News Release 97-043
Solid Curriculum and Strong Teaching Outweigh Negatives in Math and Science Learning
June 10, 1997
This material is available primarily for archival purposes. Telephone numbers or other contact information may be out of date; please see current contact information at media contacts.
U.S. fourth-graders' performance on the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) proves that students can overcome factors that traditionally are blamed for poor learning, if challenged by a solid curriculum based on national education standards coupled with competent teaching, according to officials of the National Science Foundation (NSF).
"The fourth-grade scores, released today in Boston and Washington, D.C., confirm NSF's policy to require standards-based curriculums and thorough teacher professional development in all of its education programs," noted Joe Bordogna, NSF's acting deputy director, at a press conference in the nation's capital.
"The TIMSS results are proof of what is possible in a competent educational system," said Luther S. Williams, who heads NSF's education and human resources directorate. "As the TIMSS report notes, factors such as the amount of television watching, class size, and time spent in school cannot explain student performance. What really matters is the quality of the day-to-day interaction between teachers and students around a coherent curriculum."
The TIMSS fourth-grade results indicate that in science, U.S. students outperformed most participating nations in the study. In math, U.S. fourth-graders made a stronger international showing than U.S. eighth-graders, but were not yet among the best in the world.
Even so, Williams notes that the performance of fourth-graders has improved markedly on international comparisons between 1990 and 1995, a period which coincides with the application of standards-based curriculum and teaching methods in math supported by NSF. Even so, he added, too few school systems yet offer what NSF considers a competent math and science curriculum at any level.
Margaret Cozzens, who heads NSF's elementary, secondary, and informal education division, noted that U.S. students' showing in math can be traced directly to the influence of national standards for exemplary math teaching as well as NSF-developed instructional materials based on the standards.
Published in 1989 by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, the standards have slowly been incorporated into elementary school teaching, more so than at the middle-school level, and can be expected to have influenced student performance by the mid-1990's, when the latest TIMSS data were collected, she noted.
Williams also pointed out that the TIMSS also indicates that the sharp decline in US student performance between the fourth and eighth grades is probably a result of an unfocused curriculum. He noted that a report released last October as part of TIMSS showed that the U.S. eighth-grade math and science curriculum is vague and repetitive. The U.S. fourth-grade curriculum more closely resembles those in high-scoring TIMSS countries.
He added that the U.S. fourth-grade curriculum contains many more of the topics studied by a majority of children around the world than does its eighth-grade curriculum. He also notes that the basics-oriented arithmetic curriculum that U.S. students study in fourth grade still is found in schools in the eighth grade. Many foreign countries consider algebra and geometry "basic" in middle school.
NSF-Funded Mathematics Curriculum Projects
University of Chicago School Mathematics Project (UCSMP)
Elementary math: Max Bell (312) 702-1563
Secondary math: Zalman Usiskin (312) 702-1560
Cooperative Mathematics Project
Developmental Studies Center
Investigations in Number, Data and Space
Susan Jo Russell
TIMS: Teaching Integrated Math and Science
University of Illinois, Chicago
The Connected Mathematics Project
Michigan State University
Mathematics in Context: A Connected Curriculum for Grade 5-8
University of Wisconsin
Middle School Mathematics Through Applications Project
The Institute for Research on Learning
Palo Alto, Ca.
Seeing and Thinking Mathematically
Education Development Center (EDC)
Six Through Eight Mathematics (STEM)
University of Montana
Applications/Reform in Secondary Education (ARISE)
E. Paul Goldenberg
Core-Plus Mathematics Project
Christian R. Hirsch
Western Michigan University
Interactive Mathematics Program (IMP)
San Francisco State University
Math Connections: A Secondary Mathematics Core Curriculum Project
June G. Ellis
Connecticut Business and Industry Alliance
Systemic Initiatives for Montana Mathematics and Science (SIMMS)
Montana Council of Teachers of Mathematics
Peter West, NSF, (703) 292-8070, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Margaret Cozzens, NSF, (703) 292-8628, email: email@example.com
The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent federal agency that supports fundamental research and education across all fields of science and engineering. In fiscal year (FY) 2017, its budget is $7.5 billion. NSF funds reach all 50 states through grants to nearly 2,000 colleges, universities and other institutions. Each year, NSF receives more than 48,000 competitive proposals for funding and makes about 12,000 new funding awards.
Useful NSF Web Sites:
NSF Home Page: https://www.nsf.gov
NSF News: https://www.nsf.gov/news/
For the News Media: https://www.nsf.gov/news/newsroom.jsp
Science and Engineering Statistics: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/
Awards Searches: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/