nsf.gov - NCSES Federal Funds for Research and Development: Fiscal Years 2009–11 - US National Science Foundation (NSF)
Untitled Document text-only page produced automatically by LIFT Text
Transcoder Skip all navigation and go to page contentSkip top navigation and go to directorate navigationSkip top navigation and go to page navigation
National Science Foundation National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics
Federal Funds for Research and Development: Fiscal Years 2009–11


Appendix A. Technical Notes


Scope and Method

During the period July 2010 through March 2011 a total of 27 federal agencies (15 federal departments and 12 independent agencies) submitted data in response to the National Science Foundation's (NSF's) annual Survey of Federal Funds for Research and Development (Federal Funds Survey). Because, in some cases, multiple subdivisions of a federal department were requested to complete the survey, there were 89 individual respondents (5 federal departments, 12 independent agencies, and 72 department subdivisions). The agencies reported their data as obligations and outlays incurred or expected to be incurred, regardless of when the funds were appropriated or whether they were identified in the respondents' budgets specifically for R&D activities.

Only those agencies that had obligations in the variables presented in a particular table appear in that table. Obligations are amounts for orders placed, contracts awarded, services received, and similar transactions during a given period, regardless of when the funds were appropriated and when future payment of money is required. Outlays are amounts for checks issued and cash payments made during a given period, regardless of when funds were appropriated.

A complete list of definitions appears at the end of appendix A.

Appendix B provides a complete list of the federal agencies that have been included in the Federal Funds Survey. See appendix C for additional notes associated with these agencies.

Top of page. Back to Top

Survey Instrument

In February 2009 Congress passed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). ARRA has the following three immediate goals: (1) create new jobs and save existing ones, (2) spur economic activity and invest in long-term growth, and (3) foster unprecedented levels of accountability and transparency in government spending. ARRA intended to achieve those goals through the following four means: (1) providing $282 billion in tax cuts and benefits for millions of working families and businesses; (2) increasing federal funds for entitlement programs, such as extending unemployment benefits, by $284 billion; (3) making $274 billion available for federal contracts, grants, and loans; and (4) requiring recipients of ARRA funds to report quarterly on how they are using the money. All of the data are posted on http://www.recovery.gov so the public can track the ARRA funds.

Questions relating to ARRA funding were added for the volume 59 data collection. The survey collected separate outlays and obligations for ARRA and non-ARRA sources of funding, by performer and geography.

Top of page. Back to Top

Limitations of the Data

Funds for R&D were reported on a 3-year basis, comparable with the 2011 federal budget, on which the data were based. The amounts reported for each year are the obligations or outlays incurred in that year, regardless of when funds were authorized or received by an agency and regardless of whether the funds were identified in the agency's budget specifically for research, development, R&D plant, or some combination of the three. The respondents reconciled the data reported to the Federal Funds Survey with the amounts for R&D they reported under Max Schedule C to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the President's 2011 budget.

Some agencies are not able to report the full costs of R&D. For example, the headquarters costs of planning and administering R&D programs of the Department of Defense (DOD), estimated at a fraction of 1% of the agency's R&D total, are excluded because this agency has stated that identification of the amounts is impracticable.

R&D plant data are also underreported to some extent because of the difficulty encountered by some agencies, particularly DOD and the National Aeronautics and Space Agency (NASA), in identifying and reporting these data. DOD respondents report obligations for the R&D plant funded under the agency's construction appropriation, but they are able to identify only a small portion of the R&D plant support that is within R&D contracts funded from DOD's appropriation for research, development, testing, and evaluation. Similarly, NASA respondents cannot separately identify the portions of industrial R&D contracts that apply to R&D plant; R&D plant data are subsumed in the R&D data covering industrial performance. NASA R&D plant data for other performing sectors are reported separately.

Top of page. Back to Top

Revisions to the Data

Volume 59 (FY 2009–11). When completing the current year's survey, agency respondents revise their estimates for the latest 2 years of the previous report (in this case, FY 2008 and FY 2009). Such revision is part of the budgetary cycle. From time to time, survey submissions also reflect reappraisals and revisions in classification of various aspects of agencies' R&D programs. When such revisions occur, NSF requests that the agencies provide revised prior-year data to maintain consistency and comparability with the most recent R&D concepts.

Volume 57 (FY 2007–09). Beginning in FY 2000, the Department of the Air Force (AF) did not report Budget Activity (BA) 6.7 Operational Systems Development data because the agency misunderstood reporting requirements. During the volume 57 data collection cycle, AF edited prior-year data from FY 2000 to FY 2007 to include BA 6.7 Operational Systems Development data. AF did not revise preliminary development data for FY 2008 and FY 2009; therefore, these data are not comparable to FY 2007 (actual) data.

Volume 56 (FY 2006–08). Preliminary FY 2007 industry federally funded research and development center (FFRDC) totals (major systems development, development, and R&D) reported in volume 56 of the Federal Funds series of detailed statistical tables were overstated and industry totals were understated due to misreporting by the Department of the Army of approximately $3.2 billion of major systems development obligations to industry FFRDCs rather than to industry. The aggregate estimated totals reported in volume 56 were accurate, but the receiving sector was not. Actual FY 2007 data reported here correct this error.

Top of page. Back to Top

Historical Changes

The scope of the survey has changed over time, and the survey instrument has been revised accordingly. Agency reporting methods have also changed over time, and survey data are not directly comparable for all years. The most recent changes are summarized below.


FY 2005–07. Before the volume 55 survey cycle, NSF updated the list of foreign performers in the Federal Funds Survey to match the list of countries and territories in the Department of State's Bureau of Intelligence and Research list of Independent States in the World and the list of Dependencies and Areas of Special Sovereignty. Area/country lists in volume 55 data tables and later may differ from those in previous reports.

November 2002. On 25 November, President Bush signed the Homeland Security Act of 2002, establishing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

FY 1996–98. The lines on the survey instrument for special foreign currency program and detailed field of science and engineering were eliminated beginning with the volume 46 survey cycle. A special flier was included in the volume 46 packet mailing that listed the data items that were no longer required. Two tables depicting data on foreign performers by region, country, and agency that were removed before publication of volume 43 were reinstated with volume 46.

FY 1994–96. During the volume 44 survey cycle, the Director for Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E) at DOD requested that NSF further clarify the true character of DOD's R&D program, particularly as it compares with other federal agencies, by adding more detail to development obligations reported by DOD respondents. Specifically, DOD requested that NSF allow DOD agencies to report development obligations in two separate categories, advanced technology development and major systems development.

An excerpt from a letter written by Robert V. Tuohy, Chief, Program Analysis and Integration at DDR&E, to John E. Jankowski, Program Director, Research and Development Statistics Program, Division of Science Resources Statistics (renamed the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics), NSF, explains the reasoning behind the DDR&E request:

The DOD's R&D program is divided into two major pieces, Science and Technology (S&T) and Major Systems Development. The other federal agencies' entire R&D programs are equivalent in nature to DOD's S&T program, with the exception of the Department of Energy and possibly NASA. Comparing those other agency programs to DOD's program, including the development of weapons systems such as F-22 Fighter and the New Attack Submarine, is misleading.

FY 1993–95. Before publication of volume 43, NSF removed 54 tables that provided data on two items slated for elimination: the special foreign currency program and the detailed field of science and engineering for estimates for 1994 and 1995. Data were collected from federal agencies for these two items through volume 45 (FY 1995–97) but were not published. NSF also removed two tables depicting data on foreign performers by region, country, and agency.

FY 1992–94. Volume 42 was distributed with a flier notifying data users that NSF was considering eliminating several items from future volumes of the document. Data users were asked to review the list of affected tables shown on the flier and comment on the proposed eliminations to NSF.

FY 1990–92. Since volume 40, DOD has reported research obligations and development obligations separately. Tables reporting obligations for research, by state and performer, and obligations for development, by state and performer, were specifically created for DOD. Circumstances specific to DOD are (1) DOD funds the preponderance of federal development, and (2) DOD development funded at institutions of higher education is typically performed at university-affiliated nonacademic laboratories, which are separate from universities' academic departments, where university research is typically performed.


FY 2008–10. AF did not include its BA 6.7 Operational Systems Development in its preliminary FY 2009 and FY 2010 data; therefore, these data are not comparable to FY 2008 (actual) data.

FY 2007. NASA's R&D obligations decreased by $1 billion between FY 2006 and FY 2007. Of this amount, $850 million was accounted for by obligations for operational projects that NASA excluded in FY 2007 but reported in FY 2006. The remainder was from an overall decrease in obligations between FY 2006 and FY 2007.

FY 2006. NASA reclassified as operational costs funding for Space Operations, the Hubble Space Telescope, the Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy, and the James Webb Space Telescope previously reported as R&D plant.

FY 2005. The Transportation Security Laboratory was moved from the Transportation Security Administration of DHS to the Science and Technology Directorate of DHS.

FY 2004–06. NASA implemented a full-cost budget approach, which includes all of the direct and indirect costs for procurement, personnel, travel, and other infrastructure-related expenses relative to a particular program and project. NASA's data for FY 2004 and later years may not be directly comparable to its data for FY 2003 and earlier years.

FY 2004. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) revised its financial database, and after FY 2004 NIH records no longer contain information on the field of science and engineering. Data for FY 2004 and later years are not directly comparable to data for FY 2003 and earlier years.

FY 2003–05. DHS was unable to determine adequate estimates for its R&D by the categories collected by the survey. Therefore, NSF was not able to include DHS data in the volume 53 tables. Obligations that DHS was able to provide are shown below.

  Dollars in millions
DHS componentFY 2003 actual FY 2004 preliminary FY 2005 preliminary
Transportation Security Administration49.2137.9175.3
U.S. Coast Guard15.023.7NA
U.S. Secret Service1.01.11.1
Science and Technology DirectorateNA912.81,039.3

NA = not available.

FY 2003. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration reclassified some of its funding categories as non-R&D that had been considered R&D in prior years.

FY 2000. NASA reclassified Space Station as a physical asset, reclassified Space Station Research as equipment, and transferred funding for the program from R&D to R&D plant. Also in FY 2000, NIH reclassified as research the activities that it had previously classified as development. For more information on the classification changes at NASA and NIH, refer to Classification Revisions Reduce Reported Federal Development Obligations (InfoBrief NSF 02-309), February 2002, available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf02309/.

Top of page. Back to Top


Definitions are essentially unchanged from those used in past surveys.

1. Agency and subdivision. An agency is an organization of the federal government whose principal executive officer reports to the President. The Library of Congress is also included in the survey, even though its chief officer reports to Congress. Subdivision refers to any organizational unit of a reporting agency, such as a bureau, division, office, or service.

2. Obligations and outlays. Obligations represent the amounts for orders placed, contracts awarded, services received, and similar transactions during a given period, regardless of when the funds were appropriated and when future payment of money is required. Outlays represent the amounts for checks issued and cash payments made during a given period, regardless of when the funds were appropriated. Obligations and outlays cover all transactions that occurred in FY 2009 and those estimated for FY 2010 and FY 2011.

Obligations and outlays reported are consistent with figures shown for FY 2009, FY 2010, and FY 2011 appearing in the Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2011. The R&D data that agencies submit to OMB and to the Federal Funds Survey are based on the same definitions and are reconcilable.

The data include all federal funds available to an agency that the agency received or expects to receive from direct appropriations, trust funds, special account receipts, corporate income, or other sources, including funds appropriated to the President.

The amounts shown for each year reflect obligations or outlays for that year, regardless of when the funds were originally authorized or received and regardless of whether they were appropriated, received, or identified in the agency's budget specifically for research, development, or R&D plant.

In reporting its obligations or outlays, each agency includes the amounts transferred to other agencies for support of R&D. The receiving agencies do not report funds transferred to them. Similarly, a subdivision of an agency that transfers funds to another subdivision within that agency reports such obligations or outlays as its own.

Obligations and outlays for R&D performed for an agency in foreign countries include all funds available to the agency for this purpose, including funds separately appropriated for special foreign-currency programs.

Funds reported for R&D reflect full-cost coverage, which comprises the costs of specific R&D and the applicable overhead costs. The amounts reported include the costs of planning and administering R&D programs, laboratory overhead, pay of military personnel, and departmental administration.

3. Fiscal year. The accounting period for the federal government begins 1 October of a given year and ends 30 September of the following year; thus, FY 2009 began on 1 October 2008 and ended 30 September 2009.

4. Research, development, and R&D plant. Amounts for R&D and R&D plant include all direct, incidental, or related costs resulting from, or necessary to, performance of R&D and costs of R&D plant as defined below, regardless of whether the R&D is performed by a federal agency (intramurally) or by private individuals and organizations under grant or contract (extramurally). R&D excludes routine product testing, quality control, mapping and surveys, collection of general-purpose statistics, experimental production, and the training of scientific personnel.

a. Research is defined as systematic study directed toward fuller scientific knowledge or understanding of the subject studied. Research is classified as either basic or applied according to the objectives of the sponsoring agency.

Basic research is defined as systematic study directed toward fuller knowledge or understanding of the fundamental aspects of phenomena and of observable facts without specific applications toward processes or products in mind.

Applied research is defined as systematic study to gain knowledge or understanding necessary to determine the means by which a recognized and specific need may be met.

b. Development is defined as systematic application of knowledge or understanding, directed toward the production of useful materials, devices, and systems or methods, including design, development, and improvement of prototypes and new processes to meet specific requirements.

To better differentiate between the part of the federal R&D budget that supports science and key enabling technologies (including technologies for military and nondefense applications) and the part that primarily supports testing and evaluation (mostly of defense-related systems), NSF collects from the DOD development dollars in two categories: advanced technology development and major systems development.

DOD uses service codes 6.1 through 6.7 to classify data into the survey categories. Within DOD's research categories, basic research is classified as 6.1, and applied research is classified as 6.2. Within DOD's development categories, advanced technology development is classified as 6.3. Major systems development is classified as 6.4 through 6.7 and includes component developmental prototypes, demonstration and development of management support, and operational system development.

c. Demonstration includes amounts for activities that are part of R&D (i.e., that are intended to prove or to test whether a technology or method does in fact work). Demonstrations intended primarily to make information available about new technologies or methods are excluded.

d. R&D plant is defined as R&D facilities and fixed equipment, such as reactors, wind tunnels, and particle accelerators. Amounts include acquisition of, construction of, major repairs to, or alterations in structures, works, equipment, facilities, or land for use in R&D activities at federal or nonfederal installations. Excluded from the R&D plant category are costs of expendable or movable equipment (e.g., spectrometers, microscopes) and office furniture and equipment. Also excluded are the costs of predesign studies (e.g., those undertaken before commitment to a specific facility). These excluded costs are reported under "total conduct of research and development." Obligations for foreign R&D plant are limited to federal funds for facilities that are located abroad and used in support of foreign R&D.

5. Fields of science and engineering. In this survey, there are eight broad field categories, each comprising a number of detailed fields. The broad fields are environmental sciences, life sciences, mathematics and computer sciences, physical sciences, psychology, social sciences, sciences not elsewhere classified, and engineering. The term "not elsewhere classified (nec)" is used for multidisciplinary projects within a broad field and for single-discipline projects for which a separate field has not been assigned. The following list presents the broad fields and their associated detailed fields, together with illustrative disciplines within detailed fields.

The illustrative disciplines are intended to be guidelines, not sharp definitions; they represent examples of disciplines generally classified under each detailed field. A discipline under one detailed field may be classified under another detailed field when the major emphasis is elsewhere. Research in biochemistry, for example, might be reported as biological, agricultural, or medical, depending on the focus of the project. Human biochemistry would be classified under biological, but animal biochemistry or plant biochemistry would fall under agricultural. In no case is the research reported under more than one field. No double counting is intended or allowed.

a. Environmental sciences (terrestrial and extraterrestrial) are, with the exception of oceanography, concerned with the gross nonbiological properties of the areas of the solar system that directly or indirectly affect human survival and welfare. Obligations for studies pertaining to life in the sea or other bodies of water are reported as support of oceanography and not biology. Environmental sciences comprises the detailed fields of atmospheric sciences, geological sciences, oceanography, and environmental sciences nec. Examples of disciplines in these detailed fields are as follows:

Atmospheric sciences: aeronomy, extraterrestrial atmospheres, meteorology, solar science, weather modification

Geological sciences: engineering geophysics, general geology, geodesy and gravity, geomagnetism, hydrology, inorganic geochemistry, isotopic geochemistry, laboratory geophysics, organic geochemistry, paleomagnetism, paleontology, physical geography and cartography, seismology

Oceanography: biological oceanography, chemical oceanography, marine geophysics, physical oceanography

Environmental sciences nec

b. Life sciences is concerned with the scientific study of living organisms and their systems. It comprises five detailed fields: agricultural sciences, biological sciences (excluding environmental biology), environmental biology, medical sciences, and life sciences nec. Examples of the disciplines in these detailed fields are as follows:

Agricultural sciences: agronomy, animal sciences, food science and technology, fish and wildlife, forestry, horticulture, phytopathology, phytoproduction, plant sciences, soils and soil science, general agriculture, other agriculture nec

Biological sciences (excluding environmental biology): anatomy, biochemistry, biology, biometry and biostatistics, biophysics, botany, cell biology, entomology and parasitology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience (biological), nutrition, physiology, zoology, other biological sciences nec

Environmental biology: ecosystem sciences, evolutionary biology, limnology, physiological ecology, population and biotic community ecology, population biology, systematics, other environmental biology nec

Medical sciences: dentistry, internal medicine, neurology, obstetrics and gynecology, ophthalmology, otolaryngology, pathology, pediatrics, pharmacology, pharmacy, preventive medicine, psychiatry, radiology, surgery, veterinary medicine, other medical sciences nec

Life sciences nec

c. Mathematics and computer sciences employs logical reasoning with the aid of symbols and is concerned with the development of methods of operation using such symbols or with the application of such methods to automated information systems. It comprises the detailed fields of mathematics and computer sciences. Examples of disciplines in these detailed fields are as follows:

Mathematics: algebra, analysis, applied mathematics, foundations and logic, geometry, numerical analysis, statistics, topology

Computer sciences: computer and information sciences (general); design, development, and application of computer capabilities to data storage and manipulation; information sciences and systems; programming languages; systems analysis

Mathematics and computer sciences nec

d. Physical sciences is concerned with understanding of the material universe and its phenomena. It comprises the detailed fields of astronomy, chemistry, physics, and physical sciences nec. Examples of disciplines in these detailed fields are as follows:

Astronomy: laboratory astrophysics; optical astronomy; radio astronomy; theoretical astrophysics; x-ray, gamma-ray, and neutrino astronomy

Chemistry: inorganic, organic, organometallic, and physical chemistry

Physics: acoustics, atomic and molecular physics, condensed-matter physics, elementary particle physics, nuclear structure, optics, plasma physics

Physical sciences nec

e. Psychology deals with behavior, mental processes, and individual and group characteristics and abilities. Psychology in this survey is divided into three categories: biological aspects, social aspects, and psychological sciences nec. Examples of the disciplines in these categories are as follows:

Biological aspects: animal behavior, clinical psychology, comparative psychology, ethology, experimental psychology

Social aspects: development and personality; educational, personnel, and vocational psychology and testing; industrial and engineering psychology; social psychology

Psychological sciences nec

f. Social sciences is concerned with an understanding of the behavior of social institutions and groups and of individuals as members of a group. Social sciences comprises the detailed fields of anthropology, economics, political science, sociology, and social sciences nec. Examples of disciplines in these detailed fields are as follows:

Anthropology: applied anthropology, archaeology, cultural anthropology and personality, social anthropology, ethnology

Economics: econometrics and economic statistics; economic systems and development; economic theory; history of economic thought; industrial, labor, and agricultural economics; international economics; macroeconomics; microeconomics; public finance and fiscal policy

Political science: area or regional studies, comparative government, history of political ideas, international relations and law, national political and legal systems, political theory, public administration

Sociology: comparative and historical sociology, complex organizations, culture and social structure, demography, group interactions, social problems and social welfare, sociological theory

Social sciences nec: linguistics, research in education, research in law (e.g., attempts to assess impact on society of legal systems and practices), socioeconomic geography

g. Other sciences nec is used for multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary projects that cannot be classified within one of the broad fields of science already listed.

h. Engineering is concerned with developing engineering principles or making specific principles usable in engineering practice. Engineering in this survey is divided into eight detailed fields: aeronautical, astronautical, chemical, civil, electrical, mechanical, metallurgy and materials engineering, and engineering nec. Examples of disciplines in these detailed fields are as follows:

Aeronautical engineering: aerodynamics

Astronautical engineering: aerospace, space technology

Chemical engineering: petroleum, petroleum refining process

Civil engineering: architectural, environmental, hydraulic, hydrologic, marine, sanitary, and structural engineering; transportation

Electrical engineering: communication, electronic engineering, power

Mechanical engineering: engineering mechanics

Metallurgy and materials engineering: ceramic engineering, mining, textile engineering, welding

Engineering nec: agricultural engineering, bioengineering, biomedical engineering, industrial and management engineering, nuclear engineering, ocean engineering, systems engineering

6. Performer. A performer is either an intramural group or an organization carrying out an operational function, or an extramural organization or a person receiving support or providing services under a contract or grant.

a. Intramural performers are the agencies of the federal government. The work of these agencies is carried out directly by agency personnel. Obligations reported under this category are for activities performed or to be performed by the reporting agency itself or are for funds that the agency transfers to another federal agency for performance of work, as long as the ultimate performer is that agency or any federal agency. If the ultimate performer is not a federal agency, the funds transferred are reported by the transferring agency under the appropriate extramural performer category (universities and colleges, other nonprofit institutions, or industrial firms).

Intramural activities cover not only actual intramural R&D performance but also the costs associated with planning and administration of both intramural and extramural programs by federal personnel. Intramural activities also include the costs of supplies and off-the-shelf equipment (equipment that has gone beyond the development or prototype stage) procured for use in intramural R&D. For example, an operational launch vehicle purchased from an extramural source by NASA and used for intramural performance of R&D is reported as a part of the cost of intramural R&D.

b. Extramural performers are organizations outside the federal sector that perform R&D with federal funds under contract, grant, or cooperative agreement. Only those costs associated with actual R&D performance are reported, but these costs would include costs of materials and supplies to carry out R&D activities. Note, however, that the costs of off-the-shelf supplies and equipment required to support intramural R&D and procured from extramural suppliers are considered part of the costs of intramural performance and not part of the costs of extramural performance. Extramural performers are identified as follows:

(1) Industrial firms—organizations that may legally distribute net earnings to individuals or to other organizations.

(2) Universities and colleges—institutions of higher education in the United States that offer at least 1 year of college-level study leading toward a degree. Included are colleges of liberal arts; schools of arts and sciences; professional schools, such as schools of engineering and medicine, including affiliated hospitals and associated research institutes; and agricultural experiment stations.

(3) Other nonprofit institutions—private organizations other than educational institutions whose net earnings in no part inure to the benefit of a private stockholder or individual and other private organizations organized for the exclusive purpose of turning over their entire net earnings to such nonprofit organizations.

(4) Federally funded research and development centers (FFRDCs)—R&D-performing organizations that are exclusively or substantially financed by the federal government and are supported by the federal government either to meet a particular R&D objective or, in some instances, to provide major facilities at universities for research and associated training purposes. Each center is administered by an industrial firm, a university, or another nonprofit institution. (A complete list of FFRDCs is provided in appendix D.)

In general, organizations included in the FFRDC category meet all the following criteria:

(a) Its primary activities include one or more of the following: basic research, applied research, development, or management of R&D (specifically excluded are organizations engaged primarily in routine quality control and testing, routine service activities, production, mapping and surveys, and information dissemination).

(b) It is a separate operational unit within the parent organization or is organized as a separately incorporated organization.

(c) It performs actual R&D or R&D management either on direct request by the federal government or under a broad charter from the federal government but, in either case, under the direct monitoring of the federal government.

(d) It receives its major financial support (70% or more) from the federal government, usually from one agency.

(e) It has, or is expected to have, a long-term relationship with its sponsoring agency (about 5 years or more), as evidenced by specific obligations assumed by it and the agency.

(f) Most or all of its facilities are owned by or are funded under contract with the federal government.

(g) It has an average annual budget (operating and capital equipment) of at least $500,000.

(5) State and local governments—state and local government agencies, excluding state or local universities and colleges, agricultural experiment stations, medical schools, and affiliated hospitals. (Federal R&D funds obligated directly to such state and local institutions excluded in this category are included under the "universities and colleges" category in this report.) R&D activities under the state and local category are performed either by the state or local agencies themselves or by other organizations under grants or contracts from such agencies. Regardless of the ultimate performer, federal R&D funds directed to state and local governments are reported only under this sector.

(6) Foreign performers—foreign citizens, foreign organizations, or foreign governments, and also international organizations (such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization; United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization; and World Health Organization), performing R&D work abroad financed by the federal government. Excluded from the survey are U.S. agencies, organizations, or citizens performing R&D abroad for the federal government. The survey does not seek information on offshore payments. An exception in the past was made in the case of U.S. citizens performing R&D abroad under special foreign currency funds; these activities were included under "foreign performers" but have not been collected since the mid-1990s.

(7) Private individuals—When an R&D grant or contract is awarded directly to a private individual, obligations incurred are placed under "industrial firms."

7. Federal obligations for research performed at universities and colleges, by detailed field of science. Only seven agencies are required to respond to the portion of the survey covering federal funding of research at universities and colleges, reported by detailed field of science. These seven agencies—the Departments of Agriculture, Defense, Energy, and Health and Human Services, and Homeland Security; NASA; and NSF—represented approximately 98% of the federal research obligations to universities and colleges in FY 2009.

8. Geographic distribution of FY 2009 R&D obligations. Only the 11 largest R&D-funding agencies are required to respond to the portion of the survey covering the geographic distribution of obligations for R&D and R&D plant. These 11 agencies—the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, the Interior, and Transportation; the Environmental Protection Agency; NASA; and NSF—accounted for over 98% of total federal R&D and R&D plant obligations in FY 2009.

a. For actual FY 2009 data, respondents were asked to provide the principal location (state or outlying area) of the work performed by the primary contractor, grantee, or intramural organization. When this information was not available, respondents were asked to assign the obligations to the location (state, outlying area, or U.S. offices abroad) of the headquarters of the U.S. primary contractor, grantee, or intramural organization.

b. Obligations for basic research, applied research, and development were reported as a combined R&D amount for non-DOD agencies. However, DOD agencies break out development obligations by advanced technology development and major systems development. Therefore, obligations for basic research, applied research, advanced technology development, and major system development were reported as a combined R&D amount for DOD agencies.

Geographic distribution of DOD development funding to industry reflects only the location of prime contractors, not the location of numerous subcontractors who perform most of the R&D.

c. Specifically omitted from the geographic portion of the survey were R&D obligations to foreign performers and support of foreign performers. Foreign performer data, by country, are reported in a separate section of the Federal Funds Survey.

Federal Funds for Research and Development: Fiscal Years 2009–11
Detailed Statistical Tables | NSF 12-318 | July 2012


FY 2009 Department of Defense R&D data are underreported by $7.7 billion in this report. Air Force underreported data for major systems development by a considerable amount and slightly overreported data for basic research, applied research, and advanced technology development. Air Force has since corrected these data. Revised FY 2009 data will be available in volume 60 (FY 2010–12) of the Federal Funds series of detailed statistical tables. Revised FY 2009 data will also be available in the forthcoming update of Science and Engineering State Profiles.