Overall the evaluation has shown a plausible
case for the EPSCoR program and progress in fulfilling its mandate.
The management of the EPSCoR program entails a number of strategic operational
choices. The implications of the evaluation’s findings for some of these
choices are discussed below.
EPSCoR Proposal Review
EPSCoR’s program design is based on excluding from further funding
consideration those proposals deemed scientifically excellent. The evaluation
found that NSF reviewers had problems in judging whether EPSCoR proposals
considered already scientifically excellent were appropriate for EPSCoR
support--and that the reviewers commingled two different definitions
of “excellent”--excellent for EPSCoR and scientifically excellent.
Need for orienting
reviewers of EPSCoR proposals
|
Thus, there is a need to clarify the EPSCoR definition of an excellent
proposal and the funding decision that should accompany such ratings.
Peer reviewers should receive explicit orientation, and their review
comments should be continually monitored to minimize confusion between
the two definitions.
Graduation from EPSCoR
When do EPSCoR
states "graduate" from EPSCoR?
|
“Graduation” from the EPSCoR program occurs in principle when a state
has become nationally competitive for academic R&D funds and thus
no longer requires the extra help provided by EPSCoR resources. Although
many EPSCoR clusters have subsequently become fully competitive and
no longer seek EPSCoR funding, no state has yet to graduate from EPSCoR.
Since the evaluation has demonstrated that the program has been successful
in improving the R&D competitiveness of participating states, consideration
of graduation criteria and state or university transition from EPSCoR
support appears relevant.
One option is for the EPSCoR program to reassess the current eligibility
of all EPSCoR states, using the current eligibility criteria. Such criteria
include conditions relevant not only to eligibility but also to graduation--e.g.,
a state’s ranking among all states and its amount of R&D funding
per academic scientist and engineer in the state. Such an assessment
has not been conducted in recent years, much less on an annual or other
cyclic basis.
EPSCoR’s Cluster Research Strategy
The cluster strategy has been a key operational mechanism for inducing
increased research competitiveness at the faculty and institutional
level. A cluster is a related group of research projects, often interdisciplinary,
and awards are made to a cluster’s principal investigator as well as
to the component research projects. This strategy has led to the development
of laboratories or centers, and not just the recruitment of cadres of
new, research-oriented faculty in a number of EPSCoR universities. The
cluster strategy also has been used to promote interdisciplinary collaboration
among universities and between universities and industry.
For the universities in the EPSCoR states, the cluster strategy may
continue to be a more effective way of increasing research capability
than the alternative strategy attempted earlier in EPSCoR’s history--involving
the funding of individual researchers and single research projects.
The earlier strategy proved to be counterproductive when individual
researchers were later recruited away from universities in EPSCoR states.
How the cluster strategy is to be continued, therefore, warrants ongoing
attention.
|