Award Abstract # 1629045
EXP: Inq-Blotter - A Real Time Alerting Tool to Transform Teachers' Assessment of Science Inquiry Practices

NSF Org: IIS
Division of Information & Intelligent Systems
Recipient: RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY
Initial Amendment Date: August 26, 2016
Latest Amendment Date: August 26, 2016
Award Number: 1629045
Award Instrument: Standard Grant
Program Manager: John Cherniavsky
IIS
 Division of Information & Intelligent Systems
CSE
 Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering
Start Date: September 1, 2016
End Date: August 31, 2019 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $550,000.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $550,000.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2016 = $550,000.00
History of Investigator:
  • Janice Gobert (Principal Investigator)
    janice.gobert@gse.rutgers.edu
  • Michael Sao Pedro (Co-Principal Investigator)
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: Rutgers University New Brunswick
3 RUTGERS PLZ
NEW BRUNSWICK
NJ  US  08901-8559
(848)932-0150
Sponsor Congressional District: 12
Primary Place of Performance: Rutgers University New Brunswick
NJ  US  08901-1183
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
06
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): M1LVPE5GLSD9
Parent UEI:
NSF Program(s): Discovery Research K-12,
Cyberlearn & Future Learn Tech
Primary Program Source: 01001617DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT
04001516DB NSF Education & Human Resource
Program Reference Code(s): 8045, 8244, 8841
Program Element Code(s): 764500, 802000
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.070

ABSTRACT

The Cyberlearning and Future Learning Technologies Program funds efforts that support envisioning the future of learning technologies and advance what we know about how people learn in technology-rich environments. Cyberlearning Exploration (EXP) Projects design and build new kinds of learning technologies in order to explore their viability, to understand the challenges to using them effectively, and to study their potential for fostering learning. This EXP project addresses the need for real-time diagnostic tools for teachers that can assess students' needs, i.e. provide formative assessment, in order to improve science instruction. The project will extend, pilot, implement, and study Inq-Blotter, a scalable, web-based alerting system that enables teachers' formative assessment of middle school students' Physical Science scientific practices, aligned to the newly released national framework Next Generation Science Standards. The Inq-Blotter alerting system will be used in conjunction with Inq-ITS (Inquiry Intelligent Tutoring System), in which students "show what they know" by conducting inquiry with simulations. Students form questions, design and conduct experiments, interpret data, warrant their claims with data, and communicate their findings. As students work, they are assessed in real-time by the algorithms of Inq-ITS. To complete the formative assessment loop, the Inq-Blotter alerting tool sends real time alerts to teachers' laptops and smartphones on students' inquiry skills so that the teachers know who needs the most help and on which skills. Discourse between teachers and students will be analyzed to better understand how this alerting system can support teachers' real-time instruction of inquiry and how it can foster students to learn inquiry practices in real-time and transfer them to subsequent activities, thereby contributing to practical knowledge about how science inquiry is taught and learned.

Unique to Inq-ITS is its ability to automatically assess inquiry using algorithms based on knowledge-engineering and data mining, making reliable alerting possible. By adding logging and timestamping to Inq-Blotter of every interaction a teacher has with its interface, the PIs will introduce the ability to capture and analyze teacher-student interactions on an extremely fine-grained scale, in turn allowing for maximum leverage of the algorithmic assessment capability of Inq-ITS. This combination of measuring students' inquiry practices in real-time at scale with a technological tool that facilitates real-time, targeted instruction could revolutionize how teachers interact with students during inquiry-based science instruction. The project will advance the state of the art of using a technology-based approach to close the formative assessment loop for the ill-defined domain of science inquiry. This research will also evince the broader principles surrounding this technological genre so as to guide the design of human-computer interfaces of other alerting tools for teachers and inform how learning-analytics techniques can best be utilized in such tools.

PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT

Disclaimer

This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.

Briefly Inq-ITS (inqits.com) is a platform for science inquiry. Instead of taking multiple choice tests on rote science knowledge for assessment, students conduct inquiry with interactive, virtual labs in the Inq-ITS system. While kids “show what they know”, educators get real-time, actionable reports and alerts on a teacher dashboard called Inq-Blotter. All grading on students’ competencies on science practices are done automatically using patented artificial intelligence algorithms. Reports and alerts enable teachers to pinpoint which students need help most, and on what practices (skills). Inq-Blotter responds to a current challenge for teachers and students, namely the need to hone Next Generation Science Standards’ inquiry practices (NGSS Lead States, 2013).

In this project, we conducted a number of studies with Inq-ITS and Inq-Blotter to evaluate how it was being used and whether it supported teachers’ assessment and instruction of science practices. In Study 1, we examined the teacher discourse that is generated when teachers respond to alerts. Thirty recordings of discourse from middle school teachers were collected as teachers responded to alerts, which were fired in real time in response to students’ difficulties with science inquiry practices in Inq-ITS. We examined whether teacher help based on Inq-Blotter improved students’ performance on students’ next opportunity to engage in the practice on which they were helped. Analyses showed that 80% of students improved on their next opportunity to engage in an inquiry practice after receiving help from their teacher. In Study 2 we examined whether help from teachers, triggered by alerts, improves students’ competencies on the next task for the inquiry practice on which they were helped. Our exploratory study suggested that for the practice of data analysis, students who were helped by a teacher who used Full Blotter (with alerts) demonstrated better performance by their third lab activity compared to students whose teachers used Minimal Blotter (no alerts). In studies 3a, we investigated the fine-grained discourse analysis to investigate differences in the patterns in the teachers’ feedback following the alerts. Overall, the findings of the present study reveal that the majority of students improved after receiving help, but the pattern of discursive feedback provided by each teacher differed significantly. In Study 3b, we examined whether there were particular patterns of support as identified using epistemic network analyses that promoted inquiry learning across multiple activities. We identified differences in the patterns of support related to student improvement; while lower level scaffolds may benefit students’ short-term inquiry performance, higher level inquiry combined with content help were found to be more robust. These findings have important implications for the design of alerts for teachers to, in turn, support their students. Overall, our findings show the benefits of real-time actionable alerts in terms of guiding teacher scaffolding and supporting student inquiry performance.

Intellectual Merit: The proposed project, deeply informed by learning sciences theory and undergirded by sophisticated technologies, combines techniques to measure students’ inquiry practices at scale to study how teachers interact with their students when provided real-time, alerts. In doing so, it can realize teachers’ needs for formative assessments for science practices as well as students’ needs’ for learning inquiry. It also provides principles that can guide the design and development of alerting tools for teachers by advancing the state-of-the-art using a technologically-based approach to close the formative assessment loop for an ill-defined domain, namely, science inquiry. This work contributes to the well-acknowledged need to better support teachers’ data use in classrooms, as outlined in the U.S. Department of Education’s National Education Technology Plan 2010, as well as support students in STEM learning, as outlined in the Every Student Succeeds Act. 

Broader Impact: By researching use of a real-time classroom alerting tool, Inq-Blotter, we provide new opportunities for teachers to utilize fine-grained assessment data so that it can be used in real time with students as they conduct inquiry in Inq-ITS (Inquiry Intelligent Tutoring System; Gobert et al., 2012, 2013). By conducting our research with diverse populations in a domain where many American students are falling behind (science), and where there is great need for the United States’ economy, the proposed benefits of the project are amplified.

 


Last Modified: 02/11/2020
Modified by: Janice D Gobert

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page