
NSF Org: |
CMMI Division of Civil, Mechanical, and Manufacturing Innovation |
Recipient: |
|
Initial Amendment Date: | February 12, 2013 |
Latest Amendment Date: | February 12, 2013 |
Award Number: | 1300781 |
Award Instrument: | Standard Grant |
Program Manager: |
Richard Fragaszy
CMMI Division of Civil, Mechanical, and Manufacturing Innovation ENG Directorate for Engineering |
Start Date: | March 1, 2013 |
End Date: | February 28, 2017 (Estimated) |
Total Intended Award Amount: | $264,927.00 |
Total Awarded Amount to Date: | $264,927.00 |
Funds Obligated to Date: |
|
History of Investigator: |
|
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: |
80 GEORGE ST MEDFORD MA US 02155-5519 (617)627-3696 |
Sponsor Congressional District: |
|
Primary Place of Performance: |
200 College Ave Medford MA US 02155-5530 |
Primary Place of
Performance Congressional District: |
|
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): |
|
Parent UEI: |
|
NSF Program(s): | Geotechnical Engineering and M |
Primary Program Source: |
|
Program Reference Code(s): |
|
Program Element Code(s): |
|
Award Agency Code: | 4900 |
Fund Agency Code: | 4900 |
Assistance Listing Number(s): | 47.041 |
ABSTRACT
Rapid response maps and loss estimates that are used immediately after an earthquake to assess intensity and potential impact do not currently include effects from liquefaction hazard. Thus, there is a critical need to develop new methods of estimating the likelihood of liquefaction that can be rapidly and broadly derived from both earthquake-specific intensity estimates and simple geospatial features. A fundamental limitation of prior probabilistic liquefaction models is that the liquefaction datasets contain few non-liquefaction sites (a sampling bias). A second challenge to including liquefaction effects in loss estimation and rapid response maps is that most liquefaction models rely on site- and region-specific datasets (e.g. surficial geology maps) that are time and cost intensive to collect. The preliminary results for this project demonstrate how these problems have been solved by developing logistic regression models from representative datasets of liquefaction as a function of key input parameters that can easily be estimated from global datasets (e.g. digital elevation models or DEM) and standard earthquake-specific intensity data (e.g. peak ground acceleration). Candidate explanatory variables include those derived from the DEM as well as indexes for soil saturation, vegetation, climate, and hydrology. In preliminary work, a logistic regression model was developed using data from two regions (Kobe, Japan and Christchurch, New Zealand) which predicts probabilities of liquefaction based on peak ground acceleration, elevation, distance to coast, and a hydrologic parameter - compound topographic index - which is used as a proxy for soil saturation. The model has been tested in Port-au-Prince, Haiti and provides a consistent estimate of liquefaction probability. This demonstration shows that the proposed new method of estimating the probability of liquefaction can be rapidly and broadly derived from both earthquake-specific intensity estimates and simple geospatial features. However, in order to develop a geospatial liquefaction model that will be globally applicable, the database needs to be extended to more geologic and climatic environments so that the model can constrain regional variations in the geospatial proxies. In this project, a geospatial liquefaction database will be developed from global earthquakes, where the explanatory variables will be broadly available geospatial data. Sampling bias will be addressed by developing the database from observations that are representative of the true distribution of liquefaction. This marks a shift in liquefaction potential model development, which to date has focused on case history databases that are biased toward observations of liquefaction occurrence. The goals of the project are to:
1) Develop a global database of liquefaction observations with geospatial variables.
2) Test first-order proxies for saturation and soil density
3) Normalize proxies for different geomorphic and climatic regions
4) Develop a probabilistic geospatial liquefaction model
5) Train undergraduate civil engineers in seismic hazard and loss estimation
The broader impact and potentially transformative aspect of the proposed work is the global applicability of the model which will enable liquefaction effects to be included in future rapid response maps, loss estimates, and scenario simulations for any future event anywhere in the world and, therefore improve disaster response and reduce loss. In addition, undergraduate research and outreach within the geographic information systems class at Tufts will be used to introduce civil engineering undergraduate students to the importance of seismic hazard and loss estimation for earthquakes.
PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH
Note:
When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external
site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a
charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from
this site.
PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT
Disclaimer
This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.
As part of this project, we have developed a geospatial approach to predicting earthquake-induced liquefaction immediately after an earthquake using globally available geospatial proxies. This approach is useful for both the loss estimation and rapid response communities who both need information on damage immediately after an event. The proposed geospatial liquefaction model provides an estimate of how likely a location will liquefy based on the shaking level of the earthquake and an estimate of soil density and soil saturation using topography-based proxies and climate. The geospatial approach was first evaluated using liquefaction observations from two earthquakes in Kobe, Japan and two earthquakes in the Christchurch region of New Zealand. The methodology was then extended using liquefaction observations from 27 earthquakes across six countries.
We evaluated 14 proxies for soil density and soil saturation and found that the best proxies for liquefaction prediction were slope-derived Vs30, modeled water table depth, distance to coast, distance to river, distance to closet water body, and precipitation. We also found that peak ground velocity from USGS's ShakeMap was a better predictor of liquefaction occurrence tha peak ground acceleration.
The proposed geospatial liqufaction model is recommended for regional use in loss estimation contexts. The resulting probabilities can be used to estimate the spatial extent of liquefaction. We have worked with the United States Geologic Survey to develop the geospatial liquefaction model for global application through the PAGER system that estimates fatality and econmic loss impacts after significant earthquake events.
Last Modified: 10/11/2017
Modified by: Laurie Baise
Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.