Award Abstract # 1243444
OISE-PIRE Sustainability, Ecosystem Services, and Bioenergy Development across the Americas

NSF Org: OISE
Office of International Science and Engineering
Recipient: MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
Initial Amendment Date: September 13, 2012
Latest Amendment Date: August 30, 2016
Award Number: 1243444
Award Instrument: Continuing Grant
Program Manager: Cassandra Dudka
OISE
 Office of International Science and Engineering
O/D
 Office Of The Director
Start Date: October 1, 2012
End Date: September 30, 2018 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $3,841,938.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $4,841,735.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2012 = $777,206.00
FY 2013 = $1,211,431.00

FY 2014 = $2,205,453.00

FY 2016 = $647,645.00
History of Investigator:
  • Kathleen Halvorsen (Principal Investigator)
    kehalvor@mtu.edu
  • David Shonnard (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Heidi Asbjornsen (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Rodney Chimner (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Cassandra Moseley (Co-Principal Investigator)
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: Michigan Technological University
1400 TOWNSEND DR
HOUGHTON
MI  US  49931-1200
(906)487-1885
Sponsor Congressional District: 01
Primary Place of Performance: Michigan Technological University
1400 Townsend Dr
Houghton
MI  US  49931-1295
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
01
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): GKMSN3DA6P91
Parent UEI: GKMSN3DA6P91
NSF Program(s): PIRE- Prtnrshps Inter Res & Ed
Primary Program Source: 01001213DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT
01001314DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT

01001415DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT

01001617DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT
Program Reference Code(s): 5911, 5913, 5922, 5977, 7566, 7742
Program Element Code(s): 774200
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.079

ABSTRACT

This Partnership in International Research and Education (PIRE) project addresses the question: How will biofuel development impact socio-ecological systems and associated ecosystem services, and how can those impacts best be measured, modeled, and mitigated? Society faces difficult challenges in preventing climate change and reducing dependence on foreign energy supplies that can come from political unstable regions. In response, the US, Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina have moved toward encouraging the development of new energy forms that can be domestically produced in a less environmentally negative fashion than traditional energy from petroleum, coal, or natural gas. The team, led by Michigan Technological University scientists, includes 33 scientists at nine US, three Brazilian, four Mexican, and two Argentine universities and public and private research labs. Bioenergy is energy formed from plants. Many are familiar with bioenergy in the form of firewood used for a campfire or woodstove. Bioenergy can be used to heat buildings, create electricity, or create automotive fuels, including diesel and ethanol. One of the major policy goals of the US, Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina is to promote the development of bioenergy in the forms of both biodiesel and ethanol, generally called biofuel. These fuels will be created from many types of plants, including trees, corn, sugarcane, soybeans, and palm tree nuts. As these countries work toward achieving this goal, it is important to understand whether and what types of these fuels are most likely to allow us to create new energy forms that maximize benefits while minimizing costs, including negative societal and environmental impacts. This research team of scientists from the US, Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina has the goal of increasing understanding of the societal and environmental impacts of different types of biofuels in these four countries. The team focuses on the production of these biofuels in forested regions, areas where the biofuel is being produced from forests or impacting forests through their conversion to agricultural crops, like soybeans. This international team of social, natural, and engineering scientists will work together to collect data about these impacts. But it will also translate findings into new ways to measure and reduce those impacts, while increasing understanding of how public policies can help maximize biofuel benefits while minimizing biofuel costs. Project work will advance understanding of sustainability science while training new generations of students and scientists to work more effectively in teams that include many different types of scientific professionals. The project is funded by NSF's Office of International Science and Engineering (OISE) through the PIRE.

PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH

Note:  When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

(Showing: 1 - 10 of 75)
Watkins, D.W. Jr., H. Asbjornsen, M.M.G.A. Moraes, A.S. Mayer, et al. "?Implications of Bioenergy Development for Integrated Water Resources Management in the Pan America Region,?" To be submitted to Environmental Management as part of a special issue. , v.NA , 2014 , p.NA
"The effects of oil palm plantations on the functional diversityof Amazonian birds" Journal of Tropical Ecology , 2016 doi:10.1017/S0266467416000377
Abrams, J., D. Becker, J. Kudrna, and C. Moseley "Does policy matter? The role of policy systems in forest bioenergy development in the United States" Forest Policy and Economics , v.75 , 2017 , p.41
Abrams, J., E. Nielsen, D. Diaz, T. Selfa, E. Adams, J. Dunn, and C. Moseley "How do states benefit from non-state governance? Evidence from forest sustainability certification." Global Environmental Politics , 2018 https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00470
Abrams, J., E. Nielsen, D. Diaz, T. Selfa, E. Adams, J. Dunn, and C. Moseley "Why do states embrace non-state forest governance models? Evidence from sustainability certification in the U.S. and Argentina" Global Environmental Politics , 2018 https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00470
Bailis, R., Solomon, B.D., Moser, C. and Hildebrandt, T. 2014. "Biofuel sustainability in Latin America and the Caribbean ? A review of recent experiences and future prospects." Biofuels, forthcoming. , 2014
Banerjee*, A., C. Schelly, and K.E. Halvorsen "Understanding public perceptions of wood-based electricity production in Wisconsin, United States: Place-based dynamics and social representations" Journal of Environmental Sociology , 2017 10.1080/23251042.2016.1272181
Banerjee*, A., C. Schelly, and K.E. Halvorsen "Understanding public perceptions of wood-based electricity production in Wisconsin, United States: Place-based dynamics and social representations." Environmental Sociology , v.3 , 2017 , p.381
Banerjee*, A., K.E. Halvorsen, A. Eastmond-Spencer, and S.R. Sweitz "Sustainable development for whom and how? Exploring the gaps between popular discourses and ground reality using the Mexican Jatropha biodiesel case" Environmental Management , v.59 , 2017 , p.912
Banerjee*, A., K.E. Halvorsen, A. Eastmond-Spencer, and S.R. Sweitz. "Sustainable development for whom and how? Exploring the gaps between popular discourses and ground reality using the Mexican Jatropha biodiesel case." Environmental Management , v.59 , 2017 , p.912
Barnett, B "Can U.S. forestry certification schemes guide biomass production for export markets? An evaluation using bioenergy sustainability criteria" Biofuels , 2018
(Showing: 1 - 10 of 75)

PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT

Disclaimer

This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.

This international group of researchers studied different forms of bioenergy production across the Americas. Our team of over 130 staff, students, and scientists from universities, research institutes, industry, NGOs, communities, and government came from Brazil, Canada, Mexico, Uruguay, Argentina, and the USA. We studied six cases of bioenergy development from jatropha, oil palm, and various tree species being used to produce heat and power. Our findings demonstrate how society can use bioenergy to achieve rural economic development and environmental sustainability goals while increasing energy security. We also learned how to mitigate some of the negative impacts of bioenergy on ecosystems. Our team brought our findings back to many of our research communities to help them learn how they could achieve local economic and environmental goals through bioenergy production. We also learned and shared a great deal about doing successful large-scale, international research teamwork in diverse research teams - lessons that are vital for the future of environmental sustainability studies. Our findings have helped industries across the Americas improve the environmental sustainability of their bioenergy production systems. They have also assisted many rural communities in maximizing the benefits of bioenergy while minimizing some of the negatives. They have also assisted our diverse team of researchers develop the skills and experience to solve future key societal problems within an international context.


Last Modified: 01/25/2019
Modified by: Kathleen E Halvorsen

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page