
NSF Org: |
EFMA Office of Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation (EFRI) |
Recipient: |
|
Initial Amendment Date: | September 8, 2008 |
Latest Amendment Date: | September 13, 2013 |
Award Number: | 0835930 |
Award Instrument: | Standard Grant |
Program Manager: |
Bruce Hamilton
EFMA Office of Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation (EFRI) ENG Directorate for Engineering |
Start Date: | September 15, 2008 |
End Date: | August 31, 2014 (Estimated) |
Total Intended Award Amount: | $1,999,558.00 |
Total Awarded Amount to Date: | $2,162,200.00 |
Funds Obligated to Date: |
FY 2009 = $30,725.00 FY 2011 = $40,995.00 FY 2012 = $41,000.00 FY 2013 = $49,922.00 |
History of Investigator: |
|
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: |
845 N PARK AVE RM 538 TUCSON AZ US 85721 (520)626-6000 |
Sponsor Congressional District: |
|
Primary Place of Performance: |
845 N PARK AVE RM 538 TUCSON AZ US 85721 |
Primary Place of
Performance Congressional District: |
|
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): |
|
Parent UEI: |
|
NSF Program(s): |
SSA-Special Studies & Analysis, International Research Collab, EFRI Research Projects, EDA-Eng Diversity Activities, BRIGE-Broad Partic in Eng |
Primary Program Source: |
01000910DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT 01001112DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT 01001213DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT 01001314DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT |
Program Reference Code(s): |
|
Program Element Code(s): |
|
Award Agency Code: | 4900 |
Fund Agency Code: | 4900 |
Assistance Listing Number(s): | 47.041 |
ABSTRACT
PI name: Kevin Lansey
Institution: University of Arizona
Proposal Number: 0835930
This award is an outcome of the competition as part of the Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation (NSF 07-579) solicitation under the subtopic Resilient and Sustainable Infrastructures (RESIN). The proposed project will advance engineering and scientific understanding and will develop new methods for integrated water and wastewater infrastructure planning. Over the next four years, the project aims to identify, design and evaluate water supply/wastewater treatment system configuration alternatives in the presence of complex, competing objectives and uncertainty. Each configuration will include all major conveyance facilities (pumps and pipes), storage, and treatment facilities for water and wastewater. Alternative facilities plans will be evaluated based on the triple bottom lines consisting of: (i) economic, (ii) environmental, and (iii) social values. The major intellectual innovation is the proposed approach to optimize a sustainability objective function that embodies the triple bottom line with components representing capital, operation, and maintenance costs; greenhouse emissions and depletion of ecosystem water allocations; social and institutional defined limits on water reuse and decentralized wastewater treatment; and risk as penalties arising from failure to meet system sustainability and resilience objectives. In addition to the innovations in the encompassing effort, novel approaches will be developed for dual water distribution system planning and design and new computational algorithms will be developed to optimize the resulting models. Frameworks for assessing social and institutional preferences, in the short-term for existing infrastructure and reuse options and in the long-term as co-evolving with conjunctive systems will be established.
Multiple factors combine to increase the complexity and urgency of water/wastewater facilities planning, as addressed by this project: (i) water scarcity and the need for efficient and sustainable use of every available water resource; (ii) increased population and thus, increased demand for water; (iii) general deterioration of water supply and sanitary infrastructures that are reaching the end of their lifecycles; (iv) heightened public awareness of the quality of water consumed; (iv) interdependence of water supply goals and other, sometimes competing objectives such as in-stream uses for reclaimed water and minimization of greenhouse gas emissions. These factors necessitate an urgent consideration of infrastructure system sustainability and resilience in the presence of supply and demand uncertainties. In short, water supply based solely on engineering judgment must be transformed to operate in an increasingly complex planning landscape. Moreover, the proposed research directly addresses the recently identified "National Academy of Engineering Grand Challenge" of restoring and improving urban infrastructure and wastewater systems. The systems analytical tool will generate impact, not only in the southern Arizona growth corridor but also nationally as a result of its generic approach. It will allow planners to objectively approach decisions regarding sustainable water/wastewater systems integration, degree of decentralization of new wastewater treatment facilities, timing and scale of new facility addition, and (where system extension is contemplated) apportionment of costs among existing and proposed facilities. The application of the tools to real systems and generating guidance for the applicability of decentralized dual water supply system will lead to the much broader impact of altering the present water supply paradigm that treats wastewater as a disposal issue rather than a resource. Our approach considers an integrated water and wastewater infrastructure system that is advantageous in meeting expanding water demands while accumulating the benefits of lower energy consumption and cost, a reduced carbon footprint, and better overall water quality. The project also has significant public awareness and education activities on water reuse at many levels, including key institutions (e.g., regional players such as Tucson Water) and K-12 education. Workshops will be held at AWWARF and WERF meetings. Innovations from the work will be published in peer-reviewed journals, disseminated to practitioners, and incorporated into engineering and public policy curriculum. Efforts will be made to expand the role of under-represented groups in this area through project participation.
PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH
Note:
When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external
site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a
charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from
this site.
PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT
Disclaimer
This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.
Water supply and wastewater treatment systems are intimately linked in providing a vital community resource. Historically, they were operated independently with wastewater being treated as a waste to be disposed of. To minimize costs, systems were structured with a single centralized wastewater plant (Figure 1a). As water resources become increasingly scarce, treated wastewater has the potential to serve as a new supply; improving water supply system robustness. Here, decentralized wastewater treatment plants can reduce a system’s operation costs through its proximity to users (Figure 1b), provide flexibility to respond to long term chronic disturbances and acute disruptions. Our project envisioned resilience and robustness measures and approaches to introduce those properties in interdependent infrastructures, in general, and, specifically, sustainable water supply systems. As a fundamental step, we and other RESIN teams defined sustainability, robustness, and resilience (presented below in context).
Interdependent infrastructure planning must consider a continuum of decisions from decadal planning under chronic uncertainties (population growth, climate, and public perception) to real-time control and response to sudden disturbances (minor and significant natural hazards and infrastructure mechanical failures) (Figure 2). To meet long term demands, alternative supply capacities can be constructed over time. If a large system is built in anticipation of those demands, the system will be capable of meeting demands well into the future. Such a design may exploit economies of scale by constructing few large facilities over multiple smaller ones. However, much of the systems’ capacities may go unused for some time. Further, projected demands may never materialize. Thus, security against chronic events may come at a significant cost. Stage-wise construction that is adaptable to changing conditions will more closely meet emerging demands (planning robustness) but, lacking the benefits of scale, may be more expensive. Balancing facility development and construction staging with economic, environmental and social (triple bottom line) sustainability objectives in infrastructure systems is one piece of the planning puzzle.
The second piece is how an infrastructure will respond to acute disturbances that test its ability to provide service under stressed conditions (design robustness) and recover from failures (resilience). Disturbances can be relatively small and/or localized events that might be anticipated to occur at some time (i.e., specified resilience) or large catastrophic events that are highly uncertain in their magnitude and extent (e.g., hurricanes and earthquakes).
Figure 3 depicts system capacity and functionality over time for a system that is subjected to stresses. System capacity is the supply potential divided by the demand. A system will fully provide desired services when the capacity is larger than one and functionality (demand satisfied divided by the actual demand) equals one. If the system is unable to meet demand due to one or more components being inoperable or excessive demand, the functionality is less than one. To quantify an infrastructure systems’ robust and resilience, we posed a set of metrics based on reliability engineering concepts to describe the frequency and duration of failure and non-failure periods and the severity of failure events.
To introduce planning robustness in water/wastewater system design, in conjunction with Pima County Wastewater and Tucson Water, a scenario planning (SP) process was applied to determine the optimal staged construction of centralized/decentralized water/wastewater infrastructure in ...
Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.