text-only page produced automatically by LIFT Text
Transcoder Skip all navigation and go to page contentSkip top navigation and go to directorate navigationSkip top navigation and go to page navigation
National Science Foundation
News
design element
News
News From the Field
For the News Media
Special Reports
Research Overviews
NSF-Wide Investments
Speeches & Lectures
NSF Current Newsletter
Multimedia Gallery
News Archive
Press Releases
Media Advisories
News Tips
Press Statements
Speech Archives
Frontiers Archives
 


Frontiers
U.S. Math and Science Curricula Too Broad

February 1997

American students and teachers are expected to cover more topics in math and science than are their peers in other countries. Consequently, they don't cover them in depth, according to an international curriculum study funded by NSF.

"U.S. science and math teaching is a mile wide and an inch deep, when compared to our international competitors," summarizes NSF's Larry Suter, who oversaw the research contained in the report, A Splintered Vision: An Investigation of U.S. Science and Mathematics Education.

For example, eighth graders in the United States were expected to study 33 topics in math in a school year. Their counterparts in Japan cover only 19 in the same period. Furthermore, U.S. teachers are given less time to prepare their lessons than are their foreign counterparts.

The study, led by William H. Schmidt of Michigan State University, could help explain why schoolchildren in some of the 45 other countries studied often outperform U.S. students in math and science.

Schmidt and his colleagues also found that throughout the 15,000 school districts of the United States, teachers used widely differing approaches to teaching. "No single, coherent vision of how to educate today's children dominates U.S. educational practice," he writes in A Splintered Vision. In addition to differences in teaching techniques, schools vary the topics they cover and the sequence in which those topics are taught.

"It is wishful optimism to expect our students to do well in science and especially mathematics compared to students in other countries in light of our fragmented curriculum," he concludes.

The study indicates that high-achieving nations employ inquiry-based "hands-on learning," says NSF Director Neal Lane. The concepts and philosophies of hands-on learning are imbedded in math and science education programs supported by NSF.

In addition, notes Lane, the study re-emphasizes the importance of science and math education. "This study addresses the most important investment any nation can make: the preparation of future generations for a fast-changing world. A strong foundation in science and mathematics is not a luxury; it is a necessity ... America needs a scientifically and technologically literate workforce in order to compete in the global marketplace; and all American students need a sound education in science and mathematics in order to compete in an increasingly demanding workplace."

A copy of this report is available on the World Wide Web: http://ustimss.msu.edu

 


Return to February 1997 Frontiers home page   Other Contents of This Issue
Visit Other Frontiers Issues page   Other Frontiers Issues
Visit Other NSF Publications page   Other NSF Publications
Visit Office of Legislative and Public Affairs page   Office of Legislative and Public Affairs

 

Email this pagePrint this page
Back to Top of page