
NSF Org: |
SES Division of Social and Economic Sciences |
Recipient: |
|
Initial Amendment Date: | February 22, 2000 |
Latest Amendment Date: | February 22, 2000 |
Award Number: | 9911252 |
Award Instrument: | Standard Grant |
Program Manager: |
Daniel H. Newlon
SES Division of Social and Economic Sciences SBE Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences |
Start Date: | July 1, 2000 |
End Date: | June 30, 2004 (Estimated) |
Total Intended Award Amount: | $254,638.00 |
Total Awarded Amount to Date: | $254,638.00 |
Funds Obligated to Date: |
|
History of Investigator: |
|
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: |
21 N PARK ST STE 6301 MADISON WI US 53715-1218 (608)262-3822 |
Sponsor Congressional District: |
|
Primary Place of Performance: |
21 N PARK ST STE 6301 MADISON WI US 53715-1218 |
Primary Place of
Performance Congressional District: |
|
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): |
|
Parent UEI: |
|
NSF Program(s): |
Economics, Decision, Risk & Mgmt Sci |
Primary Program Source: |
|
Program Reference Code(s): |
|
Program Element Code(s): |
|
Award Agency Code: | 4900 |
Fund Agency Code: | 4900 |
Assistance Listing Number(s): | 47.075 |
ABSTRACT
This research project examines altruistic, charitable and cooperative behavior using theoretical, experimental and standard econometric analysis. The proposal has three parts. Part I consists of four theoretical studies on private giving to public goods, such as charities. The first two studies explore institutions of fundraising to understand how they may increase charitable contributions. Two other studies explore the nature of altruism and "warm glows" to giving. Part II provides four econometric studies of charitable giving. These include analysis of gifts by married couples, hence exploring models of the provision of household public goods and the specialization of tasks within the household. These will add to the growing literature on household decisions as well as to that on charitable giving. There is also a study of how government grants to charities affect fundraising expenditures of charities as well as donations. Part III sketches nine experimental projects on three main topics. The first topic is the nature of altruistic preferences. Several controlled experiments uncover what factors produce altruism and fairness by letting subjects reveal their preferences in a number of different circumstances. The second experimental topic looks at the fundamental game theory models that we use to identify fairness. For instance, is subgame perfection a valid way of thinking about ultimatum games if fairness were not a concern of subjects? These experiments try to shed light on this question. The third experimental topic is how institutional choice interacts with preferences for fairness. Are there (realistic) features of institutions that may be benign in the absence of fairness and other social concerns, but which promote efficiency in light of these social preferences? This question is explored from a number of different perspectives. As a whole, the purpose of the projects proposed here is to gain a greater understanding of why and how people behave in fair and altruistic ways, and to understand how the world has been shaped to take advantage of these moral preferences in order to promote efficiency.
Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.