Award Abstract # 0741659
ARIEL - Augmented Reality for Interpretive and Experiential Learning

NSF Org: DRL
Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings (DRL)
Recipient: THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE
Initial Amendment Date: September 22, 2008
Latest Amendment Date: June 10, 2013
Award Number: 0741659
Award Instrument: Continuing Grant
Program Manager: Arlene de Strulle
DRL
 Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings (DRL)
EDU
 Directorate for STEM Education
Start Date: September 15, 2008
End Date: August 31, 2014 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $1,799,699.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $1,799,699.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2008 = $1,100,751.00
FY 2010 = $437,462.00

FY 2011 = $261,486.00
History of Investigator:
  • Karen Elinich (Principal Investigator)
    kelinich@yahoo.com
  • Susan Yoon (Co-Principal Investigator)
  • Steven Snyder (Former Principal Investigator)
  • Karen Elinich (Former Co-Principal Investigator)
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: Franklin Institute Science Museum
222 N 20TH ST
PHILADELPHIA
PA  US  19103-1115
(215)448-1121
Sponsor Congressional District: 03
Primary Place of Performance: Franklin Institute Science Museum
222 N 20TH ST
PHILADELPHIA
PA  US  19103-1115
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
03
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): NKPJBP5TK4W1
Parent UEI: NKPJBP5TK4W1
NSF Program(s): AISL
Primary Program Source: 04000809DB NSF Education & Human Resource
04001011DB NSF Education & Human Resource

04001112DB NSF Education & Human Resource
Program Reference Code(s): 9177, SMET
Program Element Code(s): 725900
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.076

ABSTRACT

Institution: Franklin Institute Science Museum
PI: Snyder, Steve
Project: ARIEL - Augmented Reality for Interpretive and Experiential Learning
Proposal No.: DRL-0741659

PROJECT SUMMARY

In partnership with the University of Pennsylvania's Graduate School of Education and Carnegie Mellon University's Entertainment Technology Center, the Franklin Institute Science Museum will develop, test, and pilot an exportable and replicable cyberlearning exhibit using two cutting edge technologies: Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR). The exhibit's conceptualization is anchored in the learning research vision of the NSF-funded workshop Cyberinfrastructure for Education and Learning for the Future (Computing Research Association, 2005). The incorporation of VR and AR technologies into the Franklin Institute's electricity and Earth science exhibits is an innovation of traditional approaches to hands-on learning and will improve the quality of the learning experience for the primary audience of families with children and elementary school groups. The project has implications for future exhibit development and more broadly, will provide new research on learning on how to incorporate cyberlearning efforts into traditional exhibits. Fifteen participating exhibit developers across the ISE field will assist in the evaluation of the new exhibit; receive training on the design and development of VR and AR exhibits for their institutions; and receive full access to the exhibit's new software for implementation at their informal learning sites. The technology applications will be developed by Carnegie Mellon University's Entertainment Technology Center--leaders in the field in Virtual Reality design and development. Front-end and formative evaluation will be overseen internally by the Franklin Institute. The Institute for Learning Innovation will conduct the summative evaluation. Research will be conducted by the University of Pennsylvania's Graduate School of Education on the effects of AR and VR technologies on exhibit learning.

PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH

Note:  When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

Yoon, S., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Steinmeier, C., & Tucker, S. "Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum" International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , v.7 , 2012 10.1007/s11412-012-9156-x
Yoon, S., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Steinmeier, C., & Van Schooneveld, J. "Learning Impacts of a Digital Augmentation in a Science Museum" Visitor Studies , v.15 , 2012 10.1080/10645578.2012.715007
Yoon, S., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Van Schooneveld, J., Anderson, E. "Scaffolding informal learning in science museums: How much is too much?" Science Education , v.97 , 2013 , p.848
Yoon, S., & Wang, J. "Making the invisible visible in science museums through augmented reality devices" Tech Trends , v.58 , 2014 , p.49

PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT

Disclaimer

This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.

Augmented Reality for Interpretive and Experiential Learning

Karen Elinich, Ed.D.

Principal Investigator

Intellectual Merit

In 2008, The Franklin Institute began to explore the use of augmented reality technologies in science museum exhibits as a tool for better integrating the experiential and interpretive aspects of hands-on engagement with scientific phenomena. Augmented reality combines real and virtual objects in the real environment. It changes in real time in response to manipulation, and it aligns real and virtual objects with one another. Our ultimate goal was to leverage these characteristics to strengthen the informal science learning experience that we provide for our visitors.

The Franklin Institute is a science museum located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. The organization dates back to 1824, with its origins rooted in the promotion of the mechanical arts. In 1934, the Institute opened its current incarnation as a hands-on science museum. Throughout its history, its paramount mission has been advancing the spirit of inquiry and discovery embodied by its namesake.

Like at most science museums, traditional exhibit practice at The Franklin Institute has been to design a thematically linked series of devices that invite learners to encounter individual scientific phenomena in some interactive, hands-on way. To understand magnetic forces, for example, one must first feel the forces by holding two magnets near each other, so we provide bar magnets for play. To encourage extended exploration and provide interpretive content, a graphic panel with label copy is placed beside the magnets. The expectation—or hope—is that the learner will play with the magnets, read the graphic panel, play some more, refer back to the panel, make sense of the experience, and ultimately walk away having learned about magnetic force fields. This ideal scenario is occasionally manifested, but the far more prevalent reality is that the visitor engages with only one aspect of the experience; some visitors only play with the magnets, while others only read the label copy.

As augmented reality technologies were becoming accessible in 2008, we wondered if they might be useful in exhibit design practice. As we explored the technology, we realized that they might help to integrate the interpretive and experiential aspects of our typical informal science learning experiences. The Augmented Reality for Interpretive and Experiential Learning (ARIEL) project was our effort to research and develop the transformative potential of the technology in service to informal science learning.

Our project structure had three parallel yet interwoven strands: prototyping, learning research, and platform development. Each had its own focus and goals, but the findings and outcomes reinforce the activity and process in the others. For example, as we prototyped new device interfaces, we engaged the learning research to test learning impacts with student populations. The learning research findings then informed the next stage of prototyping. Likewise, the technical needs that became evident during prototyping informed the platform development process.

The prototyping process resulted in the development and testing of seven augmented devices that enhance classic device experiences with electromagnetism, circuits, air pressure, pendulums, chain reactions, etc. The learning research track included extensive studies of learning designs that could occur using scaffolding around an augmented device. The software development track resulted in an open-source programming toolkit for exhibit developers to use when adding digital augmentations to an exhibit device.

Broader Impact

The ARIEL project served both public and professional audiences. Through the learning research part of the proje...

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page