under an NSF-funded faculty member. One of the founders received an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. Google's Vice President of Engineering is a computer science professor at the University of California at Santa Barbara and recipient of a prestigious NSF CAREER award.
This demonstrates how fundamental research in an area like mathematics acts as the lifeblood of the IT revolution. It also shows how the unparalleled innovation system in the U.S. can quickly exploit new ideas developed in university labs and bring them to market.
This example is really just the latest in a string of NSF successes. The basic research that enabled nearly all major search engines found on the web today - including Lycos, Excite, Infoseek, Inktomi and specialized search engines like Congress's own THOMAS - was conducted by university researchers funded by NSF.
This trend hasn't gone unnoticed by industry. Now leaders like Alfred Berkeley, the President of the NASDAQ Stock Market and former Lockheed-Martin CEO, Norm Augustine, talk about the importance of the NSF's investments in basic research. I've included as an attachment statements they made earlier this year on the importance of NSF's investments to industry. I've also attached the recent statement by the Council on Competitiveness, which was co-signed by dozens of CEO's and other industry executives.
Mr. Chairman, NSF has recently developed a strategic plan that reflect our role in the innovation process. The investments proposed in our FY 2001 budget were crafted to address three strategic goals for the Foundation. They are:
People -- We've always said that every NSF dollar is an investment in people. We cover kindergarten to career development to continuous, lifelong learning.
Ideas - This includes research at and across the frontiers of science and engineering, and connections to its use in service of society.
Tools -- These are the databases, the platforms, and the facilities that keep us at the leading edge. There are some new starts in here that I will highlight in a moment.
I've already mentioned the initiatives within the FY 2001 budget request. I would also like to note that nearly half our requested increase - $320 million -will support what we call the core activities. It will help us with our biggest challenge: to strengthen the core disciplines of science and engineering while moving forward in interdisciplinary areas.
NSF's investments in cutting-edge mathematics and statistics are a perfect example of how investing in core disciplines will sustain new fundamental discoveries and make interdisciplinary activities run on all cylinders.
The story of Google shows how mathematics has become increasingly important in Information Technology Research. We are also seeing impressive contributions to the new and emerging fields of bioinformatics and nano-scale manufacturing. The greatest insights into AIDS have come from mathematical models of disease.
Mr. Chairman, all of our advances in science and engineering depend upon a workforce that is literate in science and technology. When we talk about the equation for science and society, this is a critical part.
Our request for programs specifically addressing NSF's strategic goal of investing in People - spanning both the Education and Human Resources and Research Accounts - will increase by 10.8% over FY 2000. Within this broader investment, our request for Education and Human Resources represents a 5.5% increase over the FY 2000 level.
NSF science and math education programs are - like all NSF programs - "experiments". They are designed to foster the natural connections between learning and discovery. NSF-funded science and math education projects come from proposals submitted by individual investigators. These can be university faculty, but they also include local teachers, administrators, school districts officials, and state officials. What they all have in common is that their proposals are subject to merit-based peer review.
In recent years, NSF has supported a number of initiatives that are beginning to have an impact. These include:
- K-12 systemic activities
- Professional development of teachers
- Improvement of instructional materials
- Research on learning & education
- Digital libraries
- Graduate students in K-12 education
Consistent with our mission, NSF's educational programs all seek to integrate the best research across the fields of science and engineering with the education of the next generation.
Some - like our new interagency research initiative in learning and education - are more research-focused.
Others are focused clearly on the classroom - such as our efforts to develop instructional materials. These activities seek to improve the quality of classroom materials by injecting them with in-depth science and engineering content.
Still others - such as our systemic reform efforts - combine research and education by seeking to reform science and math education in a locality in ways or on scales that have never been attempted. Through rigorous assessment, these systemic efforts can help demonstrate which strategies work and which do not.
Other education highlights include:
- Funding for the Graduate Teaching Fellows in K-12
Education (GK-12) program more than doubles to
$28 million. The GK-12 program supports graduate
and advanced undergraduate students in science,
math and engineering to be content resources for
- The request for the Historically Black Colleges
and Universities --Undergraduate Program (HBCU-UP)
in FY 2001 is $11 million, an increase of $1.60
million or 17%. This reflects a contribution from
NSF's research account of $3 million. The FY 2001
request for HBCU-UP will provide continuing support
for 14 existing projects and support for up to
4 new awards in FY 2001.
- The request for the Advanced Technological Education
Program (ATE) - NSF's flagship program for 2-year
institutions - is $39 million, an increase of
$10 million or over 33%. The ATE program seeks
to strengthen the science and math preparation
of students in technical fields. This will enable
them to better compete in the high-performance
workplace in areas such as Information Technology
- Funding for education programs funded through the H-1B Petitioner Account established by Title IV of the American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act of 1998 (P.L. 105-277). These activities include the Computer Science, Engineering, and Mathematics (CSEM) Scholarships. Under this program, merit-based scholarships of up to $2,500 are provided for new or continued enrollment at institutions of higher education by eligible low-income individuals pursuing associate, undergraduate, or graduate degrees in the disciplines specified.
Our nation is in the midst of one of the greatest eras of technological change in human history. In an economy driven by knowledge and ideas, how we prepare our workforce is paramount. NSF is committed to providing leadership in this critical area.
Finally, I mentioned earlier that we have two new starts in our investments in Tools.
One is NEON - the National Ecological Observatory Network: a pole-to-pole network - Arctic to Antarctic - with a state-of-the-art infrastructure of platforms and equipment to enable 21st Century science and engineering-based ecological and biocomplexity research. The Major Research Equipment request for NEON is $12 million in FY 2001.
The other new start is EarthScope, which is an array of instruments that will allow scientists to observe earthquake and other earth processes like volcanic eruptions at much higher resolution. $17 million is requested for EarthScope in FY 2001.
Mr. Chairman, since its founding fifty years ago the National Science Foundation has been an important and vital catalyst for discovery and innovation. From the information technology revolution to the genomic revolution and everything in between - MRIs, lasers, the Internet, Doppler radar, and countless other innovations - NSF-supported fundamental research has advanced our society.
NSF's FY 2001 budget reflects the lessons of history. It focuses on national priorities, as it should. But it also recognizes that one of our highest national priorities must always be to stay at the leading-edge of science and engineering research and education across the board. Over half of the increased funding is just for that.
The entire NSF investment portfolio sets the stage for a 21st Century research and education enterprise that is focused on national priorities. Guiding all of these activities is the Foundation's longstanding commitment to merit-based investments in learning and discovery that adhere to the highest standards of excellence.
This request marks a significant step forward for U.S. science and engineering. The requested increase of over 17 percent provides a level of investment that is clearly in keeping with the wealth of opportunity that science and engineering provide society. It positions America to remain a world leader in the knowledge-based economy of the 21st Century.