WEBVTT 1 00:00:21.150 --> 00:00:34.440 Manish Parashar: Good morning, everybody, welcome to the first sighs distinguished lecture of 2022 it's my absolute pleasure to introduce our speaker today, Dr Julio ibarra. 2 00:00:35.280 --> 00:00:51.630 Manish Parashar: he's a research professor in the knight foundation school of computer science in the college of engineering and computing and is the assistant Vice President in technology augmented research in the division of it at Florida international university. 3 00:00:52.950 --> 00:01:01.200 Manish Parashar: Dr bar is responsible for furthering the mission of the Center for Internet augmented research and assessment of Sierra. 4 00:01:01.500 --> 00:01:08.340 Manish Parashar: To contribute to the pace and the quality of research at fsu to the applications of advanced cyber infrastructure. 5 00:01:08.790 --> 00:01:21.630 Manish Parashar: under his leadership and stewardship nsf is funded the empath international exchange point and america's light paths am like network in its portfolio of international science infrastructure. 6 00:01:22.380 --> 00:01:30.420 Manish Parashar: Both these projects have been tremendously impactful a empath provides international research and education network connectors. 7 00:01:30.840 --> 00:01:40.890 Manish Parashar: with access to US production experimental backbone networks such as Internet to and, yes, net to facilitate international science, research and education collaborations. 8 00:01:41.310 --> 00:01:51.330 Manish Parashar: Am light is an international network backbone and interconnect the research and education networks in the US with peer networks in Latin America, the Caribbean and Africa. 9 00:01:51.900 --> 00:02:06.210 Manish Parashar: Dr Bowers research interests include software defined networks autonomic network architectures network automation and network control and management so without delaying any further, let me turn it over to Dr bar over to Julio. 10 00:02:08.040 --> 00:02:15.870 Julio Ibarra: diminish, thank you for having me and for the opportunity to present at the nsf distinguished lecture series. 11 00:02:17.010 --> 00:02:17.550 Julio Ibarra: My. 12 00:02:19.830 --> 00:02:25.380 Julio Ibarra: The topic of my talk is the family expressive protect network and. 13 00:02:26.640 --> 00:02:44.820 Julio Ibarra: me expressing protect operates as an international production network and platform for network innovation supporting research and education, and as you see here my introductory slide here, I am the principal investigator for the vm light project. 14 00:02:49.950 --> 00:03:02.310 Julio Ibarra: This is the outline of my talk and my objective is for you to gain an understanding of first what am I, is a production, research and education network. 15 00:03:03.300 --> 00:03:18.600 Julio Ibarra: How we're using emulate resources for network, innovation and how am I responding to challenges from science applications i'll start by giving an introduction to the home of emulated fit you followed by some history about Emily. 16 00:03:21.600 --> 00:03:31.740 Julio Ibarra: So Emma is managed from the Center for Internet augmented research and assessment Sierra in the division of it edify you as as minish mentioned. 17 00:03:32.880 --> 00:03:43.620 Julio Ibarra: Sierra is an interdisciplinary Center it supports and conducts research and education through the application of advanced cyber infrastructure. 18 00:03:44.550 --> 00:03:56.910 Julio Ibarra: Sierra consists of a small group of network engineers software developers and a support team to the right of my slide you can see a recent photo of the Sierra team. 19 00:03:58.320 --> 00:04:19.530 Julio Ibarra: Some of the goals of Sierra art to bridge technology gaps between researchers and it practitioners, so one of my roles is to leverage the expertise in the division of it and the College of engineering and computing to better inform our community about em light and projects at Sierra. 20 00:04:20.700 --> 00:04:36.180 Julio Ibarra: Another goal is to reinvigorate scholarship for undergraduate and graduate students engaging students to participate in projects is one of our core activities at Sierra in 2021 19 students participated in projects at Sierra. 21 00:04:37.470 --> 00:04:47.310 Julio Ibarra: Finally, Sierra aligns with fit goals as a public research university contributing to its research scholarship and technology development. 22 00:04:53.760 --> 00:05:00.780 Julio Ibarra: Some history about Emily Emily it was established in 2020 2010 under an iron see award. 23 00:05:03.210 --> 00:05:14.760 Julio Ibarra: From the office of cyber of advanced cyber infrastructure and like consists of a 20 year build out that includes connections to research and education in Latin America. 24 00:05:15.600 --> 00:05:36.690 Julio Ibarra: fit you lead the effort to link the US research and education networks to Latin America, in collaboration with Internet to global crossing and industry collaborators this collaboration resulted in the creation of an path as an international exchange point in Miami it back in 2000. 25 00:05:38.250 --> 00:06:00.780 Julio Ibarra: Emily built upon the accomplishments of the project we call read laila it's an iron see award that was made to fit you and scenic that proceeded emulate also part of the rnc portfolio Emily was one of the first to use optical spectrum, combined with least capacity on it's backbone. 26 00:06:01.860 --> 00:06:09.270 Julio Ibarra: Long term leases on optical spectrum was a key accomplishment we have these leases until 2032. 27 00:06:10.380 --> 00:06:16.620 Julio Ibarra: They provide value to us science facilities in Chile, South America can potentially Antarctica. 28 00:06:18.930 --> 00:06:33.570 Julio Ibarra: Emily was one of the first to deploy and operate its production network with software defined networking since 2014 SDN enable dynamic service provisioning and has significantly increased operations efficiency. 29 00:06:35.580 --> 00:06:55.920 Julio Ibarra: We also establish a committee, called the South American astronomy coordination committee or the sack sack provides a venue for the exchange of information and coordination between the US astronomy projects in Chile and the am late network operators sack is now in its 11th year. 30 00:06:57.060 --> 00:07:13.530 Julio Ibarra: We had a sack meeting in 2021 we hosted 61 participants each year that number appears to be growing with more interest in the work with astronomy in in South America and also branching out to Africa. 31 00:07:14.550 --> 00:07:18.840 Julio Ibarra: The 2021 sack report is available at the M like project website. 32 00:07:23.190 --> 00:07:26.310 Julio Ibarra: Some key factors that have enabled and like success. 33 00:07:27.540 --> 00:07:37.260 Julio Ibarra: First, support from nsf the office of advanced cyber infrastructure and the rnc program the rnc program has been critical to the success of Emily. 34 00:07:38.460 --> 00:07:44.790 Julio Ibarra: Support for you, if I you has encouraged our participation and nsf programs, such as the rnc. 35 00:07:46.050 --> 00:08:04.830 Julio Ibarra: And our partnerships with research and education network scan Latin America, the Caribbean and Africa have been key to emulate success they have been built upon layers of trust, over time, for example, sharing operations resources resources such as network bandwidth. 36 00:08:05.850 --> 00:08:09.090 Julio Ibarra: Colocation facilities network and compute resources. 37 00:08:10.950 --> 00:08:17.700 Julio Ibarra: The sharing of human resources, I can emphatically say that emulates accomplishments rest upon its people. 38 00:08:18.900 --> 00:08:28.320 Julio Ibarra: collaboration and cooperation amongst some of the most talented network engineers in the global r&d Community participate in the am like project. 39 00:08:33.090 --> 00:08:37.170 Julio Ibarra: Nuts let's let's take a look at MIT as it is today. 40 00:08:38.310 --> 00:08:43.170 Julio Ibarra: Am like operates as an international production, research and education network. 41 00:08:46.470 --> 00:08:55.710 Julio Ibarra: This is the production network operating today the network map shows and light footprint in the US, Latin America and Africa. 42 00:08:56.730 --> 00:09:15.030 Julio Ibarra: The light ring showing green consists of multiple 200 gigabit segments from boca raton to San Paulo boca raton to fortaleza some pollo to fortaleza boca raton to Cape Town and Sunday, I go to Porto Alegre. 43 00:09:17.010 --> 00:09:18.150 Julio Ibarra: The ring. 44 00:09:19.320 --> 00:09:32.010 Julio Ibarra: The protect ring in red carries primary traffic, as well as serves to protect the express network it consists of the following city pairs Miami fortaleza fortaleza some pollo. 45 00:09:33.210 --> 00:09:43.140 Julio Ibarra: Some pollo Santiago Santiago Panama Panama some point one and someone back to Miami that's the red ring you see here. 46 00:09:44.910 --> 00:09:47.850 Julio Ibarra: It aggregate we have 600 gigabits of capacity. 47 00:09:49.470 --> 00:10:00.150 Julio Ibarra: To the US, we also have a president ECHO presence it's open exchange points in Miami fortaleza some pollo Santiago and Cape Town. 48 00:10:04.050 --> 00:10:05.010 Julio Ibarra: This map here. 49 00:10:06.750 --> 00:10:17.220 Julio Ibarra: represents what am late envisions for the next five years in the current iron see award the goal of this plan network infrastructure is to increase capacity and resiliency. 50 00:10:18.600 --> 00:10:24.000 Julio Ibarra: it's a very busy slide on busy diagram showing the complexity of the network. 51 00:10:25.020 --> 00:10:43.170 Julio Ibarra: My reasons for showing it our first, the number of network segments and facilities operated by am like and its partners, you see there, and all of these solid and dash and dotted lines and let operate segments shown in three colors you can see here in this legend above. 52 00:10:45.840 --> 00:11:05.940 Julio Ibarra: All the other colors are network segments operated by am like partners, this is one of the successes of the rnc program is attracting participation among all the networks in many different countries to exchange and link to the US for supportive research and education. 53 00:11:06.960 --> 00:11:11.880 Julio Ibarra: And the logos on the right identify all of our partners in Emily. 54 00:11:13.380 --> 00:11:19.050 Julio Ibarra: The ellipses as you see here represent data centers for submarine cable landings. 55 00:11:20.340 --> 00:11:31.560 Julio Ibarra: The clouds represent external collaborators, such as Internet to an s nets lines represent network connections between facilities, the solid lines here. 56 00:11:32.820 --> 00:11:48.930 Julio Ibarra: The solid lines represent active connections as well dashed lines represent connections and dotted lines represent goals for the next four years, the blue rectangles represents cities, for example, San Paulo fortaleza Brazil Santiago, Chile. 57 00:11:51.660 --> 00:11:58.830 Julio Ibarra: And the light green rectangle above represents the empath open exchange port facilities in Florida and Georgia. 58 00:12:00.780 --> 00:12:11.670 Julio Ibarra: Planned increases in bandwidth capacity are MIT is adding 200 gigabits of capacity from some pollo the boca raton it's shown in this Green dashed line here. 59 00:12:12.330 --> 00:12:22.740 Julio Ibarra: That scheduled to be completed operating by 2023 and rb is adding 200 gigabits of capacity from fortaleza to Apollo that's this this blue. 60 00:12:23.700 --> 00:12:48.210 Julio Ibarra: dashed line that you see here, so all of this is increasing the capacity of within the region on the light network with our partners, contributing to to the the capacity so by 2023 Am I scheduled to have 800 gigabits about true aggregate capacity between the US and and South America. 61 00:12:52.560 --> 00:13:05.400 Julio Ibarra: Up to this point i've presented the MIT network infrastructure it's links aggregation points and bandwidth capacity, as it is today, and the enhancements plan to increase capacity and resilience. 62 00:13:06.510 --> 00:13:12.510 Julio Ibarra: Next, I will introduce embed network telemetry referred to as I empty. 63 00:13:13.560 --> 00:13:20.610 Julio Ibarra: it's a technology that is currently in production service, but we also consider it one of the most significant innovations. 64 00:13:24.060 --> 00:13:29.400 Julio Ibarra: So i'll start by describing the challenge and reasons for it. 65 00:13:31.620 --> 00:13:42.120 Julio Ibarra: So isolating and detecting faults of data transfers in long home that works with high latency such as as the light network is complex and time consuming. 66 00:13:43.050 --> 00:13:51.780 Julio Ibarra: it's both a technical challenge and a social challenge because isolating and detective detecting false is constrained by lack of visibility. 67 00:13:52.500 --> 00:13:59.880 Julio Ibarra: And oftentimes it's not just the technology that's needed but also the support and collaboration with peer networks which. 68 00:14:00.480 --> 00:14:16.470 Julio Ibarra: Sometimes, is not not easy when they have policies to not expose all the necessary data from their networks as a result, detecting what events cause performance degradation often result in questions that have incomplete answers. 69 00:14:17.520 --> 00:14:33.870 Julio Ibarra: For example, we don't really know where there is a packet loss and why it's happening or which path the packet took or how much time a packet queued at each switch effectively there's a lack of tools that provide enough visibility to the tech faults. 70 00:14:36.840 --> 00:14:50.550 Julio Ibarra: The slide shows network monitoring pain points when attempting to detect network printing events common network management tools fail to detect network transit events tools we've used for years i've just too limited. 71 00:14:51.930 --> 00:15:11.340 Julio Ibarra: Network transit events are short term and sporadic degradation in network performance they're caused by conditions that can lead to failures, over time, for example, attenuation on an optical channel, they often go undetected such as micro bursts, so what causes a microburst. 72 00:15:12.630 --> 00:15:17.430 Julio Ibarra: A data transfer that so short and time in the time domain, the tools cannot detect it. 73 00:15:18.660 --> 00:15:28.110 Julio Ibarra: It can be malicious or not, but it's it's not easy to detect the time scale can be as low as 100 milliseconds. 74 00:15:29.970 --> 00:15:31.470 Julio Ibarra: To hundreds of microseconds. 75 00:15:33.600 --> 00:15:39.240 Julio Ibarra: They can have a high impact, causing packet loss and long haul network latency such as emulate. 76 00:15:41.040 --> 00:15:49.170 Julio Ibarra: So what is an online solution to this to this condition and challenge with monitoring and limitations with tools. 77 00:15:50.940 --> 00:15:52.260 Julio Ibarra: inbound network telemetry. 78 00:15:53.310 --> 00:16:10.920 Julio Ibarra: I believe we are creating new methods to see deeper into the phenomena in our networks, similar to the instruments astronomers and high energy physicists create to see deeper into phenomena, it is a new method by which to instrument, the network for more granular visibility. 79 00:16:17.460 --> 00:16:20.970 Julio Ibarra: This slide describes what I empty is and what it does. 80 00:16:21.990 --> 00:16:29.580 Julio Ibarra: So it records network telemetry information in the packet while the packet to versus a path between two points in the network. 81 00:16:31.230 --> 00:16:38.250 Julio Ibarra: What is network telemetry information basically it's a snapshot of the state of the network provided as metadata. 82 00:16:40.260 --> 00:16:48.330 Julio Ibarra: telemetry reports are exported directly from the data plane, with no impact to the control plane, this is very important because typically. 83 00:16:49.410 --> 00:16:59.430 Julio Ibarra: there's with our traditional monitoring tools, the cpu can be severely impacted and oftentimes resources have to be dedicated for the function. 84 00:17:01.200 --> 00:17:10.680 Julio Ibarra: It tracks contract, monitor and evaluate every single packet at line rate and in real time, and this is unprecedented. 85 00:17:11.790 --> 00:17:22.560 Julio Ibarra: Some examples of network telemetry information collected are timestamp ingress port eagerness port keeper for utilization and many others. 86 00:17:23.880 --> 00:17:35.430 Julio Ibarra: As a result, visibility on the network is unprecedented the telemetry data is available to detect throughput issues due to bottlenecks failures or configuration errors. 87 00:17:40.110 --> 00:17:45.390 Julio Ibarra: So, how does it work, this is an example of a network instrumented with iot. 88 00:17:46.620 --> 00:17:49.350 Julio Ibarra: The diagram here on the on the right shows you. 89 00:17:50.850 --> 00:17:58.290 Julio Ibarra: The the source node on the left and a sink note on the right and the network is. 90 00:17:59.430 --> 00:18:04.140 Julio Ibarra: A five switches with iot enabled in the switches. 91 00:18:05.190 --> 00:18:15.960 Julio Ibarra: So the source node at the left of the diagram sends a packet and the source node is unaware, it is enabled in the network it doesn't need to know this information. 92 00:18:17.190 --> 00:18:28.620 Julio Ibarra: And this is illustrated here with number one in the path the job of the iot source switch this first one here is the portion that I empty header and metadata into the packet. 93 00:18:30.120 --> 00:18:33.510 Julio Ibarra: that's the first telemetry a header here. 94 00:18:36.780 --> 00:18:40.620 Julio Ibarra: Every it switch in the network path and push it as metadata into the packet. 95 00:18:42.000 --> 00:18:51.780 Julio Ibarra: Sony your number three you see all of these headers being put in here with telemetry information in there note the stacking of the IT meditate. 96 00:18:53.310 --> 00:19:02.370 Julio Ibarra: If I switch is not and I empty switch it just ignores the IMC content in the packet the I empty sinks, which. 97 00:19:03.390 --> 00:19:08.610 Julio Ibarra: This one here at the end of the network path and. 98 00:19:09.750 --> 00:19:17.190 Julio Ibarra: Its job is to extract the telemetry information, then, to forward the original packet to the sink node which is here. 99 00:19:18.630 --> 00:19:20.610 Julio Ibarra: The same it sinks, which. 100 00:19:22.230 --> 00:19:39.540 Julio Ibarra: Then forwards telemetry the telemetry report to the telemetry collector all of these headers and metadata here form the telemetry report it's all collected and forward it to the telemetry collected here on this computer. 101 00:19:41.880 --> 00:19:53.910 Julio Ibarra: The telemetry collector then receives parses processes and generates operational telemetry reports and there you have the ABC of of it, how it simply works. 102 00:19:55.800 --> 00:19:56.880 Julio Ibarra: it's not that complicated. 103 00:19:58.380 --> 00:20:11.460 Julio Ibarra: So here's a representative representation of a telemetry report with metadata and its data, so you can see here all of these variables are metadata identifiers. 104 00:20:12.510 --> 00:20:35.610 Julio Ibarra: A purse which level, and these are the metadata on a telemetry port level this here is an example of what the Meta data variable is such as uptime in time per switch switch 1234 and five, as illustrated in the previous slide and all of this data is now available. 105 00:20:37.680 --> 00:20:39.120 Julio Ibarra: For us to be able to. 106 00:20:41.010 --> 00:20:45.240 Julio Ibarra: understand what is going on in the network capturing. 107 00:20:47.460 --> 00:20:48.660 Julio Ibarra: Events per packet. 108 00:20:50.400 --> 00:21:00.870 Julio Ibarra: Now this this thick set of slides provide examples of how we're using the metadata and the granular visibility provided and what has with iot. 109 00:21:01.710 --> 00:21:10.380 Julio Ibarra: So interface utilization measured in the switch per packet, this is the from ingress egress all the way through this which. 110 00:21:11.310 --> 00:21:25.470 Julio Ibarra: it's useful for detecting micro bursts and i'll get to more detail about that, but as we define microburst earlier, these are bursts that occur within a very short time domain that are very difficult to detect unless you have the visibility. 111 00:21:26.520 --> 00:21:30.540 Julio Ibarra: We can see the start and the end of the micro bursts here in this graph. 112 00:21:32.070 --> 00:21:40.590 Julio Ibarra: The Spikes or 40 gigabytes I mean gigabits per second are classified as microburst these, these are the are the first few of these five. 113 00:21:42.660 --> 00:21:43.110 Julio Ibarra: and 114 00:21:44.130 --> 00:21:54.450 Julio Ibarra: The Spikes below 20 gigabits are classified as normal traffic, these are the ones shown here below the 20 gigabit line in green and seven orange. 115 00:21:55.680 --> 00:22:07.170 Julio Ibarra: The telemetry allows us to monitor bandwidth per interface and Q, so this gives us the ability to see exactly what's going on within the switch and how long that Pack is in there. 116 00:22:10.800 --> 00:22:13.410 Julio Ibarra: instantaneous egress interface buffer utilization. 117 00:22:14.520 --> 00:22:27.210 Julio Ibarra: we're now able to measure buffer utilization report of every switch, which is something we've never been able to do before we're using this metadata to evaluate que es policies and to detect sources of packet drops. 118 00:22:28.590 --> 00:22:34.290 Julio Ibarra: note the difference in the vertical scale between the normal buffer utilization and under congestion. 119 00:22:35.430 --> 00:22:45.120 Julio Ibarra: The graph on the left the vertical scale here is in kilobytes versus on the right that's in megabytes So you can see just. 120 00:22:46.290 --> 00:22:54.360 Julio Ibarra: The difference in scale between when buffers are operating at normal levels of utilization versus under congestion. 121 00:22:55.860 --> 00:23:05.910 Julio Ibarra: So what are the thresholds for normal and under congestion buffers We found that anything above 200 kilobytes becomes a problem that leads to congestion. 122 00:23:10.320 --> 00:23:11.460 Julio Ibarra: The specs Meta data. 123 00:23:12.600 --> 00:23:22.650 Julio Ibarra: allows us to monitor perhaps per packet forwarding delay it's useful for finding sources of gender along the path deter refers to variation and packet to link. 124 00:23:23.610 --> 00:23:34.860 Julio Ibarra: The graph on the Left shows normal buffer utilization the graph on the right shows congested buffers the vertical axis represents delay that you see here. 125 00:23:35.760 --> 00:23:51.060 Julio Ibarra: Note that under normal buffer utilization delay was measured in microseconds and if you can see that, clearly, but the scale here is in microseconds under congested buffers the delay was measured in milliseconds that's here on the on the right graph. 126 00:23:52.770 --> 00:23:59.310 Julio Ibarra: And you can see here some of the Spikes that were generated, for example, this first year occurred. 127 00:24:01.050 --> 00:24:13.320 Julio Ibarra: And you had these the the buffers congested reflecting that at about 65 milliseconds so to put things in perspective, consider the degree of delay in the right track here. 128 00:24:14.040 --> 00:24:26.340 Julio Ibarra: Some packets with buffer for like I said, approximately 65 milliseconds that's about how long a packet takes to transit from some pollo to Atlanta, to give you an idea of how long. 129 00:24:27.600 --> 00:24:31.590 Julio Ibarra: Under congestion conditions, these buffers and the being. 130 00:24:34.200 --> 00:24:35.490 Julio Ibarra: delayed within cubes. 131 00:24:40.920 --> 00:24:52.770 Julio Ibarra: To sum up, this is a use case of an experiment, we did to compare it and SNP we producing an event of micro bursts on a 100 gigabit link. 132 00:24:54.510 --> 00:24:59.760 Julio Ibarra: The experiment transmits five bursts of 40 to 50 gigabits. 133 00:25:03.270 --> 00:25:12.660 Julio Ibarra: of traffic for five seconds, the top graph represents an iot switch exporting metadata in real time per packet. 134 00:25:13.770 --> 00:25:16.530 Julio Ibarra: The anti graph shows five Spikes. 135 00:25:17.760 --> 00:25:24.000 Julio Ibarra: Lasting five seconds each generating 38 to 50 gigabits per second of traffic. 136 00:25:25.380 --> 00:25:29.010 Julio Ibarra: And these these Spikes are classified as microburst. 137 00:25:30.450 --> 00:25:38.520 Julio Ibarra: The bottom graph represents an ethernet switch it's pulling with SMP at its maximum rate of every 15 seconds. 138 00:25:39.900 --> 00:25:47.910 Julio Ibarra: The s&p graph shows to Spikes lasting 30 plus seconds with peaks of utilization of 13 gigabits per second. 139 00:25:50.310 --> 00:25:54.930 Julio Ibarra: they're not report they're not reported as microbus given that they're there. 140 00:25:56.190 --> 00:25:58.860 Julio Ibarra: Within a 15 second time scale. 141 00:26:02.220 --> 00:26:07.710 Julio Ibarra: So this clearly shows that the identity graph is a more realistic representation of network events. 142 00:26:08.880 --> 00:26:19.800 Julio Ibarra: And then find an important finding, though, is that a legacy protocols, such as s&p is not enough to characterize the microburst and to determine their impact. 143 00:26:21.990 --> 00:26:30.480 Julio Ibarra: From another perspective as an MP reported that he goes ation of the hundred gigabit link was at most 13 gigabits per second. 144 00:26:31.230 --> 00:26:47.790 Julio Ibarra: Giving a false impression there's more available bandwidth and it really is so if you're using us an MP other tools will be needed in addition to accurately characterize events legacy protocols are just not going to be sufficient to do this. 145 00:26:49.380 --> 00:26:57.900 Julio Ibarra: As a result, observing microburst becomes straightforward when you're monitoring instrument provides full visibility of network events such as I empty. 146 00:27:03.480 --> 00:27:06.060 Julio Ibarra: So let's review what was previously presented. 147 00:27:10.110 --> 00:27:10.380 Julio Ibarra: We. 148 00:27:12.600 --> 00:27:16.140 Julio Ibarra: recovered reasons why amway was an early adopter of it. 149 00:27:17.370 --> 00:27:28.410 Julio Ibarra: how it works what it metadata uses for deeper visibility into the network to improve operations and support it's already communities. 150 00:27:30.090 --> 00:27:44.010 Julio Ibarra: Comparison of it is an MP for measuring micro bursts, and this next section opposite how am I operates as a platform for network innovation alongside operating as a production, research and education network. 151 00:27:47.340 --> 00:27:51.930 Julio Ibarra: This slide represents a snapshot of the M light SDN architecture. 152 00:27:53.490 --> 00:28:13.110 Julio Ibarra: SDN has been essential to foster innovation on me like the blue boxes represent southbound interfaces southbound interfaces introduce an abstraction between the traditional forwarding control planes the yellow boxes represents the ketosis SDN platform. 153 00:28:14.730 --> 00:28:23.820 Julio Ibarra: He does performs a function of the control it's responsible for interfacing own network applications and southbound protocols. 154 00:28:25.920 --> 00:28:35.550 Julio Ibarra: The Green boxes represent the keto Spyker applications I keep those my application performs a specific task for the control plane. 155 00:28:36.630 --> 00:28:51.090 Julio Ibarra: Green yellow and blue collectively form the control plane, the pink layer represents higher layer applications to support business services, such as routing troubleshooting and provisioning etc. 156 00:28:52.440 --> 00:29:06.180 Julio Ibarra: And the ellipses you see there at the top, our applications or interfaces for users to make service requests for example the ether that virtual circuit manager the ABC manager, you see here in this ellipse. 157 00:29:08.070 --> 00:29:11.520 Julio Ibarra: leveraging multiple applications from the pink layer 158 00:29:12.690 --> 00:29:16.860 Julio Ibarra: which then call upon the the green layer for specific. 159 00:29:18.030 --> 00:29:19.740 Julio Ibarra: operations with the control plane. 160 00:29:22.050 --> 00:29:34.560 Julio Ibarra: The red box is what we refer to as the optical and packet telemetry collector over here on the right it collects streaming telemetry from multiple sources, including the optical later. 161 00:29:35.760 --> 00:29:43.320 Julio Ibarra: The job of the op etc, is to detect network events at the optical and packet layers that could result in failures. 162 00:29:44.610 --> 00:29:50.790 Julio Ibarra: The purple box is the behavior anomaly and performance management bpm. 163 00:29:52.530 --> 00:29:55.050 Julio Ibarra: bpm interprets network status updates. 164 00:29:56.280 --> 00:30:13.380 Julio Ibarra: And network telemetry reports from the op etc and other sources, the bpm applies learning algorithms searches for specific patterns, then notifies the SDN controller when nonconformity is detected and by nonconformity I mean. 165 00:30:14.460 --> 00:30:32.640 Julio Ibarra: Not compliance or out of range with policies that have been already programmed into the resources of the network, so this is how we're able to use it to detect if if if things are operating normally or not normally. 166 00:30:34.110 --> 00:30:43.620 Julio Ibarra: be a PM leveraging that we're calamity to learn the current state of the network and then respond if network anomalies are potentially impacting science applications. 167 00:30:45.000 --> 00:30:49.380 Julio Ibarra: The op etc, and the bpm form the management plane of the architecture. 168 00:30:53.370 --> 00:31:08.370 Julio Ibarra: This slide shows how we're applying the the architecture to the IT infrastructure that MIT is deploying at each of the sites, you can see here in this figure the. 169 00:31:10.680 --> 00:31:16.380 Julio Ibarra: Each MIT site for too late, for example, the US and Brazil, I empty switches. 170 00:31:17.550 --> 00:31:27.090 Julio Ibarra: generate telemetry reports here in the in the data plane a telemetry collector to process telemetry reports is also part of. 171 00:31:27.630 --> 00:31:38.580 Julio Ibarra: insight and applications and database to interpret can display telemetry reports is also part of the the infrastructure, so what this. 172 00:31:39.120 --> 00:31:50.460 Julio Ibarra: What this figure here shows is that every packet becomes a telemetry report and each telemetry collector can parse up to 2 million packets per second of telemetry reports. 173 00:31:51.060 --> 00:32:00.360 Julio Ibarra: And this is unprecedented because before I empty network devices and never management tools to about process to limit reports on a per packet level. 174 00:32:01.200 --> 00:32:12.840 Julio Ibarra: And we're doing this and each one of these sites, which is our ad exchange points to be able to track every single packet as it goes through every I empty switch in the network. 175 00:32:14.460 --> 00:32:25.980 Julio Ibarra: Our goal is for me to be fully instrumented with I empty by the second quarter of 2022. 176 00:32:27.990 --> 00:32:28.470 Julio Ibarra: So. 177 00:32:29.790 --> 00:32:36.540 Julio Ibarra: To look at where we are at this point um we've covered the am light SDN architecture. 178 00:32:37.800 --> 00:32:49.800 Julio Ibarra: I described the optical and packet telemetry collector and the behavior anomaly and performance manager as intimations leveraging network telemetry and described it appointment to instrument, the light network. 179 00:32:51.270 --> 00:32:58.830 Julio Ibarra: The next innovation to present is a subset of autonomic networking that we refer to as closed loop orchestration. 180 00:33:03.060 --> 00:33:04.290 Julio Ibarra: So let me take. 181 00:33:06.420 --> 00:33:09.480 Julio Ibarra: A moment here for a brief review of autonomic networking. 182 00:33:12.210 --> 00:33:17.820 Julio Ibarra: So autonomic networking autonomic systems were first described in 2001. 183 00:33:19.080 --> 00:33:25.950 Julio Ibarra: There is a paper by gephardt and chess in 2003 on autonomic computing that. 184 00:33:27.180 --> 00:33:29.640 Julio Ibarra: describes the concepts and what they mean. 185 00:33:31.230 --> 00:33:37.830 Julio Ibarra: And they were used by IBM for many of their systems so autonomic computing is not a new idea. 186 00:33:39.420 --> 00:33:53.460 Julio Ibarra: autonomic networking adopted many of those concepts and they have been documented in the Iit pipe by the ETF in rfc documents such as 7575 as well as other rfc. 187 00:33:54.960 --> 00:34:06.630 Julio Ibarra: The fundamental goal with autonomic networking and system is self management it's comprised of several self star properties. 188 00:34:08.160 --> 00:34:14.250 Julio Ibarra: One of its goals is to reduce dependencies on your administrators or centralized management systems. 189 00:34:16.920 --> 00:34:20.130 Julio Ibarra: And to adapt to a changing environment. 190 00:34:21.960 --> 00:34:22.350 Julio Ibarra: The. 191 00:34:23.730 --> 00:34:38.850 Julio Ibarra: The other the other important characteristic about condom applicant is a closed loop control, this is a mechanism for self management functions that includes typically collecting analyzing deciding and acting on. 192 00:34:40.920 --> 00:34:49.230 Julio Ibarra: An acting process, it does this in a forever loop, and so we refer to this closed loop control as. 193 00:34:50.730 --> 00:34:52.020 Julio Ibarra: closed loop orchestration. 194 00:34:53.400 --> 00:34:58.230 Julio Ibarra: So, so why is am like developing armored functions into its production operation. 195 00:34:59.700 --> 00:35:08.280 Julio Ibarra: One reason is to increase operational efficiency by reducing dependency on knock operators and central management systems. 196 00:35:09.570 --> 00:35:23.970 Julio Ibarra: But an even bigger reason is a technology pool that's coming from science applications with a requirement for SLA grade network resilience and I have an example coming up to explain what I mean. 197 00:35:26.550 --> 00:35:30.360 Julio Ibarra: But first let's look at where we are today with. 198 00:35:32.220 --> 00:35:47.190 Julio Ibarra: Our networking and what we call closed loop orchestration so this table represents categories of self management as a as a continuum towards the left side our categories, with more human dependency. 199 00:35:48.750 --> 00:35:52.920 Julio Ibarra: The right side describes categories, with less human dependency. 200 00:35:54.000 --> 00:36:05.220 Julio Ibarra: User input towards the left requires more prescriptive information as we move to the right user inputs consists of responding to conditions and triggers. 201 00:36:05.730 --> 00:36:22.950 Julio Ibarra: and responding to us or policies, as opposed to prescriptive information and light has evolved from the left to the right since its adoption of software defined networking and emulate is currently around the middle of closed loop orchestration around here. 202 00:36:24.390 --> 00:36:35.610 Julio Ibarra: And so, with our current project, we want to get as close to autonomic as possible, for example, having autonomic provisioning and operation of layer to vpn. 203 00:36:36.870 --> 00:36:45.510 Julio Ibarra: is a goal for the current project layer to vpn is a very common service that research and education networks provide. 204 00:36:47.100 --> 00:36:51.330 Julio Ibarra: So our goal is to move more services towards autonomic over time. 205 00:36:55.620 --> 00:37:09.120 Julio Ibarra: This slide here represents a use case to self optimize the M light network or reason for self optimizing is to respond to network transit events in near real time if you recall. 206 00:37:10.140 --> 00:37:21.210 Julio Ibarra: These transit moments occur in a very short time scale, so we have to be able to do this as close to real time as possible today optimization is a manual and iterative process. 207 00:37:22.860 --> 00:37:29.430 Julio Ibarra: The diagram shows three sites in the ham like domain, we have Florida Chile and Brazil. 208 00:37:30.570 --> 00:37:37.260 Julio Ibarra: This is representative of the slide that I showed earlier of where we will have the. 209 00:37:38.280 --> 00:37:42.990 Julio Ibarra: The light SDN infrastructure and telemetry infrastructure deploy. 210 00:37:44.670 --> 00:37:46.410 Julio Ibarra: The data plane and green. 211 00:37:47.430 --> 00:37:54.210 Julio Ibarra: That you see here exports it reports to the telemetry collector represented here in blue. 212 00:37:55.680 --> 00:37:59.220 Julio Ibarra: In turn, the telemetry collectors export telemetry summaries. 213 00:38:00.960 --> 00:38:08.910 Julio Ibarra: To the learning systems, which includes the behavior anomaly and performance manager the bpm. 214 00:38:11.430 --> 00:38:14.670 Julio Ibarra: What when when nonconformity is detected. 215 00:38:15.870 --> 00:38:18.270 Julio Ibarra: The learning systems will send alarms to. 216 00:38:19.470 --> 00:38:32.520 Julio Ibarra: The the Doc where we have human intervention, if necessary, as well as to the SDN orchestrator where there's less dependency on human intervention. 217 00:38:34.350 --> 00:38:45.000 Julio Ibarra: And the SDN orchestrator sends instruction then to the control plane, which are shown here in red segments, the program the data plane. 218 00:38:46.200 --> 00:39:04.290 Julio Ibarra: If the controls are there to to allow that so all of that is is under operator control it's not like it's something that the network will now be self driven there's always a way to have operators. 219 00:39:05.370 --> 00:39:17.070 Julio Ibarra: First, determine if it's necessary to intervene or through allow for self driving of the network, so this this is representative of the closed loop orchestration system. 220 00:39:18.780 --> 00:39:35.040 Julio Ibarra: So, essentially, just to recap we're going from the bottom up here into the learning systems with telemetry summaries the interpretation occurs here and actions, then and Sue to be able to do this in a closed loop fashion fashion. 221 00:39:36.630 --> 00:39:40.740 Julio Ibarra: Now this is, this is the approach that we're taking for self self optimization. 222 00:39:41.760 --> 00:39:47.970 Julio Ibarra: To be able to respond to the the networking events in real time. 223 00:39:49.260 --> 00:39:50.490 Julio Ibarra: So i'm. 224 00:39:51.840 --> 00:40:13.020 Julio Ibarra: The roadmap to self optimizing shows the improvements plan as autonomic functions and learning algorithm arm are improved, so today where where we're working around five seconds by year three we we plan to improve to to your four to one and your five to 500 milliseconds. 225 00:40:18.450 --> 00:40:36.180 Julio Ibarra: So we've covered autonomic networking and now we've also compared closed loop orchestration with automatic automation and autonomic and presented a use case to self optimize am like that applies autonomic functions and closed loop orchestration. 226 00:40:37.890 --> 00:40:45.480 Julio Ibarra: Next let's let's take a look at how we are applying these innovations on em light as a production network to support science. 227 00:40:48.840 --> 00:40:56.220 Julio Ibarra: let's start with a service level agreement SLA agreement driven use case. 228 00:40:57.240 --> 00:40:58.620 Julio Ibarra: The verb Observatory. 229 00:41:00.630 --> 00:41:07.410 Julio Ibarra: very rude, but it is a large aperture wide field ground based optical telescope under construction in northern Chile. 230 00:41:10.230 --> 00:41:21.030 Julio Ibarra: it's an 8.4 meter telescope it will take a picture of the southern sky every 27 seconds and will produce a 30 gigabyte data set. 231 00:41:23.250 --> 00:41:36.510 Julio Ibarra: Every 27 seconds each dataset must be transferred to the US Data facility at slack in menlo park California within five seconds inside that 27 second transfer window. 232 00:41:37.650 --> 00:41:45.900 Julio Ibarra: So and white, has, along with all the networks participating in this very reuben network we have five seconds to get the. 233 00:41:46.980 --> 00:41:51.210 Julio Ibarra: The data set from northern chilly here. 234 00:41:52.230 --> 00:41:58.230 Julio Ibarra: In a town called la serena with the base station is all the way to slack in menlo park California. 235 00:42:01.080 --> 00:42:06.870 Julio Ibarra: Some of the challenges that we are are facing here with with this use case is. 236 00:42:08.310 --> 00:42:10.440 Julio Ibarra: The the high propagation delay. 237 00:42:11.610 --> 00:42:33.780 Julio Ibarra: In the end, to end path the round trip time from the base station and loss arena she led to the US Data facility and slack is approximately 180 plus milliseconds we've computed that a point 00 1% packet loss will compromise the Ruby Observatory application. 238 00:42:35.250 --> 00:42:38.040 Julio Ibarra: So this is very, very time sensitive. 239 00:42:42.300 --> 00:42:47.400 Julio Ibarra: So this slide represents the very reuben workflow cadence and. 240 00:42:48.480 --> 00:42:52.740 Julio Ibarra: we're trying to represent here, the what happens in the 27 seconds. 241 00:42:54.120 --> 00:42:59.880 Julio Ibarra: That I described in the previous slide so the 27 seconds is for data. 242 00:43:02.160 --> 00:43:11.100 Julio Ibarra: is for the data set transfer window 22 seconds is to gather and process the image shown here in white and. 243 00:43:12.540 --> 00:43:23.130 Julio Ibarra: five seconds for the transfer to the US Data facility shown in blue over here Okay, at least 40 gigabits per second of dedicated bandwidth is the estimated. 244 00:43:24.510 --> 00:43:27.810 Julio Ibarra: level to achieve the data set transfer within five seconds. 245 00:43:29.550 --> 00:43:45.000 Julio Ibarra: So what if a condition occurs that results in packet loss shown here at this point the network must react within 22 seconds of the next data set process window in order to not miss the data transfer window. 246 00:43:46.500 --> 00:43:55.710 Julio Ibarra: Without proper instrumentation because of the complexity and troubleshooting a distributed multi domain network topology such as their rubens. 247 00:43:57.210 --> 00:43:58.050 Julio Ibarra: is likely. 248 00:43:59.400 --> 00:44:08.220 Julio Ibarra: This this condition is likely to impact the following data transfer window and that's shown here with this Red Square and this X. 249 00:44:11.430 --> 00:44:13.650 Julio Ibarra: And the following wants to, but you see here. 250 00:44:14.760 --> 00:44:19.080 Julio Ibarra: So, depending on the type of issue, for example, soft issues such as a packet loss. 251 00:44:20.160 --> 00:44:26.010 Julio Ibarra: It can take hours days and possibly weeks to mitigate this problem, unlike a hard. 252 00:44:27.570 --> 00:44:28.980 Julio Ibarra: Issues such as a fiber cut. 253 00:44:30.000 --> 00:44:37.110 Julio Ibarra: It could take quite a bit of time with with packet loss as I covered previously it's hard to know where it's happening. 254 00:44:38.340 --> 00:44:39.870 Julio Ibarra: In in a short amount of time. 255 00:44:41.220 --> 00:44:49.710 Julio Ibarra: So it looks like the very reuben Observatory needs a network that's properly instrumented I can respond to transit events in real time. 256 00:44:51.300 --> 00:44:53.730 Julio Ibarra: So let's uh let's take a look. 257 00:44:57.150 --> 00:45:09.510 Julio Ibarra: emulators instrumented for SLA grade network resilience for the rubber very reuben Observatory the expressive protect paths are instrumented with iot and persona. 258 00:45:10.110 --> 00:45:21.060 Julio Ibarra: From Santiago, Chile to Atlanta Georgia, where Am I will hand off to the ies that network, you can see here all of this instrumentation is in place. 259 00:45:22.170 --> 00:45:38.640 Julio Ibarra: from Chile, all the way to to Georgia, we have the it switches we have dual connectivity here, with the primary express path and the protect path, and we have our closed loop orchestration here with the iot collector per site. 260 00:45:40.770 --> 00:45:47.760 Julio Ibarra: So instrumented with iot and lights management plane is processing telemetry reports. 261 00:45:48.450 --> 00:45:58.440 Julio Ibarra: Isolating and detecting traffic anomalies validating performance thresholds and computing risk profiles of optical links and IP layer metrics. 262 00:45:59.340 --> 00:46:13.470 Julio Ibarra: So if a transit event were to occur during the data set transfer window packet loss by impact the transfer the event will be detected in the iot reports so we may lose one image. 263 00:46:14.490 --> 00:46:15.330 Julio Ibarra: Transfer window. 264 00:46:18.810 --> 00:46:29.730 Julio Ibarra: The the instructions will program the data plane to provision an alternate path before the next data transfer window is is is set. 265 00:46:30.450 --> 00:46:37.530 Julio Ibarra: The the closed loop orchestration repeat this process for every packet as it traverses the network so we're able to. 266 00:46:38.100 --> 00:46:50.160 Julio Ibarra: Have the detection mechanism in place to be able to not miss the next window so much and not miss the next day that's made us a transfer window, as a result of the instrumentation that's in place. 267 00:46:52.050 --> 00:47:04.860 Julio Ibarra: So, finally, our metric for success is to not miss that data transfer window, and this is what we're instrument thing the network to be able to achieve from Aruba as well as for other SLA driven applications. 268 00:47:08.580 --> 00:47:10.200 Julio Ibarra: Emily also supports fabric. 269 00:47:11.880 --> 00:47:13.620 Julio Ibarra: And let will be providing a. 270 00:47:14.850 --> 00:47:16.800 Julio Ibarra: Dedicated optical. 271 00:47:18.000 --> 00:47:30.660 Julio Ibarra: path between the fabric notify you and the Atlantic or note, if I, you will be hosting one we were expecting it to arrive within the next few months. 272 00:47:31.530 --> 00:47:46.380 Julio Ibarra: We will have multiple hundred gigabits stitching points to these to these fabric nodes in Atlanta stitching points to yes, that and Internet to as well as Pam path in Miami. 273 00:47:48.000 --> 00:47:48.660 Julio Ibarra: We have. 274 00:47:49.920 --> 00:48:01.830 Julio Ibarra: This will be this will be available in Miami as well as an other locations that you see in the footprint in we saw on the footprint in South America, and even in in Cape Town. 275 00:48:03.570 --> 00:48:20.250 Julio Ibarra: and up to 50 gigabits per seconds of available bandwidth capacity over am light links during experiments to support the goal for reproducibility on fabric experiments will have access to per packet telemetry in real time as well. 276 00:48:22.980 --> 00:48:35.430 Julio Ibarra: This is a network diagram to show the the network as planned for for fabric, you see the fabric edge notify you year and the fabric or note in Atlanta. 277 00:48:36.060 --> 00:48:47.100 Julio Ibarra: there's multiple hundred gigabit path between the the fabric nodes and if I you and the coordinate in Atlanta that leverages the infrastructure that's in place. 278 00:48:47.820 --> 00:48:55.680 Julio Ibarra: compute and storage devices services at open exchange points will be available and path and these exchange points here. 279 00:48:56.520 --> 00:49:05.160 Julio Ibarra: These exchange points will be operating as software defined exchanges, the blue rectangles they will support close the orchestration. 280 00:49:05.640 --> 00:49:19.710 Julio Ibarra: For exchange point in across multiple network domains, so my main takeaway is to note that the M like backbone is instrumented with real time in bed network telemetry that fabric can leverage for its experiments. 281 00:49:22.050 --> 00:49:37.680 Julio Ibarra: Other science Community supported on emulate the large hadron collider open network environment polizzi one the open science grid partnership to advance supercomputing the event horizon telescope. 282 00:49:38.910 --> 00:49:47.580 Julio Ibarra: Ground based telescopes in Chile and South Africa, the event horizon telescope actually it's an interesting story, because that involves will eat all the. 283 00:49:48.900 --> 00:49:53.280 Julio Ibarra: The projects in the rnc program not just me right. 284 00:49:54.750 --> 00:50:02.640 Julio Ibarra: So this gives you an idea of all the different communities that can benefit from the the instrumentation that we will be operating on. 285 00:50:05.640 --> 00:50:07.020 Julio Ibarra: The MIT team. 286 00:50:09.900 --> 00:50:27.390 Julio Ibarra: Is is here, we have myself is principal investigator Toronto bizarro is the chief network architect he leads the and the engineering teams and also the software development teams, for all of the software that I described in this presentation. 287 00:50:28.950 --> 00:50:48.210 Julio Ibarra: But soca check out over is our lead for outreach and education, Heidi Morgan at usc is the lead for research engagement chip Cox of vanderbilt university is our coordinator for operations. 288 00:50:49.290 --> 00:50:56.760 Julio Ibarra: We say Professor least Lopez at the University of San Paulo and if I you, these are chair for the Research Committee. 289 00:50:58.110 --> 00:51:05.280 Julio Ibarra: And Eduardo was n D R amp D he's our Chair for for the engineering committee. 290 00:51:07.680 --> 00:51:10.590 Julio Ibarra: And I left for the last slide. 291 00:51:12.150 --> 00:51:15.540 Julio Ibarra: The the Julio in one slide. 292 00:51:16.590 --> 00:51:25.620 Julio Ibarra: description, and so I will just briefly mentioned or answer the question of when how and why did that I decided to go to pursue a research career. 293 00:51:26.970 --> 00:51:38.190 Julio Ibarra: I will give credit to much encouragement I received from a Vice President at nyu many, many years ago and and also a family member, I must say that. 294 00:51:39.750 --> 00:51:42.120 Julio Ibarra: Entering graduate school and then. 295 00:51:43.680 --> 00:51:47.340 Julio Ibarra: Pursuing my PhD was was a journey and. 296 00:51:48.360 --> 00:51:57.870 Julio Ibarra: There was inspiration from colleagues and TEAM members and also motivation for my PhD professor, I will say the experience was transformational. 297 00:51:59.910 --> 00:52:05.070 Julio Ibarra: It has really helped me to be more mindful and effective of. 298 00:52:06.180 --> 00:52:09.480 Julio Ibarra: The the importance of working with. 299 00:52:10.500 --> 00:52:23.640 Julio Ibarra: Research faculty and it practitioners and the importance of them working together effectively and I give much credit to the the programs nsf has produced to enable us to do this. 300 00:52:27.000 --> 00:52:31.920 Julio Ibarra: Some references if you're interested in more information about the topic site I covered. 301 00:52:33.090 --> 00:52:36.270 Julio Ibarra: And thank you very much for your time and the. 302 00:52:37.320 --> 00:52:40.980 Julio Ibarra: The opportunity to present this to to all of you, thank you. 303 00:52:43.200 --> 00:52:50.670 Manish Parashar: Thank you, Julio for absolutely brilliant talk on the skiff virtual round of applause TULIO. 304 00:52:54.270 --> 00:52:54.990 Elements of. 305 00:52:56.220 --> 00:53:02.400 Manish Parashar: it's just amazing to see the tremendous impact and broad impact your research is having. 306 00:53:03.600 --> 00:53:20.790 Manish Parashar: You know, both in the networking research community, but also in the science broader science community by the research and enables to these remote instruments so with that, let me open it up for questions, I know there are two lined up in the Q amp a. 307 00:53:22.500 --> 00:53:37.680 Manish Parashar: box i'll start with that the first question is from Sally o'connor and she's asking our redundancies addressed in the network, why was boca raton selected instead of fit campus. 308 00:53:39.720 --> 00:53:41.760 Julio Ibarra: The reason for boca raton. 309 00:53:42.810 --> 00:53:57.870 Julio Ibarra: Is that the the undersea cable system lands in boca raton and there is a data Center that the the the cable is is terminated X. 310 00:53:58.320 --> 00:54:13.080 Julio Ibarra: And it was just more effective for us to establish a point of presence there to minimize the latency for the Vera ruben observed the variable Observatory If you recall. 311 00:54:14.460 --> 00:54:31.290 Julio Ibarra: Where we have we have five seconds to get that 13 gigabyte data set to to the data facility at slack so by by going North directly from boca raton where the cable lands were able to. 312 00:54:32.790 --> 00:54:41.280 Julio Ibarra: Keep the the latency to a minimum, as opposed to coming all the way down to Miami and then going North again and that's mainly the reason why. 313 00:54:44.280 --> 00:54:54.300 Manish Parashar: Thank Thank you and again a reminder to everybody if you have questions, please enter them in the Q a box and i'll read them out. 314 00:54:55.020 --> 00:54:58.230 Manish Parashar: So we have another question from Jennifer schaaf. 315 00:54:59.220 --> 00:55:12.570 Manish Parashar: She asks on slide 28 our experiences with other astronomy applications, such as the hd has shown that the problem with transferring the files isn't the long haul networks such as. 316 00:55:13.230 --> 00:55:18.240 Manish Parashar: The ones you're supporting, but the network between instruments and the first exchange point. 317 00:55:18.630 --> 00:55:36.120 Manish Parashar: Which is generally less than one gigabit per second network or a controller computer with less than one gigabit transfer rate how have you dealt with these high level bottlenecks, which are more common and perform performance impacting then micro events. 318 00:55:37.800 --> 00:55:40.170 Julio Ibarra: Thank you Jennifer for your question. 319 00:55:41.340 --> 00:55:52.440 Julio Ibarra: That is is a reality that we have to to to work with that I classify that more as a social engineering challenge than a technology challenge because. 320 00:55:53.340 --> 00:56:02.250 Julio Ibarra: Many of these instruments are just not connected at the level that they should be, and Jennifer has been leading this effort for the IMC. 321 00:56:03.390 --> 00:56:06.090 Julio Ibarra: group she has a very. 322 00:56:07.290 --> 00:56:18.930 Julio Ibarra: Important program called epic that works with researchers and makes it very easy for them to understand where there are bottlenecks and what needs to be done. 323 00:56:20.040 --> 00:56:33.030 Julio Ibarra: Network telemetry essentially is providing visibility and much needed visibility that we don't have today with traditional tools, so it doesn't solve a bottleneck problem. 324 00:56:34.050 --> 00:56:40.860 Julio Ibarra: That has to be that that typically has a cost, and it just has to be addressed by the. 325 00:56:42.180 --> 00:56:44.220 Julio Ibarra: Projects or the the operators. 326 00:56:47.130 --> 00:56:47.670 Manish Parashar: Thank you. 327 00:56:49.650 --> 00:56:52.020 Manish Parashar: Our next question is from deep Medi. 328 00:56:53.070 --> 00:56:53.730 Manish Parashar: He says. 329 00:56:53.790 --> 00:56:54.090 Julio Ibarra: i'd be. 330 00:56:54.960 --> 00:56:55.770 Manish Parashar: Great talk. 331 00:56:57.150 --> 00:57:10.230 Manish Parashar: How are planning how are you planning to incorporate coordinate the need of event follow the horizon telescope an action to meet their data transfer in incoming incoming is. 332 00:57:12.240 --> 00:57:28.230 Julio Ibarra: Well, the the event horizon telescope is is, as I mentioned a social challenge because many of their sites just are not well connected for the kind of data movement that that they require. 333 00:57:29.760 --> 00:57:31.920 Julio Ibarra: There was a I think it was an. 334 00:57:33.360 --> 00:57:37.590 Julio Ibarra: That the science, the science digest nsf. 335 00:57:38.760 --> 00:57:48.870 Julio Ibarra: publish that the the the way that they are, they are getting the data to their their analysis centers essentially is via. 336 00:57:49.830 --> 00:57:57.990 Julio Ibarra: Via hard drives they drive up they take the hard drives and drive them down a mountain to whether then shipped to a an analysis Center. 337 00:57:58.920 --> 00:58:08.580 Julio Ibarra: And we have been meeting with them, working with them to adopt the research and education networks as their approach instead of using. 338 00:58:09.540 --> 00:58:23.670 Julio Ibarra: Physical disk drives from to move their data many of a number of the sites are properly connected, but quite a few others are not and, and so this is this is part of the work that we we we've. 339 00:58:25.050 --> 00:58:40.590 Julio Ibarra: we've taken on with the the sack committee to to show them what's at least available in South America, but they can leverage, but there is this is a, this is a global instrument involving many. 340 00:58:41.880 --> 00:58:44.490 Julio Ibarra: Many instruments, and so the. 341 00:58:45.570 --> 00:58:59.940 Julio Ibarra: Each of the iron CP is is working to better inform these these these astronomers about what's available to them and for them to to use these these resources. 342 00:59:02.970 --> 00:59:03.600 Manish Parashar: Thank you. 343 00:59:05.580 --> 00:59:05.970 Think. 344 00:59:08.460 --> 00:59:11.280 Manish Parashar: Jennifer thanks you for the shoutout T book. 345 00:59:13.440 --> 00:59:14.250 Julio Ibarra: you're welcome Jen. 346 00:59:15.360 --> 00:59:17.250 Manish Parashar: Other questions for Julio. 347 00:59:43.740 --> 00:59:44.130 Manish Parashar: well. 348 00:59:45.810 --> 00:59:47.520 Manish Parashar: we'll wait for another minute. 349 00:59:49.260 --> 00:59:52.800 Manish Parashar: see if there are any further questions. 350 00:59:54.600 --> 01:00:01.650 Manish Parashar: I will remind that for the nsf program officers there's a session later this afternoon. 351 01:00:04.200 --> 01:00:12.660 Manish Parashar: The boss live lecture officer it's between three and four, and so that's another opportunity to chat with Julio. 352 01:00:15.360 --> 01:00:18.630 Manish Parashar: Seeing no more questions Oh, there is one. 353 01:00:19.950 --> 01:00:29.250 Manish Parashar: Thank you Sylvia this is from Sylvia spangler do you see the network as being eXtensible to other disciplines within South America. 354 01:00:30.540 --> 01:00:33.750 Julio Ibarra: Yes, absolutely I I didn't. 355 01:00:35.940 --> 01:00:45.750 Julio Ibarra: I didn't cover other disciplines as well, but yes, we definitely are working to attract more disciplines. 356 01:00:47.190 --> 01:01:14.070 Julio Ibarra: Soviet, thank you for your question it's good to hear from you certainly the the bio sciences community is one of interest, as well as ecology and geosciences we as as a as a program the rnc P eyes communities week we share a lot of experiences and try to figure out how we can get these. 357 01:01:15.240 --> 01:01:16.080 Julio Ibarra: These different. 358 01:01:17.160 --> 01:01:18.210 Julio Ibarra: Communities of. 359 01:01:19.320 --> 01:01:34.380 Julio Ibarra: Researchers to engage with the research networks, so we have been leveraging leveraging some types of cyber infrastructure, for example, data transfer notes that that they can use to least. 360 01:01:35.580 --> 01:01:42.180 Julio Ibarra: copy their data to these nodes and be able to move them rapidly across the network to where they they are analyzed. 361 01:01:43.890 --> 01:01:45.660 Julio Ibarra: In some cases, this is a. 362 01:01:46.680 --> 01:01:56.640 Julio Ibarra: This has been very, very effective, the results have been very good in other cases it's just like I said earlier, it's a social engineering challenge to. 363 01:01:58.260 --> 01:02:11.790 Julio Ibarra: get some of the the researchers to adopt new methods and to use the research intuition networks so for sure we were certainly interested in every opportunity to engage with. 364 01:02:12.840 --> 01:02:18.750 Julio Ibarra: The different disciplines and have them benefit from the networks that are available to them. 365 01:02:23.220 --> 01:02:23.700 Thank you. 366 01:02:37.290 --> 01:02:37.770 Manish Parashar: well. 367 01:02:40.950 --> 01:02:43.740 Manish Parashar: We have a question from Patrick Smith. 368 01:02:46.290 --> 01:02:48.180 Manish Parashar: Sylvia says lovely talk. 369 01:02:48.870 --> 01:02:49.650 Julio Ibarra: Thank you, Sophia. 370 01:02:50.520 --> 01:02:57.780 Manish Parashar: and Patrick says fascinating presentation, thank you for your insights linear talk you mentioned Antarctica. 371 01:02:58.200 --> 01:03:09.570 Manish Parashar: Yes, are you interested in the recent announcement by sub tell Chile, for a subsea cable between Tierra del Fuego and King George island. 372 01:03:10.440 --> 01:03:16.890 Julio Ibarra: Yes, absolutely we we have been pursuing and following all the activities. 373 01:03:18.510 --> 01:03:40.050 Julio Ibarra: With nsf in the rnc program I I follow pat smith's presentations as much as possible, and I know he has one coming up, I think this this Saturday, as part of T PR E and we will we will certainly be be there to enjoy your talk Pat, but we are for sure interested in. 374 01:03:41.070 --> 01:03:53.010 Julio Ibarra: in Antarctica and the opportunities for Antarctica to benefit from the research networks, we have close to them, so the MIT network is is is a is a resource that we would like to. 375 01:03:54.630 --> 01:04:06.360 Julio Ibarra: make available for for the instruments in Antarctica I believe the the telemetry capability that we're instrument thing on emulate would be beneficial. 376 01:04:06.870 --> 01:04:21.330 Julio Ibarra: For a lot of that science and we would welcome the opportunity to show that so, but you know clearly this is a an opportunity for the entire irc program and nsf to to really. 377 01:04:22.800 --> 01:04:28.620 Julio Ibarra: be able to get the instruments connected to a high speed optical network. 378 01:04:29.760 --> 01:04:30.060 Julio Ibarra: and 379 01:04:31.440 --> 01:04:35.850 Julio Ibarra: As opposed to just using satellite communications as as they are today. 380 01:04:38.790 --> 01:04:46.920 Manish Parashar: Thank you Sylvia has another question, he asked should domains work with your science person at usc. 381 01:04:48.000 --> 01:04:53.070 Julio Ibarra: Yes, absolutely for sure hi amy hi amy Morgan is. 382 01:04:54.150 --> 01:05:07.110 Julio Ibarra: A excellent person to the contact and and inform them of pinterest for for me like thank you very much for for doing that. 383 01:05:09.750 --> 01:05:15.990 Manish Parashar: Q and we have a comment for for me the chose me she says no question just thanks for a great presentation. 384 01:05:16.380 --> 01:05:18.390 Julio Ibarra: Thank you so much, I really appreciate that. 385 01:05:30.450 --> 01:05:30.870 Okay. 386 01:05:32.250 --> 01:05:39.810 Manish Parashar: So with that, let us then close the session reminder again, there is a post lecture office are. 387 01:05:40.440 --> 01:05:56.520 Manish Parashar: between three and four, this afternoon, where we have another opportunity to talk to Julio can Julio, thank you for all your work impactful work and for this great presentation and with that i'm close the session, thank you. 388 01:05:56.670 --> 01:05:58.170 Julio Ibarra: Welcome Thank you so much.