Award Abstract # 2140891
Collaborative Research: Understanding Persistence through the Lens of Interruption: A Framework for Transformation (UPLIFT)

NSF Org: DRL
Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings (DRL)
Recipient: GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORP
Initial Amendment Date: August 15, 2022
Latest Amendment Date: June 9, 2023
Award Number: 2140891
Award Instrument: Continuing Grant
Program Manager: Toya frank
tfrank@nsf.gov
 (703)292-2255
DRL
 Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings (DRL)
EDU
 Directorate for STEM Education
Start Date: August 15, 2022
End Date: July 31, 2027 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $1,356,072.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $822,120.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2022 = $822,120.00
History of Investigator:
  • Tamara Pearson (Principal Investigator)
    tpearson30@gatech.edu
  • Felicia Benton-Johnson (Former Principal Investigator)
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: Georgia Tech Research Corporation
926 DALNEY ST NW
ATLANTA
GA  US  30318-6395
(404)894-4819
Sponsor Congressional District: 05
Primary Place of Performance: Georgia Institute of Technology
225 North Avenue, NW
Atlanta
GA  US  30332-0002
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
05
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): EMW9FC8J3HN4
Parent UEI: EMW9FC8J3HN4
NSF Program(s): ADVANCE,
ECR-EDU Core Research,
Alliances-Minority Participat.
Primary Program Source: 04002223DB NSF Education & Human Resource
04002526DB NSF STEM Education

04002627DB NSF STEM Education
Program Reference Code(s): 111Z, 112Z, 8212, 8817
Program Element Code(s): 016Y00, 798000, 913300
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.076

ABSTRACT

This collaborative project will study the impact of interruptions on Black women?s collegiate STEM experiences and their persistence and matriculation in STEM majors. Interruptions are defined as overt and subtle external acts and internal dialogues and decisions that result in a loss of focus, momentum, and confidence and require time to rebound. Each interruption requires resources to rebound (e.g., time), but continual interruptions impact Black women?s ability to rebound and persist in STEM over time. Conducting research that centers the voices of Black women who experience these interruptions will generate new insights into redesigning institutional and other structural factors that often serve as barriers to persistence and success in STEM majors.

The research design entails a longitudinal, mixed-methods design wherein they follow 45 Black women who are STEM majors across three colleges in Georgia. Through interviews, focus groups, audio diaries, and the use of survey methods to collect quantitative data, the research team intends to develop a framework of interruption for Black women in STEM. The goals of the framework include: (a) to define interruption, (b) to identify constructs of interruption related to intent to persist, and (c) to determine the relationship between the domains of power and the experiences of interruption by undergraduate Black women in STEM. The creation of a clear definition of interruption and a robust conceptual framework has the potential to generate knowledge that will help address systemic racism across disciplines and settings.

This collaborative project is funded through the Racial Equity in STEM Education program (EHR Racial Equity). The program supports research and practice projects that investigate how considerations of racial equity factor into the improvement of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education and workforce. Awarded projects seek to center the voices, knowledge, and experiences of the individuals, communities, and institutions most impacted by systemic inequities within the STEM enterprise. This program aligns with NSF?s core value of supporting outstanding researchers and innovative thinkers from across the Nation's diversity of demographic groups, regions, and types of organizations. Funds for EHR Racial Equity are pooled from programs across EHR in recognition of the alignment of its projects with the collective research and development thrusts of the four divisions of the directorate.

This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page