The Grant Proposal Guide (GPG) provides guidance for preparation of unsolicited proposals to NSF. Proposals submitted in response to specific NSF program announcements are also considered unsolicited and, unless specified otherwise, are prepared in accordance with GPG formatting and other requirements. Proposers should note that awards resulting from unsolicited research proposals are subject to statutory cost-sharing. (See Section II.D.7.l and Grant Policy Manual (GPM) Section 330.) In addition, some program announcements may contain other cost-sharing/matching requirements. Unless the program announcement identifies other specific criteria, unsolicited proposals are evaluated pursuant to general evaluation criteria identified in GPG Chapter III and compete with each other, but less directly than in solicited proposals.

 The Foundation considers proposals submitted by individuals or groups for support in most fields of research. (See Appendix A for programs.) Interdisciplinary proposals are also eligible for consideration.

 NSF does not normally support technical assistance, pilot plant efforts, research requiring security classification, the development of products for commercial marketing or market research for a particular project or invention. Bioscience research with disease-related goals, including work on the etiology, diagnosis or treatment of physical or mental disease, abnormality, or malfunction in human beings or animals, is normally not supported. Animal models of such conditions or the development or testing of drugs or other procedures for their treatment also are not eligible for support. However, research in bioengineering, with diagnosis or treatment-related goals, that applies engineering principles to problems in biology and medicine while advancing engineering knowledge is eligible for support. Bioengineering research to aid persons with disabilities is also eligible.

 Research proposals (not proposals for conferences or workshops) to the Biological Sciences Directorate cannot be duplicates of proposals to any other Federal agency for simultaneous consideration. The only exceptions to this rule are: (1) when the proposers and program managers at relevant Federal agencies have previously agreed to joint review and possible joint funding of the proposal; and (2) proposals from beginning investigators (individuals who have not been a principal investigator (PI) or co-principal investigator (co-PI) on a Federally funded award with the exception of doctoral dissertation, postdoctoral fellowship or research planning grants). For proposers who qualify under this latter exception, the box for "Beginning Investigator" should be checked on the Cover Sheet for Proposal to the National Science Foundation, NSF Form 1207.

 NSF expects strict adherence to the rules of proper scholarship and attribution. The responsibility for proper attribution and citation rests with authors of a research proposal; all parts of the proposal should be prepared with equal care for this concern. Serious failure to adhere to such standards can result in findings of misconduct in science. NSF policies and rules on Misconduct in Science and Engineering are discussed in GPM Section 930.

 The proposal should present the: (1) objectives and scientific or educational significance of the proposed work; (2) suitability of the methods to be employed; (3) qualifications of the investigator and the grantee organization; (4) effect of the activity on the infrastructure of science, engineering and education; and (5) amount of funding required. It should present the merits of the proposed project clearly and should be prepared with the care and thoroughness of a paper submitted for publication. Sufficient information should be provided so that reviewers will be able to evaluate the proposal in accordance with the two merit review criteria established by the National Science Board. (See Chapter III.) As a matter of convenience, a checklist is provided as Appendix B, to help assure that proposals are complete before submission to NSF.

 Access to proposal and post-award functions is limited to staff from FastLane registered organizations and is secured through the use of Personal Identification Numbers (PINs). To register an organization, authorized organization representatives must complete the registration form which can be accessed through the Registration Information hyperlink on the FastLane home page. Once an organization is registered, PINs for individual staff are available from the organization's sponsored projects office.

 Detailed information about the FastLane Project is available from the FastLane home page at www.fastlane.nsf.gov.

 Scientists, engineers and educators usually initiate proposals which are officially submitted by their employing organization. Before formal submission, the proposal may be discussed with appropriate NSF program staff. Graduate students are not encouraged to submit research proposals, but should arrange to serve as research assistants to faculty members. Some NSF divisions accept proposals for Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Research Grants when submitted by a faculty member on behalf of the graduate student. The Foundation also provides support specifically for women and minority scientists and engineers, scientists and engineers with disabilities, and faculty at primarily undergraduate academic institutions. (See Chapter V for information about Special Programs.)

1. Universities and colleges: U.S. universities and two- and four-year colleges (including community colleges) acting on behalf of their faculty members.

2. Non-profit, non-academic organizations: Independent museums, observatories, research laboratories, professional societies and similar organizations in the U.S. that are directly associated with educational or research activities.

3. For-profit organizations: U.S. commercial organizations, especially small businesses with strong capabilities in scientific or engineering research or education. (See Section V.K. for specific information on the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program.) An unsolicited proposal from a commercial organization may be funded when the project is of special concern from a national point of view, special resources are available for the work or the proposed project is especially meritorious. NSF is interested in supporting projects that couple industrial research resources and perspectives with those of universities. Therefore, it especially welcomes proposals for cooperative projects involving both universities and the private sector.

4. State and Local Governments: State educational offices or organizations and local school districts may submit proposals intended to broaden the impact, accelerate the pace and increase the effectiveness of improvements in science, mathematics and engineering education in both K-12 and post-secondary levels.

5. Unaffiliated Individuals: Scientists, engineers or educators in the U.S. and U.S. citizens may be eligible for support, provided that the individual is not employed by or affiliated with an organization and:

• the proposed project is sufficiently meritorious and otherwise complies with the conditions of any relevant program announcement/solicitation;
• the proposer has demonstrated the capability and has access to any necessary facilities to carry out the project; and
• the proposer agrees to fiscal arrangements which, in the opinion of the NSF Grants Officer, ensure responsible management of Federal funds.

Unaffiliated individuals should contact the appropriate program before preparing a proposal for submission.

6. Foreign organizations: NSF rarely provides support to foreign organizations. NSF will consider proposals for cooperative projects involving U.S. and foreign organizations, provided support is requested only for the U.S. portion of the collaborative effort. (For further information, contact the Division of International Programs, Appendix A.)
7. Other Federal agencies: NSF does not normally support research or education activities by scientists, engineers or educators employed by Federal agencies or Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs). However, a scientist, engineer or educator who has a joint appointment with a university and a Federal agency (such as a Veterans Administration Hospital, or with a university and an FFRDC) may submit proposals through the university and may receive support if he/she is a bona fide faculty member of the university, although part of his/her salary may be provided by the Federal agency. Under unusual circumstances, other Federal agencies and FFRDCs may submit proposals directly to NSF. Preliminary inquiry should be made to the appropriate program before preparing a proposal for submission.

 Many NSF programs accept proposals at any time. Other programs however, establish target dates or deadlines for submission of proposals to allow time for their consideration by review panels which meet periodically. These target dates and deadlines are published in specific program announcements/solicitations, which can be obtained from the NSF Clearinghouse (pubs@nsf.gov) or electronically through the NSF home page (www.nsf.gov). Lists of deadlines and target dates also are available electronically on the NSF home page. Unless otherwise stated in a program announcement or solicitation, proposals must be received by the specified date. However, a proposal received after a deadline may be acceptable if it carries a legible proof-of-mailing date assigned by the carrier and the proof-of-mailing date is not later than one week prior to the deadline date. If the receipt date falls on a weekend, it will be extended to the following Monday; if the date falls on a holiday, it will be extended to the following work day. The receipt date will be waived only in extenuating circumstances. Inquiry about submission may also be made to the appropriate program.

 Proposers should allow up to six months for programmatic review and processing (see chapter III for additional information on the NSF merit review process.) In addition, proposers should be aware that the NSF Division of Grants and Agreements generally makes awards to academic institutions within 30 days after the program division makes its recommendation. Grants being made to organizations that have not received an NSF award within the preceding two years, or involving special situations (such as coordination with another Federal agency or a private funding source), cooperative agreements, and other unusual arrangements may require additional review and processing time. Proposals that are time sensitive (e.g., conference, group travel and research involving ephemeral phenomena) will only be accepted for review if, in the opinion of the cognizant Program Officer, they are received in sufficient time to permit appropriate NSF review and processing to support an award in advance of the activity to be supported. Every effort is made to reach a decision and inform the proposer promptly. Until an award is made, NSF is not responsible for any expenditures incurred by the proposing organization.

 For standard proposals, electronic proposal submission via the NSF FastLane Project is the preferred method. Unless otherwise specified in a program announcement or solicitation, however, proposals may continue to be submitted in paper form.

 A proposal only needs to be submitted once to NSF, even if review by multiple programs is envisioned by the proposer. The submission of duplicate or substantially similar proposals concurrently for review by more than one program without prior NSF approval may result in the return of the redundant proposals. (See Section IV.B. for further information on proposal return.)

 The following are specific instructions regarding the submission and receipt of electronic and paper proposals to NSF:

 1. Electronic submission. A proposal is considered complete when the proposal, including the Project Description, has been submitted to NSF. If the Project Description is included in the electronic submission, unless otherwise specified in a program announcement or solicitation, the receipt date will be the date the sponsored projects office transmits the proposal to NSF. If the Project Description is submitted separately in paper form, it should accompany the signed NSF Form 1207 and the receipt date will be the date the Project Description and signed Cover Sheet for Proposal to the National Science Foundation are received by the NSF Proposal Processing Unit (or the cognizant program office if so directed in a program announcement or solicitation). In either case, a proposal may not be processed until the complete proposal (including signed Cover Sheet) has been received by NSF.

 2. Paper submission. The delivery address must clearly identify the NSF announcement or solicitation number under which the proposal is being submitted, if applicable. If the proposal is not submitted in response to a specific announcement/solicitation, proposers should enter the NSF Program(s), using Appendix A of this document as a Guide, to which the proposal should be directed. NSF will determine which program(s) will evaluate each proposal.

 Unless stated otherwise in a program announcement/ solicitation, proposals should not be addressed or sent directly to the cognizant Program Officer. If copies of the proposal are mailed or delivered in more than one package, the number of packages and the NSF Announcement/ Solicitation number, if applicable, should be marked on the outside of each package. Proposals must be sent prepaid, not collect. Proposals sent by special messenger or courier should be delivered to the below address, weekdays, except Federal holidays, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. ET. Please contact the NSF Mail Room, (703) 306-0657, with any questions regarding the mailing or delivery of proposals.

 Proposals must be addressed exactly as follows:

Announcement/Solicitation No ________________
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION PPU
NSF PROGRAM _______________________________________
4201 WILSON BLVD ROOM P60
ARLINGTON VA 22230

 3. Acknowledgment of proposal receipt. The acknowledgment of the receipt of the proposal will reference both the NSF proposal number and the cognizant NSF program to which the proposal has been assigned. Communications about the proposal should be addressed to the cognizant Program Officer with reference to the proposal number. Proposers are encouraged to use the NSF FastLane system described in Section I.C. to verify the status of their submission to NSF.