
NSF Org: |
ITE Innovation and Technology Ecosystems |
Recipient: |
|
Initial Amendment Date: | December 9, 2022 |
Latest Amendment Date: | December 9, 2022 |
Award Number: | 2236021 |
Award Instrument: | Standard Grant |
Program Manager: |
Michael Reksulak
mreksula@nsf.gov (703)292-8326 ITE Innovation and Technology Ecosystems TIP Directorate for Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships |
Start Date: | December 15, 2022 |
End Date: | November 30, 2024 (Estimated) |
Total Intended Award Amount: | $748,674.00 |
Total Awarded Amount to Date: | $748,674.00 |
Funds Obligated to Date: |
|
History of Investigator: |
|
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: |
3227 CHEADLE HALL SANTA BARBARA CA US 93106-0001 (805)893-4188 |
Sponsor Congressional District: |
|
Primary Place of Performance: |
3227 CHEADLE HALL SANTA BARBARA CA US 93106-0001 |
Primary Place of
Performance Congressional District: |
|
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): |
|
Parent UEI: |
|
NSF Program(s): | Convergence Accelerator Resrch |
Primary Program Source: |
|
Program Reference Code(s): | |
Program Element Code(s): |
|
Award Agency Code: | 4900 |
Fund Agency Code: | 4900 |
Assistance Listing Number(s): | 47.084 |
ABSTRACT
As we enter a third year of record extreme weather driven by a La Niña event, a staggering number of people are facing hunger in the United States and globally. A deadly combination of climate shocks, price increases and conflict have pushed 50+ million people to the edge of famine, highlighting the vulnerability of our global food system. Shocks to the food system are not isolated and can cascade. For example, climate shocks are often correlated, hitting multiple production areas around the world at the same time, resulting in food price hikes that can lead some countries to impose export bans, driving global prices even higher. Fortunately, correlated climate shocks are increasingly predictable. Our ability to forecast extreme heat, drought and heavy rains, driven by sea surface temperatures, has increased dramatically over the past two decades. This project leverages that predictive ability to collaborate with stakeholders along the food system to develop actionable models tailored to their needs and decision-points. Understanding, and anticipating, the vulnerability of the global food system to predictable climate shocks is critical. It will allow government agencies and aid groups to mitigate food crises and help communities build resiliency both in the United States and abroad.
This convergence research has two primary objectives. First, it will create predictive models that account for interlinkages across food security drivers. While models for crop production, meteorological forecasts, price, trade, and household food security exist, their current lack of interoperability means that the models do not readily allow for feedbacks, interactions or measures of uncertainty to be perpetuated throughout the system. Developing an integrated model requires a multidisciplinary convergence science approach, bringing together climatologists, hydrologists, sociologists, agricultural economists, statisticians and policy experts to appropriately model correlated shocks and their connections through the food system.
Second, to produce actionable output, these models need to be co-developed with stakeholders from the beginning. Stakeholders will guide model inputs, objectives, scenarios and help design their output. The researchers will work with decision-makers to co-produce models that quantify the effects of climate shocks on local and global food production, trade and prices, and enumerate the vulnerability of the households and regions to these shocks. This project will enhance our understanding of the drivers within each component of the integrated model, such as bolstering our theoretical understanding of the linkages between sea surface temperatures and climate, key nodes in the global food trade system, and the effect of combinations of specific food security drivers. Along with improving each separate model component, this project will facilitate their interaction, improving our ability to identify the correlation of weather to international trade and prices while more carefully accounting for uncertainty. To support the adoption of this approach to model development in other fields, the project will develop protocols for decision-maker coproduction of models. By bringing together academics with consequential real-world decision-makers working on both international and domestic food security, this project will help identify drivers of hunger that are relevant in different settings within developing and developed countries.
This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.
PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH
Note:
When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external
site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a
charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from
this site.
PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT
Disclaimer
This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.
Extreme weather events are becoming increasingly frequent and severe, disproportionately affecting food insecure, vulnerable, and marginalized populations. Innovative risk mitigation tactics are needed to address the inequitable impacts of extreme weather events. To meet this need, FoodSight combined science-driven statistical predictions of weather and its effect with decision support to manage risk. The three critical innovations of FoodSight’s empowering decision support science are (1) science-driven improvements in forecasting, (2) integration of novel data sources and models, and (3) culturally-embedded design and delivery of information at key decision points, structured in ways that are relevant for user decision-making. Together, these innovations could transform weather and climate data into usable information about future prices, rangeland productivity, and food insecurity and flood risk.
FoodSight partnered with three stakeholder groups that work with vulnerable populations exposed to frequent weather extremes: food banks in the Gulf Coast; USDA Climate Hubs in the Southwestern US; and county-level agro-meteorologists in Kenya.
We developed three prototypes that combined weather and other information to predict outcomes of interest for these community partners, and then developed an app that combines this information in an accessible form for end-users.
To help food banks more accurately target food aid during extreme weather events, FoodSight developed detailed flood maps and formal models of the connection between heavy rainfall, flooding and food insecurity, both spatially and through the economic effects of floods. To improve the livelihoods of ranchers and pastoralists and minimize risk, we began developing an application communicating the specific types of information that ranchers might need to make decisions during drought. To support improved drought and flood response in Kenya, we began to co-develop seasonal forecasts with the Kenya Meteorological Department, IGAD Climate Prediction and Applications Centre and local county officials, that are more timely, and more spatially disaggregated and are linked with information on prices and pasture to meet the needs of policymakers.
Key lessons from this research are summarized in a manuscript “Six Lessons for Closing the Last Mile: How to make climate decision support actionable” currently under review at Eath Futures. To summarize, first, by foregrounding and integrating the needs of users from the very beginning of model development, i.e., in the first mile, models are more likely to deliver to last-mile users. Second, modelers need to balance uncertainty and timeliness of predictions to enable response. Third, models need to be transparent. Fourth, during the co-production process, modelers need to respect the capacity constraints of end users. Fifth they need to embed approaches from multiple disciplines and sixth, they need to have a plan for what happens when they are wrong.
New insights in statistical analysis were also developed and shared in subsequent manuscripts for long-term (e.g. one-year-ahead) forecast of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) based on variables such as precipitation and vapor pressure deficit in history. As NDVI was found to be a crucial indicator for crop yield, understanding its dependence with other climate variables helps develop a reliable long-term forecast of NDVI with uncertainty assessment, which is useful for food production and security.
These innovative forecasting tools and maps combined with co-production techniques have the potential to provide critical information prior to climate extreme events which can ultimately better prepare farmers and foodbanks, leading to increased food security for vulnerable populations.
Last Modified: 04/14/2025
Modified by: Kathy Baylis
Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.