January 19, 2000
NATIONAL SCIENCE BOARD
National Science Foundation
November 18, 1999
Eamon M. Kelly, Chairman
Diana S. Natalicio, Vice Chair
John A. Armstrong
Pamela A. Ferguson
Mary K. Gaillard
Stanley V. Jaskolski
Anita K. Jones
George M. Langford
Eve L. Menger
Joseph A. Miller, Jr.
Robert C. Richardson
Vera C. Rubin
Bob H. Suzuki
Warren M. Washington
John A. White, Jr.
Rita R. Colwell, Director
Sanford D. Greenberg
Claudia I. Mitchell-Kernan
Robert M. Solow
The Minutes of the 355th Meeting were approved by the NSB at the 356th
meeting, February 2, 2000
The National Science Board (NSB) convened in Open Session at 2:05 p.m. on
Thursday, November 18, 1999, with Dr. Eamon M. Kelly, Chairman of the NSB,
presiding (Agenda NSB-99-170). In accordance with the Government in the
Sunshine Act, this portion of the meeting was open to the public.
The Chairman announced that Drs. Greenberg, Menger, Mitchell-Kernan and Solow
were not able to attend this meeting.
AGENDA ITEM 6: Minutes, July 1999 Meeting
The Board approved the Open Session minutes of the July 1999 NSB meeting
(NSB-99-153, Board Book Tab C).
AGENDA ITEM 7: Closed Session Agenda Items for February 2000
The Board approved the Closed Session items for February 2000 (NSB-99-157,
Board Book Tab D), attached as Appendix A.
AGENDA ITEM 8: Chairman's Report
The Chairman reported that the White House announced on November 2 the intent
to nominate two members of the NSB class of 2006: Dr. Michael G. Rossman, of
the Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University; and Dr. Daniel
Simberloff, Nancy Gore Hunger Professor of Environmental Sciences at the
University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
He reported that Director Rita Colwell was named one of 100 women achievers
and the "first lady of science" by the editors of the Ladies Home Journal.
He thanked Eve Menger for leading a celebration of NSF's 50th anniversary at
the Oregon Graduate Institute of Science and Technology in Portland. He
pointed out to members that information on year 2000 preparedness at NSF was
included in their pre-meeting mailing, in response to questions raised at the
The Chairman announced the establishment of an Ad Hoc Committee on the 2000
Vannevar Bush Award. It will be chaired by Eve Menger, and members include
Anita Jones, George Langford, Robert Richardson and Chang-Lin Tien. Susan
Fannoney will serve as Executive Secretary, and the committee will make
recommendations to the Board at the March 2000 meeting.
AGENDA ITEM 9: Director's Report
a. National Science Foundation Staff
The Director announced that Dr. Wanda Ward, previously of the Office of the
Director, has been named Deputy Assistant Director of the Directorate for
Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences. The Director also announced with
regret the retirement of Dr. Roosevelt Calbert from his position as Director
of the Division of Human Resource Development in the Directorate for
Education and Human Resources.
b. NSF 50th Anniversary
The Director reported that a series of events to celebrate the 50th
anniversary of NSF began with a ceremony on October 2 to present a
Distinguished Service Award to Dr. Samuel Massie, long-time professor of
Chemistry at the U.S. Naval Academy. In addition, short video vignettes have
begun playing on the NSF announcement channel, including interviews with a
sampling of employees. She described plans for a joint activity with Dow
Chemical Corporation and Dartmouth College to link award-winning scientists
with middle-school students; and she concluded the report by thanking the
Public Advisory Committee on the NSF 50th Anniversary for their
c. NSF Budget
Dr. Colwell reported that the Foundation received a seven percent increase in
the Fiscal Year (FY) 2000 budget, recently signed by the President. She
attributed the positive outcome to strong support from the external research
and education communities.
AGENDA ITEM 10: Reports from Committees
a. Audit & Oversight (A&O)
Dr. Stanley Jaskolski, Chairman, A&O Committee, reported that the committee
was briefed on a number of items, including presentations on a recent
national assessment of customer satisfaction sponsored by the President's
Management Council; the status of the Foundation's Government Performance and
Results Act (GPRA) FY 1999 Performance Report, to be made available on a
secure web site for Board member review; NSF's FY 1999 financial statement
and audit, which is reported to be on schedule, and final revisions to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB)'s Circular A-110 on sharing research
data and research misconduct policy. OMB implementation of the last item was
reported to be sensitive to concerns expressed by NSB, and to have minimal
impact on NSF. The committee discussed the Semiannual OIG report and made no
exceptions to the NSF management report that accompanies it.
b. Committee on Programs & Plans (CPP)
Dr. John Armstrong, Chairman, CPP, reported that the committee discussed
comments received on the Interim Draft Report of the Task Force on the
Environment. Final Board approval of the revised report is scheduled for
consideration at the February 2000 meeting. The committee reviewed and
recommended for approval a proposed award for U.S. Science Support to the
Ocean Drilling Program, and heard a presentation on information technology
initiatives from Dr. Ruzena Bajcsy, Assistant Director for Computer and
Information Science and Engineering (CISE).
CPP Task Force on Polar Issues (PI)
Dr. Warren Washington, Chairman, reported that the task force heard a report
on the President's recent visit to the Antarctic Support Center in New
Zealand with the NSF Director.
c. Education & Human Resources (EHR)
Dr. Bob Suzuki, Chairman of the EHR Committee, reported that the committee
heard a briefing on the proposed reorganization of the EHR Directorate from
the interim AD, Dr. Judith Sunley. It also received updates on new programs,
including an interagency educational research initiative; graduate teaching
fellowships; science, math and technology education digital libraries; and
computer science, engineering and mathematics scholarships funded by H1B visa
fees. The committee recommended that NSF act to reinstate Science and
Engineering Indicators (S&EI) as a congressionally-mandated report, and
discussed partnerships between the Foundation and the Smithsonian Institution
and trends in support for informal science education.
The committee discussed implementation of the revised workplan, and decided
to focus first on K-12 education. Members met in executive session to
discuss S&EI, and decided to continue the discussion with the Subcommittee on
S&EI in March 2000.
d. Task Force on the NSB 50th Anniversary (NSB50)
Dr. Vera Rubin, Chair of the task force, reported on the status of the 50th
anniversary commemorative brochure, which the Board is scheduled to review at
the May 2000 meeting. The chair also reported strong public response to the
NSB/PARADE/react magazine competition, announced September 19. The
associated Web site has received almost 1,000,000 visits, and the task force
discussed whether they could increase the number of winners.
Dr. Rubin distributed a preliminary agenda for the events for the winner in
May 2000, which was unanimously approved by the Board. She also announced
that three finalists were selected from among the names submitted by NSF
staff to name the NSB50 asteroid, and the Board approved sending these three
names to Dr. Carolyn Shoemaker for a final decision.
e. Committee on Strategic Science and Engineering Policy Issues (SPI)
Committee Chairman Dr. Eamon Kelly reported that the committee was briefed by
consultants from RAND and SRI on literature reviews and a review of the U.S.
Federal system. Dr. Kelly reported on a recent meeting held at OMB to
discuss the committee's work, and summarized the proposed timeline to
complete their work.
In response to a suggestion that the chairs of the various committees improve
information exchange and coordination, the Chairman said this would be an
appropriate topic for discussion at the February retreat.
AGENDA ITEM 11: NSB Delegation of Authority
The Board approved new language for delegation of award approval authority,
(Tab E in the Board book), attached as Appendix B.
AGENDA ITEM 12: NSF Strategic Plan
The Director said the final draft of the revised NSF Strategic Plan will soon
be on the NSF Web site for public comment. The Board will be asked to
approve the document at the February 2000 meeting. Dr. Colwell summarized
changes in the current draft (NSB 99-174), especially efforts to tie the
Strategic Plan more closely to the overall Foundation budget strategy.
Some discussion followed, including questions on the schedule for future
revisions; the importance of emphasizing information technology, including
both basic research and applications in all fields of science and
engineering; the concerns of the NSB/EHR Committee on K-12 education and
diversity; and suggestions for more focus on international aspects of science
and engineering; the Internet; Biocomplexity, and the Interim Report on the
environment. The Chairman asked that all additional comments be returned
through the NSB Office as soon as possible.
AGENDA ITEM 13: NSB/EHR Workplan
The Chairman of the NSB/EHR Committee, Bob Suzuki, summarized the main points
of the workplan (NSB 99-5, as revised November 5). The plan was approved by
the full Board, and will be issued as a Board report.
AGENDA ITEM 14: NSB Interim Report on the Environment
This item was not taken up.
AGENDA ITEM 15: International Task Force Status Report
The Task Force Chair, Dr. Diana Natalicio, reported on task force activities,
including the hearing held November 16 and the joint Symposium with the SPI
Committee taking place November 19 and 20. She said that the task force has
begun to develop a report, and it is preparing questions to elicit the views
of the Director's Office. The task force is aiming to present a report to
the Board at the May 2000 meeting. The task force theme has been the
challenge facing the U.S. due to the globalization of science and
engineering. The task force has sought to understand the Federal context for
international science and engineering, and to place NSF within that context.
Dr. Natalicio reported that the task force has been impressed by the vitality
and growth in international science and engineering due to globalization of
the economy and a recognition that many research problems (such as the
environment) need international approaches. The task force has noted that
policy and infrastructure do not appear to be keeping up with growth in
international science and engineering. Finally, the task force has learned
about several needs: more awareness of and involvement by the research and
education communities with international science and engineering, more
systematic policy and infrastructure support, and better coordination between
science and technology and foreign policy.
AGENDA ITEM 16: Science & Engineering Indicators
The subcommittee chair, Claudia Mitchell-Kernan, participated in this report
by telephone. The subcommittee meeting was chaired by John White in her
absence. Dr. White reported that the subcommitee discussed the final draft
("orange book"). Any additional comments are due by December 1st. The
subcommitee recommended to the EHR Committee that the Board authorize the
Executive Committee to give final approval to the publication, the cover, and
the Board companion piece (highlighting changes in science and technology in
the last 50 years). The Board approved these recommendations.
The Board approved two additional subcommittee recommendations: that NSF
take steps to reinstate the congressional mandate for the S&EI reports, and
that the S&EI 2000 provide a special acknowledgement of Congressman George
Brown. Dr. Mitchell-Kernan thanked Dr. White and members of the subcommittee
and NSF staff. The Board acknowledged the contributions made by Dr. Bennett
Bertenthal, who will be leaving his position as AD for the Social, Behavioral
and Economic Sciences in December to accept a faculty position at the
University of Chicago.
AGENDA ITEM 17: Committee on Communication & Outreach Status Report
Dr. M.R.C. Greenwood reported that the committee has developed plans for the
February 2000 policy meeting that focus on speakers with insight into
communication and opportunities for Board members to ask questions. The
committee expects to have an interim report outline ready for discussion at
the February 2000 meeting, and a final report to present to the Board at the
May 2000 meeting. In repose to questions about the policy meeting agenda,
Dr. Greenwood said the goals include outreach to opinion leaders, and
developing a constituency for advocacy and communication.
AGENDA ITEM 18: NSB February 2000 Policy Meeting & Retreat
Dr. Kelly briefly described plans to hold the February 2000 policy meeting at
the National Academy of Science's Beckman Center in Irvine, California, and
the Board retreat at the Hyatt-Newporter Hotel in Newport Beach, California.
Marta Cehelsky, Executive Officer, outlined a draft schedule for the meetings
on February 2, 3 and 4. She said that some regular Board business will be on
the agenda for the morning of February 2. In regard to plans for the Board
retreat, several members recommended that plans be flexible enough to allow
time for discussions and introducing new topics, perhaps using breakout
AGENDA ITEM 19: NSB 2000 Calendar
The Chairman reported that a recent survey of Board members indicated that
the dates for meetings in 2000 approved at the July, 1999 meeting is the best
possible schedule for maximizing attendance. Dr. Cehelsky reported on legal,
technical and procedural issues related to electronic meetings. The General
Counsel confirmed that there are no legal impediments to electronic meetings
per se, if requirements for open meetings as defined in the Government in the
Sunshine Act are followed. Some current Board procedures related to
recording votes or the presence of a quorum would require change.
Ms. Patricia Bryant, Chief of the Systems Automation Branch, Division of
Administrative Services, NSF, summarized technology issues. She described
the current video meeting capabilities at NSF headquarters, and recommended
that members consider assembling at 2 to 3 regional sites to conduct
videoconferences. Her Branch is making an inventory of regional facilities
located near members' offices, and she will prepare recommendations on
regional sites to use for videoconferences. She said that with current
technology, broadcast quality deteriorates if more than 4 sites are
Members expressed an interest in observing the current NSF video facility at
a future meeting, as well as support for developing electronic conferencing
capabilities, especially for committee meetings.
AGENDA ITEM 20: Presentation on Nanoscience & Engineering
Dr. Eugene Wong, AD for Engineering, made a presentation on Nanoscience and
Engineering. Dr. Wong outlined the possibilities for a major national
research initiative in the future. He summarized the history of NSF support
in these areas, which now totals approximately $97 million per year. He
described future areas of research focus and issues related to education for
nanoscience and engineering.
Dr. Wong described extremely rapid progress in this field in the last 12
months, which he said is accelerating. The National Science and Technology
Council established an interagency working group in 1998, co-chaired by
Mihail Roco from NSF and Thomas Kalil of the White House National Economic
Council. Congress held hearings on the subject in June 1999, a draft plan
for a research initiative was submitted to OMB in August 1999, and PCAST
formed a subpanel to make a report at its December, 1999 meeting. PCAST
hopes to see the an initiative on nanoscience and engineering in the
President's budget for FY2001, including money for fundamental research,
centers of excellence, education and training, and research infrastructure.
Dr. Wong said that NSF would emphasize fundamental research in such areas as
integrated nanosystems, nanoscale biotechnology, quantum computing, and
curriculum development. The initiative is described in several publications,
including a report on the world wide status of the field prepared by the
interagency working group, a report from an interdisciplinary NSF workshop,
and a 20 page popular publication, Moving Atoms to Remake the World. Both
reports will be released in December.
Members discussed their experiences with opportunities in this area of
research, and noted current industry activities. It was pointed out that
industry activity is limited by a shortage of trained scientists and
engineers, and that the total budget needed for the proposed educational
activities alone might be a half billion dollars.
Members thanked Dr. Wong for the presentation, and a request was made for
more presentations on leading-edge research during Board meetings.
Wishing the members a happy New Year, the Chairman adjourned the meeting at
Catherine J. Hines
NSB Operations Officer
Attachments to NSB 99-198:
Appendix A: NSB 99-157, Resolution Closing Portions of the February 2000 Meeting
Appendix B: NSB 99-158, Revised Delegation of Award Approval Authority
Appendix A to NSB-99-198
TO CLOSE PORTIONS OF
NATIONAL SCIENCE BOARD
RESOLVED: That the following portions of the meeting of
the National Science Board (NSB) scheduled for February 2-4, 2000
shall be closed to the public.
1. That portion in which the minutes of the closed sessions of earlier
meetings will be discussed. An open meeting on that portion would
be likely to compromise information and discussions properly held
confidential under the Board's resolutions authorizing the closed
2. Those portions having to do with discussions regarding nominees
for appointments as National Science Board members and National
Science Foundation (NSF) staff appointments, or with specific staffing
or personnel actions. An open meeting on these subjects would be
likely to constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal
3. Those portions having to do with future budgets not yet submitted
by the President to the Congress.
4. Those portions having to do with pending proposals and proposed
awards for specific grants, contracts, or other arrangements. An
open meeting on those portions would be likely to disclose personal
information and constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.
It would also be likely to disclose research plans and other related
information that are trade secrets, and commercial or financial
information obtained from a person that are privileged or confidential.
An open meeting would also prematurely disclose the position of
the NSF on the proposals in question before final negotiations and
any determination by the Director to make the awards and so would
be likely to frustrate significantly the implementation of the proposed
Appendix B to NSB-99-198
ATTACHMENT A TONSB-99-158
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
(1) The Director of the National Science Foundation may make no
award involving an anticipated average annual amount of one percent
or more of the awarding Directorate's or Office's prior year current
plan without the prior approval of the National Science Board, except
for any continuing project, facility, or logistics-support arrange-ment
for which the Board has waived review.
(2) The Director may make no award under any program of the Foundation
that has not been approved by the Board when that program - (A)
is expected to involve annual expenditure of more than three percent
of the awarding Directorate's or Office's prior year current plan,
(B) involves sensitive political or policy issues, or (C) will be
funded as an ongoing Foundation-wide activity.
(3) Except as provided in paragraphs (1) and (2) or by special resolution
of the Board, the Board delegates to the Director authority to make
any award within the authority of the Foundation.
(4) When the Board approves the award of a specific amount of funds,
the Director may subsequently amend the award to commit additional
sums, not to exceed twenty percent of the amount specified or ten
million dollars, whichever is less, or to change the expiration
date of the award.
(5) This delegation supersedes and replaces that adopted by the
Board in 1994 (NSB-94-95).
ATTACHMENT B TO NSB-99-158
DELEGATION TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
The Executive Committee of the National Science Board may approve
awards where Board approval is required or otherwise act for the
Board in those rare instances when immediate decision is required
between Board meetings and when the necessary action is not within
the authority of the Director of the National Science Foundation.
October 5, 1999
DO NOT DISTRIBUTE
MEMORANDUM TO MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL SCIENCE BOARD
Subject: Revised Delegation of Award-Approval Authority to the Director
and General Delegation to the Executive Committee
To complete the changes in the Board's delegation of award-approval
authority to the Director that you approved at your July meeting,
an amended delegation (Attachment A) must be adopted and, under
section 5(e)(2) of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 [42
U.S.C. 1864(e)(2)] as amended by section 202(a)(2) of the National
Science Foundation Authorization Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 869, 873;
approved 29 July 1998), must "be promptly published in the Federal
Register and reported to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources,
and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, of the
Senate and the Committee on Science of the House of Representatives".
The Board's delegation of authority to the Executive Committee to
act on behalf of the Board, when necessary, requires no change but
has traditionally been reaffirmed whenever a new award-authority
delegation was made.
You may amend and reaffirm these delegations and authorize your
Executive Officer to satisfy the requirements of NSFA 5(e)(2) by
adopting the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the National Science Board adopts the delegation of
award-approval authority contained in Attachment A to
NSB-99-158, reaffirms the delegation of authority to the
Executive Committee contained in Attachment B to NSB-99-158,
and authorizes its Executive Officer to publish the award-approval authority
delegation in the Federal Register and report it to the Foundation's House
and Senate authorizing committees.
Back to NSB Meetings