text-only page produced automatically by LIFT Text Transcoder Skip all navigation and go to page contentSkip top navigation and go to directorate navigationSkip top navigation and go to page navigation
National Science Foundation
Funding
design element
Find Funding
A-Z Index of Funding Opportunities
Recent Funding Opportunities
Upcoming Due Dates
Advanced Funding Search
Interdisciplinary Research
How to Prepare Your Proposal
About Funding
Proposals and Awards
Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide
  Introduction
Proposal Preparation and Submission
bullet Grant Proposal Guide
  bullet Grants.gov Application Guide
Award and Administration
bullet Award and Administration Guide
Award Conditions
Other Types of Proposals
Merit Review
NSF Outreach
Policy Office
Related
Grants.gov logo

Email this pagePrint this page
Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation

Systems Science  (SYS)

CONTACTS

Name Email Phone Room
Chris  Paredis cparedis@nsf.gov (703) 292-2241  529  

PROGRAM GUIDELINES

Apply to PD 14-8085 as follows:

For full proposals submitted via FastLane: standard Grant Proposal Guide proposal preparation guidelines apply.
For full proposals submitted via Grants.gov: the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide; A Guide for the Preparation and Submission of NSF Applications via Grants.gov Guidelines applies. (Note: The NSF Grants.gov Application Guide is available on the Grants.gov website and on the NSF website at: http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=grantsgovguide)

Important Information for Proposers

A revised version of the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) (NSF 15-1), is effective for proposals submitted, or due, on or after December 26, 2014. The PAPPG is consistent with, and, implements the new Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) (2 CFR 200). Please be advised that the guidelines contained in NSF 15-1 apply to proposals submitted in response to this funding opportunity.

DUE DATES

Full Proposal Window:  February 1, 2015 - February 17, 2015

February 1 - February 15, Annually Thereafter

Full Proposal Window:  September 1, 2015 - September 15, 2015

September 1 - September 15, Annually Thereafter

Due dates repeat annually. Please reference the CMMI main page for further specifics concerning unsolicited proposal submission windows.

SYNOPSIS

The Systems Science (SYS) program supports fundamental research leading to a theoretical foundation for design and systems engineering.   In particular, the Systems Science program seeks intellectual advances in which underlying theories (such as probability theory, decision theory, game theory, organizational sociology, behavioral economics or cognitive psychology) are integrated and abstracted to develop explanatory models for design and systems engineering in a general, domain-independent fashion.  Ideally, the explanatory models, derived from the underlying theoretical foundations will lead to testable hypotheses.  Based on collected evidence supporting or falsifying the hypotheses, new insights are gained allowing the explanatory models to be refined or updated.

Systems research that does not address the Engineering of Systems is out of scope.  Domain-specific applications of the theoretical foundations are also out of scope.  Research that focuses on domain-specific applications, but simultaneously advances our fundamental understanding of design and systems engineering will be considered for co-funding with other programs (see "Related Programs" below for examples). Such proposals should be submitted to the appropriate disciplinary program, with the System Science program identified as a secondary program.

Research topics of interest in SYS include, but are not limited to:

  • Processes:  Search Strategy, Guidance and Control
    Design and systems engineering are processes consisting of a large number of synthesis and analysis steps in sequence or parallel, at gradually increasing levels of detail and accuracy.  SYS supports research towards understanding the nature of this search process:  How best to monitor, guide and control the search process? Which progress metrics to use?  Which search strategy to use?  How best to frame individual design decisions?  How to determine appropriate abstractions for specification and analysis at each step in the process?  To what extent should the expected downstream process steps be considered when contemplating the current search steps?
  • Organizations: Decomposition, Communication and Incentivisation
    Systems engineering and design processes are executed in an organizational context.  Depending on the nature of the artifact being developed, different processes and corresponding organizational structures are best. This raises questions: How best to decompose problems and delegate the decomposed parts?  What is the impact of incentive structures on design outcomes?  How best to facilitate interactions and communication between experts with disparate backgrounds towards ideation and analysis in design?  These are questions at the boundary of traditional engineering disciplines, so that rigorous advances are likely to require collaboration between engineering researchers and organizational sociologists. 
  • Modeling: Creation, Use and Assessment of Models
    In design and systems engineering practice, models are ubiquitous.  Models enable designers to communicate, to predict, and ultimately to explore the design space efficiently and effectively.  But several questions remain:  How to determine which modeling formalism is most appropriate?  What are the cognitive models of modeling?  How best to teach modeling to engineering students?  How to facilitate the reuse and sharing of models?  How to assess and characterize the accuracy and applicability of models?
  • Research Methodology
    An important challenge in design and systems engineering research is that it involves a normative aspect: the ultimate goal is to "improve" design.  This raises the questions:  Which metric should be used to express "goodness"?  How to measure it rigorously?  What constitutes acceptable evidence when comparing the "goodness" of different design methods?

RELATED PROGRAMS

Engineering and Systems Design

Manufacturing Enterprise Systems

Civil Infrastructure Systems

Operations Research

Service Enterprise Systems

Design of Engineering Material Systems

Sensors, Dynamics, and Control

THIS PROGRAM IS PART OF

Systems Engineering and Design


What Has Been Funded (Recent Awards Made Through This Program, with Abstracts)

Map of Recent Awards Made Through This Program



Email this pagePrint this page
Back to Top of page