Award Abstract # 1742890
Transformation of American Southern Commemorative Landscapes

NSF Org: BCS
Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences
Recipient: MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY
Initial Amendment Date: June 20, 2017
Latest Amendment Date: June 20, 2017
Award Number: 1742890
Award Instrument: Continuing Grant
Program Manager: Antoinette WinklerPrins
anwinkle@nsf.gov
 (703)292-7266
BCS
 Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences
SBE
 Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences
Start Date: January 1, 2017
End Date: December 31, 2018 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $467,296.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $157,857.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2014 = $157,857.00
History of Investigator:
  • David Butler (Principal Investigator)
    david.butler@usm.edu
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: Middle Tennessee State University
1301 E MAIN ST
MURFREESBORO
TN  US  37132-0001
(615)494-7848
Sponsor Congressional District: 04
Primary Place of Performance: Middle Tennessee State University
Murfreesboro
TN  US  37132-0001
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
04
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): VMWUDBTMF4C9
Parent UEI:
NSF Program(s): Geography and Spatial Sciences
Primary Program Source: 01001415DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT
01001516DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT

01001617DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT
Program Reference Code(s): 1352, 9150
Program Element Code(s): 135200
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.075

ABSTRACT

Commemorative landscapes both reflect cultural values and provide a context to sustain and challenge those values. Landscapes can be constructed and used to actively remember or forget certain identities, groups, and histories in order to maintain or sometimes challenge those histories. Southern plantation tourism plays an important role in developing basic understanding of race in the United States by establishing a sense of place and meaning through the exploration of commemorative landscapes. How southern commemorative landscapes provide symbolic and substantive representations of what it means to be southern and how southern culture is defined and debated form key questions in the scientific study of social memory and commemorative landscapes. The objective of this research is to contribute to theory centered on the transformation of racialized southern commemorative landscapes within the United States. Specifically, the researchers examine the processes and politics of incorporating slavery into plantation landscapes as sites symbolic of contemporary struggles over the meanings and uses of southern and American heritage. Incorporating critical discussions of slavery at such sites not only enhances historical accuracy, but is also necessary to understand contemporary race relations in the United States. This research describes and explains the manner and extent to which southern tourist plantations are moving toward an incorporation of the history of the enslaved into the commemorative landscape of the region and nation. These issues are of importance to contemporary American society as a whole, and of specific interest to those who own, manage, or visit these tourist sites.


Traditionally, tourism plantations have given authority to the idea of white privilege and the erasure of the enslaved from southern plantation history, but these representations have begun to change. This framework drives the following research questions: (1) To what extent and how are owners/operators of plantations incorporating slavery into the built, narrative, and performative landscapes at plantations? (2) What were/are the impetuses for change, towards an inclusion of slavery into the built, narrative, and performative landscapes of plantations? (3) What are the tourists' expectations regarding slavery and reactions to the exclusion or inclusion of slavery as part of the built, narrative, and performative landscapes of plantations? (4) How is the incorporation of slavery into the built, narrative, and performative landscapes perceived changing over time at plantations? (5) How do docents embrace, resist and embody the inclusion of slavery into the built, narrative, and performative landscapes of plantations? (6) What are the tourists' pre- and post-conceptions of slavery as part of the built, narrative, and performative landscapes at plantations? The project breaks new ground in the literature by conducting fieldwork at multiple plantation sites and types, as well as examining multiple stakeholders (e.g., owners/operators, docents, and tourists). The study compares three prominent plantation regions through multiple study sites in each region. At each site, the researchers apply a mixed methods approach, including a quasi-experimental design, to interview plantation owner/operators, participant observers of plantation tours, interview docents, and surveys and interviews of tourists.

PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH

Note:  When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

Candace Forbes Bright, Derek H. Alderman and David L. Butler "Tourist plantation owners and slavery: a complex relationship" Current Issues in Tourism , 2016 10.1080/13683500.2016.1190692
Candace Forbes Bright & Perry Carter "Who are they? Visitors to Louisiana's River Roadplantations" Journal of Heritage Tourism , 2015 10.1080/1743873X.2015.1100627
Derek H. Alderman, David L. Butler & Stephen P. Hanna "Memory, slavery, and plantation museums: theRiver Road Project" Journal of Heritage Tourism , 2016 10.1080/1743873X.2015.1100629
Derek H. Alderman & E. Arnold Modlin Jr. "On the political utterances of plantation tourists:vocalizing the memory of slavery on River Road" Journal of Heritage Tourism , 2015 10.1080/1743873X.2015.1100623
Matthew R. Cook "Counter-narratives of slavery in the Deep South:the politics of empathy along and beyond RiverRoad" Journal of Heritage Tourism , 2016 10.1080/1743873X.2015.1100624
Meredith Stone; Iam Spangler; Xavier Griffin; Stephen P. Hanna "Searching for the Enslaved in the "Cradle of Democracy": Virginia's James River Plantation Websites and the Reproduction of Local Histories" Southeaster Geographer , v.56 , 2016 , p.203 10.1353/sgo.2016.0018
Perry L. Carter "Where are the enslaved?: TripAdvisor and thenarrative landscapes of southern plantationmuseums" Journal of Heritage Tourism , 2015 1743-873X
Stephen P. Hanna "Placing the enslaved at Oak Alley Plantation:narratives, spatial contexts, and the limits ofsurrogation" Journal of Heritage Tourism , 2015 10.1080/1743873X.2015.1100628

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page