Adamic L. 2000. Zipf, Power-laws, and Pareto—A Ranking Tutorial. Palo Alto: Information Dynamics Lab, HP Labs. http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/idl/papers/ranking/ranking.html. Accessed 19 June 2009.
Adams J, Black G, Clemmons R, Stephan P. 2005. Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981–1999. Research Policy 34:259–85.
Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM). 2009. AUTM Licensing Activity Survey Full Report, FY 2007. Tieckelmann R, Kordal R, Flanigan S, Glavicic-Théberge T, Bostrom D, editors. http://www.autm.net/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Licensing_Surveys_AUTM. Accessed 18 May 2009.
Bordons M, Gómez I. 2000. Collaboration networks in science. In: Cronin B, Atkins HB, editors. The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc. p 197–213.
Brainard J, Borrego A. 2003. Academic pork barrel tops $2-billion for the first time. The Chronicle of Higher Education 50(5):A18. http://chronicle.com/weekly/v50/i05/05a01801.htm. Accessed February 2009.
Brainard J, and Hermes JJ. 2008. College's earmarks grow, amid criticism. The Chronicle of Higher Education 54(29):A1. http://chronicle.com/free/v54/i29/29a00101.htm. Accessed February 2009.
Britt, R. 2010. Universities Report $55 Billion in Science and Engineering R&D Spending for FY 2009; Redesigned Survey to Launch in 2010. InfoBrief NSF 10-329. Arlington , VA: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf10329/.
Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP). 2000. Enhancing the Postdoctoral Experience for Scientists and Engineers. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record.id=9831#toc. Accessed 15 May 2011.
Glänzel W, Schubert A. 2004. Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In: Moed HFM, Glänzel W, Schmoch U, editors. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies on S&T Systems. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p 257–76.
Glänzel W, Schubert A. 2005. Domesticity and internationality in co-authorship, references and citations. Scientometrics 65(3):323–42.
Gómez I, Fernández MT, Sebastián J. 1999. Analysis of the structure of international scientific cooperation networks through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics 44(3):441–57.
Katz J, Martin B. 1997. What is research collaboration? Research Policy 26:1–18.
Kiley K, 2010. Banning Congressional Earmarks Would Cost Colleges Billions. The Chronicle of Higher Education, December 12.
Laudel G. 2002. Collaboration and reward. What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation 11(1):3–15.
Lundberg J, Tomson G, Lundkvist I, Skår J, Brommels M. 2006. Collaboration uncovered: Exploring the adequacy of measuring university-industry collaboration through co-authorship and funding. Scientometrics 69(3):575–89.
Mowery D. 2002. The changing role of universities in the 21st century U.S. R&D system. In: Teich A, Nelson D, Lita S, editors. AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook 2002. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. p 253–71.
Narin F, Stevens K, Whitlow E. 1991. Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics 21(3):313–23.
Narin F, Hamilton K, Olivastro D. 1997. The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy 26:317–30.
National Science Board (NSB). 2010. Science and Engineering Indicators 2010. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB 10-01). Available at http://nsf.gov/statistics/seind10/.
National Science Board (NSB). 2008. Science and Engineering Indicators 2008. Two volumes. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (volume 1, NSB 08-01; volume 2, NSB 08-01A). Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind08/.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2009a. Federally funded R&D centers. Master government list. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/ffrdc. Accessed 14 August 2009.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2010. Measuring Innovation: A New Perspective. http://www.oecd.org/document/22/0,3746,en_41462537_41454856_44979734_1_ 1_1_1,00.html. Accessed 16 June 2011.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2010. Careers of Doctorate Holders: Employment and Mobility Patterns. STI Working Paper 2010/4, Laureline Auriol. Paris.
Thursby J, Jensen R, Thursby M. 2001. Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U.S. universities. Journal of Technology Transfer 26:59–72.
Wagner CS, Roessner JD, Bobb K, Klein JT, Boyack KW, Keyton J, Rafols I, Börner K. 2011. Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics 165:14-26.
Wuchty S, Jones B, Uzzi B. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316:1036–39.
Zitt M, Bassecoulard E, Okubo Y. 2000. Shadows of the past in international collaboration: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics 47(3):627–57.