Award Abstract # 1661124
Exploring Biological Evidence: Helping Students Understand the Richness and Complexity of Evidentiary Constructs in Biology

NSF Org: DRL
Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings (DRL)
Recipient: PURDUE UNIVERSITY
Initial Amendment Date: July 26, 2017
Latest Amendment Date: July 1, 2019
Award Number: 1661124
Award Instrument: Continuing Grant
Program Manager: Gregg Solomon
gesolomo@nsf.gov
 (703)292-8333
DRL
 Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings (DRL)
EDU
 Directorate for STEM Education
Start Date: September 1, 2017
End Date: August 31, 2022 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $1,270,154.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $1,336,062.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2017 = $786,089.00
FY 2019 = $549,973.00
History of Investigator:
  • Ala Samarapungavan (Principal Investigator)
  • Kari Clase (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Nancy Pelaez (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Stephanie Gardner (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Aaron Rogat (Former Co-Principal Investigator)
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: Purdue University
2550 NORTHWESTERN AVE # 1100
WEST LAFAYETTE
IN  US  47906-1332
(765)494-1055
Sponsor Congressional District: 04
Primary Place of Performance: Purdue University
BRNG, 100 N. University Ave.
West Lafayette
IN  US  47907-2114
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
04
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): YRXVL4JYCEF5
Parent UEI: YRXVL4JYCEF5
NSF Program(s): ECR-EDU Core Research
Primary Program Source: 04001718DB NSF Education & Human Resource
04001920DB NSF Education & Human Resource
Program Reference Code(s): 8817
Program Element Code(s): 798000
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.076

ABSTRACT

This proposal was submitted in response to EHR Core Research (ECR) program announcement NSF 15-509. The ECR program of fundamental research in STEM education provides funding in critical research areas that are essential, broad and enduring. EHR seeks proposals that will help synthesize, build and/or expand research foundations in the following focal areas: STEM learning, STEM learning environments, STEM workforce development, and broadening participation in STEM. The ECR program is distinguished by its emphasis on the accumulation of robust evidence to inform efforts to (a) understand, (b) build theory to explain, and (c) suggest interventions (and innovations) to address persistent challenges in STEM interest, education, learning, and participation. The proposed study will explore trajectories of development in high school and undergraduate students' understanding of evidence in the context of biology teaching and learning. One of the difficulties experienced by many science learners is that they do not fully understand the evidence base that underpins contemporary science. This study will examine students' developing understanding of evidence in the context of biology learning. This research will contribute to fundamental knowledge on STEM learning and STEM learning environments by providing information on trajectories of development in students' understanding and use of evidence as a central part of their learning in biology through the secondary and post-secondary years. The project will also provide information on how variations in how teachers and instructional materials support students' understanding and reasoning about evidence influence this development. The instructional resources developed as part of this project (e.g., grade band appropriate teacher guides and exemplars of supported assignments and assessments) will be of direct value to biology educators. The outcomes of this study will help educators better prepare students who want to pursue careers in science, including research careers. Furthermore, knowledge developed by the project may support the development of scientific literacy and participation in evidence-based decision making around public policy on scientific issues among citizens.

The project will use a design-based research approach to achieve the following objectives: a) Develop a conceptual analysis of varied facets of disciplinary evidence that are important to evolutionary thinking in biology learning; b) Describe trajectories of learning in high school and undergraduate students' understanding and use of biological evidence for evolution; c) Examine how variations in instructional scaffolding relate to patterns of student learning within each grade band; and d) Develop design knowledge to facilitate integration of disciplinary evidence scaffolding in high school and undergraduate biology instruction. First, data will be collected on what students know and learn about biological evidence in the context of routine biology instruction. Subsequently the team will integrate instructional scaffolds that foster more nuanced and multifaceted understandings of biological evidence. Two variations will be examined: 1) Generic evidence scaffolds will remind students of different aspects of using evidence in science (e.g. "refer to all the evidence when constructing an explanation"), but without explicit links to relevant disciplinary knowledge for each aspect. 2) disciplinary evidence scaffolds will explicitly remind students of key disciplinary knowledge related to each aspect of evidence. The project will use a mixed method approach, combining qualitative and quantitative cognitive science techniques to collect and analyze data from a) student learning artifacts, b) pre and posttests of biology content knowledge, and their understanding and use of evidence in biology, c) videotaped classroom lessons, and d) interviews with teachers and students. These methods will allow for quantitative comparisons of group performance across the two instructional conditions and supplement these comparisons with rich descriptive data about how students learn in varied instructional contexts.

PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH

Note:  When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

Liu, Chaonan and Dreger, Dayna L. and Liu, Shiyao and Samarapungavan, Ala and Gardner, Stephanie M. and Clase, Kari L. and Pelaez, Nancy "The Conceptual Analysis of Disciplinary Evidence (CADE) framework as a guide for evidentiary reasoning: A practical implementation in a Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) laboratory investigation" Journal of Biological Education , 2022 https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2100450 Citation Details

PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT

Disclaimer

This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.

This project explored high school and undergraduate biology instructors? use of general and disciplinary evidence scaffolds to support student reasoning over the course of biology investigations using the Conceptual Analysis of Disciplinary Evidence (CADE) framework, developed, and refined over three years of iterative design implementations. The CADE is an integrative framework that supports teachers' redesign of laboratory activities to scaffold student?s reasoning with and about evidence through an entire sequence of investigation. The CADE emphasizes the need to connect disciplinary knowledge and practices in biology to general dimensions of evidentiary reasoning. Further, the CADE provides a framework for assessment of students? understanding and use of biological evidence through the analysis of student artifacts generated during laboratory inquiry and the analysis of students? pre and posttest performance on novel evidentiary reasoning scenarios.

Over three iterations of design, implementation, and evaluation with a variety of high school and undergraduate biology laboratory courses, participating high school and undergraduate instructors reported that the CADE framework was valuable in helping them to design and enact ways of scaffolding student?s understanding and use of biological evidence. Further, instructors reported that the CADE was useful in helping them assess and identify gaps in students? reasoning and disciplinary knowledge.

Analyses of students' performance showed gains in students? content knowledge and evidentiary reasoning quality under scaffolded conditions over baseline conditions with no explicit scaffolding. However, disciplinary evidence scaffolds afforded greater gains in performance than general scaffolds for younger students. The 9th graders showed the greatest gains under disciplinary scaffolding conditions, and 12th graders showed substantive but smaller gains. There were no significant differences in undergraduate evidentiary reasoning performance under general and disciplinary scaffolds which may reflect their higher degree of disciplinary knowledge relative to high school students, especially beginning high school students.

 

 


Last Modified: 01/02/2023
Modified by: Ala Samarapungavan

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page