Award Abstract # 1149107
Communicating Science and Innovation Policy through Narrative: Workshops on Fostering Narrative Nonfiction Partnerships between Science Communicators and Science Policy Scholars

NSF Org: DRL
Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings (DRL)
Recipient: ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY
Initial Amendment Date: February 29, 2012
Latest Amendment Date: February 29, 2012
Award Number: 1149107
Award Instrument: Standard Grant
Program Manager: Alphonse Desena
DRL
 Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings (DRL)
EDU
 Directorate for STEM Education
Start Date: March 1, 2012
End Date: February 28, 2015 (Estimated)
Total Intended Award Amount: $249,951.00
Total Awarded Amount to Date: $249,951.00
Funds Obligated to Date: FY 2012 = $249,951.00
History of Investigator:
  • Lee Gutkind (Principal Investigator)
    Lee.Gutkind@asu.edu
  • David Guston (Co-Principal Investigator)
Recipient Sponsored Research Office: Arizona State University
660 S MILL AVENUE STE 204
TEMPE
AZ  US  85281-3670
(480)965-5479
Sponsor Congressional District: 04
Primary Place of Performance: Arizona State University
Tempe
AZ  US  85287-5603
Primary Place of Performance
Congressional District:
04
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI): NTLHJXM55KZ6
Parent UEI:
NSF Program(s): AISL,
STS-Sci, Tech & Society
Primary Program Source: 01001213DB NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT
04001213DB NSF Education & Human Resource
Program Reference Code(s): 7603, 9177, SMET
Program Element Code(s): 725900, 760300
Award Agency Code: 4900
Fund Agency Code: 4900
Assistance Listing Number(s): 47.076

ABSTRACT

The goals of this workshops project are: (1) to provide collaborative professional development opportunities for 24 early professional social science researchers, and science writers and communicators, and (2) to foster a stronger and durable "community of practice" between the fields of science policy research and science communications for the purposes of helping the general public better understand and become engaged with major issues of science and innovation policy. In addition to the PI and co-PI, involved in the work will be: twelve science policy scholars and twelve science communications professionals (writers, bloggers, museum educators, and others); mentors; editors of major science publications; several guest observers from university writing programs around the country; and graduate students who will help document and video record the activities.

Project activities include a suite of opportunities: two, four-day workshops; mentorship support; publication in hard copy and online of their articles in a special edition of Creative Nonfiction magazine; and public engagement experiences at Science Cafes around the country. These workshops and accompanying activities will continue to develop a strong foundation for the establishment of nascent collaborations of science policy scholars, science communicators, and informal science education professionals, whose partnerships should position them better to inform and engage the public on important science policy issues of our times.

PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH

Note:  When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

(Showing: 1 - 10 of 11)
Bain, M., & Vermeulen, N. "Little cell, big science." Creative Nonfiction , 2014 , p.59
Finneran, K. "Telling stories." Issues In Science and Technology , v.XXX , 2014 , p.22
Gutkind, L. "Thinking, writing, publishing" Creative Nonfiction , 2014 , p.20
Gutkind, L., Guston, D., & Ottinger, G. "To Think, To Write, To Publish" The Cairo Review of Global Affairs , v.5 , 2012 , p.94
Marsh, A., & Wade, L. "Collective forgetting" Creative Nonfiction , 2014 , p.22
Marsh, A., & Wade, L. "Collective forgetting: Inside the Smithsonian?s curatorial crisis" Issues In Science and Technology , v.XXX , 2014 , p.47
Quinn, J., & Rajagopalan, R. "Losing, yet winning, in life?s genetic lottery." Creative Nonfiction , 2014 , p.50
Schleifer, D., & Fairbrother, A. "What fish oil pills are hiding" Creative Nonfiction , 2014 , p.31
Schleifer, D., & Fairbrother, A. "What fish oil pills are hiding" Issues In Science and Technology , v.XXX , 2014 , p.23
Vermeulen, N., & Bain, M. "Little cell, big science: The rise (and fall?) of yeast research" Issues In Science and Technology , v.XXX , 2014 , p.38
Yu, J., & Delaney, M. "A doctor?s dilemma" Creative Nonfiction , 2014 , p.42
(Showing: 1 - 10 of 11)

PROJECT OUTCOMES REPORT

Disclaimer

This Project Outcomes Report for the General Public is displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this Report are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation; NSF has not approved or endorsed its content.

Project Overview: Communicating Science and Innovation Policy through Narrative: Workshops on Fostering Narrative Nonfiction Partnerships between Science Communicators and Science Policy Scholars (aka: “Think Write Publish”), began to fill the need to connect science and innovation policy (S&IP) with the Communicators who will translate the substance and future of these fields into language and style that public audiences will find illuminating and compelling.

 

The Science Communicators comprise a variety of participants, including writers, journalists, bloggers, museum and other communication professionals whose jobs are primarily in writing (such as online zines, magazines, etc.). The Science Policy Scholars comprise a range of professionals who work as professors, medical doctors, think tank leaders and experts focused on a diverse swath of the science policy field that includes yeast research, science and history, climate change and other important science policy matters relevant to the public domain. The workshops emphasized training these Communicators and Scholars to collaborate on writing in a genre called “narrative” or “creative nonfiction.”

 

The need for such an activity is illustrated in the generally uniformed quality of contemporary public dialogues around many, high-profile scientific and technical issues. To help bring a new understanding among the public and forge a new relationship among some of the players, we brought together for two intensive week-long workshops four key groups: 1) Science Communicators interested in science and innovation; 2) Science and Innovation Policy (S&IP) Scholars; 3) writing mentors assigned to guide and assist each of the teams throughout the writing and revision process; 4) editors of major magazines and publishing organizations focused on these topics.

 

The first workshop took place October 2012 in Washington, D.C. to help Communicators and Scholars connect by providing them with a cohort experience and shared training in the skills necessary to enlighten a broad and growing audience, articulate ideas, share them with that audience, and work with editors and other senior Communicators in their fields.  Over the subsequent six months, the writing partners worked with their mentors and the project investigators to craft a compelling and informative narrative on the S&IP issues the Scholars had expertise on. A revision workshop was held in May 2013 in Tempe, AZ. Teams worked in an intense and hands-on environment, continuing to hone the craft of creative nonfiction writing. At the end of the process, teams published their work. The workshop has lead to ongoing relationships among the participants.

 

Intellectual Merit: This program began to bridge the gaps between the public’s understanding of science and innovation policy (S&IP) scholarship and perspectives of science and innovation policy. The workshop was organized by PI (Lee Gutkind) and co-PI (David Guston) who are, respectively, leaders in the genre of creative nonfiction and the field of S&IP. It is intellectually innovative because there are very few examples of effective informal science education around S&IP, especially by S&IP Scholars and those informed by them, rather than by scientists and engineers themselves. Moreover, the workshop introduced both Communicators and Scholars to creative nonfiction—which has increased awareness of and excitement about science and innovation—as a new method for communicating their work. They therefore become more skilled and motivated to communicate the essence and value of what they do, not only to policy makers in government and decision makers in business and industry, but also to the media and the general public through pr...

Please report errors in award information by writing to: awardsearch@nsf.gov.

Print this page

Back to Top of page