
NSF Org: |
DRL Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings (DRL) |
Recipient: |
|
Initial Amendment Date: | July 26, 2017 |
Latest Amendment Date: | July 1, 2019 |
Award Number: | 1661124 |
Award Instrument: | Continuing Grant |
Program Manager: |
Gregg Solomon
gesolomo@nsf.gov (703)292-8333 DRL Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings (DRL) EDU Directorate for STEM Education |
Start Date: | September 1, 2017 |
End Date: | August 31, 2022 (Estimated) |
Total Intended Award Amount: | $1,270,154.00 |
Total Awarded Amount to Date: | $1,336,062.00 |
Funds Obligated to Date: |
FY 2019 = $549,973.00 |
History of Investigator: |
|
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: |
2550 NORTHWESTERN AVE # 1100 WEST LAFAYETTE IN US 47906-1332 (765)494-1055 |
Sponsor Congressional District: |
|
Primary Place of Performance: |
BRNG, 100 N. University Ave. West Lafayette IN US 47907-2114 |
Primary Place of
Performance Congressional District: |
|
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): |
|
Parent UEI: |
|
NSF Program(s): | ECR-EDU Core Research |
Primary Program Source: |
04001920DB NSF Education & Human Resource |
Program Reference Code(s): |
|
Program Element Code(s): |
|
Award Agency Code: | 4900 |
Fund Agency Code: | 4900 |
Assistance Listing Number(s): | 47.076 |
ABSTRACT
This proposal was submitted in response to EHR Core Research (ECR) program announcement NSF 15-509. The ECR program of fundamental research in STEM education provides funding in critical research areas that are essential, broad and enduring. EHR seeks proposals that will help synthesize, build and/or expand research foundations in the following focal areas: STEM learning, STEM learning environments, STEM workforce development, and broadening participation in STEM. The ECR program is distinguished by its emphasis on the accumulation of robust evidence to inform efforts to (a) understand, (b) build theory to explain, and (c) suggest interventions (and innovations) to address persistent challenges in STEM interest, education, learning, and participation. The proposed study will explore trajectories of development in high school and undergraduate students' understanding of evidence in the context of biology teaching and learning. One of the difficulties experienced by many science learners is that they do not fully understand the evidence base that underpins contemporary science. This study will examine students' developing understanding of evidence in the context of biology learning. This research will contribute to fundamental knowledge on STEM learning and STEM learning environments by providing information on trajectories of development in students' understanding and use of evidence as a central part of their learning in biology through the secondary and post-secondary years. The project will also provide information on how variations in how teachers and instructional materials support students' understanding and reasoning about evidence influence this development. The instructional resources developed as part of this project (e.g., grade band appropriate teacher guides and exemplars of supported assignments and assessments) will be of direct value to biology educators. The outcomes of this study will help educators better prepare students who want to pursue careers in science, including research careers. Furthermore, knowledge developed by the project may support the development of scientific literacy and participation in evidence-based decision making around public policy on scientific issues among citizens.
The project will use a design-based research approach to achieve the following objectives: a) Develop a conceptual analysis of varied facets of disciplinary evidence that are important to evolutionary thinking in biology learning; b) Describe trajectories of learning in high school and undergraduate students' understanding and use of biological evidence for evolution; c) Examine how variations in instructional scaffolding relate to patterns of student learning within each grade band; and d) Develop design knowledge to facilitate integration of disciplinary evidence scaffolding in high school and undergraduate biology instruction. First, data will be collected on what students know and learn about biological evidence in the context of routine biology instruction. Subsequently the team will integrate instructional scaffolds that foster more nuanced and multifaceted understandings of biological evidence. Two variations will be examined: 1) Generic evidence scaffolds will remind students of different aspects of using evidence in science (e.g. "refer to all the evidence when constructing an explanation"), but without explicit links to relevant disciplinary knowledge for each aspect. 2) disciplinary evidence scaffolds will explicitly remind students of key disciplinary knowledge related to each aspect of evidence. The project will use a mixed method approach, combining qualitative and quantitative cognitive science techniques to collect and analyze data from a) student learning artifacts, b) pre and posttests of biology content knowledge, and their understanding and use of evidence in biology, c) videotaped classroom lessons, and d) interviews with teachers and students. These methods will allow for quantitative comparisons of group performance across the two instructional conditions and supplement these comparisons with rich descriptive data about how students learn in varied instructional contexts.
PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH
Note:
When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external
site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a
charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from
this site.
PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT
Disclaimer
This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.
This project explored high school and undergraduate biology instructors? use of general and disciplinary evidence scaffolds to support student reasoning over the course of biology investigations using the Conceptual Analysis of Disciplinary Evidence (CADE) framework, developed, and refined over three years of iterative design implementations. The CADE is an integrative framework that supports teachers' redesign of laboratory activities to scaffold student?s reasoning with and about evidence through an entire sequence of investigation. The CADE emphasizes the need to connect disciplinary knowledge and practices in biology to general dimensions of evidentiary reasoning. Further, the CADE provides a framework for assessment of students? understanding and use of biological evidence through the analysis of student artifacts generated during laboratory inquiry and the analysis of students? pre and posttest performance on novel evidentiary reasoning scenarios.
Over three iterations of design, implementation, and evaluation with a variety of high school and undergraduate biology laboratory courses, participating high school and undergraduate instructors reported that the CADE framework was valuable in helping them to design and enact ways of scaffolding student?s understanding and use of biological evidence. Further, instructors reported that the CADE was useful in helping them assess and identify gaps in students? reasoning and disciplinary knowledge.
Analyses of students' performance showed gains in students? content knowledge and evidentiary reasoning quality under scaffolded conditions over baseline conditions with no explicit scaffolding. However, disciplinary evidence scaffolds afforded greater gains in performance than general scaffolds for younger students. The 9th graders showed the greatest gains under disciplinary scaffolding conditions, and 12th graders showed substantive but smaller gains. There were no significant differences in undergraduate evidentiary reasoning performance under general and disciplinary scaffolds which may reflect their higher degree of disciplinary knowledge relative to high school students, especially beginning high school students.
Last Modified: 01/02/2023
Modified by: Ala Samarapungavan
Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.