This document has been archived and replaced by NSF 12-550 (http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf12550). Title: EarthScope National Office (ESNO) Date: 06/22/10 Replaced: NSF 06-600 EarthScope National Office (ESNO) [1]Program Solicitation NSF 10-576 Replaces Document(s): NSF 06-600 NSF Logo National Science Foundation Directorate for Geosciences Division of Earth Sciences Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. proposer's local time): October 01, 2010 IMPORTANT INFORMATION AND REVISION NOTES This is a revised solicitation that replaces [2]NSF 06-600. The primary revisions in this solicitation are (1) more explicit definition of the education and outreach role of the EarthScope National Office, taking into account the EarthScope Education and Outreach Implementation Plan; (2) more explicit description of NSF expectations for the structure of the EarthScope National Office; and (3) an increase in the anticipated funding level for the National Office from $400,000 to $600,000 pending availability of funds. In addition, this solicitation provides links to updated science and education and outreach plans. Please be advised that the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) includes revised guidelines to implement the mentoring provisions of the America COMPETES Act (ACA) (Pub. L. No. 110-69, Aug. 9, 2007.) As specified in the ACA, each proposal that requests funding to support postdoctoral researchers must include a description of the mentoring activities that will be provided for such individuals. Proposals that do not comply with this requirement will be returned without review (see the PAPP Guide Part I: Grant Proposal Guide Chapter II for further information about the implementation of this new requirement). SUMMARY OF PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS General Information Program Title: EarthScope Synopsis of Program: This solicitation calls for proposals to establish a community-based EarthScope National Office. The Office will foster and support integrated science, education, outreach, and related activities for the EarthScope program; facilitate and coordinate EarthScope scientific planning and education and outreach activities; facilitate collaborative research; and when necessary, form scientific responses to "events" in EarthScope topics and/or regions of interest. Cognizant Program Officer(s): * Gregory J. Anderson, telephone: (703) 292-4693, email: [3]greander@nsf.gov Applicable Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number(s): * 47.050 --- Geosciences Award Information Anticipated Type of Award: Standard Grant or Continuing Grant or Cooperative Agreement Estimated Number of Awards: 1 Anticipated Funding Amount: $600,000 Estimated average of approximately $600,000 per year for FY2011 and in subsequent years, for up to 4 years, pending annual performance and availability of funds. Eligibility Information Organization Limit: Proposals may only be submitted by the following: * Universities and Colleges - Universities and two- and four-year colleges (including community colleges) accredited in, and having a campus located in the US, acting on behalf of their faculty members. Such organizations also are referred to as academic institutions. PI Limit: None Specified Limit on Number of Proposals per Organization: 1 Limit on Number of Proposals per PI: 1 Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions A. Proposal Preparation Instructions * Letters of Intent: Not Applicable * Preliminary Proposal Submission: Not Applicable * Full Proposals: + Full Proposals submitted via FastLane: NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide, Part I: Grant Proposal Guide (GPG) Guidelines apply. The complete text of the GPG is available electronically on the NSF website at: [4]http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=gpg. + Full Proposals submitted via Grants.gov: NSF Grants.gov Application Guide: A Guide for the Preparation and Submission of NSF Applications via Grants.gov Guidelines apply (Note: The NSF Grants.gov Application Guide is available on the Grants.gov website and on the NSF website at: [5]http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=grant sgovguide) B. Budgetary Information * Cost Sharing Requirements: Cost Sharing is not required under this solicitation. * Indirect Cost (F&A) Limitations: Not Applicable * Other Budgetary Limitations: Not Applicable C. Due Dates * Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. proposer's local time): October 01, 2010 Proposal Review Information Criteria Merit Review Criteria: National Science Board approved criteria. Additional merit review considerations apply. Please see the full text of this solicitation for further information. Award Administration Information Award Conditions: Standard NSF award conditions apply. Reporting Requirements: Standard NSF reporting requirements apply. TABLE OF CONTENTS [6]Summary of Program Requirements I. [7]Introduction II. [8]Program Description III. [9]Award Information IV. [10]Eligibility Information V. [11]Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions A. [12]Proposal Preparation Instructions B. [13]Budgetary Information C. [14]Due Dates D. [15]FastLane/Grants.gov Requirements VI. [16]NSF Proposal Processing and Review Procedures A. [17]NSF Merit Review Criteria B. [18]Review and Selection Process VII. [19]Award Administration Information A. [20]Notification of the Award B. [21]Award Conditions C. [22]Reporting Requirements VIII. [23]Agency Contacts IX. [24]Other Information I. INTRODUCTION EarthScope is an Earth science program to explore the 4-dimensional structure of the North American continent. The EarthScope Program provides a framework for broad, integrated studies across the Earth sciences, including research on fault properties and the earthquake process, strain transfer, magmatic and hydrous fluids in the crust and mantle, plate boundary processes, large-scale continental deformation, continental structure and evolution, and composition and structure of the deep Earth. In addition, EarthScope offers multiple opportunities for Earth science education at all levels and an excellent opportunity to develop cyberinfrastructure to integrate, distribute, and analyze diverse data sets. The nucleus of the Program is the EarthScope Facility, a multi-purpose array of instruments and observatories consisting of the Plate Boundary Observatory (PBO), the San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth (SAFOD), and the USArray. These observatories provide an unprecedented amount of geophysical data to address the processes that formed and continue to deform North America. II. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Background A series of community meetings and workshops beginning in 1999 culminated in the publication of EarthScope facility construction and science plans in October 2001 and March 2002, respectively. A key need identified in the community-developed integrated science plan ("EarthScope: Scientific Targets for the World's Largest Observatory Pointed at the Solid Earth"; available from [25]http://earthscope.org/es_doc/reports/es_wksp_mar2002.pdf) was "EarthScope must proactively develop a communication mechanism with the broad research community capable of using EarthScope data and results." One option identified in the plan was the creation of an "EarthScope Office", with responsibilities that could include serving as a "central clearing house" for EarthScope products; initiating peer-reviewed, integrated EarthScope publications (for example, monographs and/or comprehensive annual EarthScope science reports); organizing workshops and sessions at national meetings; publishing a monthly newsletter, and maintaining an up-to-date Web presence, including an EarthScope archive. NSF adopted the concept of such an EarthScope National Office for which a periodic competition would be held. In 2007, the first EarthScope National Office (ESNO) was established at Oregon State University. Since then, ESNO has served as a nexus for a wide range of scientific and educational activities related to EarthScope, working in partnership with the EarthScope Steering Committee (ESSC), the operators of the EarthScope Facility, NSF, and the community. These activities have included developing and maintaining the EarthScope newsletter, the content of the EarthScope Web site ([26]http://www.earthscope.org/), one-pagers, a booth for meetings, and other items; coordinating the EarthScope Speaker Series and a variety of EarthScope meetings and short courses; and representing EarthScope at conferences and public outreach events. In 2009-2010, the EarthScope community, under the leadership of ESSC and ESNO, developed an updated EarthScope science plan, "Unlocking the Secrets of the North American Continent: An EarthScope Science Plan for 2010-2020" (available from [27]http://earthscope.org/ESSP). The first specific recommendation in the 2010 science plan is to "maintain and enhance the EarthScope National Office" as it serves the community. The science plan noted that ESNO " has helped to communicate EarthScope progress, data, and research opportunities and has expanded education and outreach efforts to include informal as well as formal education." Duties of the next EarthScope National Office NSF invites proposals to build on this success and develop the next EarthScope National Office. Duties of this office will include, but are not limited to: * Publishing a quarterly EarthScope newsletter and annual integrated EarthScope science report; * Developing and maintaining the content of the EarthScope Web site, including an EarthScope publications and products library; * Developing and distributing EarthScope outreach materials (e.g., brochures, one-pagers, the EarthScope booth, video materials, etc.) using both traditional and new media; * Coordinating the EarthScope Speaker Series and the EarthScope National Meeting; * Assisting with planning of and logistics for the EarthScope Institutes and other community-initiated workshops and short courses; * Supporting the EarthScope Steering Committee and its subcommittees, and other components of the EarthScope advisory structure; and * Representing EarthScope at appropriate research and educational conferences and public outreach events. In addition, the next office will coordinate a community-wide EarthScope education and outreach (E&O) effort centered on the five major goals of the EarthScope E&O Implementation Plan ([28]http://earthscope.org/es_doc/eno/ES_E&O_Impl_Plan_2_07.pdf): 1. Create a high-profile public identity for EarthScope that emphasizes the integrated nature of the scientific discoveries and the importance of EarthScope research initiatives; 2. Establish a sense of ownership among scientific, professional, and educational communities and the public so that a diverse group of individuals and organizations can and will make contributions to EarthScope; 3. Promote science literacy and understanding of EarthScope among all audiences through informal education venues; 4. Advance formal Earth science education by promoting inquiry-based classroom investigations that focus on understanding Earth and the interdisciplinary nature of EarthScope; and 5. Foster use of EarthScope data, discoveries, and new technology in resolving challenging problems and improving our quality of life. The E&O effort should effectively ensure that EarthScope data and discoveries, and their implications, reach a broad spectrum of local, regional, and national audiences, including scientists, educators, students, landowners, policymakers, and the general public. The EarthScope E&O effort will explicitly encourage partnerships with underrepresented institutions and non-profit organizations, such as Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), Hispanic Serving Institutes (HSI), Community and Tribal Colleges, National Parks, and museums. The next National Office will pursue additional activities that are compatible with the fundamental mission of the EarthScope National Office: to foster, facilitate, coordinate, and support integrated science, education, outreach, and related activities for the EarthScope program. EarthScope National Office Structure NSF anticipates that successful operations and management of the next National Office will require a senior-level scientist (the proposal PI) who will serve as the part-time ESNO Director and manage the activities of the office; a full-time EarthScope E&O Coordinator, whose effort will be devoted to the EarthScope E&O program; and additional dedicated support staff who will perform the other functions of the office, including maintaining Web content, providing logistical and other support for workshops, supporting the EarthScope advisory structure, and administrative functions. The ESNO Director will also serve as a member of the EarthScope Steering Committee. NSF anticipates that the next EarthScope National Office will continue to leverage the capabilities of the EarthScope Facility and will work in partnership with ESSC, NSF, and the community in order to achieve the mission of the office. Links and related documents * 2002 EarthScope science plan: [29]http://earthscope.org/es_doc/reports/es_wksp_mar2002.pdf * 2007 EarthScope Education and Outreach Implementation Plan: [30]http://earthscope.org/es_doc/eno/ES_E&O_Impl_Plan_2_07.pdf * Presentations and other documents related to the 2010 EarthScope science plan: [31]http://earthscope.org/ESSP * EarthScope Education and Outreach Subcommittee recommendations to ESSC on EarthScope Education and Outreach Structure, endorsed by ESSC in February 2010: [32]http://earthscope.org/es_doc/esno/EarthScope-EO-Coordinator-fi nal.pdf III. AWARD INFORMATION Under this Solicitation, proposals may be submitted for up to 4 years. The program expects to make one (1) standard or continuing grant or cooperative agreement depending on the quality of submissions and the availability of funds. Approximately $600,000 is expected to be available in FY2011 to support the first year of an award for proposals received under this Solicitation. IV. ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION Organization Limit: Proposals may only be submitted by the following: * Universities and Colleges - Universities and two- and four-year colleges (including community colleges) accredited in, and having a campus located in the US, acting on behalf of their faculty members. Such organizations also are referred to as academic institutions. PI Limit: None Specified Limit on Number of Proposals per Organization: 1 Limit on Number of Proposals per PI: 1 V. PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS A. Proposal Preparation Instructions Full Proposal Preparation Instructions: Proposers may opt to submit proposals in response to this Program Solicitation via Grants.gov or via the NSF FastLane system. * Full proposals submitted via FastLane: Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the general guidelines contained in the NSF Grant Proposal Guide (GPG). The complete text of the GPG is available electronically on the NSF website at: [33]http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=gpg. Paper copies of the GPG may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-7827 or by e-mail from [34]nsfpubs@nsf.gov. Proposers are reminded to identify this program solicitation number in the program solicitation block on the NSF Cover Sheet For Proposal to the National Science Foundation. Compliance with this requirement is critical to determining the relevant proposal processing guidelines. Failure to submit this information may delay processing. * Full proposals submitted via Grants.gov: Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation via Grants.gov should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide: A Guide for the Preparation and Submission of NSF Applications via Grants.gov. The complete text of the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide is available on the Grants.gov website and on the NSF website at: ([35]http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/docs/grantsgovguide.pdf). To obtain copies of the Application Guide and Application Forms Package, click on the Apply tab on the Grants.gov site, then click on the Apply Step 1: Download a Grant Application Package and Application Instructions link and enter the funding opportunity number, (the program solicitation number without the NSF prefix) and press the Download Package button. Paper copies of the Grants.gov Application Guide also may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-7827 or by e-mail from [36]nsfpubs@nsf.gov. The following items should be included in the Project Description and will be considered in the review: * A description of previous educational and/or outreach efforts of the investigators. This might include how the investigators have: 1) influenced their research discipline(s); 2) incorporated or integrated contemporary research questions, processes, and results into educational experiences; 3) demonstrated innovative use of traditional and/or new media; 4) coordinated and/or organized, or helped to coordinate and/or organize, community outreach and/or planning activities; or 5) demonstrated leadership among colleagues in promoting the above. * A description of the education and outreach activities to be undertaken as part of the proposed activities for the National Office, and how those activities would meet the goals of the EarthScope Education and Outreach Implementation Plan. * A plan for assessing and evaluating the effectiveness of Office activities. B. Budgetary Information Cost Sharing: Cost sharing is not required under this solicitation. C. Due Dates * Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. proposer's local time): October 01, 2010 D. FastLane/Grants.gov Requirements * For Proposals Submitted Via FastLane: Detailed technical instructions regarding the technical aspects of preparation and submission via FastLane are available at: [37]https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/a1/newstan.htm. For FastLane user support, call the FastLane Help Desk at 1-800-673-6188 or e-mail [38]fastlane@nsf.gov. The FastLane Help Desk answers general technical questions related to the use of the FastLane system. Specific questions related to this program solicitation should be referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this funding opportunity. Submission of Electronically Signed Cover Sheets. The Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) must electronically sign the proposal Cover Sheet to submit the required proposal certifications (see Chapter II, Section C of the Grant Proposal Guide for a listing of the certifications). The AOR must provide the required electronic certifications within five working days following the electronic submission of the proposal. Further instructions regarding this process are available on the FastLane Website at: [39]https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/fastlane.jsp. * For Proposals Submitted Via Grants.gov: Before using Grants.gov for the first time, each organization must register to create an institutional profile. Once registered, the applicant's organization can then apply for any federal grant on the Grants.gov website. The Grants.gov's Grant Community User Guide is a comprehensive reference document that provides technical information about Grants.gov. Proposers can download the User Guide as a Microsoft Word document or as a PDF document. The Grants.gov User Guide is available at: [40]http://www.grants.gov/CustomerSupport. In addition, the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide provides additional technical guidance regarding preparation of proposals via Grants.gov. For Grants.gov user support, contact the Grants.gov Contact Center at 1-800-518-4726 or by email: [41]support@grants.gov. The Grants.gov Contact Center answers general technical questions related to the use of Grants.gov. Specific questions related to this program solicitation should be referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this solicitation. Submitting the Proposal: Once all documents have been completed, the Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) must submit the application to Grants.gov and verify the desired funding opportunity and agency to which the application is submitted. The AOR must then sign and submit the application to Grants.gov. The completed application will be transferred to the NSF FastLane system for further processing. VI. NSF PROPOSAL PROCESSING AND REVIEW PROCEDURES Proposals received by NSF are assigned to the appropriate NSF program where they will be reviewed if they meet NSF proposal preparation requirements. All proposals are carefully reviewed by a scientist, engineer, or educator serving as an NSF Program Officer, and usually by three to ten other persons outside NSF who are experts in the particular fields represented by the proposal. These reviewers are selected by Program Officers charged with the oversight of the review process. Proposers are invited to suggest names of persons they believe are especially well qualified to review the proposal and/or persons they would prefer not review the proposal. These suggestions may serve as one source in the reviewer selection process at the Program Officer's discretion. Submission of such names, however, is optional. Care is taken to ensure that reviewers have no conflicts of interest with the proposal. A. NSF Merit Review Criteria All NSF proposals are evaluated through use of the two National Science Board (NSB)-approved merit review criteria: intellectual merit and the broader impacts of the proposed effort. In some instances, however, NSF will employ additional criteria as required to highlight the specific objectives of certain programs and activities. The two NSB-approved merit review criteria are listed below. The criteria include considerations that help define them. These considerations are suggestions and not all will apply to any given proposal. While proposers must address both merit review criteria, reviewers will be asked to address only those considerations that are relevant to the proposal being considered and for which the reviewer is qualified to make judgements. What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields? How well qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to conduct the project? (If appropriate, the reviewer will comment on the quality of the prior work.) To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative, original, or potentially transformative concepts? How well conceived and organized is the proposed activity? Is there sufficient access to resources? What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity? How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while promoting teaching, training, and learning? How well does the proposed activity broaden the participation of underrepresented groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity, disability, geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it enhance the infrastructure for research and education, such as facilities, instrumentation, networks, and partnerships? Will the results be disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and technological understanding? What may be the benefits of the proposed activity to society? Examples illustrating activities likely to demonstrate broader impacts are available electronically on the NSF website at: [42]http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/gpg/broaderimpacts.pdf. Mentoring activities provided to postdoctoral researchers supported on the project, as described in a one-page supplementary document, will be evaluated under the Broader Impacts criterion. NSF staff also will give careful consideration to the following in making funding decisions: Integration of Research and Education One of the principal strategies in support of NSF's goals is to foster integration of research and education through the programs, projects, and activities it supports at academic and research institutions. These institutions provide abundant opportunities where individuals may concurrently assume responsibilities as researchers, educators, and students and where all can engage in joint efforts that infuse education with the excitement of discovery and enrich research through the diversity of learning perspectives. Integrating Diversity into NSF Programs, Projects, and Activities Broadening opportunities and enabling the participation of all citizens -- women and men, underrepresented minorities, and persons with disabilities -- is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. NSF is committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports. Additional Review Criteria: * Do the proposal PI and team, and the institution, have demonstrated expertise in management of large, diverse projects? * How well would the proposed role of the E&O Coordinator support the goals expressed in the EarthScope E&O Implementation Plan? * How well would the proposed plan foster continued development of the broad EarthScope community? * How well would the proposed plan create or foster synergy among the various EarthScope components and activities? * How well would the proposed plan foster innovative use of traditional and new media? * Is there sufficient institutional support and capacity for the proposed effort? * Is there a clear management plan for the proposed effort? B. Review and Selection Process Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation will be reviewed by Ad hoc Review and/or Panel Review. Reviewers will be asked to formulate a recommendation to either support or decline each proposal. The Program Officer assigned to manage the proposal's review will consider the advice of reviewers and will formulate a recommendation. After scientific, technical and programmatic review and consideration of appropriate factors, the NSF Program Officer recommends to the cognizant Division Director whether the proposal should be declined or recommended for award. NSF is striving to be able to tell applicants whether their proposals have been declined or recommended for funding within six months. The time interval begins on the deadline or target date, or receipt date, whichever is later. The interval ends when the Division Director accepts the Program Officer's recommendation. A summary rating and accompanying narrative will be completed and submitted by each reviewer. In all cases, reviews are treated as confidential documents. Verbatim copies of reviews, excluding the names of the reviewers, are sent to the Principal Investigator/Project Director by the Program Officer. In addition, the proposer will receive an explanation of the decision to award or decline funding. In all cases, after programmatic approval has been obtained, the proposals recommended for funding will be forwarded to the Division of Grants and Agreements for review of business, financial, and policy implications and the processing and issuance of a grant or other agreement. Proposers are cautioned that only a Grants and Agreements Officer may make commitments, obligations or awards on behalf of NSF or authorize the expenditure of funds. No commitment on the part of NSF should be inferred from technical or budgetary discussions with a NSF Program Officer. A Principal Investigator or organization that makes financial or personnel commitments in the absence of a grant or cooperative agreement signed by the NSF Grants and Agreements Officer does so at their own risk. VII. AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION A. Notification of the Award Notification of the award is made to the submitting organization by a Grants Officer in the Division of Grants and Agreements. Organizations whose proposals are declined will be advised as promptly as possible by the cognizant NSF Program administering the program. Verbatim copies of reviews, not including the identity of the reviewer, will be provided automatically to the Principal Investigator. (See Section VI.B. for additional information on the review process.) B. Award Conditions An NSF award consists of: (1) the award letter, which includes any special provisions applicable to the award and any numbered amendments thereto; (2) the budget, which indicates the amounts, by categories of expense, on which NSF has based its support (or otherwise communicates any specific approvals or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the proposal referenced in the award letter; (4) the applicable award conditions, such as Grant General Conditions (GC-1); * or Research Terms and Conditions * and (5) any announcement or other NSF issuance that may be incorporated by reference in the award letter. Cooperative agreements also are administered in accordance with NSF Cooperative Agreement Financial and Administrative Terms and Conditions (CA-FATC) and the applicable Programmatic Terms and Conditions. NSF awards are electronically signed by an NSF Grants and Agreements Officer and transmitted electronically to the organization via e-mail. *These documents may be accessed electronically on NSF's Website at [43]http://www.nsf.gov/awards/managing/award_conditions.jsp?org=NSF. Paper copies may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-7827 or by e-mail from [44]nsfpubs@nsf.gov. More comprehensive information on NSF Award Conditions and other important information on the administration of NSF awards is contained in the NSF Award & Administration Guide (AAG) Chapter II, available electronically on the NSF Website at [45]http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=aag. C. Reporting Requirements For all multi-year grants (including both standard and continuing grants), the Principal Investigator must submit an annual project report to the cognizant Program Officer at least 90 days before the end of the current budget period. (Some programs or awards require more frequent project reports). Within 90 days after expiration of a grant, the PI also is required to submit a final project report, and a project outcomes report for the general public. Failure to provide the required annual or final project reports, or the project outcomes report will delay NSF review and processing of any future funding increments as well as any pending proposals for that PI. PIs should examine the formats of the required reports in advance to assure availability of required data. PIs are required to use NSF's electronic project-reporting system, available through FastLane, for preparation and submission of annual and final project reports. Such reports provide information on activities and findings, project participants (individual and organizational) publications; and, other specific products and contributions. PIs will not be required to re-enter information previously provided, either with a proposal or in earlier updates using the electronic system. Submission of the report via FastLane constitutes certification by the PI that the contents of the report are accurate and complete. The project outcomes report must be prepared and submitted using Research.gov. This report serves as a brief summary, prepared specifically for the public, of the nature and outcomes of the project. This report will be posted on the NSF website exactly as it is submitted by the PI. VIII. AGENCY CONTACTS General inquiries regarding this program should be made to: * Gregory J. Anderson, telephone: (703) 292-4693, email: [46]greander@nsf.gov For questions related to the use of FastLane, contact: * FastLane Help Desk, telephone: 1-800-673-6188; e-mail: [47]fastlane@nsf.gov. For questions relating to Grants.gov contact: * Grants.gov Contact Center: If the Authorized Organizational Representatives (AOR) has not received a confirmation message from Grants.gov within 48 hours of submission of application, please contact via telephone: 1-800-518-4726; e-mail: [48]support@grants.gov. IX. OTHER INFORMATION The NSF Website provides the most comprehensive source of information on NSF Directorates (including contact information), programs and funding opportunities. Use of this Website by potential proposers is strongly encouraged. In addition, National Science Foundation Update is a free e-mail subscription service designed to keep potential proposers and other interested parties apprised of new NSF funding opportunities and publications, important changes in proposal and award policies and procedures, and upcoming NSF Regional Grants Conferences. Subscribers are informed through e-mail when new publications are issued that match their identified interests. Users can subscribe to this service by clicking the "Get NSF Updates by Email" link on the [49]NSF web site. Grants.gov provides an additional electronic capability to search for Federal government-wide grant opportunities. NSF funding opportunities may be accessed via this new mechanism. Further information on Grants.gov may be obtained at [50]http://www.grants.gov. ABOUT THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent Federal agency created by the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended (42 USC 1861-75). The Act states the purpose of the NSF is "to promote the progress of science; [and] to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare by supporting research and education in all fields of science and engineering." NSF funds research and education in most fields of science and engineering. It does this through grants and cooperative agreements to more than 2,000 colleges, universities, K-12 school systems, businesses, informal science organizations and other research organizations throughout the US. The Foundation accounts for about one-fourth of Federal support to academic institutions for basic research. NSF receives approximately 40,000 proposals each year for research, education and training projects, of which approximately 11,000 are funded. In addition, the Foundation receives several thousand applications for graduate and postdoctoral fellowships. The agency operates no laboratories itself but does support National Research Centers, user facilities, certain oceanographic vessels and Antarctic research stations. The Foundation also supports cooperative research between universities and industry, US participation in international scientific and engineering efforts, and educational activities at every academic level. Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities provide funding for special assistance or equipment to enable persons with disabilities to work on NSF-supported projects. See Grant Proposal Guide Chapter II, Section D.2 for instructions regarding preparation of these types of proposals. The National Science Foundation has Telephonic Device for the Deaf (TDD) and Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) capabilities that enable individuals with hearing impairments to communicate with the Foundation about NSF programs, employment or general information. TDD may be accessed at (703) 292-5090 and (800) 281-8749, FIRS at (800) 877-8339. The National Science Foundation Information Center may be reached at (703) 292-5111. The National Science Foundation promotes and advances scientific progress in the United States by competitively awarding grants and cooperative agreements for research and education in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering. To get the latest information about program deadlines, to download copies of NSF publications, and to access abstracts of awards, visit the NSF Website at http://www.nsf.gov * Location: 4201 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA 22230 * For General Information (NSF Information Center):(703) 292-5111 * TDD (for the hearing-impaired):(703) 292-5090 * To Order Publications or Forms: Send an e-mail to: nsfpubs@nsf.gov or telephone:(703) 292-7827 * To Locate NSF Employees:(703) 292-5111 PRIVACY ACT AND PUBLIC BURDEN STATEMENTS The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited under the authority of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended. The information on proposal forms will be used in connection with the selection of qualified proposals; and project reports submitted by awardees will be used for program evaluation and reporting within the Executive Branch and to Congress. The information requested may be disclosed to qualified reviewers and staff assistants as part of the proposal review process; to proposer institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data regarding the proposal review process, award decisions, or the administration of awards; to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers and educators as necessary to complete assigned work; to other government agencies or other entities needing information regarding applicants or nominees as part of a joint application review process, or in order to coordinate programs or policy; and to another Federal agency, court, or party in a court or Federal administrative proceeding if the government is a party. Information about Principal Investigators may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal File and Associated Records," 69 Federal Register 26410 (May 12, 2004), and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records, " 69 Federal Register 26410 (May 12, 2004). Submission of the information is voluntary. Failure to provide full and complete information, however, may reduce the possibility of receiving an award. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, an information collection unless it displays a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. The OMB control number for this collection is 3145-0058. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 120 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions. Send comments regarding the burden estimate and any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Suzanne H. Plimpton Reports Clearance Officer Division of Administrative Services National Science Foundation Arlington, VA 22230 [53]Policies and Important Links | [54]Privacy | [55]FOIA | [56]Help | [57]Contact NSF | [58]Contact Web Master | [59]SiteMap National Science Foundation The National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230, USA Tel: (703) 292-5111, FIRS: (800) 877-8339 | TDD: (800) 281-8749 Last Updated: 11/07/06 [60]Text Only [x.gif] References 1. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10576/nsf10576.htm#toc 2. http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf06600 3. mailto:greander@nsf.gov 4. http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=gpg 5. http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=grantsgovguide 6. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10576/nsf10576.htm#summary 7. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10576/nsf10576.htm#pgm_intr_txt 8. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10576/nsf10576.htm#pgm_desc_txt 9. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10576/nsf10576.htm#awd_info 10. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10576/nsf10576.htm#elig 11. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10576/nsf10576.htm#prep 12. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10576/nsf10576.htm#prep 13. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10576/nsf10576.htm#budg_cst_shr_txt 14. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10576/nsf10576.htm#dates 15. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10576/nsf10576.htm#fastlane 16. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10576/nsf10576.htm#review 17. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10576/nsf10576.htm#reviewcrit 18. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10576/nsf10576.htm#reviewprot 19. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10576/nsf10576.htm#awardadmin 20. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10576/nsf10576.htm#awardnotify 21. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10576/nsf10576.htm#grantcond 22. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10576/nsf10576.htm#reportreq 23. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10576/nsf10576.htm#cont 24. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10576/nsf10576.htm#othpgm 25. http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/good-bye? http://earthscope.org/es_doc/reports/es_wksp_mar2002.pdf 26. http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/good-bye?http://www.earthscope.org/ 27. http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/good-bye?http://earthscope.org/ESSP 28. http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/good-bye? http://earthscope.org/es_doc/eno/ES_E&O_Impl_Plan_2_07.pdf 29. http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/good-bye? http://earthscope.org/es_doc/reports/es_wksp_mar2002.pdf 30. http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/good-bye? http://earthscope.org/es_doc/eno/ES_E&O_Impl_Plan_2_07.pdf 31. http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/good-bye?http://earthscope.org/ESSP 32. http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/good-bye? http://earthscope.org/es_doc/esno/EarthScope-EO-Coordinator-final.pdf 33. http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=gpg 34. mailto:nsfpubs@nsf.gov 35. http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/docs/grantsgovguide.pdf 36. mailto:nsfpubs@nsf.gov 37. https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/a1/newstan.htm 38. mailto:fastlane@nsf.gov 39. https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/fastlane.jsp 40. http://www.grants.gov/CustomerSupport 41. mailto:support@grants.gov 42. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/gpg/broaderimpacts.pdf 43. http://www.nsf.gov/awards/managing/award_conditions.jsp?org=NSF 44. mailto:nsfpubs@nsf.gov 45. http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=aag 46. mailto:greander@nsf.gov 47. mailto:fastlane@nsf.gov 48. mailto:support@grants.gov 49. http://www.nsf.gov/ 50. http://www.grants.gov/ 51. http://www.nsf.gov/ 52. mailto:nsfpubs@nsf.gov 53. http://www.nsf.gov/policies 54. http://www.nsf.gov/policies/privacy.jsp 55. http://www.nsf.gov/policies/foia.jsp 56. http://www.nsf.gov/help/ 57. http://www.nsf.gov/help/contact.jsp 58. mailto:webmaster@nsf.gov 59. http://www.nsf.gov/help/sitemap.jsp 60. http://transcoder.usablenet.com/tt/referrer