
NSF Org: |
DMR Division Of Materials Research |
Recipient: |
|
Initial Amendment Date: | August 28, 2018 |
Latest Amendment Date: | August 28, 2018 |
Award Number: | 1842387 |
Award Instrument: | Standard Grant |
Program Manager: |
Randy Duran
rduran@nsf.gov (703)292-5326 DMR Division Of Materials Research MPS Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences |
Start Date: | September 1, 2018 |
End Date: | August 31, 2020 (Estimated) |
Total Intended Award Amount: | $100,000.00 |
Total Awarded Amount to Date: | $100,000.00 |
Funds Obligated to Date: |
|
History of Investigator: |
|
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: |
9500 GILMAN DR LA JOLLA CA US 92093-0021 (858)534-4896 |
Sponsor Congressional District: |
|
Primary Place of Performance: |
CA US 92093-0934 |
Primary Place of
Performance Congressional District: |
|
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): |
|
Parent UEI: |
|
NSF Program(s): | DMR SHORT TERM SUPPORT |
Primary Program Source: |
|
Program Reference Code(s): |
|
Program Element Code(s): |
|
Award Agency Code: | 4900 |
Fund Agency Code: | 4900 |
Assistance Listing Number(s): | 47.049 |
ABSTRACT
NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY
Ultrasound is a powerful tool to image diseases including cancer, orthopedic disorders, and heart function. One limitation of ultrasound is that it suffers from low contrast between the region of interest versus the background tissue. Therefore, there is a wide body of research into a special kind of ultrasound known as photoacoustic imaging. Photoacoustic imaging uses light to generate sound only in the area of interest. This increases the contrast. Unfortunately, photoacoustic ultrasound is not yet approved for widespread use in people. This might be partially due to a lack of standardization devices and methods to validate the novel imaging equipment that is needed for photoacoustic imaging. Therefore, this proposed work will create specialized plastic objects with known optical and acoustic properties suitable for calibrating and standardizing photoacoustic imaging equipment. This proposal combines expertise from academia and the Food and Drug Administration to create test objects and methods that will be useful to instrument manufacturers and physicians. The resulting test objects will improve knowledge of how to best create photoacoustic imaging instrumentation and might also streamline regulatory approval of this equipment. In turn, this will increase patient access to this important imaging technique to ultimately advance the national health and quality of life.
TECHNICAL SUMMARY
Photoacoustic imaging provides deep tissue imaging similar to ultrasound but with enhanced optical contrast and additional functional and molecular imaging capabilities. However, no standardized performance test methods or phantoms exist for photoacoustic imaging system evaluation unlike mature techniques (ultrasound, MRI, CT). The fundamental limitation is a lack of materials to simultaneously simulate tissue properties over a broad range of optical wavelengths and acoustic frequencies. This leaves investigators, instrument manufacturers, and regulatory agencies without clear strategies to evaluate device safety and effectiveness. This proposed work will create stable, biologically relevant imaging phantoms with well-characterized optical absorption/scattering coefficients, acoustic impedance, etc. that broadly simulate tissue over a wide range of optical wavelengths and acoustic frequencies. A literature search and laboratory study will identify suitable materials such as polyacrylamide hydrogels or novel polyvinyl chloride plastisol formulations. Intrinsic properties will be measured using well-validated spectrophotometry and acoustic pulse transmission methods and equipment at FDA. Once the phantom material formulations have been optimized, we will construct phantoms in several specific configurations to evaluate image quality metrics such as spatial resolution, penetration depth, etc. These novel phantoms will then be used with three photoacoustic systems with substantially different operating parameter ranges (e.g. optical wavelengths). Image quality metrics will be compared between devices to elucidate performance trade-offs between systems and the overall impact of system design choices and phantom properties on performance. The goal is to produce phantoms with 6-month stability that spectrally mimic hemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin and contain targets that enable image quality testing. The outcome will be a well-validated tissue-mimicking phantom to support device developers and inform regulatory decision-making including use as potential FDA Medical Device Development Tools.
This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.
PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH
Note:
When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external
site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a
charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from
this site.
PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT
Disclaimer
This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.
We developed and characterized a PAA hydrogel-based TMM with stable, widely tunable optical and acoustic properties similar to reported values for soft tissue. We then constructed PAA phantoms suitable for evaluating image quality of PAI systems and that were sufficiently robust for transport. We found that PAA optical and acoustic properties were stable over time and that well-sealed imaging phantoms showed no qualitative signs of desiccation or damage after 6 months of storage at room temperature. This is consistent with the reported service life for Zerdine® hydrogel phantoms of several years. The advantages of PAA hydrogels compared to other available TMMs for PAI include ease of preparation, better mechanical strength/stiffness than common hydrogel-based TMMs, broad dopant compatibility of water, lower preparation temperatures, and lower viscosity during formulation. The disadvantages of PAA include faster dopant settling due to low viscosity, requirements for well-sealed housings to prevent desiccation, reduced gel quality of very high-concentration formulations, and lower mechanical strength than nonaqueous materials such as PVCP and gel wax. Also, while our acoustic characterization data showed low spatial variation, some heterogeneity might still exist in imaging phantoms. These trade-offs should be carefully considered in selecting TMMs for a given phantom design and application.
Our experimental measurements demonstrated utility of these phantoms for evaluating image quality. Phantom testing of three PAI systems indicated a performance trade-off between spatial resolution and target contrast/imaging depth. The purpose of this study was not to rank performance of these PAI devices, as each system is intended for different applications and thus has different performance requirements and design specifications. Rather, this study aimed to demonstrate that the developed TMM and phantoms are suitable for evaluating PAI systems with widely differing design parameters. Additionally, our intent was to highlight the benefit of phantom-based test methods for objective, quantitative, and reproducible characterization of device performance. Phantom-based performance test methods can provide data that illustrates performance trade-offs, elucidates device design consequences, and may help establish performance expectations. Such information can be used to further optimize the design of device hardware or image processing algorithms for a particular application during device development.
Last Modified: 12/15/2020
Modified by: Jesse V Jokerst
Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.